ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Should Haley be fired? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215038)

booger 09-29-2009 12:09 AM

Here comes Ror to hold the mirror while Mecca brushes his hair.
who woulda guessed.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-29-2009 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 6122251)
Here comes Ror to hold the mirror while Mecca brushes his hair.
who woulda guessed.

Incorrect. As Mecca's spiritual advisor, I have no hair-brushing duties, thank you.

booger 09-29-2009 12:21 AM

Tony Dungy won't be my life coach cause i got pets.

memyselfI 09-29-2009 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6121837)
I am really surprised that there are 33 people that think Haley should be fired. I fully acknowlege that there are several things that I have been unhappy with.... but wanting a guy fired after three games is incredible.

I suspect some are looking only at the poll and not at the posts which offer quantifiers on the "yes" vote.

Tiger's Fan 09-29-2009 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6120567)
Or that your average Chiefs fan has had so much !@#$ shoveled into them from the Peterson regime that they're willing to take any gruel Pioli/Haley feeds them.

It's funny - nobody's even trying to defend Pioli and Haley. Nobody's arguing they've done well.

All we've heard is:

1) Give him more time.
2) He's better than Herm.
3) Pioli can't hear your complaining with his SB rings in his ears.
4) Well why aren't you a GM?

C'mon folks, somebody try to make a cogent defense of what Pioli and Haley have actually done here. Critically examine the moves they've made while in charge of this team. Anyone can shut their brains off and become a set of automotons - "In Scott We Trust" doesn't take much effort. How about examining these moves without considering who made them?

From !@#$ing around in firing Herm, to drafting a 5 technique at #3 and paying him like a franchise QB, all the way to Haley's abortion of a game yesterday, how can anyone actually defend how these two have handled our team to this point?

I said after the draft that it was pretty obvious what the FO was trying to do. Stop the run. They had to start somewhere, and since we already had the young defensive backfield, that was the choice.

Unlike you, I realize it's early in the season, but there has been improvement in stopping the run. We've moved up 12 spots since last years 30th ranking, and are ahead of teams like the Giants, the Packers, the Cowboys, and the Chargers. We've also only given up one run of more than 20 yards, while giving up TWENTY SEVEN such runs last year.

It's easy to look at 0-3, and throw a childlike fit because we're not winning the Super Bowl yet, but you, and MANY others apparently have forgotten where this team is coming from. Rome wasn't built in a day, and neither are football teams that were decimated by Herm ****ing Edwards.

I suggest you and the other nancies take up heavy drinking for the forseeable future, as we won't be winning a lot of games this year. Sane people understand this, and are willing to give a little slack.

Hammock Parties 09-29-2009 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6122464)
I said after the draft that it was pretty obvious what the FO was trying to do. Stop the run. They had to start somewhere, and since we already had the young defensive backfield, that was the choice.

Unlike you, I realize it's early in the season, but there has been improvement in stopping the run. We've moved up 12 spots since last years 30th ranking, and are ahead of teams like the Giants, the Packers, the Cowboys, and the Chargers. We've also only given up one run of more than 20 yards, while giving up TWENTY SEVEN such runs last year.

It's easy to look at 0-3, and throw a childlike fit because we're not winning the Super Bowl yet, but you, and MANY others apparently have forgotten where this team is coming from. Rome wasn't built in a day, and neither are football teams that were decimated by Herm ****ing Edwards.

I suggest you and the other nancies take up heavy drinking for the forseeable future, as we won't be winning a lot of games this year. Sane people understand this, and are willing to give a little slack.

Bravo.

CHIEFS58 09-29-2009 07:21 AM

crap. i did it without realizing. anyway, its just 3 games. we have to see if there is any improvement at the end of the season. im a reerun for voting...and reading this...im just going to shut up and go away now.

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 05:02 PM

22 guys off the street could beat the Cleveland !@#$ing Browns.

Good thing we kept this guy around. It's pretty clear that all we needed to do was "give him more time!!!!"

Shoulda canned his ass 2 months ago. It was clear by the Raiders game that this team wasn't going to play for him. Worse still, it became increasingly obvious that the man just isn't smart enough to be in charge (yeah, lets just keep kicking away to Josh Cribbs).

