ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   ChiefsPlanet Posting Political/Religious Threads in the Main Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=224098)

jAZ 03-02-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6570091)
TI created a non-political prayer thread, said some nice things about a guy I respect, told some humorous but non-political anecdotes, and turned the other cheek when naysayers came out from under their rocks. I think I defended my position pretty well, even if you don't.

You tried to hide a political image rehabilitation thread behind a sympathy inviting prayer thread.

jAZ 03-02-2010 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 6570389)
There are plenty of us who follow politics and have opinions on political issues. You guys did this to yourselves. But in typical political fashion, it'll be spun onto all us idiots in the main forum.

It doesn't mean I don't like politics or follow politics, but sitting here watching the same group of people argue along the same party lines over and over became repetitive and pointless. The only thing it accomplished was make people angry at each other.

While I tend to agree with your assessment of DC, I also think that it's perfectly reasonable for people to choose to participate in those discussions. And it's perfectly reasonable for others to ask to keep that fuss to a separate forum.

Miles 03-02-2010 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6570511)
While I tend to agree with your assessment of DC, I also think that it's perfectly reasonable for people to choose to participate in those discussions. And it's perfectly reasonable for others to ask to keep that fuss to a separate forum.

In a way it's pretty similar to isolating the occasional group of people that likes to argue politics at a party which inevitably drags in others that normally would prefer to be having a more casual time there.

patteeu 03-02-2010 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6570494)
I don't have a "the prefix tells me where to post" standard. In fact, there can't be a "prefix tells me where to post" standard since anyone could rationalize literally any thread in DC under several literally any post in DC using just a couple of the prefixes in the Lounge.

"News"
"Life"
"Science"
"Money"
"Prayer"
"Weather"

Not to mention the way too easy... "Misc" and "Poop"

Just because you can find a way to rationalize that something is (some Lounge prefix) doesn't mean it's not political.

The standard should be "if it's about public policy, hot button political topics, political news, politicians, religion or religious news" then it should stay in DC.

I'd say that the lone exception (policed by the judgement of the mods) should be major national or local KC news stories. That's a judgement call of the Mods but it's rare.

Dick Cheney going into the hospital for the Nth time isn't a major news story. Neither is Obama getting a clean bill of health.
Praying for Obama to quit smoking or Cheney to get healthy or Biden to shut his mouth aren't exceptions either.

Bush or Cheney or Gore or Clinton or Obama or Biden dying would probably qualify as an exception.
Kerry or McCain or even Palin would be a close call but I'd lean toward major national news.
Emanuel Cleaver dying would definitely qualify as an exception (because it's a major KC story).
Stephanie Tubbs Jones dying wouldn't.

You're all over the map on this. First you've got a "prefix tells me where to post" standard that makes it impossible to make the mistakes that you were apparently prone to make (wink wink) and now you don't have a "prefix tells me where to post" because the prefixes don't give enough guidance. Pick a position and stick with it.

Needless to say, I don't find any of your various evolving standards compelling. I know I've never posted a political thread in the Lounge, "accidentally" or otherwise, whether there were prefixes or not. But I can remember you arguing that a thread you posted was news when people like Frazod were trying to say you were violating this rule. I remember that because I stuck up for you at the time and because that's when I first pointed out that the same thread posted by a poster like Rain Man or FAX would have been allowed. In addition to being a mess, you're a hypocrite just like when you were a hypocrite after you created the 2004 election mess and then joined the pro-banishment side in the aftermath. I come to the reluctant conclusion that this board would have been a lot better off if we'd have just banned you instead of splitting the forum.

Donger 03-02-2010 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJ (Post 6570474)
Besides managing my fantasy sports teams, I sometimes read big books with lots of words and no pictures. I also get the paper every morning and I don't even read the comics. Except for Sundays, of course. On Sunday mornings I read the comics and eat pancakes and never watch Meet the Press. I love Sunday morning.

LMAO

patteeu 03-02-2010 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6570506)
You tried to hide a political image rehabilitation thread behind a sympathy inviting prayer thread.

