ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 47 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs focused on Mahomes, McCaffrey, and Cunningham in RD1 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=307189)

Mr. Laz 04-17-2017 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12827985)
McCaffrey would be awesome here but my response was why trade up for him if Mahomes is on the board? Which would likely be the case... source said they prefer Mahomes.
of course, the QB would be valued above the RB

I imagine that they would be will to trade up for Mahomes but would just sit and wait for McCaffrey or Cunningham.


I don't think Dorsey wants to trade up at all, he loves his draft picks too much.

ChiefAshhole1056 04-17-2017 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12828003)
Nobody knows who we have targeted for certain. I like Mahomes but a white RB? I mean seriously, he's white and not to mention an RB in round 1 is a wasted pick. You can get one in the third that will be just as good. Good blocking makes more difference than the RB.
I think you're sleeping on what Mccaffery brings to the table. He would be every bit the chess piece that Westbrook used to be for Andy in Philly. You may be able to find a runner that is somewhat capable of what Mccaffery is in the 3rd, but as receiver as well? Not a chance.

Only player I'd be ok trading up for would be Mahomes, but overall, I'd be very pleased with ending up with any of the 3 listed. Thanks for the scoop!

Mr. Laz 04-17-2017 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerok (Post 12828022)
New info. Won't tell my source. Chiefs will draft a player I'm the first round, unless they trade down. Again, my source wants to be confidential, but this is at least 90% sure, everytime.
He gave way more info about his source and then deleted it because he wrote TOO MUCH about it. He could have gotten his source fired.

So back off a bit about that bud

Mr. Laz 04-17-2017 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 12828016)
In this case it's OK
I see

In that case, the Chiefs shouldn't draft Watson because he's black.


Black people are too dumb to play Quarterback.



:rolleyes:

Mr. Laz 04-17-2017 02:58 PM
McCaffrey is very Jamaal Charles-like


*ducks and hides under the table*

GloucesterChief 04-17-2017 03:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12828031)
McCaffrey is very Jamaal Charles-like


*ducks and hides under the table*
If Charles was slower and was swallowed up and shut down by any decent D-line he came up against. Just watch tape on the '15 and '16 Stanford-WSU games and see McCaffrey get completely shut down.

rabblerouser 04-17-2017 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12827967)
I'm going to change the post to be less descriptive about my source and his job... but if anyone asks, those who have seen it remember what he does.
Doesn't matter when your original post is still quoted for all the world to read...

pugsnotdrugs19 04-17-2017 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12828037)
Doesn't matter when your original post is still quoted for all the world to read...
Laz trimmed up the quoted OP and kept what was originally on there confidential, which was appreciated

Mr. Laz 04-17-2017 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 12828037)
Doesn't matter when your original post is still quoted for all the world to read...
No, it's not.

I edited the quote from the very beginning to get rid of the extra information.

staylor26 04-17-2017 03:13 PM
Can somebody PM me what was taken out of the OP. I MUST KNOW!!

:D

ptlyon 04-17-2017 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12828030)
I see

In that case, the Chiefs shouldn't draft Watson because he's black.


Black people are too dumb to play Quarterback.

:rolleyes:

No, it's OK in this case because of the McCaffrey /Broncos connection

MahiMike 04-17-2017 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 12828016)
In this case it's OK
uh, no dude. It's all the same.

ct 04-17-2017 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12827971)
Reid has always changed his offense for his QB. McNabb ran the Alex Smith version and Vick ran what would be the Mahomes version.
correction, alex smith is TRYING to run the mcnabb version, he just wont go down the field enough

I'm totally on board to move up for mahomes, but not mini-mac. I might be ok if he's still sitting there for 27, but would prefer cunningham or edge rusher if that's the case, so i guess it's a no for my taste.

DaKCMan AP 04-17-2017 03:23 PM
McCaffrey is sick. He, Cook, and Fournette are elite. But RB is extremely deep in this draft.

Not sold on Mahomes. At all.

Cunningham is a high energy, athletic LB that doesn't lack effort and fills a need. Would rather, admittedly biased, have Jarrad Davis.

pugsnotdrugs19 04-17-2017 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 12828055)

Cunningham is a high energy, athletic LB that doesn't lack effort and fills a need. Would rather, admittedly biased, have Jarrad Davis.
They are both studs and would be really nice at 27.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 AM.
Page 3 of 47 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.