Yes sir, pay this man.

Derp derp

Richie James is the best WR on the team. I’m going to put his face in my avatar.

Derp derp

It’s week 2 and my avatar is blank.
:LOL:

Chris Jones never doubted you. I knew you be back!

Jones was a beast today. Hopefully he keeps it going every week.

From now on I'm just going to call him Mr. Chris, Sir...

LMAO

Hard to say he isnt one of our better WRs performers so far. I will say he does not seem well suited in the return game but that doesn't have anything to do with being a WR.

Either way cant win em all. Cant bat 1.000. Can only bat .900, I guess.

Guy was an absolute force.

He just destroys rushing from DE anymore. Tackles just seem helpless

in case you're thinking about giving away a little cash to your loyal fans, i was never mad at ya, Chris. Always wanted Veach to give you a bag. Not a $30 million bag, but a $27 million one. If that counts, let me know, I'll send you my zelle info, Sacknation.


Glad you're back, buddy.

Kept the team in the ballgame early (and late). Apologies to Clint Eastwood but Chris Jones is The Enforcer.

I am not well versed on the business side of football, but isn't it a no brainer to keep an integral part of a Super bowl team that is under contract? I get you have to posture and not get rolled by one player but the defence is solid with Chris and doesn't having a realistic chance to go back translate into mucho dinero for the franchise? Seems like it the cost/benefit ratio should pencil out.

"We have Andy and we have Pat. We don't need any other high-priced players on the team. Danna and Tershown can replace him at a fraction of the cost." - CP

31 snaps, 1.5 sacks, 1 TFL, 2 QB hits and a pass breakup LMAO

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chris Jones played in 31 of 64 defensive snaps against the Jaguars Sunday, including 11 as an edge rusher. He certainly made the most of the opportunities, collecting 1.5 sacks and making impact plays that fueled the Chiefs&#39; 17-9 win in Jacksonville.<a href="https://t.co/7vYSEWVENs">https://t.co/7vYSEWVENs</a></p>&mdash; Matt Derrick (@mattderrick) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattderrick/status/1703606065168867514?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 18, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

But you just said they shouldn’t pay him 30mm/yr when he was looking for even more than that? So why put it on some attitude of CP as the problem?

I also want to apologize