ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Turk McBride Gone.... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214195)

Saccopoo 09-15-2009 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6077050)
Wait, every ten years?

1989 - Derrick Thomas
1997 - Tony Gonzales
2006?
2007?
2008?

Jared Allen. Then the dumbass pissed him off, and let him go with franchising him or anything. And the guy wanted to play here. God, Carl was such a dildo.

Mecca 09-15-2009 08:45 PM

You don't think Stephen Lynch is funny, you suck.

DJ's left nut 09-15-2009 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6077102)
You don't think Stephen Lynch is funny, you suck.

Are you also a fan of Carlos Mencia and/or Dane Cook?

If so, I truly hate you.

Marcellus 09-15-2009 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6077059)
I can see that he maybe doesn't have the "functional strength", but I did go back to look at some draft info to see how some of his weightroom strength compared to that of Jackson & Dorsey. Much to my surprise, he had 27 reps of 225 at the combine and 30 on his pro day. Dorsey did 27 at his pro day while Jackson only had 20. Not that it translates into playing strength, but I would think he stood a better chance at making the team if he had been asked to bulk up and play end.

Considering the guy played DE & DT (mostly DT) in college, never played LB until this summer and is no longer with the team, it is clear to me that making a LB out of him was not the solution. Obviously the coaches know a lot more than me, but a guy we apparently wasted a 2nd rounder on is no longer with the team and it sucks.

His numbers (40 yard, 3 cone, 20 yard shuttle etc) were far and away better than Dorsey. Again, while that doesnt translate to play on the field, I don't buy the idea that the new regime could care less about where a player was drafted.

I won't be surprised if he does well on another team as a DE, but the guy had 1 sack in his 15 game career, so I'm not going to cry over it.

JC. Jackson only did 20 reps? Seriously? I can do 15 and I'm 5'11 and I weigh 195 lbs and I am 38.

Seriously?

salame 09-15-2009 09:46 PM

have fun as a lion

Simply Red 09-15-2009 10:12 PM

so what position did he play?

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 6077241)
so what position did he play?

Fluffer

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-15-2009 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077243)
Fluffer

LMAO

Simply Red 09-15-2009 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077243)
Fluffer

LMAO seriously?

kcxiv 09-15-2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6077099)
Jared Allen. Then the dumbass pissed him off, and let him go with franchising him or anything. And the guy wanted to play here. God, Carl was such a dildo.

That still makes me sad. I was so pissed, but when we drafted Albert i was like well maybe our offensive line will be decent. Ya right, Dude looks like he's regressing. I bet Jared is sitting there saying, i am so ****ing glad they traded me out of that mess.

CosmicPal 09-15-2009 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6077099)
Jared Allen. Then the dumbass pissed him off, and let him go with franchising him or anything. And the guy wanted to play here. God, Carl was such a dildo.

You have to remember that Jared Allen was coming off his second DUI at the time. The next one would have cost him a season. That wasn't the risk the Chiefs wanted to take at the time.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6077271)
That still makes me sad. I was so pissed, but when we drafted Albert i was like well maybe our offensive line will be decent. Ya right, Dude looks like he's regressing. I bet Jared is sitting there saying, i am so ****ing glad they traded me out of that mess.

It doesn't matter.

Jared Allen would have been traded this year because he's really not suited for the 3-4. I'm sure he would have done "okay" but he's really suited for the 4-3.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicPal (Post 6077278)
You have to remember that Jared Allen was coming off his second DUI at the time. The next one would have cost him a season. That wasn't the risk the Chiefs wanted to take at the time.

Yeah, and he already had two before that.

Sorry people, it was the right move.

Mecca 09-15-2009 10:53 PM

Allen in the 3-4 would be like Aaron Kampman in the 3-4 I think he'll be successful but he won't be as good as he was in the 4-3.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6077324)
Allen in the 3-4 would be like Aaron Kampman in the 3-4 I think he'll be successful but he won't be as good as he was in the 4-3.