Did I? Where did you hear that? What's a political image rehabilitation thread anyway? You've got to be kidding. :shake:

jAZ 03-02-2010 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6570668)
You're all over the map on this. First you've got a "prefix tells me where to post" standard that makes it impossible to make the mistakes that you were apparently prone to make (wink wink) and now you don't have a "prefix tells me where to post" because the prefixes don't give enough guidance. Pick a position and stick with it.

Needless to say, I don't find any of your various evolving standards compelling. I know I've never posted a political thread in the Lounge, "accidentally" or otherwise, whether there were prefixes or not. But I can remember you arguing that a thread you posted was news when people like Frazod were trying to say you were violating this rule. I remember that because I stuck up for you at the time and because that's when I first pointed out that the same thread posted by a poster like Rain Man or FAX would have been allowed. In addition to being a mess, you're a hypocrite just like when you were a hypocrite after you created the 2004 election mess and then joined the pro-banishment side in the aftermath. I come to the reluctant conclusion that this board would have been a lot better off if we'd have just banned you instead of splitting the forum.

You are either delusional or a liar. You invent this "'prefix tells me where to post' standard" claim, ascribe it to me and then when I tell you I reject it and explain how it's nonsensical, you claim I'm all over the map.

The worst of DC-patteeu right here in the Lounge. Sweet.

DaFace 03-02-2010 05:56 PM

You guys are STILL talking about this?

There are always gray areas. Pat's Cheney thread was one of them. The typical response for those is to let them ride for a while, then move them over when they start getting out of hand. That's basically the same way that "media center" or "pictures" threads are handled. They live in the Lounge for a while, but eventually get moved over when appropriate. That practice predates me by a long time.

I guess I don't really understand what the debate is about.

stevieray 03-02-2010 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 6570729)
You guys are STILL talking about this?

There are always gray areas. Pat's Cheney thread was one of them. The typical response for those is to let them ride for a while, then move them over when they start getting out of hand. That's basically the same way that "media center" or "pictures" threads are handled. They live in the Lounge for a while, but eventually get moved over when appropriate. That practice predates me by a long time.

I guess I don't really understand what the debate is about.

:clap:

stevieray 03-02-2010 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6570725)
You are either delusional or a liar. You invent this "'prefix tells me where to post' standard" claim, ascribe it to me and then when I tell you I reject it and explain how it's nonsensical, you claim I'm all over the map.

The worst of DC-patteeu right here in the Lounge. Sweet.

...and jaz

Hog's Gone Fishin 03-02-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 6570729)
You guys are STILL talking about this?

There are always gray areas. Pat's Cheney thread was one of them. The typical response for those is to let them ride for a while, then move them over when they start getting out of hand. That's basically the same way that "media center" or "pictures" threads are handled. They live in the Lounge for a while, but eventually get moved over when appropriate. That practice predates me by a long time.

I guess I don't really understand what the debate is about.




It's because frazod has mod envy. He really wants the superpower to be able to ban everyone on CP so he can be the only one to start a thread and then post in it. He talks to himself all day long anyway so he would love to be able to do it here.

Frazod 03-02-2010 06:02 PM

Patty's butthurt over the creation of the DC forum is eternal. LMAO

patteeu 03-02-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6570725)
You are either delusional or a liar. You invent this "'prefix tells me where to post' standard" claim, ascribe it to me and then when I tell you I reject it and explain how it's nonsensical, you claim I'm all over the map.

The worst of DC-patteeu right here in the Lounge. Sweet.

One of the worst things about you is your hair trigger for calling people liars. It's a serious character flaw, IMO.

Frazod 03-02-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 6570752)
[/B]


It's because frazod has mod envy. He really wants the superpower to be able to ban everyone on CP so he can be the only one to start a thread and then post in it. He talks to himself all day long anyway so he would love to be able to do it here.

You still offering a free gallon of jiz with the purchase of every I HATE FRAZOD t-shirt? :D

Donger 03-02-2010 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 6570752)
[/B]


It's because frazod has mod envy. He really wants the superpower to be able to ban everyone on CP so he can be the only one to start a thread and then post in it. He talks to himself all day long anyway so he would love to be able to do it here.

I don't have any problems with frazod, but I must admit that the above seems to be as least somewhat accurate.

