ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Position Battles to Watch During Week 3 of the Pre-Season (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=275506)

durtyrute 08-22-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan (Post 9906049)
Id rather have Stanzi and Bray over Daniels completely.

This

AussieChiefsFan 08-22-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan (Post 9906049)
Id rather have Stanzi and Bray over Daniels completely.

Same here.

WhawhaWhat 08-22-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9905699)
FYI, for some reason nobody seems to be aware of this, but Fisher actually has played right tackle. He started 4 games there in 2010. He also started 2 games at right guard, and 3 at LT that season.

How did he perform in those 4 games?

RealSNR 08-22-2013 03:44 PM

If it's the last game of the year and the Chiefs are one win away from winning the division, and Alex Smith and Chase Daniel are both hurt, I would want Ricky Stanzi as the starting QB instead of Tyler Bray. At least for this season. Bray still has a long way to go and is far from ready to take the field when the games mean something.

That being said, that's not much of a reason to keep Stanzi over Bray. You simply do NOT risk Bray getting picked off the waivers by another team before you can fit him onto the practice squad. If he shows even a bucket of spit's worth of potential to play QB in this league, it will be seen in his second year and second full offseason with the team.

It sucks that Daniel is such a turd, but I think the San Francisco game proved that his mobility does make him a better asset to the team than Stanzi/Croyle's tendency to stay in the pocket. If you're stuck with two shit backup QBs, I guess you go with the one that can run.

Buehler445 08-22-2013 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9906676)
If it's the last game of the year and the Chiefs are one win away from winning the division, and Alex Smith and Chase Daniel are both hurt, I would want Ricky Stanzi as the starting QB instead of Tyler Bray. At least for this season. Bray still has a long way to go and is far from ready to take the field when the games mean something.

That being said, that's not much of a reason to keep Stanzi over Bray. You simply do NOT risk Bray getting picked off the waivers by another team before you can fit him onto the practice squad. If he shows even a bucket of spit's worth of potential to play QB in this league, it will be seen in his second year and second full offseason with the team.

It sucks that Daniel is such a turd, but I think the San Francisco game proved that his mobility does make him a better asset to the team than Stanzi/Croyle's tendency to stay in the pocket. If you're stuck with two shit backup QBs, I guess you go with the one that can run.

Where is Casey Printers now a days?

jspchief 08-22-2013 04:06 PM

None of the backup QBs are going to push to start at this point. Daniel is the guy to finish out a game where the starter goes down and perhaps fill in a game or two in the event of an injury.

I'm not convinced he should be the QB in the event of an extended absence from the starter though.

keg in kc 08-22-2013 04:11 PM

I'm scouring the waiver way if I'm not starting Bray. Starting Stanzi would be taking a knee at kick-off.

Easy 6 08-22-2013 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9905733)
Personally I don't care what it takes to get Stanzi out of here. Bray is a better prospect.

THIS, gimme the big arm and we'll see if Reid can fix the ten cent head.

Tight End is such a mystery, no one is really blowing up the charts, if only Moeaki could prove his durability, i believe he's the best starter... theres no question he can block and we've seen him make a few dandy grabs, i'd like to see him in there, and in dual TE sets you could do a lot worse than him and Fasano.

Its starting to look like Kelce is a bit raw, he needs a bit more time in the crockpot.

Deberg_1990 08-22-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9906729)
None of the backup QBs are going to push to start at this point. Daniel is the guy to finish out a game where the starter goes down and perhaps fill in a game or two in the event of an injury.

I'm not convinced he should be the QB in the event of an extended absence from the starter though.

When has the 3rd QB on any team pushed to start? Almost any team is in trouble if they get down to their 3rd QB.
Posted via Mobile Device

Easy 6 08-22-2013 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan (Post 9906049)
Id rather have Stanzi and Bray over Daniels completely.

I've come to the conclusion that he was brought in much more for his "football intelligence" than he was his physical skill... a questionable choice.

Starting to make me think of Trent Dilfer, he'll give you all the right answers on blackboard tests, but cant execute the play physically.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 08-22-2013 04:29 PM

Drop Daniel to 3rd string or cut him and bring in an old Vet. Alex Smith getting hurt is as close to being assured as Moeaki getting hurt.

Mr. Laz 08-22-2013 04:38 PM

it's disappointing how little real competition we have at camp this year.

competition by fail doesn't really count imo

MLB and backup RB are the only real competition imo

our WR's are just stank ... a competition of which player isn't quite 'as' stank doesn't count. We should sign 2 wide receivers at cut downs from other teams.

TE competition to see how far Moeaki falls down the depth chart is meh


fyi Fisher has played right tackle before so i just don't wanna hear it

Demps on kickoffs and Wylie on punts is a no brainer ... no McCluster required.

Deberg_1990 08-22-2013 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint (Post 9906772)
Drop Daniel to 3rd string or cut him and bring in an old Vet. Alex Smith getting hurt is as close to being assured as Moeaki getting hurt.

IMO this is a legitimate concern considering Smiths injury history. I guess Daniels might be ok for a 1 game in a pinch, but don't want him starting any more than that.

Mav 08-22-2013 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 9906755)
THIS, gimme the big arm and we'll see if Reid can fix the ten cent head.

Tight End is such a mystery, no one is really blowing up the charts, if only Moeaki could prove his durability, i believe he's the best starter... theres no question he can block and we've seen him make a few dandy grabs, i'd like to see him in there, and in dual TE sets you could do a lot worse than him and Fasano.

Its starting to look like Kelce is a bit raw, he needs a bit more time in the crockpot.

Fasano has looked excellent so far. Hes a really good blocker, smart. Just not a burner....

Easy 6 08-22-2013 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9906866)
Fasano has looked excellent so far. Hes a really good blocker, smart. Just not a burner....

Moeaki isn't a burner either, but is athletic enough to not only get open but make the catch.

Fasano might just be the more reliable football player, but i don't think he has the same set of tools that Moe has, i would call him more... workman-like.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.