![]() |
Funny that's what I just said about Matt.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Kicking ass. The offensive line. Kicking ass. People don't know anything around here and never watch football. If they did, they'd know the offensive line is completely solid and is kicking ass. |
Mike Gollic(?) on yesterday's game: "The Chiefs sure are a fun team to watch"
WTF was fun about yesterday's game |
Quote:
Point being, the line is less of a problem than a QB who is being paid $10+ mil per year to hand the ball off and not throw interceptions. |
Quote:
Kicking ass is kicking ass. That's damn near the polar opposite of "not spectactular." I mean, we could theorize about why they are having Cassel dink and dunk and sweeps and nifty little tricks and the like, but we all know that would be hypothetical blather as it's been stated here repeatedly that the o-line is "kicking ass." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't pay a QB that kind of money, and trade away a high draft pick, unless you're convinced he's the guy to build your team around. You can pay Rex Grossman, or Todd Collins, $1 mil to simply "not screw up" for a few seasons. But that's not what they acquired Cassel for. They got him to be a franchise QB. Now, everyone's realizing that he's not a franchise QB. This is an indictment on Pioli. And true to revisionists history, people in the local media are justifying his performance with comments such as, "He is what he is." Yeah, he's an inaccurate QB who get's paid $10 million per year to hand the ball off to Jamaal Charles, and not throw interceptions. Hell, I remember when Pioli first got here and was extremely stand-offish with the media. Kietzman defended him when the Cassel trade surfaced by saying (something to the effect of), "I understand now why they've been so secretive. They made the biggest trade in the history of the franchise." Now, I take most of what he says with a grain of salt. However, I think many people felt sort of this way. That we had made a huge acquisition that would eventually propel this team to the next level. Now, we have fans and the media hoping for Trent Dilfer, or Jake Delhomme. It's depressing. This season, if he's ends up being Trent Dilfer, fine. But we better cut his ass the second we lose in the first round to the Jets because he went 1 for 7 on 3rd down. |
Quote:
|
The guy's reads are just flat-out terrible. He had a wide-open receiver on that "go for it" play, and just completely ignored him.
|
Quote:
I'd be willing to bet these hacks on the air are talking shit to get listeners. Its what they do. You, however are just a moron and a drama queen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It couldn't possibly be that the coaching staff is trying to get the ball out of his hands substantially quicker this season. It couldn't be that Cassel is finally figuring out how to avoid sacks. (See sentence above.) It couldn't be that they are utilizing quick slants, running sweeps, end runs, etc. to minimize QB pressure. It's got to be that the offensive line has had an epiphany and went from super bad to kicking ass overnight. Quote:
Quote:
Talking about the offensive line is much more controversial and fire branding than trying to pull in listeners with a "start Croyle" campaign. I mean, other than around here anyway. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.