Go ahead and give me the 'hindsight' BS. This guy was trash when he hired him, he was trash when this poll was created, he's trash now. Todd Haley is nothing more than the O-Coordinator version of Gunther Cunningham.

reerun filter, indeed.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-20-2009 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6122480)
Bravo.

You "Bravo'd" Buster Hyman.

God you suck.

Tribal Warfare 12-20-2009 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6364635)
22 guys off the street could beat the Cleveland !@#$ing Browns.

Good thing we kept this guy around. It's pretty clear that all we needed to do was "give him more time!!!!"

Shoulda canned his ass 2 months ago. It was clear by the Raiders game that this team wasn't going to play for him. Worse still, it became increasingly obvious that the man just isn't smart enough to be in charge (yeah, lets just keep kicking away to Josh Cribbs).

Go ahead and give me the 'hindsight' BS. This guy was trash when he hired him, he was trash when this poll was created, he's trash now. Todd Haley is nothing more than the O-Coordinator version of Gunther Cunningham.

reerun filter, indeed.



It's really hard not to get on Haley, the past few weeks he's mad horrific playcalling decisions.

I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he's on real shaky ground IMO.

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6364651)
You "Bravo'd" Buster Hyman.

God you suck.

The best part of that is that he "Bravo'd" Buster Hyman immediately after the guy said:

Quote:

I said after the draft that it was pretty obvious what the FO was trying to do. Stop the run. They had to start somewhere, and since we already had the young defensive backfield, that was the choice.
Bravo.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-20-2009 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6122464)
I said after the draft that it was pretty obvious what the FO was trying to do. Stop the run. They had to start somewhere, and since we already had the young defensive backfield, that was the choice.

Unlike you, I realize it's early in the season, but there has been improvement in stopping the run. We've moved up 12 spots since last years 30th ranking, and are ahead of teams like the Giants, the Packers, the Cowboys, and the Chargers. We've also only given up one run of more than 20 yards, while giving up TWENTY SEVEN such runs last year.
k.

ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL


http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/129150-1/...razy_laugh.gif

chiefs1111 12-20-2009 05:12 PM

Haley never should have been hired in the first place

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6364660)
It's really hard not to get on Haley, the past few weeks he's mad horrific playcalling decisions.

I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he's on real shaky ground IMO.

If by "the past few weeks" you mean, "starting in week 1".

I'll say the same thing I said months ago - someone, ANYONE, give me a defense of Todd Haley other than "give him more time".

His actions from the moment he has been hired, from his staff, to player personnel, to game management, have been abysmal.

Jesus, imagine how bad this team would be if Herm hadn't drafted Carr, Flowers and Charles.

I hate Herm Edwards, absolutely despise the man. But he's a better head coach than Todd Haley.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-20-2009 05:15 PM

...

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5558540)
I'm not giving the guy blind faith because he's never done it as the guy.

He's not Bill Polian.

He deserves a bit of skepticism.

So far, every major move he's made I've disagreed with.

I hate the move to a 3-4
I didn't like the Haley hire
I despise putting all of our eggs in the Cassel basket.

I was happy when we hired him, but I'm not going to let that overshadow what I feel are poor decisions.


DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 05:21 PM

C'mon Eyepod, GoChiefs, Scott Free...

Where are you mouthy mother****ers now? Where are all those eye-rolling smileys and dipshit rhetoricals?

"HE JUST NEEDS MORE TIME!!!!!!"

Look at the progress this team is making! By week 5 of next season, we'll be in a position to give up 300 yards rushing to Ki-Jana Carter.

Skip Towne 12-20-2009 05:23 PM

Looks like another poll is in order.

Rausch 12-20-2009 05:23 PM

I really don't know what Haley can do to completely **** up more.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-20-2009 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6364710)
C'mon Eyepod, GoChiefs, Scott Free...

Where are you mouthy mother****ers now? Where are all those eye-rolling smileys and dipshit rhetoricals?

"HE JUST NEEDS MORE TIME!!!!!!"

Look at the progress this team is making! By week 5 of next season, we'll be in a position to give up 300 yards rushing to Ki-Jana Carter.

They've already begun, they've just transferred the love to Cassel for today, and are stroking his monkey in different threads.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-20-2009 05:25 PM

The best was Hootie crowing about our run D after Ray Rice annihilated us in week 1.

