ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Your Top 5 picks for the #3 overall. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205528)

dirk digler 04-08-2009 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5651221)
By the same token, we should read too LITTLE into the Chiefs not signing him to a deal.

This idea that Cassel is the starting QB and there's no other possibility is absurd and will be absurd until the day he signs.

I think if they don't draft a QB fairly early I think it would be safe to assume Cassel will be the starting QB on opening day.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5650593)
You need freaking glasses, dude. More than half of those guys are complete BUSTS.

And I'm sorry, but you're putting Leonard Davis in the "good" category. That's flat-out laughable.

Then you should make it your mission in life to go tell all the NFL players this past season who voted him into the Pro Bowl that they don't know jack shit because you think he sucks.

Mecca 04-08-2009 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5651766)
Then you should make it your mission in life to go tell all the NFL players this past season who voted him into the Pro Bowl that they don't know jack shit because you think he sucks.

You're reading comprehension sucks.

A player drafted in the top 5 to be a LT that ends up as a guard pro bowl or not is a bust. If you drafted a guard top 5 you'd be the laughing stock of the entire ****ing league, got it?

DJ's left nut 04-08-2009 03:36 PM

1) Stafford
2) Sanchez
3) Crabtree
4) Raji (if clean)
5) Curry
6) Brown (if Raji is a too stupid to stay off the hippy lettuce during the combine)

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5651817)
You're reading comprehension sucks.

A player drafted in the top 5 to be a LT that ends up as a guard pro bowl or not is a bust. If you drafted a guard top 5 you'd be the laughing stock of the entire ****ing league, got it?

Go tell it to the Cardinals. They drafted him and played him at guard for his first three seasons in the league. Seems to me that they drafted him as a guard, played him as a guard, Dallas signed him to play guard, and subsequently he made the Pro Bowl playing as a guard.

All I'm saying is that he was in the Pro Bowl last season and that other players typically don't vote guys in who suck. And "busts" don't usually end up in the Pro Bowl. So, perhaps I do have some comprehension problems where I'm equating the Pro Bowl to not being a bust. I guess others around here have a different understanding of what being in the Pro Bowl means.

Mecca 04-08-2009 03:44 PM

Apparently you don't understand the value of positions, good to know that.

milkman 04-08-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5651839)
Go tell it to the Cardinals. They drafted him and played him at guard for his first three seasons in the league. Seems to me that they drafted him as a guard, played him as a guard, Dallas signed him to play guard, and subsequently he made the Pro Bowl playing as a guard.

All I'm saying is that he was in the Pro Bowl last season and that other players typically don't vote guys in who suck. And "busts" don't usually end up in the Pro Bowl. So, perhaps I do have some comprehension problems where I'm equating the Pro Bowl to not being a bust. I guess others around here have a different understanding of what being in the Pro Bowl means.

Who the **** cares where the Cards played him.

They drafted him to play LT, and when they finally did play him at LT they thought enough of him to let him hit the FA market.

He's the kind of safe pick you jizz your pants over.

And the pro bowl means exactly jack.

Oh, oh, oh, we can play him at guard if he can't play LT!

JFC, you are one stupid mother****er.

Mecca 04-08-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5651855)
Who the **** cares where the Cards played him.

They drafted him to play LT, and when they finally did play him at LT they thought enough of him to let him hit the FA market.

He's the kind of safe pick you jizz your pants over.

And the pro bowl means exactly jack.

Oh, oh, oh, we can play him at guard if he can't play LT!

JFC, you are one stupid mother****er.

He's either just trying to be annoying or he's really stupid, I'm not sure which.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5651841)
Apparently you don't understand the value of positions, good to know that.

Apparently you don't understand the concept of "bust." Nobody is discussing positional value and it wasn't even mentioned in the discussion until you brought it up, and it has absolutely zero relevance in this exchange. I mean, seriously - WTF? Who gives a rats ass what position he plays? The initial impetus for this was that someone stated a moronic generalization that all Texas players suck. I pointed out that he's from Texas, was in the Pro Bowl, so it's at least obvious to other players in the NFL, who I think know a little bit more about the game and the qualities that separate a good player from one that is a bust than you, that he isn't a bust and is considered, at least by his peers (who probably don't give a flying **** about the opinions of some internet football junkie who is so pigheaded that he can't get beyond the whole initial "But he was drafted #2 so he HAS to play LT or I will consider him a completely worthless player and a bust even though he did go to the Pro Bowl" concept).

Mecca 04-08-2009 03:56 PM

A top 5 player that plays guard is a bust, why don't you just take a center with the 1st pick then if positions don't matter, hey take a kicker!

This offseason has really brought out the complete dipshits.

doomy3 04-08-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5651867)
A top 5 player that plays guard is a bust, why don't you just take a center with the 1st pick then if positions don't matter, hey take a kicker!

