ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why are the Chargers that much better? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233141)

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 6989040)
1. Manning
2. Brees
3. Rodgers
4. Rivers
5. Roethlisberger

Anyone who has a different opinion is wrong.


Pardon me, but Tom Brady and his three shiny rings would like to have a word with you...

Buck 09-09-2010 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989042)
you've never been to Arrowhead when the fan base is pumped up...

This is going to be a heavy home field advantage...

yes they have Rivers...that is their X factor...

but they lack experience at WR and OL...

and their defense simply doesn't scare me...

I think San Diego will win the division, sure...

but this is a great set up for the Chiefs...they get one of their toughest division games at home on MNF to start the season...

this will be like the great Arrowhead of the 90s back when DT and Neil Smith were rocking the joint...

That's huge and Vegas knows it.

I've been to Invesco field when the Crowd was louder than anything I've ever heard, during a week 11 game where 1st place was up for grabs, and the Chargers beat a team that is better than the Chiefs by 29 points.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989045)
They were getting 90% action on SD and moved the line DOWN? Why, to get to 95%? That doesn't make any sense.

No, no, no, no!

Come on dude...

They lowered it to further entice action...

As in...90% of the money was on San Diego at -5.5...

But that doesn't mean a lot of money was being bet...

Vegas lowered it to make it an even more attractive game to put money on...

5.5 to 4.5 isn't a SIGNIFCANT point in the NFL...

The wouldn't have moved it from 6.5 to 5.5...or 3.5 to 2.5...

I'm betting they think it will be a 3 or 4 point game...either way...so lowering it a point from 5.5 to 4.5 in a sport where 3, 6, 7, and 10 points are common finals (like 20-17)...just entices more action on something they consider a lock.

It catches the eyes of the public...

they see San Diego (-4.5) against those shitty Chiefs and are like "hell yeah, that's a lock!" and they bet it...

and Vegas wants that because they are sold on the Chiefs and the cover...

it's why the public LOSES a shit ton of money every year...

Vegas doesn't lose.

L.A. Chieffan 09-09-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 6989067)
I've been to Invesco field when the Crowd was louder than anything I've ever heard, during a week 11 game where 1st place was up for grabs, and the Chargers beat a team that is better than the Chiefs by 29 points.

Where's that Kaeding gif?

suds79 09-09-2010 02:23 PM

Why are the Chargers that much better?

Easy. There's a huge difference between QBs.

Ours is sorry. Theirs is one of the best in the game.

If they were even close I could see giving the advantage to the Chiefs.

QB and the fact that our run D is pretty bad.

Doesn't mean we can't win Monday night though. The better team doesn't always win in a single game.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 6989067)
I've been to Invesco field when the Crowd was louder than anything I've ever heard, during a week 11 game where 1st place was up for grabs, and the Chargers beat a team that is better than the Chiefs by 29 points.

Please.

Either way...

I like Mathews but he's a rookie...

Rivers and Gates are great...

But they are inexperienced everywhere else and their defense doesn't put one blister of fear into me...

I'm sorry bro...I have a different opinion...

I think it will be a 3 or 4 point game...either way. Whoever gets that one bounce.

And that's what Vegas thinks, too...

so at least I have LAS FREAKING VEGAS on my side...

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:24 PM

Here are my QB rankings by the way:

1. Manning
2. Brady
3. Brees
4. Rivers
5. Rodgers
6. Romo
7. Roethlisberger
8. McNabb

(has nothing to do with fantasy)

Buck 09-09-2010 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989074)
Please.

Either way...

I like Mathews but he's a rookie...

Rivers and Gates are great...

But they are inexperienced everywhere else and their defense doesn't put one blister of fear into me...

I'm sorry bro...I have a different opinion...

I think it will be a 3 or 4 point game...either way. Whoever gets that one bounce.

And that's what Vegas thinks, too...

so at least I have LAS FREAKING VEGAS on my side...

You also have Castle on your side, so, whatever.

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6989071)
Where's that Kaeding gif?

Hey, let him have his moment of glory. After all, the AFC West is all the Chargers have ever won....

oh, they did win the AFC that one year. But best not to mention it -- just thinking about that SB beat down is really depressing for them.