Deberg_1990 12-20-2009 05:31 PM

Yep....I want him gone and I've been a supporter of his most of the year. I don't think there is one single thing that he has improved on this team. We could lose him tonight and lose nothing as far as the rebuild goes. He brings nothing to the table.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-20-2009 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6364745)
Yep....I want him gone and I've been a supporter of his most of the year. I don't think there is one single thing that he has improved on this team. We could lose him tonight and lose nothing as far as the rebuild goes. He brings nothing to the table.
Posted via Mobile Device

And yet, your avatar.:D

Chieftain58 12-20-2009 05:40 PM

yes

Rausch 12-20-2009 05:42 PM

How much can I say yes?

Is there a word that means more than yes?...

MichaelH 12-20-2009 05:51 PM

I was a Haley supporter through the midseason. After Hermie, anything was better. Boy how bad things have gotten. I'd love to say, "nope, let's keep Haley and see what he can do in his second year." But it will be but yet another Chief's attempt at patching the leaking dam. The whole team sucks with the exception of Charles. And he's not a 30 carry a game back. He will be done if soon the way he's being used. They definitely need an offensive coordinator, a defensive coordinator, at least one position each of defense, a whole new O-line, WR's that can catch and a QB coach that can show Cassel how to throw the ball and not go into fetal position 2 seconds after the ball is snapped. There is probably more, I'm too damn pissed to go further.

DeezNutz 12-20-2009 05:55 PM

And I was correct back then.

el borracho 12-20-2009 05:59 PM

Am I the only one who thinks Haley's offense would work with better players? As bad as we are, we often have players in position to make plays- unfortunately, they eff it up. Imagine if we had more talented players (accurate QB with an arm, receivers who actually catch, Oline worth two shits). I think Haley's offense works, I just don't think we have the players to run it (or any other, for that matter). Our roster is a mess.

damaticous 12-20-2009 06:00 PM

him and Pioli are still riding on Herm's coat tails. give it a year or two. sheesh

DeezNutz 12-20-2009 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 6364838)
Am I the only one who thinks Haley's offense would work with better players? As bad as we are, we often have players in position to make plays- unfortunately, they eff it up. Imagine if we had more talented players (accurate QB with an arm, receivers who actually catch, Oline worth two shits). I think Haley's offense works, I just don't think we have the players to run it (or any other, for that matter). Our roster is a mess.

For whom is this not true?

Haley's "ability" to manage a game would prevent the best team from winning a championship, and this is all that matters.

DeezNutz 12-20-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damaticous (Post 6364841)
him and Pioli are still riding on Herm's coat tails. give it a year or two. sheesh

Good thing, too, otherwise we'd have a kicker and Chambers.

Our regime's ability to evaluate talent has been stellar, which is why Charles was inactive earlier in the season.

Our best player was inactive while a broke dick, 2.7 YPC, spitter was getting the carries. Let that sink in for a bit.

RustShack 12-20-2009 06:04 PM

Haley should be given a chance to coach a team with a coaching staff. Its not his fault Pioli was hired late, and its not his fault he was hired late. Its also not his fault Clark pushed Gailey onto them. This shit takes time. Seriously, how many first year coaches have taken complete shit winning team in one year?

el borracho 12-20-2009 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6364842)
For whom is this not true?

Haley's "ability" to manage a game would prevent the best team from winning a championship, and this is all that matters.

Haley's game management has been awful, yes, but I don't think it has cost us as much as the derth of talent on the roster. for this reason, I wouldn't upset to see Haley again next year. He definitely needs to learn some control, but at least he is aggressive. Of course, if there is a better head coaching option, I wouldn't cry to see him go, either.

RustShack 12-20-2009 06:10 PM

We need a new assistant head coach. A white one who can manage the clock for Haley... whats Dick Curl doing?

el borracho 12-20-2009 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6364850)
Good thing, too, otherwise we'd have a kicker and Chambers.

Our regime's ability to evaluate talent has been stellar, which is why Charles was inactive earlier in the season.

Our best player was inactive while a broke dick, 2.7 YPC, spitter was getting the carries. Let that sink in for a bit.

That happens all the time in the NFL. How did Tom Brady get into the starting lineup? Kurt Warner? Hell, teams have completely discarded guys like Rich Gannon (out of football for a couple of years before Marty picked him up).