This offseason has really brought out the complete dipshits.

but yet a guy like Joey Harrington isn't a bust because he is still a backup QB in this league?

Mecca 04-08-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5651871)
but yet a guy like Joey Harrington isn't a bust because he is still a backup QB in this league?

I wouldn't exactly call him good, he's not Akili Smith bad but he wasn't a good pick or anything like that.

doomy3 04-08-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5651873)
I wouldn't exactly call him good, he's not Akili Smith bad but he wasn't a good pick or anything like that.

OK, I'm just trying to figure this out.

A guy who was drafted to be a LT, but has turned into an All Pro guard is a bust, but a guy who was drafted to be a franchise QB but has turned out to be a career backup who has been on 4 different teams you just "wouldn't exactly call good."

Mecca 04-08-2009 04:03 PM

Niether one of them were good picks how hard is this to understand?

Does everyones brain just ****ing fall out during draft season? This semantic arguing game is getting really ****ing annoying really ****ing fast. So knock it the **** off and talk like you have a god damn brain.

htismaqe 04-08-2009 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5651766)
Then you should make it your mission in life to go tell all the NFL players this past season who voted him into the Pro Bowl that they don't know jack shit because you think he sucks.

He made the Pro Bowl as a GUARD. He wasn't DRAFTED as a guard.

And yes, it does matter.

htismaqe 04-08-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5651746)
I think if they don't draft a QB fairly early I think it would be safe to assume Cassel will be the starting QB on opening day.

Well, of course, that's a no-brainer. But we are talking about drafting a QB in this thread, so...

Mecca 04-08-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5651898)
He made the Pro Bowl as a GUARD. He wasn't DRAFTED as a guard.

And yes, it does matter.

It's a losing battle...

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5651855)
Who the **** cares where the Cards played him.

They drafted him to play LT, and when they finally did play him at LT they thought enough of him to let him hit the FA market.

You may be the dumbest person on this board. Seriously. Did you just talk to someone in the Cardinals organization and they specifically told you that they drafted him to be a LT? Because, it seems to me, that if you are drafted to play LT, then you play LT. However, Davis played GUARD for not only his first season in the league with the team that drafted him, but also his second and third. That would indicate that *gasp* they drafted him to play guard, since that's what they exactly did.

Quote:

He's the kind of safe pick you jizz your pants over.
Not at the #2 spot. Guards, quality guards can be found deep into the draft. I wouldn't have drafted him at the #2 spot to play guard. Cardinals apparently did though. If it works you up this much, perhaps you should call some one in their organization and see if you can't get a satisfactory explanation on their reasoning behind the pick. I'd hate to see you get an ulcer or something over this.

Quote:

And the pro bowl means exactly jack.
So, you think that if a guy gets voted to the Pro Bowl in his eighth season of playing football in the league, who has started every game he's played in, a vote by his peers no less, that that means exactly jack? Yeah, I guess the players don't know shit, and we should take the word of some internet dildo who thinks that you can still be an eighth year pro, get voted to the Pro Bowl and still be a bust. Thanks for clearing that up for us Milk. You da man!

Quote:

JFC, you are one stupid mother****er.
This must be a case of the classic euphemism "Takes one to know one."

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5651889)
Niether one of them were good picks how hard is this to understand?

Does everyones brain just ****ing fall out during draft season? This semantic arguing game is getting really ****ing annoying really ****ing fast. So knock it the **** off and talk like you have a god damn brain.

You first.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5651898)
He made the Pro Bowl as a GUARD. He wasn't DRAFTED as a guard.

And yes, it does matter.

Htis, you usually have a little more sense and rationality than the rest of these people. If the Cardinals played him at guard his rookie, as well as subsequent seasons, wouldn't that indicate that he was drafted to play at guard?

But regardless of the draft position issue, if a guy is an eighth year player who has started every game of his career and has made the Pro Bowl, does that equate to a "bust?" Yes or no?

SBK 04-08-2009 04:16 PM

findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

SBK 04-08-2009 04:18 PM

Because Davis at G was such a raging success for the Cardinals I heard the Raiders decided to draft Robert Gallery at 2 to play LG for them.

doomy3 04-08-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5651930)
Because Davis at G was such a raging success for the Cardinals I heard the Raiders decided to draft Robert Gallery at 2 to play LG for them.

Well, Robert Gallery could most definitely be a better draft pick than Jamarcus Russell...

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5651930)
Because Davis at G was such a raging success for the Cardinals I heard the Raiders decided to draft Robert Gallery at 2 to play LG for them.

