ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football QBs picked in the first two rounds 06-10....and their fates. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=275824)

DeezNutz 09-02-2013 08:38 PM

King is a drooling mother****er who believes that Pioli actually understands football. By the way, has that **** had to return his "Executive of the Year" awards in shame?

**** you, Scott Pioli. Crawl the **** out of KC any time now you worthless piece of mother****ing shit. I know that you're on this board, and we still all ****ing hate you.

Reread this post about 200 times before you go to bed. Because I know that you will.

BossChief 09-02-2013 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9934268)
basically, there aren't many "franchise" QB's in any decade. certainly not enough to go aound in the NFL.

not even close.

Sure there are...for the teams that you know, actually try to find them and develop them.

Guys like Rodgers, Flacco, Wilson, Kaepernick, Brees, Brady and many others were all deemed "not good enough" for the Chiefs to draft at the time.

It's not a matter of "there simply aren't enough franchise quarterbacks. Waaaahhh waahhh."

It's a matter of some teams always look for the instant gratification, low ceiling and small window player (KC) and some teams understand that good things come to those that wait (75% of NFL teams)

Pitt Gorilla 09-02-2013 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9934227)
The only thing this article teaches is... you don't take a 1st rnd QB just to take one.. you take one that you genuinely like. Duh.

Yup.

splatbass 09-02-2013 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9934227)
The only thing this article teaches is... you don't take a 1st rnd QB just to take one..

A lot of people have been arguing just that here on CP. That you keep taking a 1st round QB until you get it right, and some are still saying we should have taken Geno Smith at 1.1 even though no team thought he was worth a 1st. It seems like for some people getting a 1st round QB is the most important thing.

BossChief 09-02-2013 09:22 PM

Look at all of the superbowl quarterbacks of recent history (last 15 years or so) and you will get depressed as you realize how many of them "weren't good enough" for the Chiefs to draft.

Hopefully, Bray works out...but the odds are firmly against that.

Dave Lane 09-02-2013 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 9934161)
12 first round QBs and 5 legit starters. At less than 50% it is certainly no guarantee, but I still believe that is the best place to find a QB to win SuperBowls with.

Why does no one ever do a study of "safe" 1st round RT's?

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-02-2013 10:48 PM

Hopefully, we'll never have to know that crushing feeling of picking a first round bust!/Lil'Chiefy

AussieChiefsFan 09-04-2013 02:34 AM

If you were to come back in two years and include 2011/2012, the number of legit starters would be much higher.

the Talking Can 09-04-2013 04:20 AM

chiefs fans spend their off days coming up with reasons to not draft QB...


of course

mcaj22 09-04-2013 05:02 AM

i love how this fat **** left off 11,12 QBs, even if the sample is too small, the players have had such an obvious impact after 1 or 2 seasons it would have ruined his
"Fat Scott Pioli defense of shitty drafts offensive lineman and bust WRs over QBs" argument

Red Gorilla 09-04-2013 10:20 AM

Over the last ten years the league became a QB driven league. Mainly because of rules that protect the quarterback and rules that make life hard for CBs. In that time, there have been five Superbowl QBs that weren't taken in the first round. The whole first round QB thing is outdated imo. I think King's article is irrelevant.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.