Ehzactly

Easy 6 09-15-2009 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077281)
Yeah, and he already had two before that.

Sorry people, it was the right move.

I'm not so sure, what would he have been like as a 3-4 OLB? its entirely possible he'd be Ebola sick, he's been a model citizen so far in Minn, 14.5 sacks in 08 & not one flag thus far in 09.

I didnt like some of the classless ways he handled his departure, but he was departing from one of the worst NFL GM's ever...who was really wrong?

Its too late for shoulda woulda coulda's, but i'd love to have JA back.

Easy 6 09-15-2009 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6077324)
Allen in the 3-4 would be like Aaron Kampman in the 3-4 I think he'll be successful but he won't be as good as he was in the 4-3.

Kampmans range of moves, quickness & pure athleticism dont even come close.

BS.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6077346)
I'm not so sure, what would he have been like as a 3-4 OLB? its entirely possible he'd be Ebola sick, he's been a model citizen so far in Minn, 14.5 sacks in 08 & not one flag thus far in 09.

I didnt like some of the classless ways he handled his departure, but he was departing from one of the worst NFL GM's ever...who was really wrong?

Its too late for shoulda woulda coulda's, but i'd love to have JA back.

Dude, he wouldn't have been "sick". He's a 4-3 down lineman and playing in a 2-point stance wouldn't have been an advantage for him. Not at all.

Like Mecca said, he'd be like Aaron Kampman.

Why do you think that Allen wanted to go to another 4-3 team?

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6077360)
Kampmans range of moves, quickness & pure athleticism dont even come close.

BS.

What makes you think that a guy like Jared Allen, who's played as a down-lineman for this entire decade, would suddenly be better in a two-point stance?

That just doesn't make any sense.

AND on top of that, he'd have to routinely drop into pass coverage.

WTF?

Easy 6 09-15-2009 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077362)
Why do you think that Allen wanted to go to another 4-3 team?

Its very possible that i missed that news, but i'm thinking Jared went where the money was.

Had he known that a real NFL program was coming to KC, maybe he'd have felt differently about it.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6077368)
Its very possible that i missed that news, but i'm thinking Jared went where the money was.

Had he known that a real NFL program was coming to KC, maybe he'd have felt differently about it.

It wouldn't have mattered.

He's not a 2-point stance, drop into coverage, 3-4 outside linebacker.

Period.

Titty Meat 09-15-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6076665)
I think Baltimore's offense will be better than Pittsburgh's, easy.


What?

philfree 09-15-2009 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077365)
What makes you think that a guy like Jared Allen, who's played as a down-lineman for this entire decade, would suddenly be better in a two-point stance?

That just doesn't make any sense.

AND on top of that, he'd have to routinely drop into pass coverage.

WTF?

I agree. IMO if he expsoses his belly he's toast. If you can get past his length he's not as hard to block. If he's standing up his length is gone.


PhilFree:arrow:

Ralphy Boy 09-15-2009 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6077155)
JC. Jackson only did 20 reps? Seriously? I can do 15 and I'm 5'11 and I weigh 195 lbs and I am 38.

Seriously?

According to this site, yes. And a few other sources
Jackson http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings...2009&genpos=DE
Dorsey http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings...2008&genpos=DT
McBride http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings...2007&genpos=DT

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6077155)
JC. Jackson only did 20 reps? Seriously? I can do 15 and I'm 5'11 and I weigh 195 lbs and I am 38.

Seriously?

If you can run a 4.5, you're hired

Easy 6 09-15-2009 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077370)
It wouldn't have mattered.

He's not a 2-point stance, drop into coverage, 3-4 outside linebacker.

Period.

He has all of the athleticism of a younger Mike Vrabel & then some, snaring tip-toe 2 point conversion passes for petes sake...he would be one hell of an OLB IMO.

We'll never know for sure.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6077382)
He has all the athleticism of a younger Mike Vrabel & then some, snaring tip-toe 2 point conversion passes for petes sake...he would be one hell of an OLB IMO.

We'll never know for sure.

We know.