See? This is the type of stupidity that runs rampant on this board. Don't answer a direct question, but rather make some irrelevant smart ass remark because you are either:

a. Wrong
b. Stupid

Gallery was initially played at the LT spot his rookie season, so the logical assumption would be that he was initially drafted to play at the left tackle position. However, Leonard Davis played at guard for the first three years of his career. In his fourth season, the Cardinals decided to try him at LT, but found that he was more effective at his natural guard position. Dallas acquired him prior to the start of the 2007 season, giving him a seven year, $49 million dollar contract to play GUARD, which he did effectively enough to be voted to the Pro Bowl in 2008.

Mecca 04-08-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5651926)
findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

The ones this year are far worse.

KCrockaholic 04-08-2009 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5650478)
I think people understand the QB position plenty.

I also think that common sense tells you that the Chiefs aren't taking a QB third overall after trading a 2nd rounder for one just months ago.

I'm not putting QBs in my top 5 because I don't think there is a realistic chance it happens.

1. Curry
2. Crabtree
3. Raji
4. Smith
5. Brown


Best top 5 ive seen so far. Although Brown is growing on me. I would put him above Smith.

KCrockaholic 04-08-2009 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5651946)
Well, Robert Gallery could most definitely be a better draft pick than Jamarcus Russell...

As bad as they both are...This is the truth.

ChiefsCountry 04-08-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5651926)
findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

Findthedr actually knew some football he just had his mouth on Trevor Laws dick all the time.

CupidStunt 04-08-2009 05:23 PM

1. Brown
2. Sanchez
3. Curry
4. J. Smith
5. Stafford

SBK 04-08-2009 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 5652002)
As bad as they both are...This is the truth.

Picking a LG at 2 and paying him over $50,000,000 is as bad as picking someone who flames out of the league before their first contract is up.

If you pick a LT (the only position on the O-line you pick that high) in the top 5 and they play G that pick was a massive bust, no matter how good of a G they are.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5652070)
Picking a LG at 2 and paying him over $50,000,000 is as bad as picking someone who flames out of the league before their first contract is up.

If you pick a LT (the only position on the O-line you pick that high) in the top 5 and they play G that pick was a massive bust, no matter how good of a G they are.

Okie dokes. Just so I know now.

If you are a guard, and make it to the Pro Bowl = suckage/bustola.

Thank you SBK, that helps to clarify the whole discussion.

However...

It is kinda weird to see that three of the top five offensive linemen in the NFL in terms of 2008 salaries were interior linemen (not tackles). Maybe all the NFL GM's should be reading this board so that they have a better understanding of positional value and so they can better negotiate with the players and their agents.

milkman 04-08-2009 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5651902)
You may be the dumbest person on this board. Seriously. Did you just talk to someone in the Cardinals organization and they specifically told you that they drafted him to be a LT? Because, it seems to me, that if you are drafted to play LT, then you play LT. However, Davis played GUARD for not only his first season in the league with the team that drafted him, but also his second and third. That would indicate that *gasp* they drafted him to play guard, since that's what they exactly did.



Not at the #2 spot. Guards, quality guards can be found deep into the draft. I wouldn't have drafted him at the #2 spot to play guard. Cardinals apparently did though. If it works you up this much, perhaps you should call some one in their organization and see if you can't get a satisfactory explanation on their reasoning behind the pick. I'd hate to see you get an ulcer or something over this.



So, you think that if a guy gets voted to the Pro Bowl in his eighth season of playing football in the league, who has started every game he's played in, a vote by his peers no less, that that means exactly jack? Yeah, I guess the players don't know shit, and we should take the word of some internet dildo who thinks that you can still be an eighth year pro, get voted to the Pro Bowl and still be a bust. Thanks for clearing that up for us Milk. You da man!



This must be a case of the classic euphemism "Takes one to know one."

Good god, you are the stupoidest mother****er to ever pound on a keyboard.

I don't give a rat's ass where they played him for his first three seasons, they didn't draft a player that high in the draft to play guard.

They clearly saw what became evident when they did finally play him there to everyone to see.

He sucked ass at LT.

Only a ****ing moron of epic proportions would even think to suggest that he was drafted to play guard with the #2 overall pick.

Jesus Christ, I didn't think it was possible to be this ****ing stupid.

Hell, there isn't a descriptor to do justice to your stupidity.

Hammock Parties 04-08-2009 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5648585)
1. Trade down.
2. Trade down.
3. Trade down.
4. Trade down.
5. Trade down.

Yup.

NO ONE we draft at #3 is going to be worth a 50 million dollar contract.

NO ONE.

Unless it's Sanchez. If we take him we're trading him, IMO.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-08-2009 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5651902)
You may be the dumbest person on this board. Seriously. Did you just talk to someone in the Cardinals organization and they specifically told you that they drafted him to be a LT? Because, it seems to me, that if you are drafted to play LT, then you play LT. However, Davis played GUARD for not only his first season in the league with the team that drafted him, but also his second and third. That would indicate that *gasp* they drafted him to play guard, since that's what they exactly did.



