![]() |
Quote:
However he said we COULD draft Joeckel and he would play RT. But #1 for a RT dont see it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Maybe Albert will be OK playing guard like in his college days...
:whackit: |
Quote:
|
John Tait did it and our offense was awesome!
Seriously though... he did end up moving to RT here, but he signed with Chicago for big money and still played LT. |
Quote:
|
I'm with Direckshun and pr_capone on this. RTs love to make the switch to the higher paid position. LTs hate to make the switch to the lower paid position. It takes some work to switch, but any of the most physically talented guys (i.e. the LTs) should be able to do it, particularly if they have an offseason to work at it.
Bouncing back and forth on a game to game basis is probably not the best idea though. |
BTW, how many NFL wide receivers are strictly right side or left side receivers? Zero?
|
Anyone claiming that spending the one/one on Joekel and then moving him to RT is a move to be applauded much less defended needs to seriously go **** themselves. At that point, you WILL in fact be, the dumbest **** ever.
Posted via Mobile Device |
The Chiefs have a history of taking a player at an established position, and for no intelligent reason, just dicking around with them.
Usually its where they draft Safeties and try to turn them into cornerbacks. (See exhibits Eric Warfield and William Bartee) It worked out OK for Tamba, but he really wasnt a head turner on the d-line anyway. Albert is upper echelon LT caliber. Theres absolutely no reason to move him to RT. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.