DeezNutz 12-20-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 6364866)
Haley's game management has been awful, yes, but I don't think it has cost us as much as the derth of talent on the roster. for this reason, I wouldn't upset to see Haley again next year. He definitely needs to learn some control, but at least he is aggressive. Of course, if there is a better head coaching option, I wouldn't cry to see him go, either.

I'll get blasted for this by some, but, I could give a ****:

If Bill Cowher would take the job, you give it to him in an instant. Immediate, HUGE upgrade for the entire organization.

I believe he's evolved enough as a coach to compete at the highest level. Now, would he agree not to have complete control and work with Pioli? That's the only question.

doomy3 12-20-2009 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6364901)
I'll get blasted for this by some, but, I could give a ****:

If Bill Cowher would take the job, you give it to him in an instant. Immediate, HUGE upgrade for the entire organization.

I believe he's evolved enough as a coach to compete at the highest level. Now, would he agree not to have complete control and work with Pioli? That's the only question.

I definitely agree with this. And players would want to come here.

DeezNutz 12-20-2009 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 6364880)
That happens all the time in the NFL. How did Tom Brady get into the starting lineup? Kurt Warner? Hell, teams have completely discarded guys like Rich Gannon (out of football for a couple of years before Marty picked him up).

While there's truth to what you're saying, one would be hard pressed to find a more worthless player taking the place of a clear upgrade.

Not nearly the case with the examples that you've cited.

DeezNutz 12-20-2009 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6364907)
I definitely agree with this. And players would want to come here.

Hypothetical: The Chin was the HC of this very same roster this year. What would our final record have been (be)?

Rain Man 12-20-2009 06:21 PM

Firing a coach after one year means only that you have an incompetent GM. No reasonable GM would fire a first-year coach who took over a 2-14 team.

el borracho 12-20-2009 06:21 PM

Cowher would definitely be an improvement over Haley. I'm not sure he would be my first choice though, given his offensive philosophies.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-20-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6364907)
I definitely agree with this. And players would want to come here.

Seconded.

I know some here have a problem with the team-building philosophy he displayed for so many years in Pitt, but who's to say he hasn't learned a thing or two during his time as an analyst?

Or to say that the benefit of hindsight wouldn't serve him or US well.

Players would come, and young players would RESPECT Bill Cowher.

And fear him a little bit too, which isn't a bad thing if it's done RIGHT.

Norman Einstein 12-20-2009 06:27 PM

Where is the Gaz option?

Where is the "I don't care" option?

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damaticous (Post 6364841)
him and Pioli are still riding on Herm's coat tails. give it a year or two. sheesh

I love this argument.

Every single week the best players on the field, the only guys that belong on an NFL roster, are guys that were brought in by Herm.

Haioli's responsible for Mike Brown, Vrabel, Goff, Jackson, Cassel, etc... Not to mention the departure of Pollard and the monsterous regression of Branden Albert.

Succop doesn't even count for !@#$ seeing as how Conner Barth is every bit as capable.

Chambers is the only clear upgrade that this regime has brought in and even that one was a blind squirrel. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone that didn't think bringing in Chambers as a good idea, so I'm hardly going to give him credit for managing to not screw up a complete no-brainer.

This team would be significantly further along had Haley had an aneurysm in training camp and never coached or made a single decision for this team.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-20-2009 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6365949)
I love this argument.

Every single week the best players on the field, the only guys that belong on an NFL roster, are guys that were brought in by Herm.

Haioli's responsible for Mike Brown, Vrabel, Goff, Jackson, Cassel, etc... Not to mention the departure of Pollard and the monsterous regression of Branden Albert.

Succop doesn't even count for !@#$ seeing as how Conner Barth is every bit as capable.

Chambers is the only clear upgrade that this regime has brought in and even that one was a blind squirrel. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone that didn't think bringing in Chambers as a good idea, so I'm hardly going to give him credit for managing to not screw up a complete no-brainer.

This team would be significantly further along had Haley had an aneurysm in training camp and never coached or made a single decision for this team.

The thing I like, is that the quote you're countering encapsulates the gist of the situation perfectly; they are INDEED riding Herm's( talent acquisition )coattails.