Not at the #2 spot. Guards, quality guards can be found deep into the draft. I wouldn't have drafted him at the #2 spot to play guard. Cardinals apparently did though. If it works you up this much, perhaps you should call some one in their organization and see if you can't get a satisfactory explanation on their reasoning behind the pick. I'd hate to see you get an ulcer or something over this.



So, you think that if a guy gets voted to the Pro Bowl in his eighth season of playing football in the league, who has started every game he's played in, a vote by his peers no less, that that means exactly jack? Yeah, I guess the players don't know shit, and we should take the word of some internet dildo who thinks that you can still be an eighth year pro, get voted to the Pro Bowl and still be a bust. Thanks for clearing that up for us Milk. You da man!



This must be a case of the classic euphemism "Takes one to know one."

He was drafted to play LT b/c he was drafted #2 overall and no one drafts guards in the top 15, let alone the top 2. Same with centers, right tackles and fullbacks.

Kill yourself.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-08-2009 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5652113)
Hell, there isn't a descriptor to do justice to your stupidity.

The only thing I can think of:

If human rights were intelligence, he'd be the Holocaust.

RealSNR 04-08-2009 05:58 PM

Sackofgoo-

If Glenn Dorsey fails again at DT this season, but ends up having hidden potential as a long snapper to the point that he is the next Kendall Gammon, does that make him a bust?

The answer is YES.

A good guard is more valuable than a good long snapper, sure, but it's the same principle

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5652113)
I don't give a rat's ass where they played him for his first three seasons...

That's obvious.

Quote:

...they didn't draft a player that high in the draft to play guard.
Apparently they did. Maybe it was just the Cardinals plan to make sure he became accustomed to the speed of the NFL, and decided to work him into the LT position by playing him at guard for his first three seasons in the league. I'm just throwing out some guesses here...obviously you took my initial advice, called the Cardinals and they specifically told you that they drafted him to play left tackle. You seem so sure that this is the case that you must have some concrete inside information.

Quote:

They clearly saw what became evident when they did finally play him there to everyone to see.

He sucked ass at LT.
I don't know. I didn't watch many Cardinal games when he was at the LT position for them. He started every game, so he must have been a better alternative for them at the LT spot than others. I guess I'll have to trust your superior football analyzing skills for the final determining factor of him sucking ass or not. I'm sure you know a lot more about sucking ass than I do.

Quote:

Only a ****ing moron of epic proportions would even think to suggest that he was drafted to play guard with the #2 overall pick.
It's probably a feasible explanation as to why the Cardinals have struggled up until this year. Do you personally know the one responsible for picking a guard that high in 2001 in the Cardinals organization? You must, because you are calling them a moron.

Quote:

Jesus Christ, I didn't think it was possible to be this ****ing stupid.
It's okay. Most stupid people don't realize that they are stupid, and it is usually genetic. I'd ask if your parents are stupid too, but then, with you being so stupid, you probably wouldn't know if they were stupid or not. I kinda feel bad for you in a way. I'm sorry if I somehow provoked your stupidity into actually being showcased on a public internets forum. I promise I'll try to help you from here on out. I've worked with reeruns in the past doing some court ordered charity work, so I think I'll be able to help you out here.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5652123)
He was drafted to play LT b/c he was drafted #2 overall and no one drafts guards in the top 15, let alone the top 2. Same with centers, right tackles and fullbacks.

Kill yourself.

Remember, I'm stupid. Perhaps you should show me how do it, then I promise I'll copy what you do.

RealSNR 04-08-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652165)
Remember, I'm stupid. Perhaps you should show me how do it, then I promise I'll copy what you do.

Your comebacks suck. So do you.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5652175)
Your comebacks suck. So do you.

What? You didn't like how I talked to your girlfriend? You feel like you have to defend her virtue?

RealSNR 04-08-2009 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652183)
What? You didn't like how I talked to your girlfriend? You feel like you have to defend her virtue?

Now I don't even know WTF you're talking about. :spock:

Have you ever visited Warpaint Illustrated? They seem more like your type.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 06:20 PM

You know, I was wondering, do you think that Sebastian Janikowski was orginally drafted as a OLB, but was a bust, so they switched him to place kicker?

RealSNR 04-08-2009 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652192)
You know, I was wondering, do you think that Sebastian Janikowski was orginally drafted as a OLB, but was a bust, so they switched him to place kicker?

No. What's your point?

htismaqe 04-08-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5651924)
Htis, you usually have a little more sense and rationality than the rest of these people. If the Cardinals played him at guard his rookie, as well as subsequent seasons, wouldn't that indicate that he was drafted to play at guard?