Frazod 03-02-2010 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6570754)
One of the worst things about you is your hair trigger for calling people liars. It's a serious character flaw, IMO.

So is actually being one.

patteeu 03-02-2010 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 6570729)
You guys are STILL talking about this?

There are always gray areas. Pat's Cheney thread was one of them. The typical response for those is to let them ride for a while, then move them over when they start getting out of hand. That's basically the same way that "media center" or "pictures" threads are handled. They live in the Lounge for a while, but eventually get moved over when appropriate. That practice predates me by a long time.

I guess I don't really understand what the debate is about.

What was initially going on here, IMO, was an effort to push as much of that gray area into the no-go zone as possible.

More recently, I think it's become an effort to poison the well for "patteeu posts" in particular even though I almost never post threads that are even close to the gray area in the Lounge. But I think I acquitted myself pretty decently in that Cheney thread so I have confidence that nothing will change.

Frazod 03-02-2010 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6570780)
I don't have any problems with frazod, but I must admit that the above seems to be as least somewhat accurate.

Why would I want the aggravation? Besides, I really don't have much trouble getting things done around here. Especially when patteeu is being so helpful.

RJ 03-02-2010 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6570771)
You still offering a free gallon of jiz with the purchase of every I HATE FRAZOD t-shirt? :D

Fraz, I hate to admit this, but that free gallon of pig jiz was just too good of a deal to pass up. He even threw in a handy carrying case. Well, he called it a carrying case anyway. I thought it looked like a regular old plastic bag but still, it was free!

I'll probably never even wear the shirt except maybe when I'm doing yard work or washing the car. I hope you don't mind.

Frazod 03-02-2010 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJ (Post 6570804)
Fraz, I hate to admit this, but that free gallon of pig jiz was just too good of a deal to pass up. He even threw in a handy carrying case. Well, he called it a carrying case anyway. I thought it looked like a regular old plastic bag but still, it was free!

I'll probably never even wear the shirt except maybe when I'm doing yard work or washing the car. I hope you don't mind.

You cut me deep, man. :sulk:



LMAO

Donger 03-02-2010 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6570799)
Why would I want the aggravation? Besides, I really don't have much trouble getting things done around here. Especially when patteeu is being so helpful.

Are you suggesting that you wouldn't like the power of being a mod?

jAZ 03-02-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6570754)
One of the worst things about you is your hair trigger for calling people liars. It's a serious character flaw, IMO.

I'd say lying and claiming that I established any prefix "standard" is a rather obvious character flaw. Being delusional is merely a personal failure beyond your control.

I'm betting you are lying, but who knows.

Hammock Parties 03-02-2010 07:03 PM

Threads bitching about threads that belong in DC belong in DC.

Frazod 03-02-2010 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6570905)
Are you suggesting that you wouldn't like the power of being a mod?

I don't think any of them enjoy it. And as much as I'd like to torment the shitbags I hate and then eventually ban them once I got bored with it, I realize that no moderator could do that and remain a moderator for very long. It's kind of like not being able to go around shooting assholes just because I have a gun. With power comes responsibility.

Besides, I derive plenty of enjoyment from just driving them insane.

chasedude 03-02-2010 07:42 PM

My dad once told me Religion is like Masturbation.
1. It should never be brought up in casual conversation.
2. It's something that should be done privately or with like minded people.
3. I know it's your right to do as you wish, but just try not to get any on me.

I think religious threads along with politics should stay in the DC forums where no one as to see them on the main page that doesn't want to. I can understand a N00b coming in for the first time as I was once and rep bombed and ostracized in a huge flaming thread take over should be given a chance without a banning. BUT, if they continue without recourse then a banning it should be.

So, I guess I'm gonna vote yes with a condition. ONE chance, just one should be enough along with a rep bombing from everyone on the boards to change the mind. If not then let the ban hammer fly!

Norman Einstein 03-02-2010 07:46 PM

I thought it was said before that during off season pretty much anything goes?

Donger 03-02-2010 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6570932)
I don't think any of them enjoy it. And as much as I'd like to torment the shitbags I hate and then eventually ban them once I got bored with it, I realize that no moderator could do that and remain a moderator for very long. It's kind of like not being able to go around shooting assholes just because I have a gun. With power comes responsibility.

