ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Top 10: Regrettable NFL Offseason Decisions (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=212610)

TFG 08-27-2009 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6005702)
Cassel's 'problem' with the deep ball to Moss was that he couldn't beat the triple teams that Moss faces. He didn't have a problem with the deep ball when it went right through Gaffney's hands on what would have been the difference-making touchdown against the Colts, for example. Also, as Chiefs fans can, no doubt, remember, he didn't have any trouble throwing the deep ball from his own end zone in week one. By the end of last season, with teams all having the book on Cassel, they weren't able to "play tight, safeties up, jump routes, and dare him to throw it deep" enough to beat the Patriots.

Newsflash: Cassel is not the best QB in the NFL. That doesn't mean that Cassel can't play. It means he's in with every other QB in the game who's not named Tom Brady.



Moss was not triple teamed with Cassel at QB. Show me a clip of a "deep ball" by Cassel and I will show you a rainbow floater.

2008 Week 17 = copied from nfl dot com...

Cassel - longest completion 19 yards


Week 16

2nd longest completion 42 yards = M.Cassel pass short left to 34-S.Morris pushed ob at ARZ 14 for 42 yards (26-R.Hood).

LONGEST pass completion 76 yards = 16-M.Cassel pass short left to 81-R.Moss for 76 yards



Aw, heck, you'll notice...

Just Passin' By 08-27-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6005781)
Moss was not triple teamed with Cassel at QB. Show me a clip of a "deep ball" by Cassel and I will show you a rainbow floater.

2008 Week 17 = copied from nfl dot com...

Cassel - longest completion 19 yards


Week 16

2nd longest completion 42 yards = M.Cassel pass short left to 34-S.Morris pushed ob at ARZ 14 for 42 yards (26-R.Hood).

LONGEST pass completion 76 yards = 16-M.Cassel pass short left to 81-R.Moss for 76 yards



Aw, heck, you'll notice...

I saw every snap Cassel took last season.

Jim Jones 08-27-2009 11:15 AM

The Patriots aren't always right on players they sign or players they release. It just so happens that most Patriot players looked bad once the team let them go because in most of those instances, the player was old or over the hill. In many of those cases that people like to point out of the Patriots being right about letting someone go, SCOTT PIOLI was the one pulling the trigger on that move.. you know, our GM. So I don't know why Belichick is getting the benefit of the doubt with some people around here and Pioli isn't.

tooge 08-27-2009 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6003174)

nice beard, nice pedophilostache, nice hair, nice nose. What a tool. Nice shirt. Since this homo (nttawwt) wrote this, I'm guessing Cassel ends up lighting up the league.

TFG 08-27-2009 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Jones (Post 6005814)
The Patriots aren't always right on players they sign or players they release. It just so happens that most Patriot players looked bad once the team let them go because in most of those instances, the player was old or over the hill. In many of those cases that people like to point out of the Patriots being right about letting someone go, SCOTT PIOLI was the one pulling the trigger on that move.. you know, our GM. So I don't know why Belichick is getting the benefit of the doubt with some people around here and Pioli isn't.



Personally, I don't really care who did the trade etc. I just care about what I saw of the player while he was playing football. You have a pair of eyes. Use them. Stop playing "the greater guru I'm parroting knows better than the guru you are parroting." How could anyone question the great Super Bowl coach Dick Vermeil for cutting undrafted OG Ryan Lilja.... unless you actually watched Lilja and noticed he was extremely good. If I came here to Chiefs Planet and told everyone here the Chiefs were really stupid to cut Lilja the day they did, how many responses would have told me that Vermeil "knows better than you!!!" ??????

Cassel is not going to escape sacks like Big Ben and he does not have a "gun" beyond about 25 yards for a "zipped" pass. Cutler can zip it 45 yards - Jamarcus about 55. If the defense knows the QB has a limited ability to zip a ball down the field, the strategy then becomes to bait him to try, which, as the "play by play" from last year suggests, he didn't... because not every NFL team had that figured out properly. They will eventually.

WilliamTheIrish 08-27-2009 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6004206)
Exactly as I called it just after the trade.

The excuses have already started.

Everyone is getting them ready early, that way when we go 3-13 all the blame is deflected away from the supposed franchise QB.

I noticed this very phenom in the Sanchez' vs Ravens thread. When Sanchez threw that wrongway pick/td the excuse I heard was: "Well... the Ravens will do that to a lot of teams this season".

The excuses for the franchise QB in NY from CP have started too.