But regardless of the draft position issue, if a guy is an eighth year player who has started every game of his career and has made the Pro Bowl, does that equate to a "bust?" Yes or no?

Nope.

The expectation was that Davis was going to be the cornerstone of the line but he couldn't hack it and they moved him to guard.

And you can't just say "regardless of the draft position". He was the 2nd overall pick for Christ's sake...

Coogs 04-08-2009 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 5651998)
Best top 5 ive seen so far. Although Brown is growing on me. I would put him above Smith.

On Path to the Draft tonight, the special segment was on the defensive ends. Casserly, Davis, and Mayock were all less than impressed with Brown. Both as a 4-3 defensive end and as a 3-4 OLB. Pretty well said he could get exposed big time in either setting. That is me paraphrasing.

htismaqe 04-08-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 5652352)
On Path to the Draft tonight, the special segment was on the defensive ends. Casserly, Davis, and Mayock were all less than impressed with Brown. Both as a 4-3 defensive end and as a 3-4 OLB. Pretty well said he could get exposed big time in either setting. That is me paraphrasing.

Yeah, I've cooled on Brown. Somebody mentioned the FSU legacy the other day and it got me thinking about it, and I've just been down on him ever since. I really don't see any way he'll be good enough for the 4-3 which is really going to limit who looks at him.

Coogs 04-08-2009 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652382)
Yeah, I've cooled on Brown. Somebody mentioned the FSU legacy the other day and it got me thinking about it, and I've just been down on him ever since. I really don't see any way he'll be good enough for the 4-3 which is really going to limit who looks at him.

FWIW, Davis did say he could be taught more pass rush moves, and it would be up to the coaches to teach him a few more. But they really could see him struggling in the pass defense area in a 3-4 OLB spot.

Definately a buyer beware type.

crazycoffey 04-08-2009 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5652126)
The only thing I can think of:

If human rights were intelligence, he'd be the Holocaust.

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5652113)
Good god, you are the stupoidest mother****er to ever pound on a keyboard.

I don't give a rat's ass where they played him for his first three seasons, they didn't draft a player that high in the draft to play guard.

They clearly saw what became evident when they did finally play him there to everyone to see.

He sucked ass at LT.

Only a ****ing moron of epic proportions would even think to suggest that he was drafted to play guard with the #2 overall pick.

Jesus Christ, I didn't think it was possible to be this ****ing stupid.

Hell, there isn't a descriptor to do justice to your stupidity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5651926)
findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5651889)
Niether one of them were good picks how hard is this to understand?

Does everyones brain just ****ing fall out during draft season? This semantic arguing game is getting really ****ing annoying really ****ing fast. So knock it the **** off and talk like you have a god damn brain.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5652175)
Your comebacks suck. So do you.


why the big poundage on Saccogoo? Actually, more importantly, is it ever going to be possible to debate different opinions without all the intense animosity fodder?

see how htismaqe does it? all class.....



Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652338)
Nope.

The expectation was that Davis was going to be the cornerstone of the line but he couldn't hack it and they moved him to guard.

And you can't just say "regardless of the draft position". He was the 2nd overall pick for Christ's sake...


OnTheWarpath15 04-08-2009 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5651926)
findthedr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sackofgoo

No ****ing shit.

I take back all (or at least most) of the bad things I said about findthedr.

He looks like a goddamn football genius compared to some of the dipshits that graced us with their presence this offseason.

OnTheWarpath15 04-08-2009 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5652126)
The only thing I can think of:

If human rights were intelligence, he'd be the Holocaust.

LMAO

OnTheWarpath15 04-08-2009 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyCoffey (Post 5652528)
why the big poundage on Saccogoo? Actually, more importantly, is it ever going to be possible to debate different opinions without all the intense animosity fodder?

see how htismaqe does it? all class.....

As the great Patrick Swayze (LMAO) once said: (paraphrasing)

There's a time to be nice, and a time to not be so nice.

Sack-o-shit has gone WELL over the acceptable patience levels with his dipshittery - he deserves whatever he gets.

SAUTO 04-08-2009 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5652560)
As the great Patrick Swayze (LMAO) once said: (paraphrasing)

There's a time to be nice, and a time to not be so nice.

Sack-o-shit has gone WELL over the acceptable patience levels with his dipshittery - he deserves whatever he gets.

swayze=great?????:p

OnTheWarpath15 04-08-2009 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5652567)
swayze=great?????:p

Thus the LMAO

SAUTO 04-08-2009 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5652587)
Thus the LMAO

ROFL there are people that think that way though(sure as hell not me)

htismaqe 04-08-2009 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 5652524)
FWIW, Davis did say he could be taught more pass rush moves, and it would be up to the coaches to teach him a few more. But they really could see him struggling in the pass defense area in a 3-4 OLB spot.