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6364852)
Haley should be given a chance to coach a team with a coaching staff. Its not his fault Pioli was hired late, and its not his fault he was hired late. Its also not his fault Clark pushed Gailey onto them. This shit takes time. Seriously, how many first year coaches have taken complete shit winning team in one year?

Why?

What have you seen to lead you to believe that Todd Haley is the best we can do in 2010 and beyond?

Some of you folks seem to think it's either retain Haley or fold the franchise.

I'll say the same thing I've said for months - Please please please PLEASE give me a reason why he should be retained.

Don't say "give him more time." Don't say "Well at least he's not Herm."

Tell me what this person has on his resume that suggests he ought be retained. Is it the 9-7 record he compiled last season with the best WR corps in football and one of the 10 most accurate passers of all time at his disposal?

Are you really putting that much stock in the fact that the man coordinated a team that won 3 games in January? Those 3 games were so well coordinated that we should give those more weight than this abortion of a season? A season in which we not only lost games, but did so in embarassing fashion and often directly because of how the coach handled the game. A season in which we surrendered 800 yds rushing in the last 3 home games with a head coach that says stopping the run is all about attitude.

Someone please tell me what he's actually done that merits continued employment.

Royal Fanatic 12-20-2009 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6365973)
Why?

What have you seen to lead you to believe that Todd Haley is the best we can do in 2010 and beyond?

Some of you folks seem to think it's either retain Haley or fold the franchise.

I'll say the same thing I've said for months - Please please please PLEASE give me a reason why he should be retained.

Don't say "give him more time." Don't say "Well at least he's not Herm."

Tell me what this person has on his resume that suggests he ought be retained. Is it the 9-7 record he compiled last season with the best WR corps in football and one of the 10 most accurate passers of all time at his disposal?

Are you really putting that much stock in the fact that the man coordinated a team that won 3 games in January? Those 3 games were so well coordinated that we should give those more weight than this abortion of a season? A season in which we not only lost games, but did so in embarassing fashion and often directly because of how the coach handled the game. A season in which we surrendered 800 yds rushing in the last 3 home games with a head coach that says stopping the run is all about attitude.

Someone please tell me what he's actually done that merits continued employment.

Clark Hunt is not going fire Pioli after one season. Pioli is not going to fire Haley after one season.

To continue to post about it is pointless. It's not going to happen.

Bugeater 12-20-2009 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 6364931)
Firing a coach after one year means only that you have an incompetent GM. No reasonable GM would fire a first-year coach who took over a 2-14 team.

Pioli would also be admitting he made a mistake, something that egomaniacs don't ever do.

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royal Fanatic (Post 6366104)
Clark Hunt is not going fire Pioli after one season. Pioli is not going to fire Haley after one season.

To continue to post about it is pointless. It's not going to happen.

This is just another version of "Give him more time"

I don't presume any of us are actually Clark Hunt, so I'm not asking you to say why you, the CEO of the Kansas City Chiefs, will definitively fire Todd Haley.

Instead I'm asking some of you fine gentlemen to engage your brains and actually proffer an opinion of your own.

The board has been in woefully short supply of these over the last several months. It seems like everyone's just falling over themselves to blindly support the current front office.

C'mon, surely someone can actually provide a cogent defense for Haley. Right?

Otter 12-20-2009 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6366112)
This is just another version of "Give him more time"

I don't presume any of us are actually Clark Hunt, so I'm not asking you to say why you, the CEO of the Kansas City Chiefs, will definitively fire Todd Haley.

Instead I'm asking some of you fine gentlemen to engage your brains and actually proffer an opinion of your own.

The board has been in woefully short supply of these over the last several months. It seems like everyone's just falling over themselves to blindly support the current front office.

C'mon, surely someone can actually provide a cogent defense for Haley. Right?

Plenty of us have described our reasons for supporting Todd Haley. You'll have to excuse us if we don't feel like making up a power point presentation for you with bullet points and action items.

Read for yourself.

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 6364931)
Firing a coach after one year means only that you have an incompetent GM. No reasonable GM would fire a first-year coach who took over a 2-14 team.

Hiring Todd Haley in the first place means you have an incompetent GM.

Drafting Tyson Jackson at #3 overall means that you have an incompetent GM.

Trading a #2 and giving a long-term deal to Matt Cassel means that you have an incompetent GM.