OnTheWarpath15 08-27-2009 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6006037)
I noticed this very phenom in the Sanchez' vs Ravens thread. When Sanchez threw that wrongway pick/td the excuse I heard was: "Well... the Ravens will do that to a lot of teams this season".

The excuses for the franchise QB in NY from CP have started too.

And what's wrong with that comment?

I don't care who it is, I expect a rookie to struggle a bit in his 2nd preseason game against the best defense in the league, on the road.

All we heard about the Cassel deal is how he had more experience, and would be better suited to play with limited weapons and behind a bad OL. How we'd ruin a draft pick at QB. Cassel's a veteran, has experience, so on, and so forth.

Sorry, but people did it to themselves claiming that Cassel is a franchise QB without the risk of a draft pick.

Can't have it both ways.

veist 08-27-2009 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6006078)
And what's wrong with that comment?

I don't care who it is, I expect a rookie to struggle a bit in his 2nd preseason game against the best defense in the league, on the road.

All we heard about the Cassel deal is how he had more experience, and would be better suited to play with limited weapons and behind a bad OL. How we'd ruin a draft pick at QB. Cassel's a veteran, has experience, so on, and so forth.

Sorry, but people did it to themselves claiming that Cassel is a franchise QB without the risk of a draft pick.

Can't have it both ways.

Someone actually made that claim? lol

Chief Faithful 08-27-2009 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6005916)
Personally, I don't really care who did the trade etc. I just care about what I saw of the player while he was playing football. You have a pair of eyes. Use them. Stop playing "the greater guru I'm parroting knows better than the guru you are parroting." How could anyone question the great Super Bowl coach Dick Vermeil for cutting undrafted OG Ryan Lilja.... unless you actually watched Lilja and noticed he was extremely good. If I came here to Chiefs Planet and told everyone here the Chiefs were really stupid to cut Lilja the day they did, how many responses would have told me that Vermeil "knows better than you!!!" ??????

Cassel is not going to escape sacks like Big Ben and he does not have a "gun" beyond about 25 yards for a "zipped" pass. Cutler can zip it 45 yards - Jamarcus about 55. If the defense knows the QB has a limited ability to zip a ball down the field, the strategy then becomes to bait him to try, which, as the "play by play" from last year suggests, he didn't... because not every NFL team had that figured out properly. They will eventually.

n0ob, you picked a bad example. It is obvious you were not here the day Lilja was cut.

TFG 08-27-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful (Post 6006472)
n0ob, you picked a bad example. It is obvious you were not here the day Lilja was cut.


Glad to hear there were those questioning the cut. Figures that the K-State kid would have some fans watching... even if some were scouts from the Colts...

chiefzilla1501 08-27-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6005667)
Pats with starting QB = 16 wins
Pats with backup QB = 11 wins, no playoffs

Matt Cassel was a backup at USC for a reason. The reason is that he really does not have a strong arm. Cassel floats anything more than 25 yards or so. Good thing the Chiefs don't have any "deep threats" because they would be "decoys." Cassel is smart, has a reasonably quick release, and is better than most NFL backup QBs. The way to stop Cassel is to play tight, safeties up, jump routes, and dare him to throw it deep, because he can't zip a deep ball. Even the Raiders will eventually figure it out...

I don't get the segway.

You're comparing Cassel to a hall-of-fame QB and arguably the best QB of his generation. And you're implying that he's backup material because he won a "measley" 11 games and didn't win all 16 games?

Pretty harsh stuff for a guy making his first ever starts in the NFL.

I've seen nothing that leads me to believe Cassel throws a lousy deep ball. He has to work on his accuracy, but the arm strength is fine. The deep ball is by far the most overrated element of a player's game. Can Cassel zip a 50 yarder? No. Can he zip a 20-yarder? Yes.

Even Peyton and Brees throw good not great deep balls.

SAUTO 08-27-2009 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6006912)
I don't get the segway.

You're comparing Cassel to a hall-of-fame QB and arguably the best QB of his generation. And you're implying that he's backup material because he won a "measley" 11 games and didn't win all 16 games?

Pretty harsh stuff for a guy making his first ever starts in the NFL.

I've seen nothing that leads me to believe Cassel throws a lousy deep ball. He has to work on his accuracy, but the arm strength is fine. The deep ball is by far the most overrated element of a player's game. Can Cassel zip a 50 yarder? No. Can he zip a 20-yarder? Yes.

Even Peyton and Brees throw good not great deep balls.

to me it's also funny when people bash him for sitting behind 2 heisman winners in college.