Definately a buyer beware type.

Well, it stands to reason. He's a boom/bust prospect if there ever was one. He's definitely got the most explosive first step of any pass rusher in this draft. I've heard some say he's got one of the best 1st steps they've EVER SEEN, which is phenomenal.

But he's just not fluid in the open field. Who knows, maybe he'll be the next DT. After all, DT had similar holes in his game, even as a pro. Then again, maybe he'll be the next Andre Wadsworth...

DeezNutz 04-08-2009 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5652560)
As the great Patrick Swayze (LMAO) once said: (paraphrasing)

There's a time to be nice, and a time to not be so nice.

Sack-o-shit has gone WELL over the acceptable patience levels with his dipshittery - he deserves whatever he gets.

If I were him, I would have ****ed the shit out of the skanky blond. Never could understand that decision.

SAUTO 04-08-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5652619)
If I were him, I would have ****ed the shit out of the skanky blond. Never could understand that decision.

ROFL wasnt she a doctor too?

DeezNutz 04-08-2009 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5652621)
ROFL wasnt she a doctor too?

He ****ed that one. I'm talking about the one who strips and asks him, "Want to go back to my place and ****?"

The answer, Patrick, is, "Yes."

crazycoffey 04-08-2009 08:06 PM

If you can't walk him to the door, get a buddy and you can both walk him to the door, but be nice!

what if he calls my momma a whore?

Is she?

Coogs 04-08-2009 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652615)
Well, it stands to reason. He's a boom/bust prospect if there ever was one. He's definitely got the most explosive first step of any pass rusher in this draft. I've heard some say he's got one of the best 1st steps they've EVER SEEN, which is phenomenal.

But he's just not fluid in the open field. Who knows, maybe he'll be the next DT. After all, DT had similar holes in his game, even as a pro. Then again, maybe he'll be the next Andre Wadsworth...


They actually called him a "One Trick Pony". And they did not know if he could survive with just the one move, and being a liability against the run as well.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyCoffey (Post 5652528)
why the big poundage on Saccogoo?

They secretly love me. It's kind of like that kid in the fifth grade that picks on the one girl at recess incessantly. It's not that he hates her, he actually loves her and always will. It's the same thing here. They desire and love me so much that they need to have me give them attention, but they are shy and coy about their real feelings towards me. So they act out in a way that they think their peers will find acceptable and still receive attention from me. I think it's cute, and if I was gay, I'd even flirt with them a bit. However, I'm not, so I just find happiness in making them look foolish and silly with their rantings and ravings.

crazycoffey 04-08-2009 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652766)
They secretly love me. It's kind of like that kid in the fifth grade that picks on the one girl at recess incessantly. It's not that he hates her, he actually loves her and always will. It's the same thing here. They desire and love me so much that they need to have me give them attention, but they are shy and coy about their real feelings towards me. So they act out in a way that they think their peers will find acceptable and still receive attention from me. I think it's cute, and if I was gay, I'd even flirt with them a bit. However, I'm not, so I just find happiness in making them look foolish and silly with their rantings and ravings.


silly bundle of sticks, dicks are for chicks!!!

htismaqe 04-08-2009 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 5652734)
They actually called him a "One Trick Pony". And they did not know if he could survive with just the one move, and being a liability against the run as well.

Like I said, Derrick Thomas combined basically one ripping pass rush move with one of the most explosive first steps in the history of football into a Hall of Fame career. Teams ran right at him and he couldn't do anything about it. And he really couldn't cover either.

Saccopoo 04-08-2009 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652931)
Like I said, Derrick Thomas combined basically one ripping pass rush move with one of the most explosive first steps in the history of football into a Hall of Fame career. Teams ran right at him and he couldn't do anything about it. And he really couldn't cover either.

Yep, and that's what kept him out of the Hall of Fame for a couple of years. Guys, players remembered he couldn't play the run or pass for shit. Could get into the back field though.

htismaqe 04-08-2009 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652944)
Yep, and that's what kept him out of the Hall of Fame for a couple of years. Guys, players remembered he couldn't play the run or pass for shit. Could get into the back field though.

The biggest problem with Brown is that I could EASILY see him being like Thomas - even with the flaws, we'd all take it in a heartbeat. And just as easily, I could see him being a career backup because he can't play any position well.

RealSNR 04-08-2009 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652766)
They secretly love me. It's kind of like that kid in the fifth grade that picks on the one girl at recess incessantly. It's not that he hates her, he actually loves her and always will. It's the same thing here. They desire and love me so much that they need to have me give them attention, but they are shy and coy about their real feelings towards me. So they act out in a way that they think their peers will find acceptable and still receive attention from me. I think it's cute, and if I was gay, I'd even flirt with them a bit. However, I'm not, so I just find happiness in making them look foolish and silly with their rantings and ravings.

