ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   I'm calling out Hootie (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=171809)

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
I am sure Damon would not like to know how you use pictures of him for your own personal wanking sessions.

Maybe it is time to find a new spank Idol. :whackit:

Relax, half-man...fat girls need loving, too...and most don't even have friend zones to get stuck in (just fat rolls!)

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX
Well said! :clap:

"Teams don't respect our running game because it's non-existent"

That's a tautology.

What pray-tell are some of the reasons why this running game might struggle??

If anyone feared Huard more than David Klingler, they might not put 8 and 9 in the box.

I'm not saying that's the end-all of the conversation, because our blocking has sucked and we are too predictable on O, but you can't use the running game as an excuse for Huard because he is part of the problem.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
I will leave the board FOREVER if you find a post where I said I didn't think I was being an attention whore...

If saying 'Huard is better for the Chiefs, here is why: (etc...)' makes me an attention whore, and if cracking Freud related jokes about females having penis envy is attention whoring, so be it! Don't care...take Hootie for what he is (attention whore) or shut the **** up and don't read my shit...put me on ignore...it's what the cool kids are doing, skull ****!

You're just dying to be on The Real World, aren't you?

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
"Teams don't respect our running game because it's non-existent"

That's a tautology.

What pray-tell are some of the reasons why this running game might struggle??

If anyone feared Huard more than David Klingler, they might not put 8 and 9 in the box.

I'm not saying that's the end-all of the conversation, because our blocking has sucked and we are too predictable on O, but you can't use the running game as an excuse for Huard because he is part of the problem.

and if Croyle were starting rather than Huard, he would be part of the problem as well...

Right now, the only two that aren't part of the problem are Bowe and Gonzalez...

Halfcan 10-07-2007 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Relax, half-man...fat girls need loving, too...and most don't even have friend zones to get stuck in (just fat rolls!)

Your gay man crush reminds me of Blades of Glory.

"I love you Damon, I love you!!!!" :p

kregger 10-07-2007 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
I really don't understand the 'noodle arm' jab, either...

Sure, he doesn't have a Croyle-esque cannon, but the dude throws the ball plenty strong enough...he has a better arm than Trent Green, and that's a fact...and we were fine and dandy with him for half a decade.

Come on Hootie, that first pass to Secret Weapon was a joke that SW made into a nice stat for your boy. That freaking pass looked like a directional punt. He held the ball too long on Kennison's one play in the end zone. That's a TD with anyone else on our staff chucking it.

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
You're just dying to be on The Real World, aren't you?

I'd do it in a second...

That should be awesome...

Plus, I would make the One Nut Tuck a household trick!

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kregger
Come on Hootie, that first pass to Secret Weapon was a joke that SW made into a nice stat for your boy. That freaking pass looked like a directional punt. He held the ball too long on Kennison's one play in the end zone. That's a TD with anyone else on our staff chucking it.

that was a bad throw?!?!?

Too Wilson?

Huh?

You guys are ****ing off your rockers...

I was laughing hysterically when he completed that pass because, after four weeks, I can't believe it finally worked...

But it certainly wasn't a bad pass...

Halfcan 10-07-2007 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
and if Croyle were starting rather than Huard, he would be part of the problem as well...

Right now, the only two that aren't part of the problem are Bowe and Gonzalez...

Damon is done in KC-Get over it Man Crush.

DFB 10-07-2007 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Plus, I would make the One Nut Tuck a household trick!

Look, for the last time....if you're not going to give the youtube link to it....quit teasin'!

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
Damon is done in KC-Get over it Man Crush.

That could be true...

He has a one week tryout against one of the worst defenses in the NFL...

TEX 10-07-2007 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
"Teams don't respect our running game because it's non-existent"

That's a tautology.

What pray-tell are some of the reasons why this running game might struggle??

If anyone feared Huard more than David Klingler, they might not put 8 and 9 in the box.

I'm not saying that's the end-all of the conversation, because our blocking has sucked and we are too predictable on O, but you can't use the running game as an excuse for Huard because he is part of the problem.

