![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Needless to say, I don't find any of your various evolving standards compelling. I know I've never posted a political thread in the Lounge, "accidentally" or otherwise, whether there were prefixes or not. But I can remember you arguing that a thread you posted was news when people like Frazod were trying to say you were violating this rule. I remember that because I stuck up for you at the time and because that's when I first pointed out that the same thread posted by a poster like Rain Man or FAX would have been allowed. In addition to being a mess, you're a hypocrite just like when you were a hypocrite after you created the 2004 election mess and then joined the pro-banishment side in the aftermath. I come to the reluctant conclusion that this board would have been a lot better off if we'd have just banned you instead of splitting the forum. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The worst of DC-patteeu right here in the Lounge. Sweet. |
You guys are STILL talking about this?
There are always gray areas. Pat's Cheney thread was one of them. The typical response for those is to let them ride for a while, then move them over when they start getting out of hand. That's basically the same way that "media center" or "pictures" threads are handled. They live in the Lounge for a while, but eventually get moved over when appropriate. That practice predates me by a long time. I guess I don't really understand what the debate is about. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's because frazod has mod envy. He really wants the superpower to be able to ban everyone on CP so he can be the only one to start a thread and then post in it. He talks to himself all day long anyway so he would love to be able to do it here. |
Patty's butthurt over the creation of the DC forum is eternal. LMAO
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
More recently, I think it's become an effort to poison the well for "patteeu posts" in particular even though I almost never post threads that are even close to the gray area in the Lounge. But I think I acquitted myself pretty decently in that Cheney thread so I have confidence that nothing will change. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'll probably never even wear the shirt except maybe when I'm doing yard work or washing the car. I hope you don't mind. |
Quote:
LMAO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm betting you are lying, but who knows. |
Threads bitching about threads that belong in DC belong in DC.
|
Quote:
Besides, I derive plenty of enjoyment from just driving them insane. |
My dad once told me Religion is like Masturbation.
1. It should never be brought up in casual conversation. 2. It's something that should be done privately or with like minded people. 3. I know it's your right to do as you wish, but just try not to get any on me. I think religious threads along with politics should stay in the DC forums where no one as to see them on the main page that doesn't want to. I can understand a N00b coming in for the first time as I was once and rep bombed and ostracized in a huge flaming thread take over should be given a chance without a banning. BUT, if they continue without recourse then a banning it should be. So, I guess I'm gonna vote yes with a condition. ONE chance, just one should be enough along with a rep bombing from everyone on the boards to change the mind. If not then let the ban hammer fly! |
I thought it was said before that during off season pretty much anything goes?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I think Frazod's poll was a question of changing the protocol to stop the relatively recent trend of posters who know better but have chosen to move their religious or politics topics out into the Lounge. Since there really isn't any reason for a DC regular to accidentally post a political thread in the Lounge, any thread that shows up in the Lounge is deliberately there. In some cases it might be a noob who made a mistake. In some cases, it's a major news story that is a rightful exception. But in the last few cases, it's clearly a deliberate effort by a few to broaden the visibility of their political or religious topic. It's deliberate choices like that that IMO could be subject to extra punishment at the discretion of the Mod. |
Quote:
Not everyone has a hard on for religion like frazod seems to have. He can hate it here just as much as he can hate it there. I find it shameful that Christians get more disrespect on this bulletin board than most I've seen. It's almost like if you are an NFL fan you are not supposed to be religious because the games are mostly on Sunday. My point is that if you don't like religious type threads just stay out of them! That would be a very easy fix. |
What about hunting threads? Some Planeteers are vegetarians and aren't exactly keen on the whole idea of murdering a poor, defenseless elk in cold blood.
Not that I have a problem with it. Personally, I love killing elks. The more elks I kill, the better I feel. The way I see it, the only good elk is a dead elk. Elks need to keep away from my ass. But, I think there might be some people who would be offended by hunting threads and the murderous bastards who post them. Peanut butter lovers, and all like that. FAX |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nice name change, BTW. But if you're trying to revitalize your image, it isn't working. |
Quote:
But, actually, I'd prefer to set several enormous iron bear traps they could catch their foot in and (after the initial shock due to excruciating pain and loss of blood has worn off, of course) be faced with the horrific choice of either dying of hunger or having to gnaw off their own limb. FAX |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Your attempt to call me a racist fails badly. Abortion is something that everyone has an opinion on. I've never said, in my life, that if you don't believe the way I do you are going to hell. If you are going to hell it's totally your life choices and nothing posted by anyone here or in the other forum has an impact on that. If you feel I need to have an image change you should probably post that in the other forum, it doesn't belong here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Virtually every one of them match your persona. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you are going for disapproval you may have just failed. |
Quote:
|
Hey Daface I just wanted to let you know I will be starting a Happy Birthday thread for Obama in a few months. This thread will be news and is not intended to be political, but if people like patteeu and his ilk can't behave themselves and moderators think it deserves more reverent treatment, I won't have any problem with them moving it to the DC sanctuary.