We insult you because you refuse to listen to reason. It's NOT ****ING SMART to draft non-LT offensive line positions with the 3rd overall selection in the draft. You get zero value out of it.

SBK 04-08-2009 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652958)
The biggest problem with Brown is that I could EASILY see him being like Thomas - even with the flaws, we'd all take it in a heartbeat. And just as easily, I could see him being a career backup because he can't play any position well.

Yeah, if he turns into a stud he'd be big time, but it's so easy to see him as less than Tamba Hali too.

The Bad Guy 04-08-2009 10:45 PM

Chiefs are meeting with Rey this week.

I like how Pioli is covering all the bases.

SBK 04-08-2009 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5653203)
Chiefs are meeting with Rey this week.

I like how Pioli is covering all the bases.

He's awesome at keeping you guessing. I don't seem to remember that being the King's suit.

ChiefsCountry 04-08-2009 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5653207)
He's awesome at keeping you guessing. I don't seem to remember that being the King's suit.

Hell no its how I was able to pick so many of Peterson's draft picks the last few years including both kicker and punter picks.

Mecca 04-08-2009 10:55 PM

I don't think Everette Brown is the typical FSU line prospect, so I think that legacy should be looked at with a grain of salt I can be in depth about it if anyone really wants to know.

ChiefsCountry 04-08-2009 11:13 PM

For all the Curry lovers - #59 is open on the Chiefs roster.

Saccopoo 04-09-2009 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652958)
The biggest problem with Brown is that I could EASILY see him being like Thomas - even with the flaws, we'd all take it in a heartbeat. And just as easily, I could see him being a career backup because he can't play any position well.

Ayep.

Hey Htis, can you be the designated poster for the intolerant assholes around here until draft day? You are already carrying the motherload in terms of rationality for that side of the argument...

RealSNR 04-09-2009 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo
Ayep.

Hey Htis, can you be the designated poster for the intolerant assholes around here until draft day? You are already carrying the motherload in terms of rationality for that side of the argument...

Yep. You're one mountain of rationality, that's for sure. Posts like this one below. Rational.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5650065)
Holy shit. Did Matt Millen have some effed up genetic experiment done to him a la The Boys from Brazil, gave them one way tickets to Kansas City and an open wifi connection?

Knowing that we now have Cassel as a QB, you people are still putting Stafford and Sanchez as your first choices for the Chiefs pick? I can't wait until next year when all you little Millen replicas want to draft Bradford and McCoy. Oh, that's right. McCoy plays at Texas and all the respectable CP Insiders know that every player from Texas isn't worth jack squat, and since Bradford played in a spread offense, he sucks too. Damnable spread monkeys! I loathe them. They couldn't operate an offense under center in a Pop Warner league, let alone the pros. Goddamn shame Freeman decided to come out. 6'6", 260 lb., cannon arm, and worked in a pro style system. He'd be perfect for us next year...oh, wait. He played in the Big 12, and we should never draft from the Big 12, because every team, and in a direct correlation all players from all teams in that conference sucks dog nuts. Not as much as Texas, but still sucking pretty hard.

I wonder what quarterback from any conference other than the Big 12 we can draft in 2011?

We sure as hell show them boys in Detroit what for! They think that they can draft four wide receivers in five years in the first round?! We'll draft five quarterbacks in five years, hold each of those drafts hostage for potential picks in later years and we'll build a monster team with all those third and fourth round selections! Hostage I say!!!! Hold every draft hostage! The Chiefs will be the only team with first round quarterbacks! We will force all teams to give us picks to make sure that the get a first round quarterback. The quarterback of the future for any team in the NFL will now go through Kansas City!!!! We will have our pick of QBOTF, and trade off the others in our hostage situation. Mother ****ers will have to call in the ****ing FBI to negotiate 'cause we're holding the rest of the drafts till the ****ing end of time mother ****ing hostage!!!! Hostage!!!! I said HOSTAGE!!!!!

So, I have two top five lists. One is mine, encompassing sanity and reason, the other is a CP Insider friendly version so I don't get ripped by all the draft geniuses around here for not wanting to hold the draft hostage. That's right. I said MOTHER ****ING HOSTAGE!!!!!!

