![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
2011 Chiefs with Brady > 2011 Patriots with Brady
|
http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2011/1107...bradyt_576.jpg
Let's go Da'Bears! Will someone please start a MNF thread? TIA & GB http://planetsmilies.net/not-tagged-smiley-14836.gif |
Quote:
|
same could be said about 20+ other teams. Why limit it to the chiefs?
Also, the patriots have fallen from grace. Back in 2007-2008, when cassel was with the patriots....he still excelled thanks largely to the supporting cast he had in NE. I think cassels problems are with the coaching. Sure, he shares some of the blame, but we've had 3 different OC's in the past 3 years. Mix that with a shoddy OL and few playmakers to boot, and we have the perfect storm. |
Quote:
|
It would be nice if any of you who call this a incredibly stupid comment would elaborate. IMO, if they don't have Brady, they are actually worse than the Chiefs, but really all he is saying is that without Brady, the Patriots are a 6-10 to 9-7 team. Which is being pretty generous.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
FAX |
Quote:
|
I thought I heard this on ESPN this morning, and didn't hear the no playmakers part.
|
It's kind of a stupid statement I heard it myself. Sort of true though.
but two of our playmakers are on IR Charles, Moeaki Baldwin has played in 3 games you can't label him a playmaker although I think he will be McCluster is a playmaker in his own way. kickoffs, punts, reverses So really the only playmaker we have now is bowe Next year this team will be loaded with playmakers...especially with a new QB. |
Quote:
they are all on IR... |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.