Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17249001)

{shrug}

The moment Skyy has a game half as good as MVS had in the Bengals game, I'll listen.

And MVS at least does the little shit (he's always getting dap from teammates and coaches for running hard/good pick routes and/or strong blocking downfield) consistently whereas Moore seems lost in space on half his snaps.

I think Moore has a higher ceiling and greater upside, but the snaps where he appears to have never played football before are a real issue.

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17249008)

Ya'll slob Frank ****ing Clark's knob for only showing up in the playoffs. So given how huge the AFCC game was last year, why aren't you doing the same with MVS?

I just want to know what the line is. Is it because MVS dropped the important catch? So what if instead of having his screw-up on full display in a crucial situation he were just invisible like Frank always was in the regular season? Would he be getting the same treatment then?

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17249019)

They can see a clear out with MVS and he won't be a Chief next year.

Frank was under contract so that had to be justified.

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17249008)

Ya'll slob Frank ****ing Clark's knob for only showing up in the playoffs. So given how huge the AFCC game was last year, why aren't you doing the same with MVS?

I just want to know what the line is. Is it because MVS dropped the important catch? So what if instead of having his screw-up on full display in a crucial situation he were just invisible like Frank always was in the regular season? Would he be getting the same treatment then?

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17249028)

What about that last weird restructure/whatever the crap Veach did to his contract to allow him to stick around for another year? He should have been cut, but we were too afraid to run out a DL with Danna/Dunlap.

Veach did the contract thingy and everybody celebrated. When a handful of us said it was bad, we got nothing but, "PLAYOFF FRANK!!!!!" comments.

Originally Posted by Shoes (Post 17249002)

Everyone forgets the playoff game vs the Bengals- MVS put the receivers on his back that game which is large in part why we got to the Superbowl. At least MVS has those spectacular moments/game where he's been a large contributor.

Skyy Moore has never done shit.

Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief (Post 17249038)

I have no problem overall with the MVS signing simply for that reason. Same reason I always defended Frank Clark, he showed up when it mattered and helped us win Super Bowls. MVS did the same thing.

If he never makes another meaningful play, I still won't have any issue paying him what they did. I just prefer he stop sucking shit this year at some point.

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 17248963)

Never was crazy about drob but dude did have a specific role. He was actually really good at getting open in scramble drill. Catching the ball, not as much. But he was always open.

Mvs is a very different WR. He’s definitely a clear out option but it’s hard to be valuable when your number gets called a few times a game. I never understood why a clear out option had to be a boom bust guy. Of course a speed options bread and butter will be deep routes, but we can’t find a guy who’s fast and at least remotely effective with short/intermediate stuff too?

It’s been pointed out that Andy likes his WRs to wear many hats. In the future we need to have more guys with versatility versus having specialists who do only one thing well (even worse when they don’t do the one thing they were supposed to specialize in).

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17249116)

He is not

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 17249144)

Well shit. If BWillie comes to the same conclusion that I do, then I'm more than likely wrong.