ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Sacking vs Pressuring the QB. Which is better (or more effective)? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=234528)

keg in kc 10-02-2010 04:51 PM
That would work if masturbation wasn't there to confuse things.

Psyko Tek 10-02-2010 05:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 7055614)
Maybe it would be better to ask sometyhing like:

Would you rather have consistent pressure and hurries (with no sacks) etc...or 1-2 sacks in a game and not much pressure otherwise....

The way you asked the question it is a no brainer -- a sack is obviously better.
I think the question is wrong
sacks or hurries would be more valid

with a hurry the Qb is not doing what HE wants he's doing what we has to

Bob Dole 10-02-2010 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 7055980)
I think the question is wrong
sacks or hurries would be more valid

with a hurry the Qb is not doing what HE wants he's doing what we has to and stuffs
FYP

Psyko Tek 10-02-2010 06:03 PM
pressure= foreplay
hurry = sex
sack = orgasm

sack with int = blow job

sack with pick 6 = blow job from her and her friend ( know the hot one with the ass)

Rain Man 10-02-2010 06:32 PM
I saw that and laughed out loud at Lebeau's answer. Basically he said, "Pressure is more important. If you get pressure, you're also going to get some sacks."

If I remember my set theory from seventh grade math, if you get sacks, you're always going to get pressure. If you get pressure, you're sometimes going to get sacks. The whole question is dumb. Sacks are a subset of pressure and produce a better result, so no one except Lebeau and maybe Greg Robinson would prefer pressure over sacks.

Rain Man 10-02-2010 06:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 7056001)
pressure= foreplay
hurry = sex
sack = orgasm

sack with int = blow job

sack with pick 6 = blow job from her and her friend ( know the hot one with the ass)

Spinner defense = viewing of Schindler's list at a senior center.

crispystl 10-02-2010 06:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 7056043)
I saw that and laughed out loud at Lebeau's answer. Basically he said, "Pressure is more important. If you get pressure, you're also going to get some sacks."

If I remember my set theory from seventh grade math, if you get sacks, you're always going to get pressure. If you get pressure, you're sometimes going to get sacks. The whole question is dumb. Sacks are a subset of pressure and produce a better result, so no one except Lebeau and maybe Greg Robinson would prefer pressure over sacks.
This

Pioli Zombie 10-02-2010 07:04 PM
I don't understand what's to comprehend here. Consistant pressure can effect every play. If you're very lucky you'll get 5 or 6 sacks. I'd rather see that my defense pressured a guy all game then to see they got 6 sacks from 15 pressures. Duh.

Pioli Zombie 10-02-2010 07:08 PM
Rain Mans theory makes sense only if you expect your defense to get 55 sacks a game.
But what do Dick LeBeau and Greg Robinson know anyways. They only win Super Bowls, while Rain Man is a true football genius.

Pioli Zombie 10-02-2010 07:18 PM
Apologies for mistake in previous posts. I mixed up the Gregs. Thinking of Williams not Robinson. In any case, pressure every play that leads to sacks anyway is a hell of a lot more important than 5 sacks.

Ming the Merciless 10-02-2010 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 7056107)
I'd rather see that my defense pressured a guy all game then to see they got 6 sacks from 15 pressures. Duh.
I will take the 6 sacks and 9 additional pressures...that is 15 pass plays disrupted and 6 HUGE plays.

googlegoogle 10-02-2010 07:31 PM
Pressure on each snap FTW.

RippedmyFlesh 10-02-2010 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 7056120)
Rain Mans theory makes sense only if you expect your defense to get 55 sacks a game.
But what do Dick LeBeau and Greg Robinson know anyways. They only win Super Bowls, while Rain Man is a true football genius.
LeBeau and Robinson don't belong in the same sentence.

LOCOChief 10-02-2010 08:01 PM
A sack can be a result of the qb hanging onto the ball to long, maybe pushing it to the limit of what the defense is allowing.

Pressure is dictated by the defense alone regardless of qb play.

grandllama 10-02-2010 08:38 PM
Kinda the sparkling wine analogy...

all Champagne is sparkling wine, but not all sparkling wine is Champagne...

all sacks are pressure, but not all pressures are sacks.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.