Mike Vrabel has NEVER put up several 15 plus sacks seasons.

Mike Vrabel was in the league for 5 years before he made an impact.

Mike Vrabel's best year was 10 sacks.

Mike Vrabel is paid $3.5 million per year and was dumped by a perennial Super Bowl coach.

Jared Allen, the DEFENSIVE END, is the highest paid defensive END in the league.

And rightfully so.

No offense but you don't know what you're talking about.

Have a good night.

RippedmyFlesh 09-15-2009 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077362)
Dude, he wouldn't have been "sick". He's a 4-3 down lineman and playing in a 2-point stance wouldn't have been an advantage for him. Not at all.

Like Mecca said, he'd be like Aaron Kampman.

Why do you think that Allen wanted to go to another 4-3 team?

And of all the 4-3 teams minn may have been the best place for him to go.He can look toward the center of the line and see 600lbs plus of williams taking up blockers and collapsing the pocket.A great spot for a pass rushing end to be.

Titty Meat 09-15-2009 11:31 PM

Dane theres almost no reason to debate these people when it comes to the few good draft picks Carl Peterson made. Theres alot of people who still think trading Tony Gonzalez for a 2nd round pick was a bad trade. It's too bad Pioli wasn't hired a year earlier with all those picks this team woulda been a contender for the playoffs this year.

Mecca 09-15-2009 11:31 PM

I wouldn't be thrilled being compared to Vrabel who was basically a scrub until he was nearly 30 years old...a friend of mine basically said he's a great example of a career due to modern chemistry..because well if you want HGH side affects just look at his chin.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RippedmyFlesh (Post 6077392)
And of all the 4-3 teams minn may have been the best place for him to go.He can look toward the center of the line and see 600lbs plus of williams taking up blockers and collapsing the pocket.A great spot for a pass rushing end to be.

Maybe.

He wouldn't have sucked with the Giants, either.

Or the Jets with Rex Ryan.

Easy 6 09-15-2009 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077388)
We know.

Mike Vrabel has NEVER put up several 15 plus sacks seasons.

Mike Vrabel was in the league for 5 years before he made an impact.

Mike Vrabel's best year was 10 sacks.

Mike Vrabel is paid $3.5 million per year and was dumped by a perennial Super Bowl coach.

Jared Allen, the DEFENSIVE END, is the highest paid defensive END in the league.

And rightfully so.

No offense but you don't know what you're talking about.

Have a good night.

If 'WE' know know just how dynamic & athletic he is...why is it such a stretch to see him operating in space?

Its a pointless argument, i can only speculate, the same as everyone here with all of the answers speculates.

RippedmyFlesh 09-15-2009 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077398)
Maybe.

He wouldn't have sucked with the Giants, either.

Or the Jets with Rex Ryan.

On the giants good lord....would be like bill gates hitting the lottery...the ultimate rich getting richer.

DaneMcCloud 09-15-2009 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6077410)
If 'WE' know know just how dynamic & athletic he is...why is it such a stretch to see him operating in space?

Its a pointless argument, i can only speculate, the same as everyone here with all of the answers speculates.

Alright, goddamit. Give me a ****ing break.

Jared Allen has been a 4-3 defensive end his entire professional and college career. He's been extremely successful in the NFL with not just one but two NFL teams.

Why in the ****ing world would you try to change that? That's just ****ing uninformed, fan-boy bullshit.

Jared Allen covering tight ends? WTF? Yeah, let's take him away from what he does best.

JFC.

Maybe Dwayne Bowe should be a defensive back or safety.

What do you think?

Easy 6 09-15-2009 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077414)
Alright, goddamit. Give me a ****ing break.

Jared Allen has been a 4-3 defensive end his entire professional and college career. He's been extremely successful in the NFL with not just one but two NFL teams.

Why in the ****ing world would you try to change that? That's just ****ing uninformed, fan-boy bullshit.

Maybe Dwayne Bowe should be a defensive back or safety.

What do you think?

I'm not trying to change that, why is it such an offense to wonder what could have been?