Brock 09-09-2010 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989042)
you've never been to Arrowhead when the fan base is pumped up...

This is going to be a heavy home field advantage...

yes they have Rivers...that is their X factor...

but they lack experience at WR and OL...

and their defense simply doesn't scare me...

I think San Diego will win the division, sure...

but this is a great set up for the Chiefs...they get one of their toughest division games at home on MNF to start the season...

this will be like the great Arrowhead of the 90s back when DT and Neil Smith were rocking the joint...

That's huge and Vegas knows it.

Either that or the boos will be deafening.

Buck 09-09-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989080)
Hey, let him have his moment of glory. After all, the AFC West is all the Chargers have ever won....

oh, they did win the AFC that one year. But best not to mention it -- just thinking about that SB beat down is really depressing for them.

**** off.

I ****ing hate you ****ing Boston pieces of shit. You win a few championships finally after never having won any and you turn into the ****ing Reaper16 of the NFL.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 6989077)
You also have Castle on your side, so, whatever.

Castle and Castille!

but anyways...

Rivers is the X factor...if he plays amazingly (which I could surely see)...we lose.

If the Chiefs control the clock and Charles/McCluster and Jones open up the play-action game...

I could certainly see the Chiefs being the talk of the town after MNF...

I don't expect a miracle...but I do expect a 7 win team, minimum this year...with not much of a higher ceiling...

The pessimism of the drafturbators is to be expected...they see no improvement and that is laughable to say the least...

DaneMcCloud 09-09-2010 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989085)
Castle and Castille!

but anyways...

Rivers is the X factor...if he plays amazingly (which I could surely see)...we lose.

If the Chiefs control the clock and Charles/McCluster and Jones open up the play-action game...

I could certainly see the Chiefs being the talk of the town after MNF...

I don't expect a miracle...but I do expect a 7 win team, minimum this year...with not much of a higher ceiling...

The pessimism of the drafturbators is to be expected...they see no improvement and that is laughable to say the least...

Play action? LMAO

Yeah, Cassel throwing three yard outs in play action will make ALL the difference.

You're funny, Dude.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 6989084)
**** off.

I ****ing hate you ****ing Boston pieces of shit. You win a few championships finally after never having won any and you turn into the ****ing Reaper16 of the NFL.

This we can agree on!

I hate Boston more than I hate New York now and I never thought that would be possible...

DaneMcCloud 09-09-2010 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989085)
The pessimism of the drafturbators is to be expected...they see no improvement and that is laughable to say the least...

Illustrate the improvement on defense for us, then, illustrate the improvement on offense.

Then show us how those improvements will help the Chiefs to overcome the 30 point losses suffered at the hands of the Chargers last year.

Convince me.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-09-2010 02:30 PM

We're winning this ****ing game. End of discussion.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6989087)
Play action? LMAO

Yeah, Cassel throwing three yard outs in play action will make ALL the difference.

You're funny, Dude.

Ok...whatever man.

We'll see on Monday Night.

I just laid out the facts for how ignorant your 20+ bullshit was...

I'll side with Vegas...you can side with your drafturbator buddies who take Bruce Campbell in the 1st round...

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 6989084)
**** off.

I ****ing hate you ****ing Boston pieces of shit. You win a few championships finally after never having won any and you turn into the ****ing Reaper16 of the NFL.

A few? A few? Dude, we cleaned up. I was going broke buying all the Championship hats and T-shirts and stuff.











:fire:

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6989092)
Illustrate the improvement on defense for us, then, illustrate the improvement on offense.

Then show us how those improvements will help the Chiefs to overcome the 30 point losses suffered at the hands of the Chargers last year.

Convince me.

Nah, I don't feel like doing the merry-go-round debate right now...

Vegas is siding with the Chiefs (to at least cover)...meaning it's going to be a good game.

I laid out all of those facts for you...

Now I'm just ready to see some real game action on Monday night and I'm not going to let you morons ruin that for me like you ruin every other Chiefs discussion on this board.

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989088)
This we can agree on!

I hate Boston more than I hate New York now and I never thought that would be possible...

Sorry, Chiefs fans are just collateral damage for me taking shots at Buck.