I can show you a lot of things about this club that scream 'incompetent GM'...undoing a problem like Todd Haley would be among the first even marginally competent thing Pioli has done in his time in KC.

DJ's left nut 12-20-2009 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 6366116)
Plenty of us have described our reasons for supporting Todd Haley. You'll have to excuse us if we don't feel like making up a power point presentation for you with bullet points and action items.

Read for yourself.

Can't even give me a link?

Surely you'll be willing to stand behind it.

Royal Fanatic 12-20-2009 11:37 PM

Fatlock stole this thread and made it tomorrow's column.

kcfanXIII 12-20-2009 11:37 PM

today is the day. its official, we gotta clean house. 286 to who? i don't normally like merry go round coaching, but he hasn't demonstrated any ability to lead this team at all. they're ****ing clown shoes!

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6366120)
Hiring Todd Haley in the first place means you have an incompetent GM.

Drafting Tyson Jackson at #3 overall means that you have an incompetent GM.

Trading a #2 and giving a long-term deal to Matt Cassel means that you have an incompetent GM.

I can show you a lot of things about this club that scream 'incompetent GM'...undoing a problem like Todd Haley would be among the first even marginally competent thing Pioli has done in his time in KC.

And you would be talking to a ****ing wall. Or a room full of Buster Hyman's!

Take your pick!

Mr. Flopnuts 12-21-2009 02:09 AM

All the responses to the old stopping the run comment is so much more hilarious today.

Mr. Plow 12-21-2009 09:42 AM

I had to watch Herm Edwards for 3 ****ing years....I can handle giving a rookie head coach 2.

Bane 12-21-2009 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 6366741)
I had to watch Herm Edwards for 3 ****ing years....I can handle giving a rookie head coach 2.

Agreed. Actualy Im starting to worry more about Pisoli for bringing Haley in as HC.:eek:

Hammock Parties 12-25-2010 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6115850)
I'd have never hired the guy to begin with so rather than piss away this season and the next, I'm still in favor of shotgunning the lunatic MFer.

A mentally unstable offensive coordinator that has alienated virtually every player he has ever directly interacted with is not head coach material.

So do I want him fired on account of his 0-3 start? Nope. I want him fired because we should've never hired the crazy one who sucks the penis to begin with.

DJ's left nut for the motha fockin WIN!

Reerun_KC 12-26-2010 12:02 AM

Oh my, I imagine how much fun this thread will be.

KurtCobain 12-26-2010 12:06 AM

Haley rules the planet.

Hammock Parties 12-26-2010 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6365949)
This team would be significantly further along had Haley had an aneurysm in training camp and never coached or made a single decision for this team.

:LOL:

Ouch, bro.

I feel bad for bumping this now.

Hammock Parties 12-26-2010 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6364635)
Todd Haley is nothing more than the O-Coordinator version of Gunther Cunningham.

http://weblog.leidenuniv.nl/media/bl...unter_2006.jpg

Wallcrawler 12-26-2010 12:08 AM

:popcorn:


Gonna be a rough ride for DJ's left nut.

Wonder how he likes his crow?

pr_capone 12-26-2010 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7288192)

There has got to be a better way to take seals as game.

Sassy Squatch 12-26-2010 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 7288202)
There has got to be a better way to take seals as game.

The Early Years of the CSCL

As the “Great White North” was slowly tamed by alcoholic racists like Jack London, seal clubbing began to garner an organized fan base. Much like lacrosse, Caucasians that came into contact with the sport were at first horrified, then perplexed, then confused. They then decided to make it palatable to the White Man by adding a number of needlessly complicated rules and equipment. It was from this mismatched meeting of cultures that seal clubbing as we know it today was born.

In 1903 the first professional seal clubbing club—the Yellowknife Yellowskins—was founded. The team would scrimmage with the local Inuit tribes; it was the popularity of these scrimmages led to the formation of the additional five teams that made up the “Original Six” teams (the Whitehorse Whiteskins, Red Deer Redskins, Armstrong Strong Arms, Saskatoon Coons, and Iqaluit ****ers) of the Canadian Seal Clubbing League.

