![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And in that one... Chambers outplayed the younger WR. Quote:
I don't know why you suggested that. I would much rather re-sign Chambers as a #2 who can stretch the field (something that he's better at than Walter) and DRAFT his replacement. |
Quote:
How can you expect a guy that hasn't been consistent over the last 5 seasons to magically maintain that level of play here - as he's aging? You know, if he had consistently put up 800+ yards over the past 5 years, I wouldn't have nearly the issue. Problem is, he hasn't. He had an average year catching punts from Matt Cassel, people forget about his past, and now he's a legit WR2? It doesn't work that way. Unless you're just going out of your way to be optimistic, I see no evidence to lead me to believe that Chambers will replicate his performance of 2009. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What about the 2 years before where Walters outplayed Chambers? Care to explain why Walter isn't a 5 year option other than it's made up and makes your argument look better? |
Quote:
Walter is a good receiver and he would have been a nice add. I would have rather have had him than Chambers. But let's not treat him like he's some kind of a messiah. He's a guy who can give us a few good years until you find someone younger to replace him. Not a whole lot different than Chambers, except that you have a little more time. |
Quote:
You really want this team to be going into the playoffs 5 years from now with a 34 year old receiver who was never a superstar even in his peak years? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Walter, who's 28 years old, can't play until he's 33. Yet the guy you're pimping, who's 31, has at least two years left in the tank. Interesting. |
DUECES!
|
Quote:
Q_Q because the Chiefs aren't signing anybody and Q_Q because the Chiefs are working on signing somebody |
Quote:
Then again, considering Pioli's drafting ability, you might be right. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I also think that Todd Haley would be eating his 22 guys off the street bullshit words if it weren't for Chris Chambers. I absolutely think he'll repeat last year's performance if not exceed it. He's one of the very few assets I think this team has. If we actually get him signed, I'll gladly own this post this time next year if he doesn't meet expectations. |
Quote:
Chambers was doing a lot of stuff that Bowe should have been long. He was catching a lot of very poorly thrown balls, doing a great job jumping up to get underthrown balls, catching balls in the middle of the field as well as serve as a legit deep option. He wasn't just an average #2 WR in 2009 with the Chiefs. He was a middle-of-the-road #1 WR. If Chambers continues to commit to the game, I'm not worried about him. Frankly, I'm a hell of a lot more worried about Bowe. |
Quote:
Dwayne Bowe was targeted 87 times in 11 games. Chris Chambers was targeted 61 times (as a Chief) in 9 games. Sorry...what were you saying? |
Quote:
He produces consistently, and buys you more time. Chambers has produced once in five years, and you might get another year or two out of him. I guess he really wowed people pulling in those punts from Cassel. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I suggested he's a one year stop-gap and you DRAFT his replacement. I wouldn't depend on him producing for two more years. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Both of these guys are good options 2 years down the road when we're not competing for anything. It's unacceptable if either of these guys, at their age, are a major receiving option 4-5 years down the road. |
Quote:
I'd like to look at targets. |
Quote:
Are we just going to gloss over the 7 games he played for a good team with a franchise QB just because he didn't produce there? |
Quote:
All you really need is 1-2 years. Keep in mind that next season, the free agent market is going to be a whole lot better. And you have 2-3 years of drafts to try to find Chambers' successor. I'd rather go after a cream of the crop receiver in the 2011 offseason than to just settle for a long-term option in 2010 because he was the best we could get. Walter, like Chambers, is a stopgap at best. The only main advantage is that he buys you maybe an extra year or 2 to find his eventual replacement. |
It's funny people are bitching like resigning Chris Chambers is going to set this franchise back a bazillion years. If he comes back and sucks, Clark Hunt is out of some money and that's about it. It's not like the Chiefs are using picks to get him and will sign him to a 91.5 million dollar contract.