Besides, I derive plenty of enjoyment from just driving them insane.

You didn't answer my question.

jAZ 03-02-2010 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 6570729)
You guys are STILL talking about this?

There are always gray areas. Pat's Cheney thread was one of them. The typical response for those is to let them ride for a while, then move them over when they start getting out of hand. That's basically the same way that "media center" or "pictures" threads are handled. They live in the Lounge for a while, but eventually get moved over when appropriate. That practice predates me by a long time.

I guess I don't really understand what the debate is about.

It is a judgement call. I might disagree with a Mod's judgement in a given case, but it's your call not mine.

But I think Frazod's poll was a question of changing the protocol to stop the relatively recent trend of posters who know better but have chosen to move their religious or politics topics out into the Lounge.

Since there really isn't any reason for a DC regular to accidentally post a political thread in the Lounge, any thread that shows up in the Lounge is deliberately there.

In some cases it might be a noob who made a mistake. In some cases, it's a major news story that is a rightful exception.

But in the last few cases, it's clearly a deliberate effort by a few to broaden the visibility of their political or religious topic. It's deliberate choices like that that IMO could be subject to extra punishment at the discretion of the Mod.

Norman Einstein 03-02-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6571081)
It is a judgement call. I might disagree with a Mod's judgement in a given case, but it's your call not mine.

But I think Frazod's poll was a question of changing the protocol to stop the relatively recent trend of posters who know better but have chosen to move their religious or politics topics out into the Lounge.

Since there really isn't any reason for a DC regular to accidentally post a political thread in the Lounge, any thread that shows up in the Lounge is deliberately there.

In some cases it might be a noob who made a mistake. In some cases, it's a major news story that is a rightful exception.

But in the last few cases, it's clearly a deliberate effort by a few to broaden the visibility of their political or religious topic. It's deliberate choices like that that IMO could be subject to extra punishment at the discretion of the Mod.

Is there currently a rule that says you cannot post political or religious threads here? As I asked before, I thought during the off season everything was open until the draft, then after the draft until camps started setting up.

Not everyone has a hard on for religion like frazod seems to have. He can hate it here just as much as he can hate it there.

I find it shameful that Christians get more disrespect on this bulletin board than most I've seen. It's almost like if you are an NFL fan you are not supposed to be religious because the games are mostly on Sunday.

My point is that if you don't like religious type threads just stay out of them! That would be a very easy fix.

FAX 03-02-2010 08:44 PM

What about hunting threads? Some Planeteers are vegetarians and aren't exactly keen on the whole idea of murdering a poor, defenseless elk in cold blood.

Not that I have a problem with it. Personally, I love killing elks. The more elks I kill, the better I feel. The way I see it, the only good elk is a dead elk. Elks need to keep away from my ass.

But, I think there might be some people who would be offended by hunting threads and the murderous bastards who post them. Peanut butter lovers, and all like that.

FAX

Bwana 03-02-2010 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6571285)
What about hunting threads? Some Planeteers are vegetarians and aren't exactly keen on the whole idea of murdering a poor, defenseless elk in cold blood.

Not that I have a problem with it. Personally, I love killing elks. The more elks I kill, the better I feel. The way I see it, the only good elk is a dead elk. Elks need to keep away from my ass.

But, I think there might be some people who would be offended by hunting threads and the murderous bastards who post them. Peanut butter lovers, and all like that.

FAX

That's an easy one Mr. FAX, those of us who own firearms and love to hunt, just hunt them down, shoot them a few times and kick a little dirt on them.

Frazod 03-02-2010 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 6571279)
Is there currently a rule that says you cannot post political or religious threads here? As I asked before, I thought during the off season everything was open until the draft, then after the draft until camps started setting up.

Not everyone has a hard on for religion like frazod seems to have. He can hate it here just as much as he can hate it there.

I find it shameful that Christians get more disrespect on this bulletin board than most I've seen. It's almost like if you are an NFL fan you are not supposed to be religious because the games are mostly on Sunday.

My point is that if you don't like religious type threads just stay out of them! That would be a very easy fix.