One most certainly can - YOU won't because you're intent on not. That's why it's futile to dicuss anything with someone that already has their mind made up such as yourself.

BTW, today the Jags played the Chiefs straight up a great deal of the time and the O-line and running game still couldn't do anything. The running game is struggling mostly because the O-Line $UCKS. Go back and look at the 1st drive today and see what happened - it's all right there for you to view for yourself so you don't have to argue with anyone.

Halfcan 10-07-2007 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
That could be true...

He has a one week tryout against one of the worst defenses in the NFL...

He won't even play next week. HE IS DONE!!!!!



:clap: :clap: :clap:

FloridaMan88 10-07-2007 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
If so, you're a ****ing idiot.

The Jags are a good ****ing team, that's all I know.


Go stick your head back in Carl's ass. No one gives a shit about anything you say. You are a clown and people such as yourself who blindly support crappy GMs who run teams into the ground are one of the most pathetic elements of sports.

People like yourself are one of the reasons Carl will remain in KC as long as he wants. Blind homers who will continue to support this organization and continue to shell out $$$, regardless of how many year go by without a playoff win and regardless of how far the team continues to sink in the abyss known as mediocrity.

You should go work for kcchiefs.com or perhaps Wargarbage Illustrated. At least those frauds are receiving a paycheck for giving up their backbones to King Carl.

Skip Towne 10-07-2007 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
This is all totally false.

Green was only good in KC when he had Roaf blocking his blindside...

As soon as Roaf retired, Trent Green became a below average QB who took too many sacks and made far too many mistakes.

Huard has many flaws, but if LJ were gaining 4+ YPC (like we all expected), Huard would be a great QB for this team. However, teams don't respect our running game because it is non-existant...Jacksoville wasn't stacking the box today, not in the least bit...and we still couldn't run the ball because our center gets manhandled, our right tackle is ridiculously bad, and our right guard is in dire need of his roid supply...

If we lose a few more in a row because of our running game, and it becomes obvious the playoffs are a stretch, then yes, let's see Croyle...

But at this time, turning to Croyle is simply a panic move...he's not poised (like some are saying after his performance today) and he makes the same quick throws Huard makes...

If you think Croyle didn't know where he was throwing the ball before he even snapped the ball then you are delusional...he makes less post snap reads than Huard, and it's not even close...

Let's not forget what Croyle is king of...the backfoot panic heave...

If Huard is Downfield BigGame, Croyle is BackFoot Panic Heave...

Do you think you are going to get away with a volume of rhetoric while ignoring what I said? It is NOT totally false. Green used progressions. Huard looks at one dude and bails. Huard has no arm strength which shortens the field they have to defend. Your going off on a tangent did not address what I told you. You don't know what you re talking about. How could you? You have no experience or training in this game. You will not get by with double talk with me. Huard is not an NFL QB. Me and 31 NFL team agree on that. Your 22 year old inexperienced, uneducated rantings notwithstanding. Shut the fuck up or come up with better reasoning.

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
He won't even play next week. HE IS DONE!!!!!



:clap: :clap: :clap:

I know he won't play next week, he has already been ruled out...

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX
One most certainly can - YOU won't because you're intent on not. That's why it's futile to dicuss anything with someone that already has their mind made up such as yourself.

BTW, today the Jags played the Chiefs straight up a great deal of the time and the O-line and running game still couldn't do anything. The running game is struggling mostly because the O-Line $UCKS. Go back and look at the 1st drive today and see what happened - it's all right there for you to view for yourself so you don't have to argue with anyone.

I'm not against Huard because he's hurting the running game. I'm against him because he's hurting the passing game and the entire team with his chickenshit decisions. He's a checkdown machine.

The O-line blows ass, and Solari is worse. But Huard is still shitacular.

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88
Go stick your head back in Carl's ass. No one gives a shit about anything you say. You are a clown and people such as yourself who blindly support crappy GMs who run teams into the ground are one of the most pathetic elements of sports.