Along with that, if other teams were as interested in the "White Lightning" as CP was, I don't think he'd be as quick to resign with the Texans after Ozzie Newsome told him to GTFO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Like I said, yes, I worry about motivational issues. But I also know that his failure in San Diego was more in the head than it was lacking pure athletic ability. A lot of people believe that. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's not an elite receiver now and he's quickly approaching 30. If we were a few steps close to being a playoff team, fine. But who really cares if he gets 800 yards for a team that's not going to make the playoffs anyway? |
Quote:
You know what you're going to get out of Walter because he's produced consistently over the past several years. Chambers hasn't. You guys can keep saying you think he'll equal last years production, but there's not a shred of evidence to back it up. |
|
Quote:
But apart from that, he was generally a 700-1000 yard receiver. That's about Walter's range too. |
Actually Chambers was targeted more Mic.
|
Quote:
Last year was the first time he broke the 700 yard mark since 2005. |
Quote:
There's no evidence that Walters would ever do anything away from the cover of Andre Johnson. Would you really give a guy that has averaged 600 yards a year and 2 and a half TD's while he was with Houston 4 million a year? That's what Walter got. Chambers is a much better risk to me. JMHO. |
Really, this is sad. Chambers has never been a "force" ro reckon with on ANY team he's played for - us, the Chargers, or the Dolphins, yet here we are, debating his worth to the Chiefs. I am of the belief that he can be around a 8-900 yard, 5-7 TD guy for us. I'm also of the belief that if he doesn't re-sign with us, I'm not going to shake my head and scream to the heavens "WHY, PILOI???!!", because I feel that we can get that production from any number of places, most notably a draft pick.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Since Chambers joined the team
Chambers had 61 targets Bowe 44 targets |
Quote:
But I would like to know how my ass tastes... ROFL |
Quote:
Dude just stop. ROFLROFLROFL |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Mics a dumbass. In the last 3 games each got 23 targets.
|
Quote:
|
Chambers was a nice player about 7 years ago, now he's an aging player that played a nice final what 8 games?
He was never an elite player, if we're going off this theory let's go sign Owens at least he was great once. |
anytime cassel throws down the field everyone gets a target
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the 9 games Chambers played in Kansas City last year... He was targeted 61 times. Bowe was targeted 44 times over the same stretch, but he missed 4 games. If we just look at the games they played in TOGETHER... Chambers was targeted 32 times. Bowe was targeted 44 times. ROFL |
Quote:
|
I think it's a pretty clear sign that your team isn't very good when we actually think resigning a 32 year old player that his past employer just outright cut is something that is key and must happen.
This FA period sucks, it's like being a Royals fan. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd love to know how 555 yards in 2007 is "almost" 1000. Nevermind. Reading fail. On a side note, WHOO! Chris Chambers broke 700 yards TWICE! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also it's really difficult to quantify the value of Chambers when the Chiefs are a team that rolled up a ton of garbage time numbers.
Hell Chambers had a ton of them in the Jaguars game, the 4th hits game is all but over and dude rolls up what 100 and 2 TD's? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Zilla have you been sniffing Piolis butt hash?
|
Also if I read "Walters" one more time my brain is going to implode
Walter, Kevin ****ing WALTER. There is no S, not one, there's only an s if you are showing possession Walter's. |
Quote:
I owned up to my fail, and didn't delete my post, unlike a certain someone who has posted in this thread. |
Quote:
Maybe it'll help ease the pain of that ass-whooping you just took. "I was wrong" is much easier. Look at Weeks 9, 10, 15, 16, 17... Those are the 5 games they played in together. Chambers = 32 targets Bowe = 44 targets It's in Black & White chief. Quit while you're behind. |
Quote:
|
Looking at those stats, Chris Chambers was a reliable, consistent, 8-900 yard and 8TD a year receiver before he ended up in SD. I can write that off considering what he did when he came here.
|
Chase Daniels
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And go ahead through my recent history and tell me how many positive things I've said about Pioli since free agency started. |
Quote:
The misspelling of such simple names is debalcling my mind. |
Quote:
This changes nothing. YOU...WERE...WRONG. ROFL |
Also if the Chiefs idea of FA is Justin Fargas and Chris Chambers and they follow that with Bulaga, I think I'll need a new hobby.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Who didn't own up to their fail and removed their post? I missed it. FTR, Chambers hit 700 yards in 4 of his last 6 years. Really, close to 900 in 3 of the last 6. He had an off year in Miami, I don't know what his deal was. He played in all 16 games. I'm willing to give him a pass on the SD experiment. Sometimes guys just don't fit well with a team. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.