And my point is that we have an entire forum set up for you and your pals to whine about communism and brown people and abortion and how everybody who doesn't think exactly like you is going to hell, so why not post it there?

Nice name change, BTW. But if you're trying to revitalize your image, it isn't working.

FAX 03-02-2010 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bwana (Post 6571312)
That's an easy one Mr. FAX, those of us who own firearms and love to hunt, just hunt them down, shoot them a few times and kick a little dirt on them.

An excellent idea, Mr. Bwana.

But, actually, I'd prefer to set several enormous iron bear traps they could catch their foot in and (after the initial shock due to excruciating pain and loss of blood has worn off, of course) be faced with the horrific choice of either dying of hunger or having to gnaw off their own limb.

FAX

DaFace 03-02-2010 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 6571279)
Is there currently a rule that says you cannot post political or religious threads here? As I asked before, I thought during the off season everything was open until the draft, then after the draft until camps started setting up.

There's never been an "offseason mode" around here. Poop threads are as welcome in the Lounge during the season as they are in the offseason. Conversely, political threads are as unwelcome in the Lounge during the offseason as they are during the season.

Norman Einstein 03-02-2010 09:08 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6571345)
And my point is that we have an entire forum set up for you and your pals to whine about communism and brown people and abortion and how everybody who doesn't think exactly like you is going to hell, so why not post it there?

Nice name change, BTW. But if you're trying to revitalize your image, it isn't working.

Are there rules that state political and religious cannot be posted here?

Your attempt to call me a racist fails badly. Abortion is something that everyone has an opinion on. I've never said, in my life, that if you don't believe the way I do you are going to hell. If you are going to hell it's totally your life choices and nothing posted by anyone here or in the other forum has an impact on that.

If you feel I need to have an image change you should probably post that in the other forum, it doesn't belong here.

Frazod 03-02-2010 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 6571375)
There's never been an "offseason mode" around here. Poop threads are as welcome in the Lounge during the season as they are in the offseason. Conversely, political threads are as unwelcome in the Lounge during the offseason as they are during the season.

BTW, I won't mind at all if you're inclined to lock this thread if you've grown weary of it. Seems like it's pretty much run its course at this point.

Frazod 03-02-2010 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 6571386)
Are there rules that state political and religious cannot be posted here?

Your attempt to call me a racist fails badly. Abortion is something that everyone has an opinion on. I've never said, in my life, that if you don't believe the way I do you are going to hell. If you are going to hell it's totally your life choices and nothing posted by anyone here or in the other forum has an impact on that.

If you feel I need to have an image change you should probably post that in the other forum, it doesn't belong here.

Nice button. I assume you have a lot of them. LMAO

DaFace 03-02-2010 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6571414)
BTW, I won't mind at all if you're inclined to lock this thread if you've grown weary of it. Seems like it's pretty much run its course at this point.

Eh, I could just ignore it if I wanted to. I'm not generally a fan of locking threads. Though I kind of agree that this one fails to entertain.

Frazod 03-02-2010 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 6571429)
Eh, I could just ignore it if I wanted to. I'm not generally a fan of locking threads. Though I kind of agree that this one fails to entertain.

It's certainly entertained me. :evil:

Norman Einstein 03-02-2010 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6571426)
Nice button. I assume you have a lot of them. LMAO

I imported them specifically for you.

Virtually every one of them match your persona.

Norman Einstein 03-02-2010 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 6571375)
There's never been an "offseason mode" around here. Poop threads are as welcome in the Lounge during the season as they are in the offseason. Conversely, political threads are as unwelcome in the Lounge during the offseason as they are during the season.

So which category does this thread fall under?

Frazod 03-02-2010 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 6571459)
I imported them specifically for you.

Virtually every one of them match your persona.

As always, I'm thrilled that you disapprove. :thumb:

Norman Einstein 03-02-2010 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6571479)
As always, I'm thrilled that you disapprove. :thumb:

I don't disapprove. I couldn't have less respect for people like you. To waste my time disapproving of them is a waste of my time.

If you are going for disapproval you may have just failed.

