ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Thoughts on the Offense. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303906)

Sandy Vagina 11-21-2016 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12569270)
We are not a passing team, yet we try to be one. Commit to the run and mix in the pass as a compliment.

Thought it was explained time and again when Andy came aboard? that we should expect a shit load of short passes (as extensions of runs). That Andy always forgets about the run game, and is obsessed with lots of short passing.

:hmmm:

gold_and_red 11-21-2016 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12569754)
The thing is, this offense is good when we run at least 50% of the time. We have only done that twice this whole season.

Take out the Oakland game and we have thrown it 335 times and ran it 201 times. That is a 5 to 3 ratio of pass to run. We are better when it is reversed.

And watchable. The game against Oakland was fun to watch. Not painful.

So nobody in this organization has the courage to tell Andy that his pass happy playcalling and red zone trickery is not working as expected? We have two OCs, a veteran QB who is supposed to be an astute student of the game and a GM who has been around elite offenses in the past. I wonder what they discuss during the week.
It also looks like Andy places too much emphasis on if it works in practice it must work in the game except without a real feel for how the game is progressing.

Hydrae 11-21-2016 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 12569777)
Oh well, It's just a game.

So, IJaG?

KevB 11-21-2016 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12569665)
They were, but many of us didnt wanna hear it because we were so excited about all of the big changes taking place

To be fair, we were a laughingstock when he came to town and now are considered a playoff team with reasonable aspirations for a title. He's far from perfect, but he's a hell of a lot better than what we had before him. I'd guess anyone we brought in would have flaws, and he's no different. But he does win games, even if we question if he has the juice to get us to the promised land.

CupidStunt 11-21-2016 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 12569440)
We're trying to win the election and be Democrat

LMAO

Not into politics, not even American, but this is a beauty.

Perfectly describes the fail of Alex Smith.

Dunerdr 11-21-2016 05:00 PM

I would like to go on record as being against whatever shit tiger comes up with. It's the most bullet proof argument.

Easy 6 11-21-2016 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 12569893)
To be fair, we were a laughingstock when he came to town and now are considered a playoff team with reasonable aspirations for a title. He's far from perfect, but he's a hell of a lot better than what we had before him. I'd guess anyone we brought in would have flaws, and he's no different. But he does win games, even if we question if he has the juice to get us to the promised land.

I wouldnt argue with any of that, there were far worse choices Clark could've made... but with better records comes increased expectations

IMO its fair to begin wondering if Andy can take us over the top, considering some of his stubborn tendencies

Mr. Laz 11-21-2016 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12569294)
No you aren't.

You're supposed to scream that it's the defense's fault.

^ might as well be Clayton's Twin Troll Brother

Just a little more polished

Sandy Vagina 11-21-2016 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 12569893)
To be fair, we were a laughingstock when he came to town and now are considered a playoff team with reasonable aspirations for a title. He's far from perfect, but he's a hell of a lot better than what we had before him. I'd guess anyone we brought in would have flaws, and he's no different. But he does win games, even if we question if he has the juice to get us to the promised land.

Good post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gold_and_red (Post 12569863)
So nobody in this organization has the courage to tell Andy that his pass happy playcalling and red zone trickery is not working as expected? We have two OCs, a veteran QB who is supposed to be an astute student of the game and a GM who has been around elite offenses in the past. I wonder what they discuss during the week.

Yes, it's puzzling.

SAUTO 11-21-2016 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 12569435)
We're trying to think with Blackbob's brain.

Trying to talk with bukkakebob's mouth?

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-21-2016 05:46 PM

Cocaine is a hell of a drug.

Coogs 11-21-2016 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gold_and_red (Post 12569863)
So nobody in this organization has the courage to tell Andy that his pass happy playcalling and red zone trickery is not working as expected? We have two OCs, a veteran QB who is supposed to be an astute student of the game and a GM who has been around elite offenses in the past. I wonder what they discuss during the week.
It also looks like Andy places too much emphasis on if it works in practice it must work in the game except without a real feel for how the game is progressing.

Last year we were 1-1 and should have been 2-0 (Charles fumble returned for TD), and passed 58 times out of 118 snaps for a 49% passing vs 51% run. Then we went the next 4 games with 152 passes out of 236 snaps. 64% pass vs 36% run. Record 0-4. Next 11 games, 280 passes out of 609 plays. 46% pass vs 54% run. Record 11-0. Last game vs NE 50 passes out of 82 snaps. 61% pass 39% run. Loss.

That is what they should be discussing.

Bewbies 11-21-2016 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12569436)
15 TDs 8 INT is what Smith is on track for

I don't even know if this is acceptable in high school... LMAO

Chiefshrink 11-22-2016 12:59 AM

Play calling is our problem. Tyreek is our Antonio Brown in the making and he needs to be actually touching the ball much more. Last week has been the only time he was seriously targeted for much of the game.

PAChiefsGuy 11-22-2016 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 12570925)
I don't even know if this is acceptable in high school... LMAO

There's been QBs who have won the SB with far worse stats so I don't really care what Alex Smith's stats are right now. I care about beating the Broncos.

Aaron Rodgers is on pace for 40 TDs 11 INTs but his team sucks so who really cares? You think the Packer fans are saying "hey we are losing but our QB is awesome so this season is a success!"

We have to focus on winning as a team despite any limitations our QB may have. We've got the D to make up for his short-comings and I don't believe the current slump the offense is in will last much longer. They'll break out of it soon.

I hope. :huh:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.