What you hate are teams/cities that win championships other than your own. Oh, and that the Pats owned Peyton's ass for the first half of his career. Don't be bitter. Or be bitter, I don't care. I'll just throw in a tape of us winning the SB, or kicking the Colts and/or Chargers' ass in the playoffs, repeatedly, to comfort myself.


:evil:

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:34 PM

Congrats Amnorix...

I envy those roided up World Series and Spygate Super Bowls!

Awesome job, brah!

Your World Series hero was in the Mitchell Report and your Super Bowls were brought to you via cheating!

TAINTED LOVE

Red Dawg 09-09-2010 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 6989093)
We're winning this ****ing game. End of discussion.


YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT! TEAM AMERICA BERRY! **** YA!

Kyle DeLexus 09-09-2010 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 6989040)
1. Manning
2. Brees
3. Rodgers
4. Rivers
5. Roethlisberger

Anyone who has a different opinion is wrong.

Wait so Tom Brady isn't a top 5 QB anymore?

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989101)
Sorry, Chiefs fans are just collateral damage for me taking shots at Buck.

What you hate are teams/cities that win championships other than your own. Oh, and that the Pats owned Peyton's ass for the first half of his career. Don't be bitter. Or be bitter, I don't care. I'll just throw in a tape of us winning the SB, or kicking the Colts and/or Chargers' ass in the playoffs, repeatedly, to comfort myself.


:evil:

I wish the Pats had the #1 pick when Peyton was coming out...

They'd probably have 12 straight Super Bowls right now...

Too bad Peyton got stuck with Dungy...

Could you imagine Peyton KNOWING WHAT THE DEFENSE WAS GOING TO DO before snapping the ball during Brady's spygate era?!?!?

I mean, he's already pretty good at predicting...but just imagine if he KNEW FOR SURE...

man the dude would put up a perfect QB rating for an entire season!

DaneMcCloud 09-09-2010 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989095)
Ok...whatever man.

We'll see on Monday Night.

I just laid out the facts for how ignorant your 20+ bullshit was...

I'll side with Vegas...you can side with your drafturbator buddies who take Bruce Campbell in the 1st round...

Yeah, that worked out well last year, right?

:shake:

Pants 09-09-2010 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989098)
Nah, I don't feel like doing the merry-go-round debate right now...

Vegas is siding with the Chiefs (to at least cover)...meaning it's going to be a good game.

I laid out all of those facts for you...

Now I'm just ready to see some real game action on Monday night and I'm not going to let you morons ruin that for me like you ruin every other Chiefs discussion on this board.

Vegas, just like everyone else, doesn't know shit the first 2 or 3 weeks. Not saying we won't win or stay close, but Vegas is a silly argument at this point.

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989103)
Congrats Amnorix...

I envy those roided up World Series and Spygate Super Bowls!

Awesome job, brah!

Your World Series hero was in the Mitchell Report and your Super Bowls were brought to you via cheating!

TAINTED LOVE

All of MLB was tainted, which is sad. Frankly, I'm not much of a baseball fan. I was mostly glad to stop hearing "86 years" and Curse of the Babe and all that silly crap.

SpyGate -- give me a break. But whatever gives you comfort in your hours of nursing your bitterness...

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989108)
I wish the Pats had the #1 pick when Peyton was coming out...

They'd probably have 12 straight Super Bowls right now...

Too bad Peyton got stuck with Dungy...

Could you imagine Peyton KNOWING WHAT THE DEFENSE WAS GOING TO DO before snapping the ball during Brady's spygate era?!?!?

I mean, he's already pretty good at predicting...but just imagine if he KNEW FOR SURE...

man the dude would put up a perfect QB rating for an entire season!


:rolleyes:

Doesn't it disturb you that you fellate him so very thoroughly? I mean, it's one thing to thinkg someone is good, but to drop trou as fast as you do for a guy isn't really anything I want to witness...

DaneMcCloud 09-09-2010 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989098)
Nah, I don't feel like doing the merry-go-round debate right now...

Vegas is siding with the Chiefs (to at least cover)...meaning it's going to be a good game.

I laid out all of those facts for you...

Now I'm just ready to see some real game action on Monday night and I'm not going to let you morons ruin that for me like you ruin every other Chiefs discussion on this board.

