ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Let's Take A Vote: The Trade Deadline Approaches (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278044)

Rain Man 10-28-2013 05:42 PM

Why are some people opting to give up a 1st round pick for someone when they could give up a 3rd round and a conditional pick?

Coach 10-28-2013 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10135464)
Seeing as how 95% of this board thinks the OL is a problem, and you can get quality OL in the later rounds - absolutely.

They aren't using the R1 pick on a QB, so it doesn't much matter.

That's true on the R1 pick on a QB. Plus Bray is possible QBOTF, so I'll stick with that for now.

I will say this, I would have no problem with either Gordon or Blackmon, one or the other for a first.

But I would like some picks in return, as you mentioned, quality OL in the later rounds, because I just get the feeling that KC is going to need to find another RT a lot sooner than they wished for....

OnTheWarpath15 10-28-2013 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 10135468)
Why are some people opting to give up a 1st round pick for someone when they could give up a 3rd round and a conditional pick?

I'm guessing because those people believe a R3 and a conditional is unrealistic.

Cleveland is reported to want at least a R2 pick. Not sure why anyone would think our R3 pick in the mid-late 80's is enough to get a deal done.

O.city 10-28-2013 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10135459)
Is anybody here advocating for Gordon/Blackmon really comfortable going into the 2014 draft with zero picks amongst the first sixty?

Seeing as though I think either of those wrs are better than what we could get in said pick slot, yea.

Mother****erJones 10-28-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10135411)
I'd give a first for Gordon or Blackmon. I voted Blackmon but I'd take either.

I'd give one of our 6th's for Wade Smith and stick Allen on the bench the rest of the season.

Wade Smith was a big under the radar loss for us a few years ago

O.city 10-28-2013 06:00 PM

Gordon is a significant upgrade at wr for the next 10 years who could give you a top 5 player at his position.

Yeah, I'd do it

swayy07 10-28-2013 06:13 PM

a 3rd and a conditional 4th or 5th for Gordon.....hell yes, then a 6th for Tony id JIMP, but realistically its gonna take our 1st for Gordon.

Easy 6 10-28-2013 06:18 PM

Gordon, **** decrepit Gonzalez fools gold.

l4z4rd 10-28-2013 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 10135468)
Why are some people opting to give up a 1st round pick for someone when they could give up a 3rd round and a conditional pick?

Gonna take a lot more than a 3rd and conditional to land a legit #1 with a cheap contact through '15.

Easy 6 10-28-2013 06:22 PM

Furthermore, its just a terrible slap in the face of Cleveland fans to be trying to trade away their singular biggest threat.

That team will just never get it right, always making the wrong call... heres a guy who can really spark your offense and make some slapdick QB look decent... whats the answer? trade him.

LMAO

DeezNutz 10-28-2013 06:23 PM

I think I'd prefer Blackmon, too, but I'd gladly give a first for Gordon, as well.

ShowtimeSBMVP 10-28-2013 06:38 PM

Redskins are aggressively shopping Fred Davis

Posted by Mike Florio on October 28, 2013, 8:27 PM EDT
File photo of Davis turning to run after a catch against the New York Jets during the first half of their NFL football game in Landover
Reuters
With the trade deadline less than a day away, the Redskins are trying hard to make a deal.

Per a league source, Washington hopes to trade tight end Fred Davis.

The 2012 franchise-tag recipient tore an Achilles tendon last season. He returned under a one-year, $1 million contract, and the Redskins have phased him out of their plans, given the performances of Jordan Reed and Logan Paulsen.

The Redskins, according to the source, are aggressively shopping Davis. If a deal can’t be worked out, there’s a chance Davis will be cut.

If he’s cut after the trade deadline, Davis will be subject to waivers.

keg in kc 10-28-2013 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10135480)
I'm guessing because those people believe a R3 and a conditional is unrealistic.

Cleveland is reported to want at least a R2 pick. Not sure why anyone would think our R3 pick in the mid-late 80's is enough to get a deal done.

Just give them our seco-. ****.

SAUTO 10-28-2013 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10135411)
I'd give a first for Gordon or Blackmon. I voted Blackmon but I'd take either.

.

I voted Gordon but I would take either too
Posted via Mobile Device

Coach 10-28-2013 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10135662)
Redskins are aggressively shopping Fred Davis

Posted by Mike Florio on October 28, 2013, 8:27 PM EDT
File photo of Davis turning to run after a catch against the New York Jets during the first half of their NFL football game in Landover
Reuters
With the trade deadline less than a day away, the Redskins are trying hard to make a deal.

Per a league source, Washington hopes to trade tight end Fred Davis.

The 2012 franchise-tag recipient tore an Achilles tendon last season. He returned under a one-year, $1 million contract, and the Redskins have phased him out of their plans, given the performances of Jordan Reed and Logan Paulsen.

The Redskins, according to the source, are aggressively shopping Davis. If a deal can’t be worked out, there’s a chance Davis will be cut.

If he’s cut after the trade deadline, Davis will be subject to waivers.

Interesting. If he gets cut, assuming he doesn't get traded, is KC first on the waiver wire, based of their record from last year? Or does the rules change during the regular season? (I admit, I forget.)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.