TFG 08-27-2009 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6006912)
I don't get the segway.

You're comparing Cassel to a hall-of-fame QB and arguably the best QB of his generation. And you're implying that he's backup material because he won a "measley" 11 games and didn't win all 16 games?

Pretty harsh stuff for a guy making his first ever starts in the NFL.

I've seen nothing that leads me to believe Cassel throws a lousy deep ball. He has to work on his accuracy, but the arm strength is fine. The deep ball is by far the most overrated element of a player's game. Can Cassel zip a 50 yarder? No. Can he zip a 20-yarder? Yes.

Even Peyton and Brees throw good not great deep balls.




I love that "he won" 11 games. Nobody else on the Pats mattered at all. Those 11 wins were 100% Cassel.


Brees' arm has gotten stronger since his first few years in SD, but he doesn't have a good deep ball. Brees has about 30-35 yards of range on zipped balls. Brees is super smart, accurate, and throws 50 times a game. He isn't a HOF caliber QB and never will be, and he is overrated because he puts up "big numbers" by throwing 50 times a game and stat parrots and fantasy people love him because of that. Truth be told, good defenses that press Brees really handle the Saints no matter how many yards and scores the Saints get in the meaningless Q4 against prevent. Cassel's "ceiling" is lower, and Brees is about 10 years ahead in net starting experience spotting four at Purdue. Peyton throws excellent deep balls. Peyton is a HOF QB. Brees is a wannabe who only impresses with stats other than wins.

The deep ball is not the most overrated part of the game. Fear of the deep ball causes the D to keep the safeties back, away from the LOS. If the opposing D loses that fear, watch it. For a great example, look at the Titan loss to SD in the playoffs two years ago. SD had nobody on D more than 5 yards off the LOS, because they had no fear of the Titan downfield passing attack, because there was no reason to fear it... and down went the Titans.

To have a ground game in the NFL, the defense must first fear the pass and defend the pass by not stacking the LOS...

Titty Meat 08-27-2009 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6005667)
Pats with starting QB = 16 wins
Pats with backup QB = 11 wins, no playoffs

Matt Cassel was a backup at USC for a reason. The reason is that he really does not have a strong arm. Cassel floats anything more than 25 yards or so. Good thing the Chiefs don't have any "deep threats" because they would be "decoys." Cassel is smart, has a reasonably quick release, and is better than most NFL backup QBs. The way to stop Cassel is to play tight, safeties up, jump routes, and dare him to throw it deep, because he can't zip a deep ball. Even the Raiders will eventually figure it out...

WTF. Comparing the 2007 Patriots to the 2008 Patriots is apple to oranges. Did you watch any of the Patriots games? Cassel wasn't the reason they lost most of those games so shut your cum dump.

KChiefs1 08-27-2009 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 6003161)
1 and 1a the chiefs don't draft sanchez

We'll be able to tell pretty quickly on this one.

Cassel or Sanchez?

Pasta Little Brioni 08-27-2009 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6007062)
WTF. Comparing the 2007 Patriots to the 2008 Patriots is apple to oranges. Did you watch any of the Patriots games? Cassel wasn't the reason they lost most of those games so shut your cum dump.

Brady is clearly better and everyone knows that, but you are right it is a HORRIBLE comparison. That team wasn't going 16-0 again.

TFG 08-27-2009 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 6007070)
Brady is clearly better and everyone knows that, but you are right it is a HORRIBLE comparison. That team wasn't going 16-0 again.



Ah yes, the "you can't say anything bad about our team" deal. Got it. Still waiting for a clip of a deep throw by Cassel that isn't a floater...


The opportunity cost of Cassel and converting to the 3-4 given the personnel on the roster and hence spending 1st and 3rd on 3-4 DLs is a pretty sorry score so far. Scott Pioli has had his first offseaon, and the Chiefs still have a sorry OL and a lame pass rush. The season may prove me wrong, but I'd give Pioli a flat "F" so far. Oh, but you have Matt Cassel to enjoy the fruits of that OL. Sanchez has better pass protection and a better set of skill players, but don't let that stop the "QB and only the QB wins the game crowd" from comparing the two. Craig Krenzel started off 3-0 for da Bears... a lock for the HOF for sure...

SAUTO 08-27-2009 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007111)
Ah yes, the "you can't say anything bad about our team" deal. Got it. Still waiting for a clip of a deep throw by Cassel that isn't a floater...


