ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Hunt willing to trade pick per kffl (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268909)

BossChief 01-15-2013 08:22 AM

I would be fine if we got a haul similar to what the Rams got for the 2 slot last year.

Move back to 6, add 2 firsts and a second while still getting one of:

Smith
Wilson
Barkley
Glennon
Murray

I would prefer to stay put and draft Geno Smith, but if a team wants to give us a crazy stockpile of picks, I trust Reid and Dorsey to get a good quarterback at 6 that can run the modified WCO we are gonna run.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-15-2013 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9320036)
I would be fine if we got a haul similar to what the Rams got for the 2 slot last year.

Move back to 6, add 2 firsts and a second while still getting one of:

Smith
Wilson
Barkley
Glennon
Murray

I would prefer to stay put and draft Geno Smith, but if a team wants to give us a crazy stockpile of picks, I trust Reid and Dorsey to get a good quarterback at 6 that can run the modified WCO we are gonna run.

If there was a QB worth that kind of haul ala RGKnee, don't you think we'd just snatch him up ourselves since we don't have a Sam Bradford?

loochy 01-15-2013 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memyselfI (Post 9319993)
Good. Get more good players than one questionable QB at #1.

He's only questionable because he's not Luck or RG3.

Guess what...nearly every draft pick is questionable.

loochy 01-15-2013 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9320041)
If there was a QB worth that kind of haul ala RGKnee, don't you think we'd just snatch him up ourselves since we don't have a Sam Bradford?

We have a matt cassel - same thing.

ShortRoundChief 01-15-2013 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bwana (Post 9320022)
Ding ding!

Who is the mystery player that any team would step up to the #1 pick for in this draft and give away the farm to do so? Not going to happen.

I don't think anybody is going to give up the farm, however, any team that covets a player that might not be there when their pick is up could move forward. There is a lot more realistic chance now of that happening then it would have been a couple of years ago.

ChiefMojo 01-15-2013 08:37 AM

I'm not against trading back a little if we deemed two QB's equal. The likelihood one will be there is very high.

With that said I don't see a player out there that teams will be dying to trade up for?

The top of the draft is filled with DT's and DE's.... unless someone was desperate for Joeckel?

buddha 01-15-2013 09:03 AM

Who is willing to trade up for the #1 pick this year? I sure as hell wouldn't. This is the most f'd up year to have the first pick...typical Chiefs luck.

suds79 01-15-2013 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 9319969)
Seattle found a QB in round three last year.

certainly that's exception and not the rule

suds79 01-15-2013 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 9319975)
That would be real smart. In a league that is freaking out about concussions you should go out and draft a guy who has a history of concussions.

How many has he had?

DMAC 01-15-2013 09:09 AM

They are stuck at #1.

Mr. Laz 01-15-2013 09:10 AM

'Willing to' and 'Wants to' are vastly different things


at this point, i would expect the team to be open to anything.

OmahaChief 01-15-2013 09:12 AM

I really hope that someone emerges at the combine and some team wants to overpay for that first pick. We could could afford to pick up some addtional picks and continue to build this team through the draft.

Saul Good 01-15-2013 09:15 AM

A team traded up for Tannehill. Think about that.

crossbow 01-15-2013 09:17 AM

Again, There is no Reggie White, Derrick Thomas or Julius Peppers in this draft class so why would someone trade the farm to us to move up?

BigMeatballDave 01-15-2013 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memyselfI (Post 9319993)
Good. Get more good players than one questionable QB at #1.

People are ****ing dumb.

If there is no player that a 2-14 needs at #1, then why would anyone trade up?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.