ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 14 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Browns looking to trade Alex Mack and Joe Thomas (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=295775)

-King- 11-01-2015 04:03 PM
I'd trade a second for Thomas straight up. Easy decision. Don't know why the Bears would take only a 6th for Alshon though.

jerryforeverrice80 11-01-2015 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11856079)
Wouldn't mind trading for Joe thomas, but morse is the center of the now and future. Thanks, but no thanks.

Now Vernon davis otoh
VD hasn't been the same since smith left the 49ers.

notorious 11-01-2015 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 11855966)
I can see Denver making a trade for both guys...
This.


sigh.

The Franchise 11-01-2015 04:16 PM
2nd for Thomas? Yes please.

milkman 11-01-2015 04:17 PM
I'm not trading the future to bring in a 30 year old LT that might make the difference between getting pounded by the Patriots by 37 instead of 40.

This kind of trade is a win now move, and we ain't winning now.

RobBlake 11-01-2015 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerryforeverrice80 (Post 11856163)
VD hasn't been the same since smith left the 49ers.
he might be good in a reid offense

milkman 11-01-2015 04:18 PM
And why would you bring in Alshon Jeffery with Alex Smith at QB?

RobBlake 11-01-2015 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11856197)
And why would you bring in Alshon Jeffery with Alex Smith at QB?
Jeffery and Maclin is a great duo.. no matter how you slice it.

Discuss Thrower 11-01-2015 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11856197)
And why would you bring in Alshon Jeffery with Alex Smith at QB?
this

NJChiefsFan 11-01-2015 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11856193)
I'm not trading the future to bring in a 30 year old LT that might make the difference between getting pounded by the Patriots by 37 instead of 40.

This kind of trade is a win now move, and we ain't winning now.
Depends on the compensation. Being under contract until 2018 makes it interesting to me.

NJChiefsFan 11-01-2015 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11856197)
And why would you bring in Alshon Jeffery with Alex Smith at QB?
Yeah I would only do that move if it was really cheap or if I had intentions of giving a young QB more weapons. No matter how good, the #2 in an Alex Smith offense isn't going to get many targets. I would be very interested to see Albert Wilson with a good QB.

RunKC 11-01-2015 04:23 PM
I could see Seattle trading for Mack. They need OL help bad.

chiefzilla1501 11-01-2015 04:32 PM
I've said this before and I'll say it again.

Giving Alex Smith great receivers and a great ol is like giving a Lamborghini to Mr. Magoo. It's sad that the only reason people are reluctant to make this trade is they know it's basically putting lipstick on a pig.

RobBlake 11-01-2015 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 11856231)
I've said this before and I'll say it again.

Giving Alex Smith great receivers and a great ol is like giving a Lamborghini to Mr. Magoo. It's sad that the only reason people are reluctant to make this trade is they know it's basically putting lipstick on a pig.
So, it's better to not to try to improve the offense, because.. eff it?

Discuss Thrower 11-01-2015 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 11856235)
So, it's better to not to try to improve the offense, because.. eff it?
You probably don't understand the concept of diminishing returns, do you.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:40 PM.
Page 3 of 14 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.