DJ's left nut |
01-07-2025 04:35 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus
(Post 17897101)
I still maintain that if you think Tomlin isn’t a good coach, you have to feel the same about Harbaugh.
|
John's always been a fair bit more high variance, but they're very similar in their approach.
To John's credit, The Ravens were in pretty sharp decline under Billick when he took over. He took over a 5-11 football team and then with a QB he drafted/developed, turned them into a perennial playoff team overnight and won a SB with them. He went THROUGH Foxborough to get there, no less -- the only team to beat Brady at home in the playoffs, right? Or at least during those prime years?
Then as Flacco aged out, he drafted/developed a NEW young quarterback who's won MVPs. He's hired strong assistants who have rebuilt that offense and that defense a couple of different times. The 'detail stuff' like special teams is typically better under Harbaugh than it's been under Tomlin.
The things that his particular style of coach is supposed to do (the CEO type) he's done a little better than Tomlin pretty much across the board.
Tomlin took over a team with a young QB who'd already won a championship. That had an established, championship coaching staff essentially pre-built around him with Arians and LeBeau already on staff. And has won all of 3 playoff games since 2010.
And I'm not gonna Stan for Harbaugh's coaching genius either, especially not in the post-season. But when you look at the job he took over and the way that team has been built/rebuilt, i think he's demonstrated more than Tomlin. Not a lot, but a little.
I'd hate to live off the difference either way.
|