Seal Clubbing Today

Today, seal clubbing is played on an amateur, semi-professional, and professional level. The sixteen teams of the CSCL make up the 22th largest professional sports league in North America, just beating out Major League Soccer. There are also two “minor” seal clubbing leagues—one based in Canada and another in Europe. Seal clubbing is also the official sport of the Territory of Nunavut.

In addition, the sport will be contested for the first time at an international level during the 2010 Winter Olympics—a major victory for the sport as a whole. Sixteen nations—including the United States, Russia, Germany, and China—have fielded teams, causing the sport’s popularity to increase dramatically.

Rules

Seal clubbing is typically played by two teams of six. Each man is equipped with a club—called a club—as well as clothing conducive to the weather. The teams search out and bludgeon as many seals as possible, with points being awarded based upon the size, age, and relative “cuteness” of the seals. The amount of points varies significantly from league to league, and is also affected by the time of year, and the size of the local seal population.

stevieray 12-26-2010 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6364710)
C'mon Eyepod, GoChiefs, Scott Free...

Where are you mouthy mother****ers now? Where are all those eye-rolling smileys and dipshit rhetoricals?

"HE JUST NEEDS MORE TIME!!!!!!"

Look at the progress this team is making! By week 5 of next season, we'll be in a position to give up 300 yards rushing to Ki-Jana Carter.

:spock:

damn dude....:LOL:

pr_capone 12-26-2010 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 7288210)
The Early Years of the CSCL
Seal clubbing is typically played by two teams of six. Each man is equipped with a club—called a club—as well as clothing conducive to the weather. The teams search out and bludgeon as many seals as possible, with points being awarded based upon the size, age, and relative “cuteness” of the seals. The amount of points varies significantly from league to league, and is also affected by the time of year, and the size of the local seal population.

How can they tell how cute it was after it's head has been bashed in?

Hammock Parties 12-26-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6364745)
Yep....I want him gone and I've been a supporter of his most of the year. I don't think there is one single thing that he has improved on this team. We could lose him tonight and lose nothing as far as the rebuild goes. He brings nothing to the table.
Posted via Mobile Device

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefs1111 (Post 6364673)
Haley never should have been hired in the first place

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6117639)
If Pioli followed and Eric DeCosta was hired immeditealy then I would be for it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain58 (Post 6364774)
yes

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcfanXIII (Post 6366170)
today is the day. its official, we gotta clean house. 286 to who? i don't normally like merry go round coaching, but he hasn't demonstrated any ability to lead this team at all. they're ****ing clown shoes!

http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/d...lmn002-cu3.jpg

Sassy Squatch 12-26-2010 12:18 AM

Wow, man. What are you searching for to generate these results.

Reaper16 12-26-2010 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 7288220)
Wow, man. What are you searching for to generate these results.

I'm gonna' take a chance on this one, but: posts made by DJ's Left Nut in this thread?

Sassy Squatch 12-26-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7288224)
I'm gonna' take a chance on this one, but: posts made by DJ's Left Nut in this thread?

I meant the pictures...

Hammock Parties 12-26-2010 12:24 AM

Do you think it's hard to find pictures of seals being clubbed? Really?

Sassy Squatch 12-26-2010 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7288235)
Do you think it's hard to find pictures of seals being clubbed? Really?

Nah, but the penguin slaugther has me concerned for your mental health.

Hammock Parties 12-26-2010 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 7288242)
Nah, but the penguin slaugther has me concerned for your mental health.

Those are seals, bro.

Perfectly normal.

Sassy Squatch 12-26-2010 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7288243)
Those are seals, bro.

Perfectly normal.

Sorry. They were clubbed so thoroughly I thought they had wings and a beak. Please, continue.

kcfanXIII 12-26-2010 12:47 AM

Ya. I was wrong... In my defense i posted that after the browns 3rd string rb almost broke the 300 mark against us. FWIW Im glad I was wrong.

RealSNR 12-26-2010 12:52 AM

Heh. The Donk fans all wanted us to ditch Haley

CrazyPhuD 12-26-2010 01:13 AM

I just voted to fire haley! **** yea can that bitch! Especially now that mcdaniels is available again!

Rams Fan 12-26-2010 07:07 AM

It's going to be fun seeing some posters eat crow. LMAO

Dave Lane 12-26-2010 08:51 AM

DJs Nut hoisted on his own petard for all to see.

This may leave a mark.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.