People like yourself are one of the reasons Carl will remain in KC as long as he wants. Blind homers who will continue to support this organization and continue to shell out $$$, regardless of how many year go by without a playoff win and regardless of how far the team continues to sink in the abyss known as mediocrity.

You should go work for kcchiefs.com or perhaps Wargarbage Illustrated. At least those frauds are receiving a paycheck for giving up their backbones to King Carl.

Carl isn't a bad GM, not even close...

He's never put us in cap hell, and he always puts a quality team on the field...we've had several Super Bowl caliber teams in his tenure, just because the players and coaches haven't gotten it done on the field doesn't mean Carl isn't an above average and capable GM...

Halfcan 10-07-2007 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
That could be true...

He has a one week tryout against one of the worst defenses in the NFL...

He is out with injury dumbass.

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne
Do you think you are going to get away with a volume of rhetoric while ignoring what I said? It is NOT totally false. Green used progressions. Huard looks at one dude and bails. Huard has no arm strength which shortens the field they have to defend. Your going off on a tangent did not address what I told you. You don't know what you re talking about. How could you? You have no experience or training in this game. You will not get by with double talk with me. Huard is not an NFL QB. Me and 31 NFL team agree on that. Your 22 year old inexperienced, uneducated rantings notwithstanding. Shut the fuck up or come up with better reasoning.

Just because you're old, doesn't mean you're smart ROFL

You don't even talk football on this board...you just follow a certain band of people around and correct their grammar and punctuation.

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan
He is out with injury dumbass.

I
AM
AGREEING
WITH
YOU
HALF-MAN

FloridaMan88 10-07-2007 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Carl isn't a bad GM, not even close...

He's never put us in cap hell, and he always puts a quality team on the field...we've had several Super Bowl caliber teams in his tenure, just because the players and coaches haven't gotten it done on the field doesn't mean Carl isn't an above average and capable GM...


Never put the Chiefs in cap hell? Obviously you forget about the 2001 offseason that saw the Chiefs nearly $30 million over the salary cap. And you blaming the head coaches and players for the Chiefs failure to reach the Super Bowl is funny considering the one constant during the past 18 years that has seen every team in the division reach the Super Bowl except for the Chiefs has been the very GM that you are attempting to suckle.

Four head coaches (including a head coach who took 2 previous teams to the Super Bowl and won the Super Bowl with one of those teams).

At least 13 different starting QBs

... but the one constant has been Carl Peterson.

Hootie 10-07-2007 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88
Never put the Chiefs in cap hell? Obviously you forget about the 2001 offseason that saw the Chiefs nearly $30 million over the salary cap. And you blaming the head coaches and players for the Chiefs failure to reach the Super Bowl is funny considering the one constant during the past 18 years that has seen every team in the division reach the Super Bowl except for the Chiefs has been the very GM that you are attempting to suckle.

Four head coaches (including a head coach who took 2 previous teams to the Super Bowl and won the Super Bowl with one of those teams).

At least 13 different starting QBs

... but the one constant has been Carl Peterson.

I'm sorry that we don't share the same views...

What else do you want me to say?

Obviously I'm not going to get anywhere trying to defend Carl Peterson on this board...

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Carl isn't a bad GM, not even close...

He's never put us in cap hell, and he always puts a quality team on the field...we've had several Super Bowl caliber teams in his tenure, just because the players and coaches haven't gotten it done on the field doesn't mean Carl isn't an above average and capable GM...

We've won 3 playoff games in 19 years. fucking 3.

2001 called, it just wanted to remind you that you're a dumbass in regards to "cap hell".

We had two Super Bowl caliber teams, 1995 and '97. The 2003 team was castrated by the _efense.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Just because you're old, doesn't mean you're smart ROFL

You don't even talk football on this board...you just follow a certain band of people around and correct their grammar and punctuation.

He just made an entire post about Huard's problems in reading defenses and you addressed none of it. Then, you claim that he doesn't talk football when he's making a direct refutation of your football "knowledge" based on his own.

You are a stupid sonofabitch, and you're even dumber if you think we don't notice you trying to dodge, dodge, dodge.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
I'm sorry that we don't share the same views...