LMAO

This is an AWESOME post!

LMAO

I'm absolutely certain that I, me personally, haven't ruined a ****ing game for you, EVER.

Am *I* responsible for the Chiefs poor drafts this decade? Did *I* choose shit coordinators and coaches? Am *I* the person responsible for going 4-12, 2-14 and 4-12?

Am I?

Titty Meat 09-09-2010 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989036)
Reasons why the Chiefs will pull an upset:

1.) It's a division game.
2.) The Chiefs ground game will control the tempo of the game.
3.) It's Monday Night Football...and it's kickoff weekend. The stands will be full and the crowd will be pumped. If we have home field advantage ONE TIME this season...this will be the week.
4.) We've improved, they've regressed.

I know Rivers can kill us with the pass...I do. If we lose, it will be because Philip Rivers beat us. That's my opinion.

However...I think Charles/McCluster and Thomas Jones will pound the shit out of the ball...I think we will win the T.O.P. and I think our defense will play good enough to get the job done.

I think the Chiefs win 24-20 and I think we'll be on our way to an up and down, 7-9 or 8-8 season.

This is easily the most idiotic post of the year.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6989109)
Yeah, that worked out well last year, right?

:shake:

last year was different and you're a damned fool to say otherwise

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989113)
:rolleyes:

Doesn't it disturb you that you fellate him so very thoroughly? I mean, it's one thing to thinkg someone is good, but to drop trou as fast as you do for a guy isn't really anything I want to witness...

It's like how some old-timers envy Willie Mays...

or Joe Namath...

or Johnny Unitas...

We're witnessing a once in a lifetime QB and I'll be damned if I don't soak it in as it's happening...someday I'll be able to tell my grandkids I got to watch Peyton Manning every week for his entire career.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6989115)
This is easily the most idiotic post of the year.

yeah, well...at least I wasn't raised in a house with wheels.

Buck 09-09-2010 02:40 PM

THE WHOLE MLB WAS ROIDING WICKED HAARD, DUDE!

DONT EVEN ACT LIKE EVERY COACH WASNT FILMING THE OTHER SIDELINE. TOM TERRIFIC WON ALL THOSE GAMES FOR US FAIR AND SQUARE.

DaneMcCloud 09-09-2010 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989116)
last year was different and you're a damned fool to say otherwise

Really? How so?

New QB? Nope.

New pass rushing beast? Nope.

Run stuffing NT? Nope.

4-12, Hootie, 4-12. Just like last year.

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manning's 'gina (Post 6989120)
It's like how some old-timers envy Willie Mays...

or Joe Namath...

or Johnny Unitas...

We're witnessing a once in a lifetime QB and I'll be damned if I don't soak it in as it's happening...someday I'll be able to tell my grandkids I got to watch Peyton Manning every week for his entire career.

Dude, pull your pants up. It's disturbing.

Titty Meat 09-09-2010 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6989124)
Really? How so?

New QB? Nope.

New pass rushing beast? Nope.

Run stuffing NT? Nope.

4-12, Hootie, 4-12. Just like last year.

6-10 with that schedule.


Chiefs keep it within 10 if they don't turn the ball over. Fans come on after the game and tell us how the team is improved.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-09-2010 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 6989122)
THE WHOLE MLB WAS ROIDING WICKED HAARD, DUDE!

DONT EVEN ACT LIKE EVERY COACH WASNT FILMING THE OTHER SIDELINE. TOM TERRIFIC WON ALL THOSE GAMES FOR US FAIR AND SQUARE.

ROFL

And please note the awesome post-"Oops; busted"!-success those chowder-eating ****heads have enjoyed since!


"But-but...they compete every year"!

Yeah, well, send Martyocrity a thank you note, 'kay?

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6989124)
Really? How so?

New QB? Nope.

New pass rushing beast? Nope.

Run stuffing NT? Nope.

4-12, Hootie, 4-12. Just like last year.

Another year for our young team to mature...

Everyone knows their role now, or knows it better.

Everyone is more familiar with the offense.

Better players...

More experience...

Easier schedule...

But hey...

We will see.

I'm tired of arguing...

I'm just looking forward to the season...I am an optimist and I don't have to apologize to anyone for that.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989127)
Dude, pull your pants up. It's disturbing.

