| listopencil |
05-04-2016 06:10 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!
(Post 12216299)
Just curious...
If we accept that genes can get ****ed up during birth and create things like achondroplasia, cystic fibrosis, and Down's syndrome, and we accept that genes in utero determine sex, why is it hard to believe that somethings gets twisted and turns what's supposed to be an innie into an outie?
|
It's not to me. Furthermore, if someone wants to switch outie to innie or vice versa it's not really that big of a deal. If someone in my personal life were going through a sex change I would refer to them by whatever name they wanted and use the appropriate pronouns, because I would be interacting with them on a regular basis and it makes sense, and I think it would ease the transition for both of us. I don't feel compelled to do that when referring to a public figure - especially someone who has gone out of their way to make the transition as public as they can.Especially someone who was very well known as one gender and hasn't gone through the biological change to the opposite gender yet. So, to me, this person is going to be Bruce Jenner until he goes through that surgery to make herself Caitlyn Jenner. With all of that being said - I have no interest in seeing pictures of him scantily clad in a sports magazine. It would be the equivalent, to me, of being flashed by a transvestite. |
SI goes full reerun: Caitlyn Jenner to pose nude in SI shoot.
(https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299713)