Hey look its a mirror!

http://www.lakewoodconferences.com/d...med_Mirror.jpg

Again, still waiting for your Gridiron Brilliance, Professor Asshat!

Excellant post. This is exactly what I'm saying. Prepare to be attacked for it. :)
Posted via Mobile Device

we already have a dominant LT

About what? Do you have a question, ass hole?
Posted via Mobile Device

Puh-leeze. Dominant?
Posted via Mobile Device

So your wanting to cut Albert already?

i would agree

I have EVERY problem taking a linemen at 3rd overall. Why? Because you don't pay linemen that kind of bank. You don't pay CORNERS that kind of bank, unless you happen to be a an old, geriatric, brain-dead fossil like Alzheimers Davis.

But please, Professor Asshat; enlighten me in the error of my ways!

The pistol requires three.

We're two drafts away from starting to improve the left side of the line.

Why bother. Obviously the only point of view that will please the ass hole club here is that a quarterback must be the pick no matter who that quarterback is. Any dissension amongst the other 85 percent on this board will not be tolerated without moronic verbal assault. You would think by listening to you amatuers that a OT, a LB, or a WR had never been taken with a #3 pick in the NFL. This only shows complete ignorance and its just a good thing the professionals who actually are doing the drafting don't read or give a shit what morons such as yourself have to say.
Posted via Mobile Device

I posted another thought in a different thread too...I'm getting more and more sold on Sanchez the more I find on him, but I can't say I'm completely comfortable with him either, there are obvious questions. But that's sort of a deducted thought process and not necessarily because he's the best player available, has to do more with dollars and need.

I'm in love with the idea of taking one of these badass centers with the 2nd round pick to help shore up some OL. However, again, that means we MUST address defense in FA if we are to compete at all this season, and I think we will.

Free Agency will change every thread on this website. I'm looking forward to it...just hoping Pioli has some ideas, and that we can land a couple keepers. Doesn't sound like Pioli is too worried about Cassel, I'd post a link but I can't, it's on PFT.

Some hopefuls:

FA (Ravens) Jason Brown, Bart Scott - I'll take em both, thank you.
FA (NYJ) Tony Richardson - Call it a homer, but he's the best FB I've ever seen.
FA (Bolts) Igor Olshansky - best 3-4 guy IMO that won't cost us a mint, he's a second contract guy, and 26 years old.

Nice cop-out, you half a pussy-fart! Check your User CP for your reward!

4321

abort yourself

How many right tackles and coverage linebackers who dont rush the passer were taken #3 overall?

Actually, you can take LT's that high. Corners no.

I await this answer.

When did I say cut Albert?
Posted via Mobile Device

Based on "basic drafting principles" of no real creed, I completely agree.

Top 5 CB though...I would've taken Bailey that high coming out.

Then why draft a LT?

Jesus ****. Why would you spend the #15 pick on a guy to play RT when he's already proven he can play LT and you can get RTs in the 3rd and 4th rounds? Moreover, why blow a #3 pick on an LT when you already have one and you need a quarterback and there are two elite prospects?

I'm certainly not equating the guy to DT or LT, but what is all the negative buzz on Curry's pass rush abilities? That may not have been his highlight reel, but he makes a lot of plays behind the line...the guy is quick.

Clint Sintim seems to me to be the guy if you want a rushing OLB in this one, and he's certainly not that early pick...but I'm just saying, Curry looks solid.

"for the sake of debate" - do these words mean something other than what I thought? Are you guys all fired up on whiskey and just angry about something?

Its clear alot of people dont understand draft value and core postions.

Resign Tony Richardson?

LMAO LMAO LMAO

And I was genuinely just throwing it out for debate, we should, and will draft one of these 2 guys.

Aaron Curry isn't Lawrence Taylor. It's not what he does. He's Derrick Brooks if he absolutely becomes everything he could ever hope to be.

Rush backers change games. Cover backers make it more difficult to pass to the tight end and run to the outside.

The mere fact that a guy is a LB doesn't mean he's the same as every other backer.

A 4-3 DE is far different than a 3-4 DE, and a 3-4 DT is far different from a 4-3 DT.

Why are you asking? What does this have to do with anything I've said in this thread. Right tackle? I don't know wtf you are talking about. My position is this. If Pioli determines the qbs in question are good enough to warrant taking them at #3 he will and should do it. If he doesn't then he won't and shouldn't and in the long history of the nfl non quarterbacks have been taken with the #3 and making such a selection was not an act of a reerun.

That is a reasonable position taken by most fans. But the it must be qb no matter what crowd here has bonded together like a gay dance troupe. Enjoy your circle jerk. Please remember to use condoms when inserting your dicks in each others mouths

I'm still waiting to hear more about your leaders position that sanchez should be picked because his brother went to Yale.