Just thought I would give you a heads up. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I had, I'd have been in agreement with those who said that blatant and repeated disregard for the rules of the board ought to continue to be a bannable offense just like it's always been. I can't tell from your poorly designed poll whether that puts me in the majority or the minority. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for Bootlegged's thread, it was the one about NBC menu with all the racial overtones. It's in DC now. Find it yourself. |
Quote:
That was a great example of the way who the poster was had more to do with what happened to that thread than what it was about. |
Quote:
|
I swear is there a bigger whiner on this board than patteeu?
|
Quote:
|
dirk must think I'm the stepfather who stole his mother's affections away from him.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cmon patty you have anything else to whine about? Is my mom not putting out as much as you like? Is she not cooking the eggs the way you want them?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
no no no..it's quite the accomplishment...you should be proud. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hmmm. I didn't realize that the "goosebumps" thread was race-related. I haven't opened it for a long time, though, so I don't really know. Maybe it took a turn I didn't see.
Anyhow, I have always operated under the impression that people of any and all races, creeds, colors, or sexual orientation experienced goosebump symptomatology from time to time. Is that incorrect? Unless we're talking about people who possess no skin. The skinless would naturally go through life goosebump free, I suppose. But, it's generally considered difficult, at best, to establish the race of a person with no skin. In cases where a person is utterly skinless, alternate means of determining race must be employed. Bowling aptitude, for example. If utilizing a house ball and renting shoes, a game of bowling is a fairly inexpensive and usually highly accurate method of determining race. Of course, bowling while skinless can, in itself, be problematic. In cases of that nature, it's vitally important to wear a silk bowling shirt exclusively. Bowling shirts made from other materials, synthetic or otherwise, can irritate the skinless person causing his or her bowling score to suffer potentially resulting in a false negative. FAX |
Quote:
|
FAX, I believe you may be on to something. To the best of my knowledge, black folks don't bowl, except for the BICO's. That's "Black in Color Only" for the acronym challenged. And even among the bowling black folks, I'm sure that none of them would be caught dead in an official bowling shirt. This deserves further research.
|
Quote:
The difference between that thread and the Bootlegged thread is that no one went off on Wutamess claiming he was racist just for posting it the way people went after Bootlegged. Wutamess's thread never became contentious, but it was just as much about race as Bootlegged's was. It would be different if Bootlegged had started his thread with a racist rant or something, but he didn't. He just posted a race-related topic like Wutamess did. Of course, the video in Wutamess's thread was more interesting and had more sexy chicks in it than Bootlegged's picture of a menu so that's a difference too. |
You guys might think this sounds crazy, but I'm starting to believe that there are some board members who just like to argue, and don't really much care what the subject matter is. In fact, I'm pretty sure that I could start a thread about, say, the history of the potato, and if the right planeteers got involved there would eventually be a fight. Sure, most people would agree that the potato isn't the most controversial tuber - that honor would have to go to the yucca - but I have no doubt that a bone of contention would eventually be found, leading to acrimony and hilarity.
Of course, there are some who might disagree with me. |
Quote:
|
Oops. That last post was supposed to say "dumber than dirt". Damn this iPhone and it's small keypad! ;)
|
The history of the potato is actually quite fascinating.
The potato was originally from Peru where the local inhabitants laid them out on the cliffs. There, the ocean breezes, sunshine, and cool weather would, essentially, freeze dry the little spuds. As a result, they attained the exact carbohydrate to protein ratio necessary for human survival. Once taken to Europe, of course, they were responsible for the industrial revolution since, for the first time, persons didn't have to spend all their time acquiring food. The resultant "spare time" provided a work force that allowed the industrial revolution to take place. Therefore, the lowly spud is directly responsible for putting a man on the moon. Plus, you can make little people out of them with toothpicks. FAX |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.