ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 5 12 3 45
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   News Mo. woman wins $5.8M in 'Girls Gone Wild' case (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=259009)

Papi 04-28-2012 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 8578903)
Yeah, those faces afterwards do not seem like a no face..
This. Times 5.8 million :)

Nightfyre 04-28-2012 04:24 PM
She has a ring on in those pics... I'm sure her husband was pleased to see how his wife was spending her time.

sedated 04-28-2012 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8578832)
She doesn't seem very upset.

Oh, and...not bad.

Lumpy 04-28-2012 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedated (Post 8578979)
She doesn't seem very upset.

Oh, and...not bad.
I agree that she doesn't look upset. She has the, "hey, guys, check out these fun-bags", look in every pic.

No comment on her boobs. LMAO

I honestly cringe every time I see a GGW commercial. I always wonder how many dads buy those DVD's and see their daughter's goods? :Lin:

kysirsoze 04-28-2012 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bump (Post 8578127)
stupid bitch better not get a cent, I bet she loved it at the time.
Issues...

Lumpy 04-28-2012 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 8578627)
It isn't a live event. GGW edited the tape to ensure her conclusion.

That's pretty irresponsible of them.

GGW deserved the hit. In the grand scheme of things, it's pocket lint for Joe Francis and ultimately it will keep him from being as reckless in the future.
I'm well aware of how they're produced and you're right, (to an extent). They included her in the final production and that shouldn't have happened. I also thought that I read that she didn't sign the waiver. If that's the case, she definitely shouldn't have been included in the vid.

However, consider that the majority of these girls are probably under the influence of alcohol when they sign the waiver. That in itself should be scrutinized.

Bugeater 04-28-2012 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 8579664)
Issues...
Judging from those pics, I'd have to say he's right on this one.

kysirsoze 04-28-2012 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8579670)
Judging from those pics, I'd have to say he's right on this one.
Could be, but that strangely vitriolic comment came before the pics. Just thought it was a little weird.

scho63 04-28-2012 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedated (Post 8578979)
She doesn't seem very upset.

Oh, and...not bad.
:thumb:

5.8 mil because they damaged her reputation? What reputation would that be? Classy stripper, dump slut, drunk bimbo? :doh!:

Bugeater 04-28-2012 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 8579682)
Could be, but that strangely vitriolic comment came before the pics. Just thought it was a little weird.
Oh, he's all of that.

Saul Good 04-28-2012 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 8578640)
How does that matter? Celebs get shots of nip slips and vagina showing all the time in a public setting that they did not agree to be pictured, but it was in public so they dont have to sign off on it.. She needs to go after the guy who did it to her, unless he was employed by ggw.. If anything they should play that ggw is the hero by capturing what happened on tape..
Maybe because this wasn't a situation where her tit popped out because she chose to wear something that didn't cover her properly. She was at a bar, and someone pulled her top down. It's pretty clear from the pictures that she was making an (admittedly drunken) attempt at pulling her top up and covering up.

Because she is suing, people all jump her case for it. If this was just some random dude in the bar who came up and pulled your wife's top down, filmed it, and sold the video for millions of dollars, I'm sure everyone would feel a little differently about it.

Because there was some sign saying that GGW is there, "she was asking for it". People are ****ing stupid.

Saul Good 04-28-2012 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 8579684)
:thumb:

5.8 mil because they damaged her reputation? What reputation would that be? Classy stripper, dump slut, drunk bimbo? :doh!:
How much should someone have to pay for pulling a drunk chick's top down, filming it, selling the video, and making billions off of it?

Saul Good 04-28-2012 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumpy (Post 8579623)
I agree that she doesn't look upset. She has the, "hey, guys, check out these fun-bags", look in every pic.
Really? Which pic is it where she isn't either covering up or pulling her top back up?

listopencil 04-28-2012 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 8576916)
ST. LOUIS (AP)...claimed that she only became aware of her appearance in the video when a friend of her husband pointed it out.

I wonder how many times he watched it before he told them.

OnTheWarpath15 04-28-2012 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumpy (Post 8579623)
I agree that she doesn't look upset. She has the, "hey, guys, check out these fun-bags", look in every pic.

No comment on her boobs. LMAO

I honestly cringe every time I see a GGW commercial. I always wonder how many dads buy those DVD's and see their daughter's goods? :Lin:
At that point, what is she supposed to be upset about?

She's pissed video of the incident was put in the DVD without her permission. That happened well after the fact.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 AM.
Page 3 of 5 12 3 45
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.