The opportunity cost of Cassel and converting to the 3-4 given the personnel on the roster and hence spending 1st and 3rd on 3-4 DLs is a pretty sorry score so far. Scott Pioli has had his first offseaon, and the Chiefs still have a sorry OL and a lame pass rush. The season may prove me wrong, but I'd give Pioli a flat "F" so far. Oh, but you have Matt Cassel to enjoy the fruits of that OL. Sanchez has better pass protection and a better set of skill players, but don't let that stop the "QB and only the QB wins the game crowd" from comparing the two. Craig Krenzel started off 3-0 for da Bears... a lock for the HOF for sure...

the thigpen and cassel bashers are the ones who act like "the qb and only the qb wins the game"

Pasta Little Brioni 08-27-2009 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007111)
Ah yes, the "you can't say anything bad about our team" deal. Got it. Still waiting for a clip of a deep throw by Cassel that isn't a floater...


The opportunity cost of Cassel and converting to the 3-4 given the personnel on the roster and hence spending 1st and 3rd on 3-4 DLs is a pretty sorry score so far. Scott Pioli has had his first offseaon, and the Chiefs still have a sorry OL and a lame pass rush. The season may prove me wrong, but I'd give Pioli a flat "F" so far. Oh, but you have Matt Cassel to enjoy the fruits of that OL. Sanchez has better pass protection and a better set of skill players, but don't let that stop the "QB and only the QB wins the game crowd" from comparing the two. Craig Krenzel started off 3-0 for da Bears... a lock for the HOF for sure...

Your and idiot

Titty Meat 08-27-2009 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007111)
Ah yes, the "you can't say anything bad about our team" deal. Got it. Still waiting for a clip of a deep throw by Cassel that isn't a floater...


The opportunity cost of Cassel and converting to the 3-4 given the personnel on the roster and hence spending 1st and 3rd on 3-4 DLs is a pretty sorry score so far. Scott Pioli has had his first offseaon, and the Chiefs still have a sorry OL and a lame pass rush. The season may prove me wrong, but I'd give Pioli a flat "F" so far. Oh, but you have Matt Cassel to enjoy the fruits of that OL. Sanchez has better pass protection and a better set of skill players, but don't let that stop the "QB and only the QB wins the game crowd" from comparing the two. Craig Krenzel started off 3-0 for da Bears... a lock for the HOF for sure...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHFEdh8jjiU

Dumbass

tonyetony 08-27-2009 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007111)
Ah yes, the "you can't say anything bad about our team" deal. Got it. Still waiting for a clip of a deep throw by Cassel that isn't a floater...


The opportunity cost of Cassel and converting to the 3-4 given the personnel on the roster and hence spending 1st and 3rd on 3-4 DLs is a pretty sorry score so far. Scott Pioli has had his first offseaon, and the Chiefs still have a sorry OL and a lame pass rush. The season may prove me wrong, but I'd give Pioli a flat "F" so far. Oh, but you have Matt Cassel to enjoy the fruits of that OL. Sanchez has better pass protection and a better set of skill players, but don't let that stop the "QB and only the QB wins the game crowd" from comparing the two. Craig Krenzel started off 3-0 for da Bears... a lock for the HOF for sure...


How many QB's throw 50 yard passes on a fly route like a 15 yard out pattern? Uh if your trying to go over the top the ball will need a higher trajectory. I disagree with your idea of Cassel having a rag arm. Instead of asking for evidence of long balls why don't you produce a clip of all the FLOATERS you seem to reference every other comment.

TFG 08-27-2009 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6007164)

Dumbass


Interesting that even with that view, you don't see the ball in the air, because the throw is so high the camera misses it. I don't know what you define as a "floater" but that surely doesn't refute anything I've posted. That is a medium deep out lobbed to Moss so high it is out of the camera... LMAO

SAUTO 08-27-2009 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007216)
Interesting that even with that view, you don't see the ball in the air, because the throw is so high the camera misses it. I don't know what you define as a "floater" but that surely doesn't refute anything I've posted. That is a medium deep out lobbed to Moss so high it is out of the camera... LMAO

show me a qb that throws a 40-50 yard pass that stays in camera without the camera panning up

TFG 08-27-2009 05:33 PM

Correct, that is a 40 yard deep out FLOATER. Ball travels 55 yards in the air and Moss is there for it. But the pass is not exactly zipped. LOL. No. If you want to say that is "not a floater" then you have no clue at all.

Hammock Parties 08-27-2009 05:33 PM

Who cares about floaters?

