Chiefaholic |
09-18-2004 04:26 PM |
wow
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENDelt260
Is my attitude for attitude's sake? Well, yeah. But, you were chosen as the target today for posting quite possibly the stupidest take I've ever read on this board.
Tho, it occurred to me that perhaps I'm being unfair. Are you under 10? Because if you're a child, I'd be more than happy to calmly explain to you why your take is ridiculous. If you're an adult, then you're just an idiot. Completely ridiculous takes aren't worthy of calm reasoned discussion, IMO.
|
Even though I disagree that the Chiefs are picked on by the officiating. I do think that you're overreacting to the initial post. If you disagree, then say so. Perhaps voice your opinion on WHY you disagree w/o the senseless gradeschool namecalling.
Now, to answer the initial post..... I disagree that the Chiefs are picked on by the officiating. YES, I've seen calls that make you want to jump out of your chair and throw something at the TV. Yet, we catch an occasional break as well (Kennison's down by contact last week comes to mind).
If there's a legit arguement to officiating, there needs to be consistancy from week to week. If a crew or individual ref keeps making game deciding mistakes, then he/they need to be fined, suspended, or just flat out fired. One current example would be the constant flag throwing in preseason on contact after 5 yards and how "the NFL will crack down on the rule this year". Then in week one, Gonzales was mugged damn near every play. Where are the flags? There's no way in hell that the refs never saw it the entire game. If you're going to "crack down on a rule", then you need to be consistant with the playcalling.
Here's a legit arguement for you. You can work it from here....
|