Asswipes.
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh c'mon....how can you not love TRICH!?! :D

Ok.

Here's why you can't.

You've already given Branden Albert 10-15 million in guarantees and close to 30 overall.

If you moved him to RT that makes him one of the highest paid RTs in the league, which is a far less important position than LT, a position at which he has shown pro bowl potential, and at which he isn't even paid that much.

Plus, most RTs in this league are mid rounders.

So if you move Albert to RT you do several things--

You significantly decrease his draft value
You significantly hamper your cap because you are far above the average pay scale for the position at which he'll play
You move him to a less important position on the OL which he is not as well suited to play.

Moreover, you've created a hole at the most important position on the offensive line.

So, would you rather pay Branden Albert 30 mil to protect your blindside, and someone like Feneki Tupou 3 million, and draft a guy like Sanchez or Stafford to be your franchise QB...

or,

Would you rather pay Eugene Monroe 55 million, Albert 30, and have Tyler Thigpen as your franchise QB, while paying Nate Davis or Rhett Bomar 3-5 million?

It doesn't make any sense.

You are a complete ****ing cum rag.

Definitely, there's no denying any of that, but hell, Brooks changed a lot of games too. No doubt there's a lot to be said for schemes and specific talents of individuals...

We need to get Michael Johnson with our 1st because he might not make it to when we draft in the 2nd.

Of course! Because it's safer!

The only position that has ever busted--there's that mother****ing word, again-- in round 1 in the history of the NFL draft is QB.

Because this explains why QB should be our pick.

And Curry is not remotely as fast as Brooks was...

It's just not worth it you'd be better off taking a guy like Marcus Freeman in the 3rd round.

You people are still debating this from this morning? If a QB is worth the pick, then I'm sure we'll take it, if not, then I'm asuming that we'll do what is best for the TEAM....

Question: If we DON'T take a QB with the 1st rd pick, will all the QB (it's this year or bust) crowd turn on Pioli? :doh!:

You know, I'm extremely happy with Albert's play thus far and agree he's got that kind of potential...to quote Haley, "Brandon is the least of our problems". But we are far from complete up front, and definitely need a C/RG/RT in my opinion, and that's just the line.

Again, I'm interested to see what we do in FA to address some of these "holes".

If the draft were tomorrow, I agree we're taking a QB.

We'll just be ****ed for 3 years so it's not really a position I'd like to be in.

Because you are convinced the qbs in question are worth it. Fine. If Pioli agrees you got it. If not you don't and you can either figure Pioli knows what he's doing or you can convince yourself you know much more than he does.
Posted via Mobile Device

Please walk into this:

http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u...alomartree.jpg

ROFL

Either tell us why these qb's aren't worth it or STFU!!!

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

Of course they will because they are effen geniuses. The draft is "their thing". Of course in a few years when the chiefs are strong contenders the same people will be jumping on the Pioli/Haley bandwagon claiming they knew it all along. Always the same with internet geniuses.
Posted via Mobile Device

:crybaby: man, I want to post graphics.

Are you Scott Pioli in subterfuge, or do you just wash his balls?

What position if we didn't need a QB?

doggy sans astro-glide.

Well, if I had a million dollars, I'd...

...there's no getting around it, we need one, bad. However, to comply...Defensive front 7, no question to me - specific player TBD on base defense.

:D

This is great. First off, can ya read? I'm not making the ****ing pick. You are not making the ****ing pick. PIoli is making the pick. So why do I have to show that neither qb is worth it? I wasn't all that impressed in stafford when I saw him. And I would think a "franchise qb" would impress me in college. Bottom line is for the 88th time its not up to us. I trust Piolis judgement if he picks one of the two fine. If he doesn't then evidently he wasn't impressed. Why does this bother the shit out of you guys so much

Do you really think you know any of this crap more than Pioli???
Posted via Mobile Device

He IS Pioli! ROFL

The biggest part of this evaluation has to be the interviews/film study sessions where teams get to watch these guys break down tape and demonstrate their intellectual ability to be a QB. And without being privy to these sessions, I don't know how anyone other than the teams and the people these teams talk to would have a clue what the facts on these guys really are.

:spock:

Why are you posting on a football message board then?

You realize that this is supposed to be the entire purpose of this type of forum? We actually debate things here.

Is "Leave it to Pioli" it?

I get it. This is your schtick. It's like how Blueballs writes in verse rather than prose. You're the any answer is "Pioli" guy.

We don't know what the **** Pioli is going to do! That is why we can have opinions about it. That's what the board is for, discussing/arguing about the chiefs. If you're not going to argue for a position why are you here? You offer nothing to this board.

Frankly if it were me either front defensive seven or offensive line.
Best available


I see what this is really all about. You guys really do think you know more than Pioli. You are that psycho to think that.

Internet chat users. Pretty sad.