Well I'm glad Boston fans at least finally realize Peyton > Brady...

It used to be very annoying having them try and say otherwise...

Of course I've known the truth since 2003...

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6989124)
Really? How so?

New QB? Nope.

New pass rushing beast? Nope.

Run stuffing NT? Nope.

4-12, Hootie, 4-12. Just like last year.


Even without that stuff they shoudl NOT be 4-12. They've had another year in the system, including most importantly the QB. They should have adjusted to the new philosophies, and begun building off the knowledge they had last year. Berry is a very solid pick, and you'd think Romeo and Charlie would be an improvement.

Not that I'm predicting playoffs or anything. Hell, 8-8 would be fantastic, IMHO, but they shouldn't go 4-12 again.

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 6989129)
ROFL

And please note the awesome post-"Oops; busted"!-success those chowder-eating ****heads have enjoyed since!


"But-but...they compete every year"!

Yeah, well, send Martyocrity a thank you note, 'kay?

errr...like being one minute and an absurd helmet catch from a perfect season? Yeah, try again.

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989133)
Well I'm glad Boston fans at least finally realize Peyton > Brady...

It used to be very annoying having them try and say otherwise...

Of course I've known the truth since 2003...


Your bitterness is showing. You're also mumbling. Try to remove the penis blocking your airways...

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989135)
errr...like being one minute and an absurd helmet catch from a perfect season? Yeah, try again.

too bad Brady decided to play his worst game of the year in his biggest moment...

damn I always thought he was captain clutch?

whatever happened?!?

OH YEAH THEY GOT CAUGHT CHEATING...WITH EVIDENCE SO BAD IT HAD TO BE DESTROYED...

almost forgot

RINGLEADER 09-09-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 6987104)
What's your view on the coaching?

I know Norv's a smart guy and has been around a long tmie, but I find it hard to give that douchenozzle the nod in any sort of coaching match. I mean... it's Norv, fer crissake.

One of the best things going for the Chiefs on Monday night is that they're playing the Chargers in September -- and we all know how terrible SD is in September.

Titty Meat 09-09-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989139)
too bad Brady decided to play his worst game of the year in his biggest moment...

damn I always thought he was captain clutch?

whatever happened?!?

OH YEAH THEY GOT CAUGHT CHEATING...WITH EVIDENCE SO BAD IT HAD TO BE DESTROYED...

almost forgot

All that meth your parents smoked is coming back to haunt society.

DaneMcCloud 09-09-2010 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989134)
Even without that stuff they shoudl NOT be 4-12. They've had another year in the system, including most importantly the QB. They should have adjusted to the new philosophies, and begun building off the knowledge they had last year. Berry is a very solid pick, and you'd think Romeo and Charlie would be an improvement.

Not that I'm predicting playoffs or anything. Hell, 8-8 would be fantastic, IMHO, but they shouldn't go 4-12 again.

Should, should, should.

Until I see evidence of improvement on the field (something I did not see during preseason), it's hard for me to imagine this team winning more than six games.

I see 6-10 as a logical prediction but I could also see them at 4-12.

Personally, I think they're stuck in neutral. They probably won't get blown out by 20+ per game as often as last year, but they haven't added the necessary personnel to get this team even close to .500.

Titty Meat 09-09-2010 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 6989145)
One of the best things going for the Chiefs on Monday night is that they're playing the Chargers in September -- and we all know how terrible SD is in September.

If the Chargers are bad in Sept what are the Chiefs? Haven't won an opener since 2005.

Amnorix 09-09-2010 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989139)
too bad Brady decided to play his worst game of the year in his biggest moment...

damn I always thought he was captain clutch?

whatever happened?!?

OH YEAH THEY GOT CAUGHT CHEATING...WITH EVIDENCE SO BAD IT HAD TO BE DESTROYED...

almost forgot

Thsi from the guy that fellates Mr. Pick Six.

And ask ANY Patriots fan, or any reasonably unbiased football fan who saw the game, and I think they would ascribe just a smidge more blame to the Pats overwhelmed offensive line than to Brady.

Oh, and to helmet catch.

Did I metnion Pick Six?

Pick Six?