I say he could have made the transition, you & some others here dont...but to be told by people here, flat-out, that 'no he couldnt. period.' doesnt make any sense to me.

Goodnight.

RippedmyFlesh 09-15-2009 11:49 PM

Freeney when he was younger would be the kind of de that could make that switch. Thats where I thought he might play coming out of school. Prob a bit short though he's only 6'1. He's 268 now but was closer to 250 when he came out.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-15-2009 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077398)
Maybe.

He wouldn't have sucked with the Giants, either.

Or the Jets with Rex Ryan.

Allen with them this year would be ****ing sick. That team that the Vikes have been promising/projected to be for the last two years? The one that just needed a good QB to make the legitimate run?

That's New York right now. I honestly think they are going **** the Patriots world up this week. They are going to physically and defensively bloody them. Beat them down. They'll have their problems with Brady( who doesn't? ), but they will be WAY more up his ass than Buffalo, and I guarantee you will NOT see any boneheaded bullshit game-killers like McKelvin pulled under Rex Ryan.
That team is a true sleeper in the NFL right now. And they're hungry. And they're starting to believe in themselves and that they can do this because of their coach and their QB.
If they beat New England this week, I can guarantee you will see them in the post season.


Edit:

This just in.

Quote:

(has some quotes from Randy Moss) talking about facing the Jets. Moss was respectful, and seems to relish the game this weekend against Rex and the rest of the Jets.

Asked Monday night about facing off against the Jets, New England wide receiver Randy Moss said, “I can remember Coach Ryan talking about he ain’t coming to kiss no rings so I think it’s gonna be a big game. . . . I think we have our work cut out for us. The Jets defense has really picked up, they got that rookie quarterback in [Mark Sanchez] so it’s gonna be a barnburner.”

Moss said he has no issue with Ryan’s comments.

“I’ve always been a fan of the Ryan brothers,” he said. “I was in Oakland with Rob [now the defensive coordinator in Cleveland] and I played a couple times [against] Rex in Baltimore and I met old Buddy so I think that [Rex] really meant what he said and I think that he has a really good team backing him.”

DaWolf 09-15-2009 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077279)
It doesn't matter.

Jared Allen would have been traded this year because he's really not suited for the 3-4. I'm sure he would have done "okay" but he's really suited for the 4-3.

If Jared Allen were still here I doubt we'd be switching to the 3-4.

I think one of the main reasons we're switching to a 3-4 was that the guys got in here and decided that this defensive roster in essence had little to no talent to run an effective 3-4 OR 4-3 scheme, and therefore they might as well clean house and essentially start over.

Hali had been a disaster in the 4-3 without Allen. Dorsey wasn't doing anything. DJ wasn't doing anything special.

But if Jared Allen were still here, I think they'd be more inclined to try and put in some pieces around him and keep the 4-3 scheme.

But really, Carl and Herm and Gunther did such a spectacular job of ****ing up this defensive front seven that there was really no clear elite building block there. You might as well dump the trash and start over...

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-16-2009 12:02 AM

Dorsey was a goddamned rookie DT in the 4-3. He had the same kind of rookie year that basically every other rookie DT had. He had numbers almost identical to the player he was most compared to in the pre-draft process, Warren Sapp. We would have switched to the 3-4 regardless of whatever talent we had, because the FO was by-god-****ing-damned and determined to switch to it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-16-2009 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6077434)
Dorsey was a goddamned rookie DT in the 4-3. He had the same kind of rookie year that basically every other rookie DT had. He had numbers almost identical to the player he was most compared to in the pre-draft process, Warren Sapp. We would have switched to the 3-4 regardless of whatever talent we had, because the FO was by-god-****ing-damned and determined to switch to it.

Did Belichick install the 3-4 in NE right off the bat?

dj56dt58 09-16-2009 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6076299)
Funny, all I heard for three years was how Herm had this great eye for talent and how our drafts had improved under him.

the sad thing is...they did improve

Ralphy Boy 09-16-2009 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6077396)
It's too bad Pioli wasn't hired a year earlier with all those picks this team woulda been a contender for the playoffs this year.