Joe ****ing Montana floated his way into the Hall of Fame.

TFG 08-27-2009 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6007222)
show me a qb that throws a 40-50 yard pass that stays in camera without the camera panning up


The system does not let me post LINKS...

There is a six minute Eddie Royal tape on youtube, the second clip of which is about 40 yards in the air from Jay...

Just Passin' By 08-27-2009 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007225)
Correct, that is a 40 yard deep out FLOATER. Ball travels 55 yards in the air and Moss is there for it. But the pass is not exactly zipped. LOL. No. If you want to say that is "not a floater" then you have no clue at all.

Ok. I wasn't sure if you were a troll or a ****ing idiot. Now, I realize that you're a ****ing idiot even if you are a troll.

TFG 08-27-2009 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6007230)
Who cares about floaters?

Joe ****ing Montana floated his way into the Hall of Fame.


I don't agree with that. Joe had about 35 yards of laser when he needed it.

TFG 08-27-2009 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6007241)
Ok. I wasn't sure if you were a troll or a ****ing idiot. Now, I realize that you're a ****ing idiot even if you are a troll.



Sorry if the truth hurts...

LOCOChief 08-27-2009 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6004803)
Colin Brown, 5th round

Donald Washington, 4th round (when Leggett, Carr & Flowers are on the roster).

I'm not with Pioli until he proves he knows something we don't.

I can understand this, but it's one thing to take a wait and see approach like I think you're saying and another to anticipate Poilis failure like the douchbag did with this list.

Just Passin' By 08-27-2009 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007246)
Sorry if the truth hurts...

You're an idiot. Sorry if the truth hurts.

Hammock Parties 08-27-2009 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007242)
I don't agree with that. Joe had about 35 yards of laser when he needed it.

SO DOES CASSEL.

Jeez.

Go and watch highlights of Montana's deep balls - the stuff he threw over 40 yards, deep down the field.

High, arcing, floaters.

Completely irrelevant, quite frankly.

TFG 08-27-2009 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6007307)
SO DOES CASSEL.

Jeez.

Go and watch highlights of Montana's deep balls - the stuff he threw over 40 yards, deep down the field.

High, arcing, floaters.

Completely irrelevant, quite frankly.



I must say I admire and respect the fans of the KC Chiefs... as fans.


I strongly disagree that Cassel has as strong an arm as Montana did. Montana did float some, but he could zip it when he needed to, and did. Neither could get it 40 yards zipped, but Montana had 10 on Cassel. Cassel, for an NFL starting QB, has a weak arm. The tape of the throw to Moss is everything he has with perfect protection, something he won't have here. Matt has 25 yards of zip and 55 of float. That allows defenses to pinch, jump routes, and blitz, and this roster doesn't appear to have either Randy Moss or Jerry Rice on it. Enjoy the season. Regardless of what happens, just remember that Pioli is the smartest darn GM ever to walk the planet, at least until he is fired...

WilliamTheIrish 08-27-2009 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6006078)
And what's wrong with that comment?

I don't care who it is, I expect a rookie to struggle a bit in his 2nd preseason game against the best defense in the league, on the road.

All we heard about the Cassel deal is how he had more experience, and would be better suited to play with limited weapons and behind a bad OL. How we'd ruin a draft pick at QB. Cassel's a veteran, has experience, so on, and so forth.

Sorry, but people did it to themselves claiming that Cassel is a franchise QB without the risk of a draft pick.

Can't have it both ways.

That's a sweet excuse too. You expect that from a rookie. Okay. Ground work laid.

And look, I don't give a rat's ass either way. What the Chiefs do in the war room and on the field is completely out of my control. All I can do is be a fan of the laundry the guy wears.

TFG 08-27-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6007304)
You're an idiot. Sorry if the truth hurts.


At least your grammar is acceptable. The last one was "your and idiot."

WilliamTheIrish 08-27-2009 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007503)
At least your grammar is acceptable. The last one was "your and idiot."

Acceptable lexicon.

It has a story behind it that, as you grow on this forum, you'll find and laugh about.

One other notable: Retart=reerun.

Skip Towne 08-27-2009 07:40 PM

Why is this douche still green? Feel welcome to help me fix that.

Pioli Zombie 08-27-2009 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne (Post 6007587)
Why is this douche still green? Feel welcome to help me fix that.

Your douche has been coming out green since you've been on the soft vegetables you old ****.
Posted via Mobile Device

the Talking Can 08-27-2009 09:07 PM

this thread is parachute out of a plane and get stuck in the branches of an aids tree hilarious....