Besides, HTF did you get into this with me? I was shooting at Buck you dumbass.

Hootie 09-09-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6989150)
Thsi from the guy that fellates Mr. Pick Six.

And ask ANY Patriots fan, or any reasonably unbiased football fan who saw the game, and I think they would ascribe just a smidge more blame to the Pats overwhelmed offensive line than to Brady.

Oh, and to helmet catch.

Did I metnion Pick Six?

Pick Six?

Besides, HTF did you get into this with me? I was shooting at Buck you dumbass.

If the pick six was a choke...

what was playing the worst game in a season that was one decent game away from always being remembered?

his smug response to Plaxico suggesting they'd only score 17 points...

Brady shit the bed...Brady's choke job (over the course of the whole game) cost the Pats immortality...

Manning made one bad pass the entire game in a season where the Colts would have won 2 games had he not been the league MVP and starting/in uniform every single game...just like every single year.

Brady goes out in game one...

and...

BEFORE HE EVER GOT INJURED...I HAVE ARCHIVED POSTS ON THIS BOARD SUGGESTING THAT HE WAS OVERRATED BECAUSE EVEN HIS INEXPERIENCED, HASN'T STARTED A GAME SINCE HIGH SCHOOL BACKUP COULD COME IN AND LEAD THAT TEAM TO THE PLAYOFFS...

well I was almost right...

he led them to 11 wins...but they got ****ed out of the playoffs (and who the hell knows what would have happened had they made a WC...with BB...who knows???)...

so yeah...

Brady is overrated.

He's great.

But he is 1/10th of the QB Peyton Manning is...and Manning will...easily, without a doubt...go down as the greatest to ever play the game.

If anyone in any sport has ever been close to MJ...

we're looking at him

Amnorix 09-09-2010 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989161)
If the pick six was a choke...

what was playing the worst game in a season that was one decent game away from always being remembered?

his smug response to Plaxico suggesting they'd only score 17 points...

Brady shit the bed...Brady's choke job (over the course of the whole game) cost the Pats immortality...

Manning made one bad pass the entire game in a season where the Colts would have won 2 games had he not been the league MVP and starting/in uniform every single game...just like every single year.

Brady goes out in game one...

and...

BEFORE HE EVER GOT INJURED...I HAVE ARCHIVED POSTS ON THIS BOARD SUGGESTING THAT HE WAS OVERRATED BECAUSE EVEN HIS INEXPERIENCED, HASN'T STARTED A GAME SINCE HIGH SCHOOL BACKUP COULD COME IN AND LEAD THAT TEAM TO THE PLAYOFFS...

well I was almost right...

he led them to 11 wins...but they got ****ed out of the playoffs (and who the hell knows what would have happened had they made a WC...with BB...who knows???)...

so yeah...

Brady is overrated.

He's great.

But he is 1/10th of the QB Peyton Manning is...and Manning will...easily, without a doubt...go down as the greatest to ever play the game.

If anyone in any sport has ever been close to MJ...

we're looking at him


Honestly, blaming Brady instead of the OLine for the Giants game is idiotic.

As is this debate, which is neither new nor newly interesting. At least Brady can point to the OLIne for losing that game. Manning can't blame anybody for that pick six.
</EMBED>

Hootie 09-09-2010 03:01 PM

so Brady gets to blame his line but when Peyton did it years ago he was just being a bad teammates/baby...

lolololol

just admit Peyton Manning >>> Tom Brady and I'll never bring it up to you again

Amnorix 09-09-2010 03:07 PM

Shall we post a poll on here about whether it was Brady or his offensive line who should be blamed for losing the game?

We saw what Brady did when he was healthy and had the weapons around him that Manning has had his entire career -- undefeated until losing in the SB by the skin of their teeth, and a new record for TDs in a season.

I've said this before and I'll say it again -- both are great QBs and I wouldn't be unhyappy to have either on my team. The only reason I even discuss this with you is because of your stupid thought that Manning is to Brady what Michael Jordan is to, oh, I don't know, Greg Kite. It's reeruned. Beyond reeruned.

But yeah, Peyton wouldn't have won any more championships than Tom did. Sorry to disappoint you on that one.

