ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 11 12 3 4567 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Reid is a terrible chess player (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=341672)

Jet Chip Wasp 01-03-2022 06:46 PM
If you think Andy Reid is a "terrible chess player" it would be interesting to hear what you think of other coaches in the NFL like Vic Fangio. Every single coach in the NFL have lost a few games like the one we had yesterday: Hank Stram, Marty, Vince Lombardi, Tom Landry, Chuck Noll, Bill Walsh, Bill Belichick, etc.

Shall I go on?

Chiefspants 01-03-2022 06:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davewan (Post 16051052)
In other words, you got nothin'.
Idk dude look at this post I quoted below. This guy already convinced me against your argument with this 5D gem of a post from less than a month ago. Check it out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davewan (Post 15995103)
Given how Mahomes has played over the last 5 games, how likely is he to engineer a late 4th quarter game winning drive with 2-3 minutes or less on the clock?

Keep in mind that that in each of the last 3 games, the Chiefs have scored early and then gone 51, 44 and 52 minutes without scoring an offensive touchdown.

If the Chiefs don't have a 4th quarter lead in any game remaining, they lose because the offesne simply isn't good enough to overcome itself. And while I've defended Mahomes all season long (not here, this is my first day here), I can't anymore.Not only is he not the best QB in the league; he's not the best in the conference anymore.
If Andy had only listened to this genius he wouldn’t have instructed Patrick to keep throwing against the Chargers and then, thankfully, everyone would have understood why Patrick, a QB no longer even defendable for his bad play, shouldn’t have the ball late in the 4th.

Stupid Andy for trusting Patrick against the Chargers. If we had a 5D chessgenius brain like this as a coach, Patrick would have never even had the chance to orchestrate his division winning drive against the Chargers.

srvy 01-03-2022 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davewan (Post 16051015)
Clearly, you'd rather lose with Mahomes standing on the sidelines than give him the chance to go tie or win the game with a couple of minutes left on the game clock.

Absolute insanity.
Had the whole second half and produced 3 points though not all his fault but it is a team sport. So those last couple of minutes you let Cincy score and hope whatever happened most the second half just vanishes in the last minute? Good plan:clap:

ClevelandBronco 01-03-2022 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jet Chip Wasp (Post 16051061)
If you think Andy Reid is a "terrible chess player" it would be interesting to hear what you think of other coaches in the NFL like Vic Fangio. Every single coach in the NFL have lost a few games like the one we had yesterday: Hank Stram, Marty, Vince Lombardi, Tom Landry, Chuck Noll, Bill Walsh, Bill Belichick, etc.

Shall I go on?
Fangio can barely grasp tic tac toe.

Bl00dyBizkitz 01-03-2022 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davewan (Post 16051050)
But the Chiefs WERE in that situation, so then the question becomes what is your best chance to win. And the answer is simple. You get the ball back in the hands of the best player on the field with as much time as you can. The answer isn't to hope your defense keeps Cincinnati from scoring 7 or 3. They were going to score, one way or another.
The goal was to keep it a 3 point game, making it easier for Mahomes to tie and maybe win the game, albeit with less time and no timeouts.

The point is, letting them score increases our chances of winning by like a 1-2%. You're burning Reid at the stake over an incredible negligible decision when we likely already lost. You're crying over nothing.

BWillie 01-03-2022 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16051057)
Let's assume you are right about this. And to be fair, you totally make a reasonable case and lots of people here sympathize with this post.

Who cares? What should the Chiefs do? Fire him?

Does periodically managing the clock in less-than-ideal fashion totally invalidate and overwhelm all the other good he does as a (HOF) head coach (that has led us to 3 straight AFCCGs and a SB title)?

No. So this post is about as worthwhile as the one that said Hill needs to catch the ball more with his hands.

Yes, that's great and all. But do you have a better alternative at WR?

No. No. And hell no. So shut the **** up with these dumb threads.
They should hire some analytics dork to make the on field decisions. Hell, all teams should probably do this. I believe the Ravens and John Harbaugh do this - with the exception of going for two in the first half. Teams will eventually even start doing that.

TwistedChief 01-03-2022 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jet Chip Wasp (Post 16051061)
If you think Andy Reid is a "terrible chess player" it would be interesting to hear what you think of other coaches in the NFL like Vic Fangio. Every single coach in the NFL have lost a few games like the one we had yesterday: Hank Stram, Marty, Vince Lombardi, Tom Landry, Chuck Noll, Bill Walsh, Bill Belichick, etc.

Shall I go on?
davewan - JCW joined this board a full month after you did and CP has collectively decided he's a much better poster and chess player than you.

davewan 01-03-2022 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16051071)
davewan - JCW joined this board a full month after you did and CP has collectively decided he's a much better poster and chess player than you.
Ask me if I give a fuck what you think.

eDave 01-03-2022 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16051071)
davewan - JCW joined this board a full month after you did and CP has collectively decided he's a much better poster and chess player than you.
Is he a JAG or staight up bust?

Bowser 01-03-2022 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eDave (Post 16051033)
Does that site have an Andy Reid dedicated thread?
https://media1.tenor.com/images/bd1e...temid=16390680

TwistedChief 01-03-2022 06:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16051066)
They should hire some analytics dork to make the on field decisions. Hell, all teams should probably do this. I believe the Ravens and John Harbaugh do this - with the exception of going for two in the first half. Teams will eventually even start doing that.
Even Harbaugh goes against his analytics recommendations. There is no coach that uses analytics as a black box without considering real world circumstances that aren't considered in the model.

BWillie 01-03-2022 06:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davewan (Post 16051075)
Ask me if I give a **** what you think.
Antifreeze.

Drink it.

Tell us how it goes down and tastes.

Thanks

DaFace 01-03-2022 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davewan (Post 16051075)
Ask me if I give a fuck what you think.
Ask me what we do to people who bypass our language filters, especially those who are clearly raging douchebags

TwistedChief 01-03-2022 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davewan (Post 16051075)
Ask me if I give a **** what you think.
Awww. Someone replied to you with something thoughtful and you didn't get enduring adulation on an anonymous message board and now you're lashing out.

I kinda like you to be honest.

Rainbarrel 01-03-2022 06:55 PM
11-5 after a 3-4 start, says antifreeze would be to sweet


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 PM.
Page 3 of 11 12 3 4567 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.