OnTheWarpath15 08-27-2009 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6007940)
this thread is parachute out of a plane and get stuck in the branches of an aids tree hilarious....

You should take a look at the one where someone claims that Ben Roethlisberger lucked into 2 Lombardi Trophies, and that Kurt Warner was "nothing special" before he got to Arizona.

DaneMcCloud 08-27-2009 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6007949)
You should take a look at the one where someone claims that Ben Roethlisberger lucked into 2 Lombardi Trophies, and that Kurt Warner was "nothing special" before he got to Arizona.

I'll take Trent Green any day of the week over those guys.

I just hope that Cassel is as good as Green.

OnTheWarpath15 08-27-2009 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6007963)
I'll take Trent Green any day of the week over those guys.

I just hope that Cassel is as good as Green.

LMAO

ALL WE NEEDED WAS A DEFENSE AND WE WOULD HAVE ROLLED TO THE SUPER BOWL!!!111!1!!!1111one11eleventy...2

WilliamTheIrish 08-27-2009 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6007949)
You should take a look at the one where someone claims that Ben Roethlisberger lucked into 2 Lombardi Trophies, and that Kurt Warner was "nothing special" before he got to Arizona.

Uh-oh. CAn you link me to that/those?

OnTheWarpath15 08-27-2009 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6007968)
Uh-oh. CAn you link me to that/those?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=170

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6007619)
Roethlisberger's stats are average at best, but since he was drafted in the first round and his defense handed him 2 super bowls, he must be a HOFer. :rolleyes:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=214

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6007932)
Hey, I put Kurt Warner in the category of "surrounded by talent, nothing special", before he did what he did in Arizona last year.


Mecca 08-27-2009 09:20 PM

If sedated is going to go to stats, I'm wondering if he thinks Phil Rivers is a top 3 QB.

the Talking Can 08-27-2009 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6007949)
You should take a look at the one where someone claims that Ben Roethlisberger lucked into 2 Lombardi Trophies, and that Kurt Warner was "nothing special" before he got to Arizona.

i was actually talking about your posts


the whole let's-try-really-hard-to-be-upset-about-a-season-that-hasn't-even-started-because-we're-obsessive-compulsive-and-slightly-miserable-martyrs-selling-some-a-ha-gotcha-argument-about-cassel-that-is-actually-incomprehensible-and-just-a-piss-poor-logical-sleight-of-hand-based-on-half-heard-comments-by-like-one-or-two-actual-posters-that-magically-become-representative-of-the-entire-planet-for-the-sole-purpose-of-enabling-the-fantasy-that-you-are-a-lone-knight-defending-reason-against-muslim-hordes-and-like-it-is-all-treated-like-it-is-real-life-and-not-just-some-poor-simulacrum-on-a-less-than-meaningless-sports-message-board-thing is really old and boring....just let mecca do it, at least he's good at it....




and yeah, those things you mentioned, that two people out of a 1000 believe, are stupid too

DaneMcCloud 08-27-2009 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6007968)
Uh-oh. CAn you link me to that/those?

Dude, they're everywhere. Seriously.

There are people in this forum that thinks that Roesthisberger sucks, even after driving his team 80+ yards for the Super Bowl win.

They bring up his stats, talk about the defense, etc.

It's insane.

Mecca 08-27-2009 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6007984)
Dude, they're everywhere. Seriously.

There are people in this forum that thinks that Roesthisberger sucks, even after driving his team 80+ yards for the Super Bowl win.

They bring up his stats, talk about the defense, etc.

It's insane.

Um dude it's the QB position, I don't know what it is but our fan base generally speaking does not like QB's.

OnTheWarpath15 08-27-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6007983)
i was actually talking about your posts


the whole let's-try-really-hard-to-be-upset-about-a-season-that-hasn't-even-started

No reason to read past here.

I'm not upset at all. How the hell can you get upset when you have ZERO expectations?

If they aren't 6-10 or better next year, and competing for the division in 2011, THEN I'll get upset.

veist 08-27-2009 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6007949)
You should take a look at the one where someone claims that Ben Roethlisberger lucked into 2 Lombardi Trophies, and that Kurt Warner was "nothing special" before he got to Arizona.

To be fair, one could at least make the argument that Rofflesburger's lack of intelligence cost them the chance at any kind of contention in 2006.