Msmith 09-09-2010 03:27 PM

Take the preseason game the Saints vs the Chargers. With both teams had their first units played in the first half, the score was tied 14-14. Rivers rallied both TDs. Matthew ran wild at first and was contended later. Expect the outcome to be similar, Rivers will do most the damage. Matthew will run for a while until the defense figures him out then his yardage would be dropped off.

the Talking Can 09-09-2010 04:08 PM

hootie's takes on brady are a kind of reerunation it is hard to fathom....

keg in kc 09-09-2010 04:11 PM

It's hootie...

ThaVirus 09-09-2010 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle DeLexus (Post 6989105)
Wait so Tom Brady isn't a top 5 QB anymore?

No, he's not. If we were talking about careers, then yes he would be; but as of right now I'd take all of those 5 over Brady..

michaelj_58 09-09-2010 04:23 PM

its going to come down to tunovers,rivers against our secondary in the fourth quarter!

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-09-2010 04:42 PM

Oh **** New England already.

keg in kc 09-09-2010 04:45 PM

People thinking Brady is off his game because he only had 4400 yards passing and 28 TDs is a sign that the guy really is on another level.

Kyle DeLexus 09-09-2010 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6989366)
People thinking Brady is off his game because he only had 4400 yards passing and 28 TDs is a sign that the guy really is on another level.

Thats the truth. It would take a couple years a little worse than that to move him out of the #2 spot. Statistically that was his 2nd best year too I believe.

The guy just hasn't been to a Superbowl in 2 years (one of which he's on the IR) so he must be washed up.

MadMax 09-09-2010 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 6989358)
Oh **** New England already.



THIS!!! times 11 billion.

Hootie 09-09-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6989366)
People thinking Brady is off his game because he only had 4400 yards passing and 28 TDs is a sign that the guy really is on another level.

well he did take an 11 win Matt Cassel led team and turned them into a ... 10 win team.

synthesis2 09-09-2010 10:47 PM

I understand how @#@@ the chiefs have made us feel over the last several years, all I am saying is that with their best O-Lineman holding out, as well as their best WR, having a rookie running back we have a very good chance to beat the chargers.

Do I think its a sure thing? Absolutely not but I think we have at least a 50/50 chance and I think there is no reason why we can't win the division, this is about as weak as I can remember in the last 20 years.

Yes they are better at QB, a lot better but after that and TE, we are just as good if not better in many areas. I just don't see how they are that much better, if at all.

It does not really matter, we will see come Monday night, if they lay a turd then everyone on the board that thinks we suck will be on the right track, if we win that I hope you speak up as well.

4 days baby!!!!!!!!!

DaneMcCloud 09-09-2010 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synthesis2 (Post 6990604)
I think there is no reason why we can't win the division, this is about as weak as I can remember in the last 20 years.

You're a ****ing mouth-breathing, drooling Mongo.

The Chiefs couldn't win this division if Denver, San Diego & Oakland all took detours into the Bermuda Triangle before facing the Chiefs.

B_Ambuehl 09-10-2010 12:03 AM

Quote:

Tell me ONE thing that will make a difference between losing by 30 or more points.

Don't give me Weis or Crennel. Coaches don't make NEARLY the difference people think it will make.

Hence, Herm to Haley.

Eric Berry can't shut down Matthews and Gates by himself.

McCluster will be lucky if he breaks 50 yards total.

Cassel sucks ****ing ass.

The "crowd", in the end, doesn't mean jackshit.

So, what does that leave us with?
Peeholi?

baitism 09-10-2010 12:10 AM

Goddamn, all of you are reeruned. Just get out of this thread until Monday night.

B_Ambuehl 09-10-2010 12:45 AM

Seriously, I'm a fan of both teams, they're the only 2 teams I follow each and every week, and they have a considerable amount in common. Both teams have hard assed front offices that in recent history routinely make terrible personnel decisions. Both teams run 3-4 defenses and both have practice squad caliber defensive fronts and undermanned inside linebackers. Both have lackluster offensive tackle play. Both teams have pretty good corners and both have (or should have) 1 good safety. Both have a scheme built around a strong running game.

