ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 5 12 3 45
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Conspiracy Theory Re: Jamal only getting 5 touches (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265910)

jspchief 10-30-2012 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lou_Zare (Post 9065107)
you are way over-thinking this. Daboll is a ****ing loser.
/thread

siberian khatru 10-30-2012 08:44 AM
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

FRCDFED 10-30-2012 08:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canofbier (Post 9065216)
I think Haley is just giving Pioli the middle finger on the way out. Wait, what?
For sure.......Haley definately got the short straw. He ended up in a situation with too many ego's and Patriot Club cards. A club he wasn't a member of.

splatbass 10-30-2012 08:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9065099)
This is kind of like how people think that the U.S. Govt. orchestrated 9/11 attacks. There's NO WAY that an organization as incompetent as that could orchestrate something on that scale.
As someone that has worked for the government as a defense contractor for 30 years I can tell you they are not as incompetent as you seem to believe. Could they pull it off? Absolutely. Could they keep it a secret for 10 years? Probably not. Did they do it? Not likely. But they are not incompetent.

I know it is popular to call the government incompetent, but we have the best, strongest, highest tech military in the world, and they are far from incompetent. The same goes for the intelligence system.

loochy 10-30-2012 08:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9065239)
As someone that has worked for the government as a defense contractor for 30 years I can tell you they are not as incompetent as you seem to believe. Could they pull it off? Absolutely. Could they keep it a secret for 10 years? Probably not. Did they do it? Not likely. But they are not incompetent.

I know it is popular to call the government incompetent, but we have the best, strongest, highest tech military in the world, and they are far from incompetent. The same goes for the intelligence system.
Guess who else works as a defense contractor.

splatbass 10-30-2012 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9065245)
Guess who else works as a defense contractor.
I don't know. I don't care. I know I've seen the government do some amazing, and very competent, things over the last 30 years.

Molitoth 10-30-2012 09:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9065239)
As someone that has worked for the government as a defense contractor for 30 years I can tell you they are not as incompetent as you seem to believe. Could they pull it off? Absolutely. Could they keep it a secret for 10 years? Probably not. Did they do it? Not likely. But they are not incompetent.

I know it is popular to call the government incompetent, but we have the best, strongest, highest tech military in the world, and they are far from incompetent. The same goes for the intelligence system.
This.

loochy 10-30-2012 09:05 AM
They are too big for their own good. Individual empowered cells can get things done but excessive bureaucracy and top down involvement significantly hamper progress and agility.

But can't we agree here that there is NO CHIEFS CONSPIRACY?!?! They just suck.

Also, enjoy this picture of AJ McCarron's mom:

http://thebiglead.fantasysportsven.n...carron-mom.jpg

splatbass 10-30-2012 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9065277)
They are too big for their own good. Individual empowered cells can get things done but excessive bureaucracy and top down involvement significantly hamper progress and agility.
This is true of every large corporation too. Something else I have much experience with. Any large organization is going to be like that in some fashion.

If you think they are so bad why do you work as a contractor for them? Maybe you should find another, more competent, line of work. Or maybe its just you.

Canofbier 10-30-2012 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9065282)
This is true of every large corporation too. Something else I have much experience with. Any large organization is going to be like that in some fashion.

If you think they are so bad why do you work as a contractor for them? Maybe you should find another, more competent, line of work. Or maybe its just you.
Jeez, harsh. Contractors go where the money is, right?

loochy 10-30-2012 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9065282)
This is true of every large corporation too. Something else I have much experience with. Any large organization is going to be like that in some fashion.

If you think they are so bad why do you work as a contractor for them? Maybe you should find another, more competent, line of work. Or maybe its just you.
It makes me money? WTF kind of question is that? I don't do this out of the goodness of my heart.

Also, I agree about the corporation thing. You and I might work for the same company...

buddha 10-30-2012 09:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRCDFED (Post 9065097)
How in the world do you only give Charles 5 carries is beyond me. Hopefully they don't do something stupid this week and overload him. We need Charles to make it through this season so we will have a stud RB to pair with our shiny new QB next year!

It doesn't make any sense...so the only reason I can come up with is that KC is mailing it in on all levels trying to get the top pick in the draft. At this point, why not do that? We literally have nothing to lose. Better to trade Bowe, draft an elite QB in the first round, and find a GM and coaching staff who know what they are doing.

Personally, I'd pull for Gruden.

keg in kc 10-30-2012 09:16 AM
Or it could be that the Raiders defense is much better against the run than the pass, and they were actually trying to attack a team's weakness for a change.

htismaqe 10-30-2012 09:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9065298)
Or it could be that the Raiders defense is much better against the run than the pass, and they were actually trying to attack a team's weakness for a change.
That's like an armless man saying "I didn't try to kick him because he's prone to taking punches to the face".

loochy 10-30-2012 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9065308)
That's like an armless man saying "I didn't try to kick him because he's prone to taking punches to the face".
ROFL this


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 PM.
Page 3 of 5 12 3 45
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.