DaneMcCloud 08-28-2009 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veist (Post 6008083)
To be fair, one could at least make the argument that Rofflesburger's lack of intelligence cost them the chance at any kind of contention in 2006.

WHAT?

veist 08-28-2009 02:42 AM

You know when he almost got himself killed? That was the thing I was getting at. And then I'm sorry but either the team or he himself rushed him back to the field that season after his appendectomy and then again after his concussion either way he needs to be able to tell them no. Think you are confusing the 2005 post season with the 2006 regular season which is what I'm talking about. He played more like Jake Plummer in one of his 20 INT seasons than himself in 2006.

chiefzilla1501 08-28-2009 04:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6007984)
Dude, they're everywhere. Seriously.

There are people in this forum that thinks that Roesthisberger sucks, even after driving his team 80+ yards for the Super Bowl win.

They bring up his stats, talk about the defense, etc.

It's insane.

I don't think he sucks. I think he's an amazing QB.

But don't deny for a second that he's able to play in his style of play because of his amazing defense. His defense gave up 13.9 points per game. Do you realize that in 5 seasons, the Chiefs' defense has only given up 14 or less points 16 times? The Steelers did it TEN TIMES in one season.

Chiefnj2 08-28-2009 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007216)
Interesting that even with that view, you don't see the ball in the air, because the throw is so high the camera misses it. I don't know what you define as a "floater" but that surely doesn't refute anything I've posted. That is a medium deep out lobbed to Moss so high it is out of the camera... LMAO

You are criticizing a perfectly thrown 40 yard pass?

Brock 08-28-2009 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6007990)
Um dude it's the QB position, I don't know what it is but our fan base generally speaking does not like QB's.

That's a stupid thing to say.

SAUTO 08-28-2009 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6008024)
No reason to read past here.

I'm not upset at all. How the hell can you get upset when you have ZERO expectations?

If they aren't 6-10 or better next year, and competing for the division in 2011, THEN I'll get upset.

BULLSHIT

Brock 08-28-2009 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009098)
BULLSHIT

You some kind of mind reader?

L.A. Chieffan 08-28-2009 09:34 AM

how come jets trading up and taking sanchez isnt on the list? or lions drafting stafford #1? these are obviously worse things right?

ct 08-28-2009 10:11 AM

They traded Matt Cassel because it was more adventageous for the organization to cash in his trade value (which ballooned from out of nowhere!), than to pay him the market value he had earned as a backup for thier team. This, also, is the Patriot way, not just get rid of players who are finished at just the right time.

Branch and Samuel were let go for mostly financial reasons, not cause they got old and suck. Branch fell short of expectations from injury, not poor performance.

SAUTO 08-28-2009 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6009118)
You some kind of mind reader?

no all you have to do is read a couple of his posts.

OnTheWarpath15 08-28-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009456)
no all you have to do is read a couple of his posts.

Then you're doing a real shitty job of it, as always.

I've been predicting no more than 4-5 wins for this team since before Pioli and Haley were hired, so I'm not sure how I could be upset by anything they've done or haven't done - when you have no expectations, it's hard to be disappointed.

Nice try, Ms. Cleo.

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6009492)
Then you're doing a real shitty job of it, as always.

I've been predicting no more than 4-5 wins for this team since before Pioli and Haley were hired, so I'm not sure how I could be upset by anything they've done or haven't done - when you have no expectations, it's hard to be disappointed.

Nice try, Ms. Cleo.

whatever asshole. you arent upset over anything they have or havent done? ANYTHING? bullshit.

Brock 08-28-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009456)
no all you have to do is read a couple of his posts.

I've read more than a couple of his posts. I'm not reading "upset" from any of what he's said.

OnTheWarpath15 08-28-2009 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009524)
whatever asshole. you arent upset over anything they have or havent done? ANYTHING? bullshit.

CAN YOU READ?

Why would I be upset when I've has ZERO expectations since before Pioli was hired?

Are there things they've done or haven't done that I don't agree with?

Absolutely.

But being upset about them?

Why?

I've thought all along that it's going to take 3 years for this team to be respectable again. What would cause me to get upset when I've expected them to suck all along?

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6009530)
I've read more than a couple of his posts. I'm not reading "upset" from any of what he's said.

really? so he's not upset we drafted tyson jackson? not upset we traded for cassel rather than draft a qb? not upset we didnt sign young WRs? not upset we didnt get more o-line help? maybe you dont read so good.

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6009541)
CAN YOU READ?

Why would I be upset when I've has ZERO expectations since before Pioli was hired?