Frazod 03-02-2010 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 6571511)
I don't disapprove. I couldn't have less respect for people like you. To waste my time disapproving of them is a waste of my time.

If you are going for disapproval you may have just failed.

Well, on this point we certainly agree.

dirk digler 03-02-2010 09:42 PM

Hey Daface I just wanted to let you know I will be starting a Happy Birthday thread for Obama in a few months. This thread will be news and is not intended to be political, but if people like patteeu and his ilk can't behave themselves and moderators think it deserves more reverent treatment, I won't have any problem with them moving it to the DC sanctuary.

Just thought I would give you a heads up. ;)

jAZ 03-02-2010 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 6571511)
I don't disapprove. I couldn't have less respect for people like you. To waste my time disapproving of them is a waste of my time.

If you are going for disapproval you may have just failed.

How much "time" did it take you to post this?

Norman Einstein 03-02-2010 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6571592)
How much "time" did it take you to post this?

Probably less time than it took you to post yours.

patteeu 03-03-2010 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6570919)
I'd say lying and claiming that I established any prefix "standard" is a rather obvious character flaw. Being delusional is merely a personal failure beyond your control.

I'm betting you are lying, but who knows.

I think you'd do well to take that position more often, given that you're so regularly wrong when you try to tell us what other people are thinking.

patteeu 03-03-2010 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6571081)
It is a judgement call. I might disagree with a Mod's judgement in a given case, but it's your call not mine.

But I think Frazod's poll was a question of changing the protocol to stop the relatively recent trend of posters who know better but have chosen to move their religious or politics topics out into the Lounge.

Since there really isn't any reason for a DC regular to accidentally post a political thread in the Lounge, any thread that shows up in the Lounge is deliberately there.

In some cases it might be a noob who made a mistake. In some cases, it's a major news story that is a rightful exception.

But in the last few cases, it's clearly a deliberate effort by a few to broaden the visibility of their political or religious topic. It's deliberate choices like that that IMO could be subject to extra punishment at the discretion of the Mod.

Could someone list these "other cases" and this "recent trend" that you're talking about? I haven't noticed any significant difference lately.

patteeu 03-03-2010 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6571414)
BTW, I won't mind at all if you're inclined to lock this thread if you've grown weary of it. Seems like it's pretty much run its course at this point.

Good Lord. Frazod's inner nazi mod is coming out again. Since when do we lock threads around here just because some people might have grown weary of them? Are you familiar with Luv's "I have a date" thread? You'd be a horrible moderator.

patteeu 03-03-2010 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6571544)
Hey Daface I just wanted to let you know I will be starting a Happy Birthday thread for Obama in a few months. This thread will be news and is not intended to be political, but if people like patteeu and his ilk can't behave themselves and moderators think it deserves more reverent treatment, I won't have any problem with them moving it to the DC sanctuary.

Just thought I would give you a heads up. ;)

You won't have to worry about me behaving. You probably won't even see me in it.

jAZ 03-03-2010 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6572041)
Could someone list these "other cases" and this "recent trend" that you're talking about? I haven't noticed any significant difference lately.

Aside from Donger's recent display I was referring to GoChiefs and his ungoldly woman/rape thread.

patteeu 03-03-2010 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6572184)
Aside from Donger's recent display I was referring to GoChiefs and his ungoldly woman/rape thread.

OK. The Donger thread came long after this one and I skipped the GoChiefs thread entirely. Sounds to me like we're not really talking about much of a trend here.

Frazod 03-03-2010 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6572050)
Good Lord. Frazod's inner nazi mod is coming out again. Since when do we lock threads around here just because some people might have grown weary of them? Are you familiar with Luv's "I have a date" thread? You'd be a horrible moderator.

Doesn't matter to me. I thought he might be getting tired of it. But if you want to continue to cry, I'll happily to continue to mock you, while the vote against you continues to hover around a 70/30 split. Works for me. :thumb:

Frazod 03-03-2010 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6572184)
Aside from Donger's recent display I was referring to GoChiefs and his ungoldly woman/rape thread.