Real Top Five:
1. Aaron Curry
2. Brian Orakpo
3. Michael Oher
4. Eugene Monroe
5. Beanie Wells

CP Insider Top Five:
1. St. Sanchez
2. Matt Stafford - who is better than Sanchez, but we all know that every closet homosexual here has an absolute crush on the handsome, exotic Sanchez and seeing him in a Chiefs uniform will help transition us from the Tony G exotic looking homo man crush phase to a new one where we can silently purr in gay joviality that our new 80%'er (sociologists state that only 10% of the population is heterosexual and 10% is homosexual, with the other 80% falling somewhere in-between) is in a position of actual relevance on the football field, unlike a tight end, or, god-forbid, a ILB.
3. Everette Brown - because a short DE/OLB tweener with suspect speed is just what this franchise needs to pull itself from the ashes of putricity.
4. BJ Raji - 'cause he likes weed, doesn't like to study, is short with short arms and has an ass the size of Jupiter. But I bet he'd love hims some of that Gates and Bryants and Haywards and Hereford House and Jess and Jims and Golden Ox and shit like that yo'. Dude was made for guest judging the Lenexa BBQ contest every stinkin' year.
5. Aaron Curry - just because I don't want to look like a complete and utter dumbass I'll reluctantly put his name here because when all is said and done I know from the bottom of my heart that this guy is the best player in the draft, and I really wanted to put him at the number one spot because, well he is the best player and our linebacking situation for the past 20 years has sucked something fierce, but if I did put Curry at my one spot some of the guys around here would call me names and mock me and then where would I be without my social circle of good internets buddies?

Rational. Teach me the ways of being tolerant and rational like you, please.

Kill yourself.

htismaqe 04-09-2009 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5653203)
Chiefs are meeting with Rey this week.

I like how Pioli is covering all the bases.

Yep.

htismaqe 04-09-2009 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5653252)
I don't think Everette Brown is the typical FSU line prospect, so I think that legacy should be looked at with a grain of salt I can be in depth about it if anyone really wants to know.

Maybe not. But it's still a concern. I'm a big believer in history and pedigree.

kcbubb 04-09-2009 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5653667)
Yep. You're one mountain of rationality, that's for sure. Posts like this one below. Rational.

Quote:

Knowing that we now have Cassel as a QB, you people are still putting Stafford and Sanchez as your first choices for the Chiefs pick? I can't wait until next year when all you little Millen replicas want to draft Bradford and McCoy. Oh, that's right. McCoy plays at Texas and all the respectable CP Insiders know that every player from Texas isn't worth jack squat, and since Bradford played in a spread offense, he sucks too. Damnable spread monkeys! I loathe them. They couldn't operate an offense under center in a Pop Warner league, let alone the pros. Goddamn shame Freeman decided to come out. 6'6", 260 lb., cannon arm, and worked in a pro style system. He'd be perfect for us next year...oh, wait. He played in the Big 12, and we should never draft from the Big 12, because every team, and in a direct correlation all players from all teams in that conference sucks dog nuts. Not as much as Texas, but still sucking pretty hard.

I wonder what quarterback from any conference other than the Big 12 we can draft in 2011?

We sure as hell show them boys in Detroit what for! They think that they can draft four wide receivers in five years in the first round?! We'll draft five quarterbacks in five years, hold each of those drafts hostage for potential picks in later years and we'll build a monster team with all those third and fourth round selections! Hostage I say!!!! Hold every draft hostage! The Chiefs will be the only team with first round quarterbacks! We will force all teams to give us picks to make sure that the get a first round quarterback. The quarterback of the future for any team in the NFL will now go through Kansas City!!!! We will have our pick of QBOTF, and trade off the others in our hostage situation. Mother ****ers will have to call in the ****ing FBI to negotiate 'cause we're holding the rest of the drafts till the ****ing end of time mother ****ing hostage!!!! Hostage!!!! I said HOSTAGE!!!!!
Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5653667)
Rational. Teach me the ways of being tolerant and rational like you, please.

Kill yourself.


Saccogoo may not always be right, but the guy is funny. And I think he has a good point with the argument of drafting a QB and wanting to trade him. Really, has anyone ever done that and successfully traded a QB that they planned to trade??? Not like the Manning Rivers trade that was predetermined, but just draft a guy and sit on the pick and hope to trade the QB????? Has it ever happened? just curious.

Coogs 04-09-2009 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5653865)
Saccogoo may not always be right, but the guy is funny.

That's no kidding. Post #13 in "The Way We Hear It -- Draft Edition" thread had me laughing for several minutes last night. It even maked me giggle a bit this morning. :)

Saccopoo 04-09-2009 01:52 PM

My newly amended, Thursday edition of my top five for #3:

1. Brian Orakpo
2. Michael Crabtree
3. Tyson Jackson
4. Aaron Curry
5. Andre Smith

Mecca 04-09-2009 01:53 PM

If we draft Brian Orakpo I will literally stop being a fan.

You did that on purpose I'm sure since I hate most of those players.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.