Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16915553)

How big was Osi when he played for Spags?

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16915557)

6'3 255

Although if you notice, the game has changed over the years. The reason they don't like undersized linemen is because they can play nickel in run downs because they don't need an extra run defender behind the line.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16915565)

What's a run down in the league today?

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16915566)

Clark played at probably 250-255 last year. And as we all know, nobody sets the edge like Frank Clark.

So clearly mass is immaterial.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16915565)

What's a run down in the league today?

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16915567)

And that is the entire point of why when your line alone can stop the run it's a big deal.

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16915567)

And that is the entire point of why when your line alone can stop the run it's a big deal.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16915571)

I'd guess it's a bigger deal when you can't rush the passer...but I digress

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16915577)

You realize teams have things they generally do, and formula's they follow, the Chiefs don't like undersized linemen, that has basically been consistent for awhile.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16915579)

If we're going by that, they wouldn't have drafted McDuffie last year.

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16915491)

No, no he's not. McDonald plays like a defensive end trying to stand up when he does that. He doesn't show fluidity to legit play standing at this time. He also has never gained weight in 5 years so the idea he'll just get bigger than 240 is wishful thinking.

To me he is a situation rusher and do you really want to use a 1st round pick on a role player? He also is not a schematic fit at all with the Chiefs so...