Bootlegged has been testing the waters as well.

patteeu 03-03-2010 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6572268)
Doesn't matter to me. I thought he might be getting tired of it. But if you want to continue to cry, I'll happily to continue to mock you, while the vote against you continues to hover around a 70/30 split. Works for me. :thumb:

Vote against me? I didn't even take a position. :shrug:

If I had, I'd have been in agreement with those who said that blatant and repeated disregard for the rules of the board ought to continue to be a bannable offense just like it's always been. I can't tell from your poorly designed poll whether that puts me in the majority or the minority.

patteeu 03-03-2010 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6572272)
Bootlegged has been testing the waters as well.

Link?

Frazod 03-03-2010 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6572318)
Vote against me? I didn't even take a position. :shrug:

If I had, I'd have been in agreement with those who said that blatant and repeated disregard for the rules of the board ought to continue to be a bannable offense just like it's always been. I can't tell from your poorly designed poll whether that puts me in the majority or the minority.

LMAO Please, keep posting. You are a shining beacon of all that sucks about DC.

As for Bootlegged's thread, it was the one about NBC menu with all the racial overtones. It's in DC now. Find it yourself.

patteeu 03-03-2010 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6572332)
LMAO Please, keep posting. You are a shining beacon of all that sucks about DC.

As for Bootlegged's thread, it was the one about NBC menu with all the racial overtones. It's in DC now. Find it yourself.

Race-related threads are not banned from the Lounge. If they were, the "I literally got goosebumps and started shaking" thread would have been sent packing. It's what happens after racemongers like yourself start pissing yourselves and bleeding all over otherwise unobjectionable threads like Bootlegged's menu thread that they get too political for the faint-of-heart.

That was a great example of the way who the poster was had more to do with what happened to that thread than what it was about.

Frazod 03-03-2010 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6572342)
Race-related threads are not banned from the Lounge. If they were, the "I literally got goosebumps and started shaking" thread would have been sent packing. It's what happens after racemongers like yourself start pissing yourselves and bleeding all over otherwise unobjectionable threads like Bootlegged's menu thread that they get too political for the faint-of-heart.

That was a great example of the way who the poster was had more to do with what happened to that thread than what it was about.

Yes, poor old Bootlegged. I'll bet he had to attend klan-sponsored therapy sessions after his thread got moved. LMAO

dirk digler 03-03-2010 10:13 AM

I swear is there a bigger whiner on this board than patteeu?

stevieray 03-03-2010 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6572413)
I swear is there a bigger whiner on this board than patteeu?

fraz

patteeu 03-03-2010 10:17 AM

dirk must think I'm the stepfather who stole his mother's affections away from him.

Brock 03-03-2010 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6572424)
dirk must think I'm the stepfather who stole his mother's affections away from him.

ROFL

dirk digler 03-03-2010 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6572420)
fraz

LMAO That was predictable. It just seems he whines alot.

dirk digler 03-03-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6572424)
dirk must think I'm the stepfather who stole his mother's affections away from him.

you were

Frazod 03-03-2010 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6572420)
fraz

I'm so happy that you disapprove. :thumb:

dirk digler 03-03-2010 10:29 AM

Cmon patty you have anything else to whine about? Is my mom not putting out as much as you like? Is she not cooking the eggs the way you want them?

patteeu 03-03-2010 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6572462)
Cmon patty you have anything else to whine about? Is my mom not putting out as much as you like? Is she not cooking the eggs the way you want them?

I'm sure your mother is a lovely woman, but I swear I'm not the guy who took her from you. If she'll make me eggs, I might stop by for breakfast someday though.

stevieray 03-03-2010 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6572444)
I'm so happy that you disapprove. :thumb:

disaprove...?

no no no..it's quite the accomplishment...you should be proud.

Frazod 03-03-2010 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 6572475)
disaprove...?

no no no..it's quite the accomplishment...you should be proud.

Indeed.

dirk digler 03-03-2010 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6572474)
I'm sure your mother is a lovely woman, but I swear I'm not the guy who took her from you. If she'll make me eggs, I might stop by for breakfast someday though.

She is a good cook

FAX 03-03-2010 10:42 AM

Hmmm. I didn't realize that the "goosebumps" thread was race-related. I haven't opened it for a long time, though, so I don't really know. Maybe it took a turn I didn't see.

