ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 5 12 3 45
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   CBS 7 Round Mock (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348428)

The Franchise 04-20-2023 09:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16909691)
Wait a minute - I didn't have you as Team Harrison to this point.
I've started to kind of move onto a WR in the 2nd because I like the options that should be there (even with a small trade up).

Foskey at 31 would be a perfect pick for me but he's been pretty quiet up until this point, so I don't know where he's going to go.

Harrison would be a perfect fit at RT if he's there.

The Franchise 04-20-2023 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16909689)
Alright - who you on in the 3rd?

Because we have room to bargain here. I'm gonna need you to get behind Harrison in the 1st and I can back Foskey (even over Rice, because I'm trying to build us a consensus board here) in the 2nd.

Though sadly, we may be an an impasse because I can't imagine Foskey going late 2 and I don't have him in my top tiers in Rd1.

Wait - how 'bout

1st: Foskey
2nd: Rice
3rd: Blake Freeland
4a: No idea - let's discuss. I'll throw my Mizzou guy, Isaiah McGuire out there for consideration
4b: Kuntz
5: Keondre Coburn
6a: Nick Saldiveri
6b: Jerrod Clark
7a: Anthony Johnson Jr.
7b: Cam Jones

Join me, sir, in supporting this as the ideal Mock Draft for your 2023 Chiefs.
You've got my vote on that mock. That 4a pick could be anything if the rest of it goes like that. McGuire would be perfect.

DJ's left nut 04-20-2023 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16909692)
Just FYI, Nate Taylor has Harrison as a possibility at pick 63
No ****ing way a pass-protecting OT with LT feet falls to 63.

And if he did, he would not be a 'possibility' - he'd be an absolute certainty.

I'm still only 50/50 he makes it to 31. Fellas, there aren't many guys in this draft with the length/feet/strength that Harrison has. Paris Johnson is the only OT in this draft who I think it obviously more capable of playing LT in the NFL. Broderick Jones is just such a fascinating physical specimen that I put him right at the same level as Harrison in that regard. But Harrison's technique is better, IMO.

In either event - no, Harrison won't be there at 63.

DJ's left nut 04-20-2023 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16909702)
You've got my vote on that mock. That 4a pick could be anything if the rest of it goes like that. McGuire would be perfect.
Sold. So it is written, so shall it be done.

Get Bling Vance on the line.

The Franchise 04-20-2023 09:53 AM
It's pretty much common knowledge, and he admits it, that Nate doesn't really know dick about the draft or prospects. He gets all of his takes from Brugler's draft guide.

The Franchise 04-20-2023 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16909710)
Sold. So it is written, so shall it be done.

Get Bling Vance on the line.
It's crazy that at the beginning of this process I didn't think Foskey would even have a chance of being there at 31. Now I have no clue if he's even going round 1 at all.

It'd be nice to have an Irish player get drafted by the Chiefs that didn't get cut in his first training camp.

DJ's left nut 04-20-2023 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16909714)
It's crazy that at the beginning of this process I didn't think Foskey would even have a chance of being there at 31. Now I have no clue if he's even going round 1 at all.

It'd be nice to have an Irish player get drafted by the Chiefs that didn't get cut in his first training camp.
That's really similar to Karlaftis, though.

Heading into draft season, he was being discussed as a potential top 10 pick and maybe the first DE to go after Hutchison.

I don't think anyone realistically expected him to fall to 29.

Mecca 04-20-2023 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16909711)
It's pretty much common knowledge, and he admits it, that Nate doesn't really know dick about the draft or prospects. He gets all of his takes from Brugler's draft guide.
It's so weird to me that a guy who covers football for a living doesn't know things like that.

The Franchise 04-20-2023 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16909730)
That's really similar to Karlaftis, though.

Heading into draft season, he was being discussed as a potential top 10 pick and maybe the first DE to go after Hutchison.

I don't think anyone realistically expected him to fall to 29.
Maybe we can pull that off two years in a row then. A DE group of Karlaftis, Omenihu, Foskey, Danna and whatever 5th DE you want to keep would be pretty ****ing stout. Especially if you can have Foskey/Karlaftis as your DEs and Jones/Omenihu as your DTs in obvious passing situations.

Mecca 04-20-2023 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16909737)
Maybe we can pull that off two years in a row then. A DE group of Karlaftis, Omenihu, Foskey, Danna and whatever 5th DE you want to keep would be pretty ****ing stout. Especially if you can have Foskey/Karlaftis as your DEs and Jones/Omenihu as your DTs in obvious passing situations.
I apparently am the only dude who isn't a Foskey fan.

staylor26 04-20-2023 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16909735)
It's so weird to me that a guy who covers football for a living doesn't know things like that.
Might not be a popular opinion, but Taylor is low key kind of worthless IMO.

He doesn't have the sources in the organization OR the football knowledge of Terez.

Or maybe we were just spoiled with Terez :shrug:

The Franchise 04-20-2023 10:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16909740)
I apparently am the only dude who isn't a Foskey fan.
Yeah well...your opinions suck, man.

Mecca 04-20-2023 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16909742)
Might not be a popular opinion, but Taylor is low key kind of worthless IMO.

He doesn't have the sources in the organization OR the football knowledge of Terez.

Or maybe we were just spoiled with Terez :shrug:
Even without insider sources you could have a lot of just knowledge of what's going on. The fact that some of these guys seem oblivious to other NFL teams and the college game is really ****ing baffling.

Mecca 04-20-2023 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16909747)
Yeah well...your opinions suck, man.
He's big and athletic but he doesn't have a whole lot of refinement. I'm assuming it's all the positions he played but there's not a lot of moves on the rush and he needs a lot of coaching in my view.

DJ's left nut 04-20-2023 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16909735)
It's so weird to me that a guy who covers football for a living doesn't know things like that.
He covers the NFL for a living. He doesn't cover 'football' write large and he sees this as a college football thing.

Or a 'draft guru' thing whereby he defers to the experts.

But yeah, he just rarely gets a damn thing right.

I like Nate, don't get me wrong, but damn I miss Terez. Because that guy covered the Chiefs but knew EVERYTHING. Taylor simply doesn't have the broad knowledge base that Paylor had.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 PM.
Page 3 of 5 12 3 45
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.