ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL 101--Haley Coach of the Year (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=240252)

chefsos 01-13-2011 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 7352998)
How is this thread not getting more hits on a Chiefs website?

I

chefsos 01-13-2011 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 7352998)
How is this thread not getting more hits on a Chiefs website?

don't

chefsos 01-13-2011 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 7352998)
How is this thread not getting more hits on a Chiefs website?

know

Hydrae 01-13-2011 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 7352998)
How is this thread not getting more hits on a Chiefs website?

Because it is no surprise that a KC based group would award this to the local NFL coach? :shrug:

FAX 01-13-2011 08:32 PM

This raises an interesting issue.

There exists in the NFL a school of thought that continuity at the head coaching position lends itself to long-term success. Chuck Noll and Don Shula come are often used as examples.

On the other hand, head coaches can also burn out and lose their team over time. Whatever message they want to convey eventually becomes stale and redundant. Over time, players who have heard the same pitch over and over can't help but tune it out.

I wonder what the optimum tenure of a head coach ought to be? Obviously, it depends on the coach, his age, the owner and lots of other factors, but I'm thinking 5 to 6 years ... maybe a tad more. At that point, whatever methods that coach has used in the past to motivate his players will have surely gone stale.

FAX

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 01-13-2011 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 7353111)
This raises an interesting issue.

There exists in the NFL a school of thought that continuity at the head coaching position lends itself to long-term success. Chuck Noll and Don Shula come are often used as examples.

On the other hand, head coaches can also burn out and lose their team over time. Whatever message they want to convey eventually becomes stale and redundant. Over time, players who have heard the same pitch over and over can't help but tune it out.

I wonder what the optimum tenure of a head coach ought to be? Obviously, it depends on the coach, his age, the owner and lots of other factors, but I'm thinking 5 to 6 years ... maybe a tad more. At that point, whatever methods that coach has used in the past to motivate his players will have surely gone stale.

FAX

Not if he turns the roster over in that time. Keep bringing in new players and they'll never know if Coach is telling one of his old war stories or not. LMAO

FAX 01-13-2011 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 7353148)
Not if he turns the roster over in that time. Keep bringing in new players and they'll never know if Coach is telling one of his old war stories or not. LMAO

Hmmm.

So head coaches don't lose their jobs because the team simply ceases to respond to their coaching and/or ideas? I can think of dozens of coaches who were fired after having reasonably successful careers with a variety of teams. I wonder why they were terminated? Didn't turn the roster over fast enough?

FAX

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 01-13-2011 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 7353207)
Hmmm.

So head coaches don't lose their jobs because the team simply ceases to respond to their coaching and/or ideas? I can think of dozens of coaches who were fired after having reasonably successful careers with a variety of teams. I wonder why they were terminated? Didn't turn the roster over fast enough?

FAX

I would lean toward that.

In the comic industry, they figure the average readership turns over every 8-10 years, which is why you see so many "retcons" of Superman's origin or a new spin on how Batman became Batman. Why? Because most of the readers who "grew up" with those comics aren't reading them any more and the new readers don't have any emotions tied to "how it was".

Coaches/GMs could take the same approach.

It's the American way, after all. :hmmm: :evil:

-King- 01-13-2011 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 7352828)
101 Banquet the Chiefs host every year.

Actually

Quote:

The awards are voted on by 101 sportswriters and broadcasters around the nation who cover the NFL

Read more: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/0...#ixzz1AyiHd1Tk
So its not the Chiefs awards banquet. Its an actual award by an organization called NFL 101.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-13-2011 09:55 PM

I wonder if ShitMyPants! is still be bandied about as an MVP candidate?LMAO

ShortRoundChief 01-13-2011 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 7353261)
Actually



So its not the Chiefs awards banquet. Its an actual award by an organization called NFL 101.



hmm,

KINGFIGHT

stevieray 01-14-2011 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 7353261)
Actually



So its not the Chiefs awards banquet. Its an actual award by an organization called NFL 101.

that's why I called it the 101 Banquet...the Chiefs host the banquet and the proceeds go to Chiefs charities.

Tribal Warfare 01-14-2011 01:39 AM

The real coach of the year is Crennel what he did with the defense is nothing short of amazing.

michaelj_58 01-14-2011 04:19 AM

thank you haley for a good season.

Phobia 01-14-2011 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrae (Post 7353100)
Because it is no surprise that a KC based group would award this to the local NFL coach? :shrug:

That's unfair. Chiefs rarely collect any of the big hardware at this ceremony.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.