What else do you want me to say?

Obviously I'm not going to get anywhere trying to defend Carl Peterson on this board...

How about your back up your claims with some substance or shut the fuck up?

Hootie 10-07-2007 11:06 PM

Hamas...

Sometimes I just don't feel like arguing 1 against 3,000...

I'm happy to do it most of the time, but really, I don't have the energy right now.

Bump this thread when Croyle shows why he's EVERYONE'S JESUS in a few weeks and we can all have a good laugh...

Of course, when he struggles we'll all chalk it up to inexperience and claim Huard would've done twice as bad, just like we did last year with Trent (minus the inexperience part)...

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Hamas...

Sometimes I just don't feel like arguing 1 against 3,000...

I'm happy to do it most of the time, but really, I don't have the energy right now.

Bump this thread when Croyle shows why he's EVERYONE'S JESUS in a few weeks and we can all have a good laugh...

Of course, when he struggles we'll all chalk it up to inexperience and claim Huard would've done twice as bad, just like we did last year with Trent (minus the inexperience part)...

Did you ever stop to think that one of the reasons it's one against 3,000 is because you are so obviously wrong, and then bash people for doing the same things you are most guilty of?

Hootie 10-07-2007 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Did you ever stop to think that one of the reasons it's one against 3,000 is because you are so obviously wrong, and then bash people for doing the same things you are most guilty of?

first off, I'm almost never wrong...

Secondly, you're just one of those 'Damon can't do any right' groupies...you all team up together and quote each others' posts with the ROFL smiley and it makes you feel like one BIG happy fraternity that specializes in sucking each others' cocks.

I'M ON TO YOU

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
first off, I'm almost never wrong...

Secondly, you're just one of those 'Damon can't do any right' groupies...you all team up together and quote each others' posts with the ROFL smiley and it makes you feel like one BIG happy fraternity that specializes in sucking each others' cocks.

I'M ON TO YOU

Why aren't you trying to rebut Skip's assertion?

You are completely full of shit.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Sometimes I just don't feel like arguing 1 against 3,000...

I'm happy to do it most of the time, but really, I don't have the energy right now.

And you've had about 20 posts since this admission of defeat. You can't counter anyone with knowledge, insight, or accuracy, so like the crazy man screaming at the street corner, you just try and get your message across by shouting as loudly as possible.

Hootie 10-07-2007 11:44 PM

admission of defeat?!

I've argued why I like Huard MILLIONS of times...

There gets to a point where I'VE ****ING SAID IT SO MANY TIMES that it just gets tiring...

I like Huard.
You like Croyle.

WE DISAGREE.

Get OVER it JESUS Christ...

You made this thread, not me...you're the one with the problem, not me.

so **** yourself Prince.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-07-2007 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
admission of defeat?!

I've argued why I like Huard MILLIONS of times...

There gets to a point where I'VE ****ING SAID IT SO MANY TIMES that it just gets tiring...

I like Huard.
You like Croyle.

WE DISAGREE.

Get OVER it JESUS Christ...

You made this thread, not me...you're the one with the problem, not me.

so **** yourself Prince.

You can't even articulate why you like Huard with any shred of substantive support.

I don't hate Huard because he's Huard. I don't like Huard because he fucking sucks, he has no upside, and playing him is setting this franchise back.

Be content to live out the rest of Peterson's tenure in purgatory.

And how is a complete evasion of the topic NOT an admission of defeat??

CHIEF4EVER 10-07-2007 11:48 PM

Why do you have such a man crush on Huard Hootie? Did he tickle your peepee at a party or something?

Hootie 10-07-2007 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
You can't even articulate why you like Huard with any shred of substantive support.

I don't hate Huard because he's Huard. I don't like Huard because he fucking sucks, he has no upside, and playing him is setting this franchise back.

Be content to live out the rest of Peterson's tenure in purgatory.

And how is a complete evasion of the topic NOT an admission of defeat??

Evasion of topic?