Anyhow, I have always operated under the impression that people of any and all races, creeds, colors, or sexual orientation experienced goosebump symptomatology from time to time. Is that incorrect? Unless we're talking about people who possess no skin. The skinless would naturally go through life goosebump free, I suppose. But, it's generally considered difficult, at best, to establish the race of a person with no skin. In cases where a person is utterly skinless, alternate means of determining race must be employed. Bowling aptitude, for example. If utilizing a house ball and renting shoes, a game of bowling is a fairly inexpensive and usually highly accurate method of determining race. Of course, bowling while skinless can, in itself, be problematic. In cases of that nature, it's vitally important to wear a silk bowling shirt exclusively. Bowling shirts made from other materials, synthetic or otherwise, can irritate the skinless person causing his or her bowling score to suffer potentially resulting in a false negative.

FAX

patteeu 03-03-2010 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6572491)
She is a good cook

Invite me over sometime when your stepdad will let you visit her.

RJ 03-03-2010 10:49 AM

FAX, I believe you may be on to something. To the best of my knowledge, black folks don't bowl, except for the BICO's. That's "Black in Color Only" for the acronym challenged. And even among the bowling black folks, I'm sure that none of them would be caught dead in an official bowling shirt. This deserves further research.

patteeu 03-03-2010 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6572513)
Hmmm. I didn't realize that the "goosebumps" thread was race-related. I haven't opened it for a long time, though, so I don't really know. Maybe it took a turn I didn't see.

It was race related from the beginning. The article in the OP alludes to a race controversy that may or may not have led Coke to re-score the competition so that a black sorority would share the award with the white girls who originally won it. Coke claims they found and corrected a scoring error without explaining what that error was.

The difference between that thread and the Bootlegged thread is that no one went off on Wutamess claiming he was racist just for posting it the way people went after Bootlegged. Wutamess's thread never became contentious, but it was just as much about race as Bootlegged's was. It would be different if Bootlegged had started his thread with a racist rant or something, but he didn't. He just posted a race-related topic like Wutamess did. Of course, the video in Wutamess's thread was more interesting and had more sexy chicks in it than Bootlegged's picture of a menu so that's a difference too.

RJ 03-03-2010 11:02 AM

You guys might think this sounds crazy, but I'm starting to believe that there are some board members who just like to argue, and don't really much care what the subject matter is. In fact, I'm pretty sure that I could start a thread about, say, the history of the potato, and if the right planeteers got involved there would eventually be a fight. Sure, most people would agree that the potato isn't the most controversial tuber - that honor would have to go to the yucca - but I have no doubt that a bone of contention would eventually be found, leading to acrimony and hilarity.

Of course, there are some who might disagree with me.

patteeu 03-03-2010 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RJ (Post 6572591)
You guys might think this sounds crazy, but I'm starting to believe that there are some board members who just like to argue, and don't really much care what the subject matter is. In fact, I'm pretty sure that I could start a thread about, say, the history of the potato, and if the right planeteers got involved there would eventually be a fight. Sure, most people would agree that the potato isn't the most controversial tuber - that honor would have to go to the yucca - but I have no doubt that a bone of contention would eventually be found, leading to acrimony and hilarity.

Of course, there are some who might disagree with me.

The yucca? You can't be serious and if you are, you're dumber than dirk.

patteeu 03-03-2010 11:07 AM

Oops. That last post was supposed to say "dumber than dirt". Damn this iPhone and it's small keypad! ;)

FAX 03-03-2010 11:07 AM

The history of the potato is actually quite fascinating.

The potato was originally from Peru where the local inhabitants laid them out on the cliffs. There, the ocean breezes, sunshine, and cool weather would, essentially, freeze dry the little spuds. As a result, they attained the exact carbohydrate to protein ratio necessary for human survival.

Once taken to Europe, of course, they were responsible for the industrial revolution since, for the first time, persons didn't have to spend all their time acquiring food. The resultant "spare time" provided a work force that allowed the industrial revolution to take place.

Therefore, the lowly spud is directly responsible for putting a man on the moon. Plus, you can make little people out of them with toothpicks.

FAX


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.