Great way to try and end one thread that morphed into an alternate reality world. Now there is going to be 3 or 4 more threads about who we would have drafted? Would we even have traded Allen? Haley was nobody then, who would our coach be?

Phobia 09-16-2009 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6075981)
This.

You know what Dane, Im not sure why people give you so much shit.

People are insecure. Dane threatens some of them. They can't handle the braggadocious.

Mecca 09-16-2009 12:45 AM

We were always going to end up as a 3-4 team, that's what the NE guys do.

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6077469)
We were always going to end up as a 3-4 team, that's what the NE guys do.


Exactly.

Jared Allen would have been traded, regardless.

Miles 09-16-2009 01:06 AM

Kinda sucks that Turk is gone in the sense that he did show a few signs of being solid last season and is a likeable guy/story. Still the attempted shift to LB showed he had no place in this defense before camp even started.

cookster50 09-16-2009 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 6075902)
Nick Wright just cut himself.

I don't know how anyone can stand to listen to that voice for longer than the 2 seconds it takes to recognize and then switch the station.

Chiefnj2 09-16-2009 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6077396)
Theres alot of people who still think trading Tony Gonzalez for a 2nd round pick was a bad trade.

Don't you think you should wait and see what they do with that pick before coming to a conclusion that it was good or bad?

Chiefnj2 09-16-2009 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6077469)
We were always going to end up as a 3-4 team, that's what the NE guys do.

The Falcons are in a 43.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-16-2009 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6077446)
Did Belichick install the 3-4 in NE right off the bat?

No.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-16-2009 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6077610)
The Falcons are in a 43.

Dimitroff, as many of have said, is the one guy who didn't do it the way of a geometric proof. Ironically, he's also the only one to leave and have immediate success. Are the two correlated? Maybe, maybe not.

"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of a little mind"

Chiefnj2 09-16-2009 07:40 AM

Thanks Herm,

"Sitting in front of his stall in the Reliant Stadium visitors' locker room, Leon Washington kept shaking his head, trying to find the words.

The Jets had just run for 190 yards in their season-opening 24-7 win over the Texans. As the conversation turned to fullback Tony Richardson, Washington had to take a few moments to find the way to appropriately describe just how vital Richardson was to the ground game.

"Man, look here," Washington said. "You find a better fullback over the last . . . I mean this guy has been playing for 16 years. He's blocked for a lot of great ones. I've got nothing but love and respect for that guy. That guy comes out every day, and every game he does his job and it seems like he's got another eight years in him."

That's probably the last thing any opponent wants to hear. The 6-1, 238-pound Richardson is still going strong at age 37, showing no sign of slowing down. He was hampered a bit in the preseason after suffering a hip pointer on the first day of tackling drills in training camp up in Cortland. But he's bounced back nicely, serving as the lead blocker and bowling ball that knocks the pins down to pave the way for the Jets' stable of running backs.

Richardson, who's in his second year with the Jets, had two crushing blocks that sprung Thomas Jones on his way to a 106-yard, two-touchdown performance in the second half. On Jones' 38-yard touchdown run, he clocked Nick Ferguson as the safety was coming in from the right side, leveling him so hard that Ferguson crumpled to the turf.

He also sealed the right side of the line beautifully on Jones' 39-yard burst midway through the fourth quarter, locking up cornerback Brice McCain to give Jones a gaping hole to run through.

"There were some plays earlier in the first half that I was like, dang, I wish I would have gotten a better hit on this guy or whatever," Richardson said. "But that's just how the running game is. It's violent and really it's not always going to be perfect."

Reerun_KC 09-16-2009 08:21 AM

Herm is the gift that keeps on giving...

htismaqe 09-16-2009 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6077059)
I can see that he maybe doesn't have the "functional strength", but I did go back to look at some draft info to see how some of his weightroom strength compared to that of Jackson & Dorsey. Much to my surprise, he had 27 reps of 225 at the combine and 30 on his pro day. Dorsey did 27 at his pro day while Jackson only had 20. Not that it translates into playing strength, but I would think he stood a better chance at making the team if he had been asked to bulk up and play end.

