Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7379784)

You sure spend a lot of time bitching about the line for a guy who admits our QB sucks and that you need a good QB to win. Focus some of your energy there perhaps?

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7379776)

They do suck. They hospitalized Huard and Croyle before Cassel even was on the team. Tom Brady would suck balls behind this offensive line. They can't pass block or sustain a drive.

And that's after playing the worst defensive lines in the league in the 2010 season.

When we get a real schedule, it's not going to be pretty.

Personally, I'd love a St. Louis situation. They picked up Bradford, but also Roger Saffold in the second round of that same draft. Saffold was a ****ing stud at LT for them in his rookie year. They've got a lot of additional holes to fill, but they have their foundations set now. The Chiefs got a lot of dog and pony show tricksters (McCluster, Arenas, Berry, etc.), but no substance where it counts. (Specifically the offensive line and the quarterback.)

As I've stated before, if a football team has these three things, they can expect to win more than they lose:

1. Good quarterback
2. Protection for good quarterback
3. Pressure on opposing quarterback with using blitzes/tricks

A good quarterback, given the time, will beat even the very best defenses. But you've got to give him the time. Who he's throwing to is almost a non-consideration. (Look at the Pats Super Bowl teams and tell me who would be considered an elite receiver.)

Chiefs have none of these things other than possibly #3 with Hali.

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7379793)

1) Trade Cassel to Minnesota so they can "win now"
2) Package picks to move up for Gabbert
3)???
4) Profit.

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7379799)

Like I said, Tom Brady would be dead behind this line. They'd have to pick Manning up with a shovel.

I'd love to have a great quarterback. However, after signing Cassel to a long term, big money deal, I'm not really optimistic about them picking another guy in the first round anytime soon.

As such, if they could possibly upgrade a position in which they don't really have any vested interest in (and none of our offensive lineman are inked to huge, new contracts), and that position is a position of importance, I think that they could and should do it.

We can all sit around and wish that they would draft that mythical "franchise quarterback," but you can crap in one hand and wish in the other and see which one fills up faster.

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7379807)

Gotta love the n00bs arguing with Sac about the O-Line. Listen n00bers, don't waste your time - Sac hates Albert worst than lot of us hate Cassel, he thinks you need an all-world OL. Just let him say his stupid shit and ignore it.

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7379805)

So with such a terrible O-line how did we lead the league in rushing?

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7379817)

The same way Barry Sanders is now in the Hall of Fame with just one single playoff win.

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7379817)

The same way Barry Sanders is now in the Hall of Fame with just one single playoff win.

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7379807)

Gotta love the n00bs arguing with Sac about the O-Line. Listen n00bers, don't waste your time - Sac hates Albert worst than lot of us hate Cassel, he thinks you need an all-world OL. Just let him say his stupid shit and ignore it.

Originally Posted by ClayWhit (Post 7379825)

That's just great. Another year of throwing to Bowe and a bunch of shit.

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 7379824)

That's right...having a good offensive line is stupid shit.

http://seattlest.com/attachments/sea...ael2/moron.jpg

Originally Posted by ClayWhit (Post 7379825)

That's just great. Another year of throwing to Bowe and a bunch of shit.

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7379821)

Andre Ware, Dave Kreig and Scott Mitchell.