Are there things they've done or haven't done that I don't agree with?

Absolutely.

But being upset about them?

Why?

I've thought all along that it's going to take 3 years for this team to be respectable again. What would cause me to get upset when I've expected them to suck all along?

yeah dumbass i can read and 90% of your posts lately have sounded like a baby who's mom took away the tit.

Brock 08-28-2009 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009544)
really? so he's not upset we drafted tyson jackson? not upset we traded for cassel rather than draft a qb? not upset we didnt sign young WRs? not upset we didnt get more o-line help? maybe you dont read so good.

He obviously disagreed with those moves. He can disagree without being upset, just as I am doing with you right now, brushing aside your ignorant speculative comment about my literacy.

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6009560)
He obviously disagreed with those moves. He can disagree without being upset, just as I am doing with you right now, brushing aside your ignorant speculative comment about my literacy.

well if you cant tell he's been upset the i dont know what else the problem is...

Brock 08-28-2009 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009565)
well if you cant tell he's been upset the i dont know what else the problem is...

I know what the problem is. You're speculating about someone's state of mind over the internet, which is not exactly smart.

OnTheWarpath15 08-28-2009 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009549)
yeah dumbass i can read and 90% of your posts lately have sounded like a baby who's mom took away the tit.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/afViRNSr5wg&hl=en&fs=1&start=26&autoplay=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/afViRNSr5wg&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6009579)
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/afViRNSr5wg&hl=en&fs=1&start=26&autoplay=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/afViRNSr5wg&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

YEAH i didnt get shit there

TFG 08-28-2009 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6008804)
You are criticizing a perfectly thrown 40 yard pass?



Actually, the distance the ball travels in the air is about 55 yards, since it is thrown in the middle of the field at about the 45 and caught on the sideline at the 15. The question was not the accuracy of the pass, but whether or not anyone could show me a video of a "deep pass" by Cassel that was not FLOATED. I am not questioning Matt's accuracy, but rather his arm strength. There is no way to deny that pass is floated. It has a high arc and spends about four seconds in the air. A "zipped" pass is "flat" and "fast." A "floater" is soft with lots of arc and much longer time in the air. So, once again, I ask the Red Planet here, can anyone show me a pass by Cassel of more than 25 yards in the air that is a ZIPPED flat fastball, not a floating arcing sky high softball???

Start the Jeopardy! music...

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6009569)
I know what the problem is. You're speculating about someone's state of mind over the internet, which is not exactly smart.

ok and you are doing the same thing no? i mean saying he's not upset is the same as saying he is.

Brock 08-28-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009612)
ok and you are doing the same thing no? i mean saying he's not upset is the same as saying he is.

I guess I'd have to just take his word for it, since, you know, his feelings are the topic of discussion. Jesus.ROFL

Hammock Parties 08-28-2009 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6007499)
Cassel, for an NFL starting QB, has a weak arm.

Oh, garbage. His arm is stronger than Trent Green's.

If you find fault with this throw you're a fool.

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NHFEdh8jjiU&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NHFEdh8jjiU&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6009623)
I guess I'd have to just take his word for it, since, you know, his feelings are the topic of discussion. Jesus.ROFL


ok well read some posts. if you can throw the fits he does and post about the same ****ing thing for hours on end you probably are upset

TFG 08-28-2009 11:42 AM

Honestly, if you cannot or will not read what I post, there is no sense replying. That is not a ZIPPED deep pass. It is a FLOATER. It is an accurate FLOATER, but it is indeed a FLOATER. It isn't a perfect spiral and Moss actually has to wait about a half second for it to get there. It is late getting there because it lacks MUSTARD, ZIP, ARM STRENGTH, LAZER...

Can you understand that ACCURACY and ARM STRENGTH are 2 different things???

Brock 08-28-2009 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6009633)
ok well read some posts. if you can throw the fits he does and post about the same ****ing thing for hours on end you probably are upset

Circular logic.

TFG 08-28-2009 11:45 AM

Trent Green had a weak arm for an NFL starter. The greatness of the Chief Offense during Trent's tenure here was the OFFENSIVE LINE, which was the best OL in recent history of the NFL. Priest Holmes and each and every one of his backups got 150 yards per game without much trouble BECAUSE OF THE OL. Trent Green's passer rating was excellent because Trent had time to see the field and step into his throws.

Put Trent Green behind a sorry offensive line and, well, what did the last Chief playoff game look like???

SAUTO 08-28-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6009643)
Circular logic.

most is, life is a circle


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.