And because I readily admit that a guy who helped build a dynasty knows more than me I'm suddenly a ballwasher?

**** you. Don't choke on your cheetos losers.
Posted via Mobile Device

And I can have an opinion about it too so **** you.

Your qb only crowd constantly insults those whose opinion differs but when you get a push back you act like you are being told you can't have an opinion. Its not an outragous thing to say that I do trust Pioli. The guy has helped build a champion. What has been won here?
Posted via Mobile Device

**** you douchebag. I guess you know more than Pioli right internet genius?
Posted via Mobile Device

Nice take, and Rep!










DID YOU SEE THAT PROFESSOR ASSHAT? THAT'S HOW IT'S ****ING DONE.

Uh-oh. Now they are going to call you a Pioli ballwasher.
Posted via Mobile Device

You really need a new schtick.

You do realize that sooner or later Pioli is going to make a 1st round pick that is going to bust, or he is going to pass on someone that turns out to be really good. And when that happens there will be a bunch of people on here that will have been right about the bust or right about the stud we passed over. Pioli isn't infallible. A lot of people on here have pretty informed opinions. If you give them a chance you might learn something.

You can. You just aren't required to call people noobs and reeruns and ballwashers if they don't agree with you

To debate the draft and call people idiots you disagree with. Its almost like you are in a psychotic fantasy world where you think if you win the argument then that thing is going to happen. Why can't you discuss it without abusing people and acting like what gets determined in here is the ****ing end of the world? Lighten the **** up will you people?
Posted via Mobile Device

It's schtick. From username to posts.

Has to be.

And to respond to the previous, I don't believe I've ever called anyone a name on this forum. I might be wrong, but it's typically not my style, and it would be a rare occurrence.

Who said he was infallible? Of course he'll.make mistakes. But he knows more than anyone here that's for sure
Posted via Mobile Device

Ride with it, man. These guys are successful in throwing their weight around here and nowhere else.

Monday morning they'll have no choice but to be eating shit again. That fuel burns hot.

Maybe you haven't. Others have.

So now we have the new catchphrase. Schtick.

One guy says it so now everyone else will to?

Brilliant
Posted via Mobile Device

What is that, 'Hamas'?

Yes, that one guy was me.

Why do you keep talking about Pioli? Are you his wife? She knows more about him than anyone on here, that's for sure. No one should act like they know anything about Pioli since they don't know as much about him as his wife.

http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/7503/tom2.jpg

No, you stupid ****ing ball-licker; he brought a fresh perspective on the overall gist of the topic.

He brought something no one else had touched on, and he did so in a manner that didn't come across as a butt-hurt n00b dancing the hokey-pokey with a carrot up his ass!

OK....there's really no good QBs for the next 3 years?? You're really set against Bradford?? Even after he said he's not ready for the NFL, and needs to build body stength and better recognization skills? Just asking...

Sounds like this is becoming a pissing match (or mismatch) so I'll just go back to minding myown business.

This is the most solid arguement for drafting a QB at 3. Now, if by some miracle we could trade out of 3 and back a couple of spots and still get the guy we want, then great. I just don't see it happening. I think our best bet is to "gamble" on Sanchez and see if he can be our Franchise QB.

I will say this, if we draft him we sure the hell better get some players to protect him so we don't ruin him right away. That's a lot of money to spend on a piñata.

No shit.

I think this guy is Pioli's little net-troll.

"Alright Wang, get your ass on the net and find out the general pulse of the fan base on several forums".

Oooohhh, yes SIR Mr. Pioree; sankyou"!

I'm sorry. I thought this was a football forum. I believe the GM who is running the draft is a big part of the draft discussion

So go back to whacking off
Posted via Mobile Device

Personally, I haven't seen a single post by El Zombo that is substantive. I'm sure I missed something but they're few and far between if they exist at all.

From what I can tell, all he's done since he arrived is slam other posters and remind us all that Pioli knows more than we do - which, of course, may well be true. Nevertheless, it kind of hampers conversation.

Based on his English skills, Zombo is uneducated. And probably socially inept, as well. I'm going to chalk it up to that, but I wish he'd at least come forward with some ideas and forgo this constant comparison of our experience as NFL front office executives and Pioli's.

FAX THE WEARY OF THIS

Have you even used your dick for anything the last 8 or 9 years for anything other than jamming it into your hand?
Posted via Mobile Device

Absolutely.

Improving the QB position and improving the O-line aren't mutually exclusive. We can do both this off-season, and both are pressing needs.

But the point is to identify the best avenues to accomplish these goals. We're already solid at LT. It would be beyond foolish to even consider taking a RT, guard, or center with our first-round pick.

So you are proposing that our forum adopt the view that expressing an partially informed opinion about the GM is okay but doing the same about a player is out of bounds?