Considering the guy played DE & DT (mostly DT) in college, never played LB until this summer and is no longer with the team, it is clear to me that making a LB out of him was not the solution. Obviously the coaches know a lot more than me, but a guy we apparently wasted a 2nd rounder on is no longer with the team and it sucks.

His numbers (40 yard, 3 cone, 20 yard shuttle etc) were far and away better than Dorsey. Again, while that doesnt translate to play on the field, I don't buy the idea that the new regime could care less about where a player was drafted.

I won't be surprised if he does well on another team as a DE, but the guy had 1 sack in his 15 game career, so I'm not going to cry over it.

Strength at the point of attack is usually much more about lower body strength and leverage, therefore bench press reps aren't totally meaningful.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6077146)
Are you also a fan of Carlos Mencia and/or Dane Cook?

If so, I truly hate you.

Neither.

But Stephen Lynch is fuh-knee.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6077281)
Yeah, and he already had two before that.

Sorry people, it was the right move.

This.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6077324)
Allen in the 3-4 would be like Aaron Kampman in the 3-4 I think he'll be successful but he won't be as good as he was in the 4-3.

And that.

htismaqe 09-16-2009 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6077615)
Dimitroff, as many of have said, is the one guy who didn't do it the way of a geometric proof. Ironically, he's also the only one to leave and have immediate success. Are the two correlated? Maybe, maybe not.

"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of a little mind"

True. He's a pretty singular anomaly in an otherwise fairly consistent model of the guys that have left New England.

It will be interesting to see how it all plays out, because so far, he's not just the only one to have immediate success, he's the only one to have ANY success.

The Franchise 09-16-2009 10:13 AM

Is there a possibility that if Allen was still here when the new regime took over.....that we would have stayed with the 4-3?

L.A. Chieffan 09-16-2009 10:14 AM

why would anybody miss this guy? he did nothing for us...NOTHING

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6078082)
Is there a possibility that if Allen was still here when the new regime took over.....that we would have stayed with the 4-3?

I think that Jared Allen, much like Tony Gonzalez, wouldn't be into the whole "changing of the culture thing". I think he would have been traded because these guys (Pioli, Haley and the defensive staff) are all 3-4 guys.

Plus, putting Allen in the 3-4 just wouldn't and couldn't maximize his talents. It would be a waste and I think that he'd turn into a malcontent, which would not sit well with this regime.

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6078090)
why would anybody miss this guy? he did nothing for us...NOTHING

Cool white guys that listen to country music, drink beer, hunt and play in the NFL are in short supply.

L.A. Chieffan 09-16-2009 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078113)
Cool white guys that listen to country music, drink beer, hunt and play in the NFL are in short supply.

i was talking about turk. i see now the convo switched over to jared. yeah, im pissed we let him go but it was inevitable is my take on that one

htismaqe 09-16-2009 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078106)
I think that Jared Allen, much like Tony Gonzalez, wouldn't be into the whole "changing of the culture thing". I think he would have been traded because these guys (Pioli, Haley and the defensive staff) are all 3-4 guys.

Plus, putting Allen in the 3-4 just wouldn't and couldn't maximize his talents. It would be a waste and I think that he'd turn into a malcontent, which would not sit well with this regime.

I agree.

I think they would have gone 3-4 regardless and Jared might not have had a good place to fit.

But your first sentence is the most important IMO. It's quite possible that Jared wouldn't have meshed with Haley and Pioli - much like Waters and Gonzo, he had accomplished quite a bit personally, and he probably wouldn't have appreciated the style.

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6078126)
i was talking about turk. i see now the convo switched over to jared. yeah, im pissed we let him go but it was inevitable is my take on that one

Guys named Turk are in short supply in the NFL

L.A. Chieffan 09-16-2009 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078138)
Guys named Turk are in short supply in the NFL

ha...word....hey u and tiny gonna meet up for any games this season?