The main difference is QB, TE, scheme, and things a QB allows them to do in scheme. I'm sure Haley would love to get down the field but Cassell can't throw anything deeper than 10 yards. Rivers is accurate with the deep ball, has Gates to draw congestion to the middle, has a dynamite safety valve in Sproles, and all that allows Norv a lot of versatility in play calling.

The other main difference I see is D coordinator. Ron Rivera schemed the chargers D to a top 15 ranking in points allowed with nothing to work with other than smoke and mirrors. That team defensively had no business being 13-3 last year. They've been dead last or 2nd to last in QB pressures the prior 3 years and gave up nearly 5 yds/carry on the ground to at least one rusher in the majority of games they played, the majority of their defense grades out at well below average, but they were still able to make enough plays when it counted because of the way Rivera used them.

I saw nothing in preseason to indicate any major change in scheme or approach for the Chiefs 3-4. Crennell still has Ron Edwards playing a 2-gap role but he can be effectively blocked with just a center. Tyson Jackson is a 4-3 left defensive end playing out of position. Dorsey tries but he's not big enough to effectively be a force doing what they're asking him to do. The end result is an easy ~5 yards thru the a-gaps on the majority of inside runs.

The Parcells 3-4 (which Romeo runs) is outdated and has been for a couple of years now. That's why Miami brought in Mike Nolan. That's largely why the Pats got gutted for 250 on the ground against the Ravens and knocked out of the playoffs.

For an alternate 1-shade/1-gap approach (which the personnel is better suited for) watch the Cowboys under Phillips.

When your front line is overmatched you concede yards on the ground, concede TOP and generally have to get a lot of quick scores to win. The Saints & Pats can get away with it because of their offense.

The basic problem with the chiefs is their approach offensively doesn't match up to what they can do defensively. They might be able to pressure the QB a bit and hold up on the back end in the passing game, but being a team that runs to win they need to be able to stop the run and force teams into consistent 3rd and long situations so they can get after the QB and let their secondary fly around and make plays.

Notice around the league virtually all the teams that run the ball for high yardage are generally very good at stopping the run. Most of the teams that throw the ball for big yardage are good at pressuring the QB. Until the Chiefs get to the point where their O and D complement each other opposing teams will be able to play day 1 install and drive the ball, run the clock, play conservative D and know that Cassell & the passing game will eventually shit the bed. Last year it generally didn't take much longer than a quarter or so for that to happen. We'll see.

synthesis2 09-11-2010 12:36 PM

I'm just saying that with their best WR out as well as their best OLine man who happens to be the left tackle and with all of the upgrades we have done over the season, I think we have a real shot at beating them. We will see come Monday night if I'm way off or not but looking at it on paper, its looks very close.

the Talking Can 09-11-2010 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6989511)
well he did take an 11 win Matt Cassel led team and turned them into a ... 10 win team.

which means nothing, you flaming dipshit


chiefs fans and stats


always a deadly mix

synthesis2 09-11-2010 03:55 PM

Go F### yourself A-hole

-King- 09-11-2010 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synthesis2 (Post 6993641)
Go F### yourself A-hole

Self censoring is frowned upon on Chiefs Planet.

synthesis2 09-11-2010 06:44 PM

Just responding to talking can, people that try and put others down, I have zero patience for...

Chiefs Pantalones 09-11-2010 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synthesis2 (Post 6994014)
Just responding to talking can, people that try and put others down, I have zero patience for...

Let's get naked.

DaneMcCloud 09-11-2010 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synthesis2 (Post 6994014)
Just responding to talking can, people that try and put others down, I have zero patience for...

Then you're on the wrong website

the Talking Can 09-11-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synthesis2 (Post 6994014)
Just responding to talking can, people that try and put others down, I have zero patience for...

your mom is my toilet

Chiefs Pantalones 09-11-2010 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6994027)
your mom is my toilet

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/wi.../0a/RKelly.jpg

the Talking Can 09-11-2010 06:52 PM

i mean, you're defending hootie for christ sake


the man likes to pee on his friends in the shower

Rausch 09-11-2010 07:00 PM

If we have any shot at beating the Chargers it's this game...

Chiefs Pantalones 09-11-2010 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6994050)
If we have any shot at beating the Chargers it's this game...

I agree. I think we can wear them down with our running game, control the clock, long drives.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.