Quote:
|
Even IF we do see the Raiders again, it’s going to be in a very cold Kansas City environment.
We know Carr sucks nuts in those conditions. |
Quote:
|
I have:
1. Chiefs 2. Steelers 3. Titans 4. Bills 5. Raiders 6. Ravens 7. Browns 1. Saints 2. Packers 3. Rams 4. Cowboys 5. Seahawks 6. Buccaneers 7. Cardinals Browns & Colts both ended up 10-6, but Browns must have had the tiebreaker. Every NFC team not making the playoffs ended up with a losing record in my scenario, and the Cowboys are in with a stellar 6-10 record. |
These are always fun. I tried to go conservative and had us dropping the TB and NO games. Here's what I came up with:
1. PIT 2. KC 3. BUF 4. IND 5. TEN 6. BAL 7. LV Poor Brownies and Dolphins on the outside looking in at 10-6 and 9-7 :( 1. NO 2. GB 3. SEA 4. PHI 5. TB 6. ARI 7. LAR I have the Eagles taking the NFC East at 6-9-1, hosting the 13-3 Buccaneers in round 1 LMAO I tried to sneak in some upsets here and there but I ended up with NYJ, CIN, DET, WFT and JAX losing out. I'm positive that won't happen but it's hard to bet on any of those teams. |
Quote:
|
quite possible to have all 7 AFC teams with 12+ wins AND a 10 win team misses out.....crazy
|
Quote:
|
For home field I believe tiebreakers are:
Head to head Conference record Common opponents The last one is why we need Balt to win badly this coming week. |
Quote:
A division winner will always host a WC, regardless how bad a division winner is! |
I think The Ravens are gonna fold.
|
Not sure why people are stressing so much over the 1 seed. There won't be a home crowd advantage, and we're likely hosting a team like the Browns/Titans/Dolphins that we would probably dispose of fairly easily.
Gives Mahomes a chance to pad his playoff win total and another rare playoff W for the franchise. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.