Mr. Laz 09-16-2009 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6076160)
The Ravens may end up being one of the best offenses in the league, as well. It's hard to say.

They were like 11th last year. People act like it's the Raven's offense of old and it's not.

KCDC 09-16-2009 10:35 AM

From The Detroit News:

Defensive lineman Turk McBride didn't seem to fit anymore with the Kansas City Chiefs, who switched from a 4-3 defense to a 3-4 defense this offseason. The three-year pro was waived by the Chiefs on Tuesday, according to NBCsports.com.

Lions defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham had the same job with the Chiefs when McBride, 24, was drafted in the second round in 2007 and played in all 16 games his rookie season, making McBride (6-foot-2, 278 pounds) a likely waiver pickup for the Lions.

DaneMcCloud 09-16-2009 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6078145)
ha...word....hey u and tiny gonna meet up for any games this season?

Yeah, I think so.

There's a new sports bar opening in Hollywood on Friday. 7,000 square foot with forty-five 65" flat screens. Like 60 beers on tap or something called Capitol City.

I know I'll probably hit that place in October so I'll shoot you a PM to see if you're up for it.

Titty Meat 09-16-2009 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCDC (Post 6078175)
From The Detroit News:

Defensive lineman Turk McBride didn't seem to fit anymore with the Kansas City Chiefs, who switched from a 4-3 defense to a 3-4 defense this offseason. The three-year pro was waived by the Chiefs on Tuesday, according to NBCsports.com.

Lions defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham had the same job with the Chiefs when McBride, 24, was drafted in the second round in 2007 and played in all 16 games his rookie season, making McBride (6-foot-2, 278 pounds) a likely waiver pickup for the Lions.

The Lions really could go 0-16 again this year.

the Talking Can 09-16-2009 01:56 PM

mcbride picked up by lions per 610


shocker

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-16-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6078729)
The Lions really could go 0-16 again this year.

NFL.com rankings just came out. We'll be picking at number three again this year if they are to be believed.

Sure-Oz 09-16-2009 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCDC (Post 6078175)
From The Detroit News:

Defensive lineman Turk McBride didn't seem to fit anymore with the Kansas City Chiefs, who switched from a 4-3 defense to a 3-4 defense this offseason. The three-year pro was waived by the Chiefs on Tuesday, according to NBCsports.com.

Lions defensive coordinator Gunther Cunningham had the same job with the Chiefs when McBride, 24, was drafted in the second round in 2007 and played in all 16 games his rookie season, making McBride (6-foot-2, 278 pounds) a likely waiver pickup for the Lions.

Jason laconfronta (sp?) says the lions have claimed him officially

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-16-2009 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6079334)
Jason laconfronta (sp?) says the lions have claimed him officially

http://images.southparkstudios.com/i...son10/1002.jpg

Good for YOU, Turk!

milkman 09-16-2009 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6079334)
Jason laconfronta (sp?) says the lions have claimed him officially

La Canfora

ChiefaRoo 09-16-2009 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6078396)
Yeah, I think so.

There's a new sports bar opening in Hollywood on Friday. 7,000 square foot with forty-five 65" flat screens. Like 60 beers on tap or something called Capitol City.

I know I'll probably hit that place in October so I'll shoot you a PM to see if you're up for it.

Can I come? I'll buy you a $12 beer and we can look fabulous together chillin' and sh*t. :)

chagrin 09-16-2009 07:14 PM

that's what happens when you draft a ****ing back up with your second pick in the nfl draft - **** herm, ****ing stupid ****

Sure-Oz 09-16-2009 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6079357)
La Canfora

thanks lol

DaneMcCloud 09-17-2009 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo (Post 6079529)
Can I come? I'll buy you a $12 beer and we can look fabulous together chillin' and sh*t. :)

Will you be in town?

I doubt I'll look too fabulous at 10am but you're welcome to put on your best duds.

LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.