Not him, dude.

The guys that called it a vicious beating.

I think the kid is actually pretty tough. Had he not stood up for himself in that situation, he probably wouldn't have caught that ass whippin.

As for a vicious beating, I posted one for you. Doesn't need to result in death, but its more than a swollen eye.

It's obviously subjective. So I concede.
I'm sure this is vicious to some.

It's not to me. Hence my pussy remark.

Vicious is what this Taco Bell is going to do to by colon.

ROFL

Actually the next paragraph says one guy had admitted to it and the cops are trying to identify up to four other people involved in the beating
Posted via Mobile Device

if too can't see the difference between a cheap shot during a ****ing game with pads and helmets and this situation you have a serious mental problem
Posted via Mobile Device

NWMSU Bearcats currently viciously beating up the Missouri Western Griffins 14 zip in the first quarter. w00t

Both were players intentionally trying to injure the teams other player. And neither were just players being players. It's not like we are talking about players hitting people over competitively. We have players instructed and rewarded for taking a player out of the game.

Let me ask you this. What's stopping a coach from telling his player in a playoff game to helmet to helmet megatron . You may get fined but it will be worth it to we win?

I don't know how you fail to see the difference. Did you see the cheap shots favre took and how it messed up his ankle? You really think that was in the spirit of the game? It was obvious what the saints were trying to do. It was cheating. So is beating up the other teams QB.

So he got punched. How vicious.

I saw an interview with Brett Frafravre that he basically said he liked the thought of teams putting a bounty on his head. It gave him an even bigger ego.

When I hear "5 on 1 vicious beating" I picture the guy on the ground taking a 10 boot nazi stomping that leaves him bloody, battered and broken.
Clearly it's a subjective term, it just seems a bit over the top to me considering he just took a shot to the eye.

Maybe the quarterback shouldn't have peed on their shoes in the bathroom?

WooWoo

NW close to wrapping that thing up.

Sounds like that game was called off. The NW commentators mentioned it.

Except he didn't know it happened until after it happened. There's no doubt that favre was a shell of himself I'm the 4th quarter. I am just saying that as much as people complain about being too harsh on big hits or excusing bounties, the issue with those is similar to the issue at Winston.

If you can't beat the other team, take their other player out. If you can't win a gold medal in figure skating, knee cap the favorite. Even with the Chiefs... This Sunday, one cheap shot to Peyton or to jamaal Charles could completely swing the game. A 15 yard penalty and a small fine is nothing if it knocks Peyton out and leads to a win.

It makes me cringe that one cheap shot has that much ability to completely change a teams chance of winning and potentially crush a teams season. Something to think about. I'll close with this. If is college beating was about beating up a backup QB, would a forfeit even be in the conversation? No. It's only in the conversation because the opponent sabotaged the game by taking out the most important player. It is the same damn thing when you try to sabotage a game by trying to cripple a QB extracurricular to normal football.