Why don't you do a Hootie search and go look for reasons why I like Damon Huard. I've named them thousands of times.

It's a ****ing broken record Prince...your penis is SO much bigger than mine and everyone else's...YAY YOU

Hootie 10-07-2007 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHIEF4EVER
Why do you have such a man crush on Huard Hootie? Did he tickle your peepee at a party or something?

Why do all of you have such a vendetta against Huard? Did he **** all of your wives at a party or something?

CHIEF4EVER 10-07-2007 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Why do all of you have such a vendetta against Huard? Did he **** all of your wives at a party or something?

Easy there sport. I was just asking. You seem to have a more than minor thing for Damon. I don't have anything against the guy other than his being the wrong guy for the job. You are beginning to remind me of that chick in the movie 'The Crush'. Please tell me you don't have a candlelit shrine with pictures of him on your nightstand.

Hootie 10-08-2007 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHIEF4EVER
Easy there sport. I was just asking. You seem to have a more than minor thing for Damon. I don't have anything against the guy other than his being the wrong guy for the job. You are beginning to remind me of that chick in the movie 'The Crush'. Please tell me you don't have a candlelit shrine with pictures of him on your nightstand.

I don't have a nightstand, I'm straight.

Redcoats58 10-08-2007 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
'7 of which was off of a turnover from your boy'...

Yeah...

No.

He threw a pick when we were down 0-17...and the game was over.

I know everyone hates Huard on this board, but putting this loss on his shoulders is a ****ing joke. It's sickening, really...

We have a horrible playcalling coordinator, a terrible running game, a right tackle who cannot pass protect or run block, a center who gets manhandled every game, a right-guard who is in dire need of his roid supply, yet, we're going to blame the loss on Damon Huard??

You're right, because with our offense BUILT around LJ who wasn't even getting a yard per carry it's still going to be Damon Huard's fault...

At least Damon was moving the ball when they were calling passing plays...Solari was ****ing it up by even trying to run. We should've kept using the play-action until Jacksonville had an answer for it, instead Solari ****ed it up by even TRYING to run...there wasn't a single running lane created by our ridiculously awful offensive line the entire game.

LJ should just ****ing go on his inevitable rant RIGHT NOW, because I think it's due. **** Solari, **** the offensive line...I want to hear from LJ.

Aren't you the same person that said Trent Green doesn't fit in this system anymore but Huard does and this team is now built for a QB like Huard? Which is it? The line or Huard, Was it the line or Trent? Just saying...

Hootie 10-08-2007 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redcoats58
Aren't you the same person that said Trent Green doesn't fit in this system anymore but Huard does and this team is now built for a QB like Huard? Which is it? The line or Huard, Was it the line or Trent? Just saying...

The line is doing fine in pass protection...

They are awful in run blocking...

That wasn't a problem with Trent or Damon at QB last year.

Goldbrick 10-08-2007 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
the entire team played poorly...

This wasn't on Huard.

This is on Solari, the offensive line, LJ, etc...

WTF do you expect when we rush for 9 total yards?

Are you kidding? NINE YARDS RUSHING AND YOU EXPECT THE CHIEFS TO WIN WITH HUARD AT QB?

And besides, even when Croyle got in it's not like he played any better...

He looked JUST as timid and was throwing the same quick passes that everyone hates Huard throwing...

He lead the Chiefs on a meaningless touchdown drive when the Jags were blitzing four guys...

Someone explain to me how you think Croyle would've faired today with 9 friggin' rushing yards between LJ and Bennett...

You think the Chiefs would've won with Croyle?

If so, you're a ****ing idiot.

The Jags are a good ****ing team, that's all I know.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/120/2...61d896.jpg?v=0

Easy 6 10-08-2007 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Why do all of you have such a vendetta against Huard? Did he **** all of your wives at a party or something?

Its not a vendetta.

People are ready to try & build a future, Huard is NOT the future...its really as simple as that.

ChiefsCountry 10-08-2007 06:36 AM

You know this thread is just feeding the attention whore even more. Just what he wanted.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.