![]() |
Quote:
As I mentioned, the problem as far as I can tell is that we're running on software that was designed in like 2007. Can we change it? Sure, but it's a ton of work, and just look at how people have responded to the change at the Orange Mane. Everyone loves vBulletin 3.8 for the front-end. It's just that the back-end sucks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not a computer expert, but maybe we could cut off access to guests?
I just saw that we have 124 members online, with 770 guests. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Daface - we all appreciate you, FYI.
|
I blame Texans and Patriots planets
|
Is it time for another fundraiser?
The last one was a smash hit and seemed to help a lot, because the traffic around here will only get worse as we continue to dominate the NFL... |
Move the site off to a kubernetes cluster and use mariadb gluster and could improve performance quite a bit.
Combine that with moving to modern software and the site can fly. |
This site is going to be damn near unreadable during game time, and that makes me a sad turtle.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have no idea how it all works, but are we somehow limited in what can be done at this point, sharing bandwidth with other boards etc? |
Quote:
|
I love this forum software: https://www.discourse.org/
You can paste images directly, it has no pages - just infinite scroll, posts are updated live w/o refreshing (amazing for gameday threads), it turns all links into previews, easier to quote. After spending some time on a discourse forum - vbulletin sites feel really dated and clunky to me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
At some point, if we decide we're just going to live with this software forever, we may need to consider pruning the database down. I've mulled over something like cloning the site and DB, then putting it at a different URL as a pure archive (no new posts), then pruning the active CP site down to just threads/posts from the past 5 years or something. Constantly sorting a 13 GB table almost has to be the biggest issue. There are better ways of doing the query in newer versions of vBulletin, but the queries in this version suck donkey balls. The one hardware upgrade that I wonder might help would be to move to a server where we could throw the entire database onto SSDs rather than HDDs. I could be wrong, but it seems like IO is probably the issue, so moving the DB onto a drive that would respond a lot faster might help. Maybe. So for what it's worth, here are the options as I see them:
|
Percona >
|
Thank you for such a thorough and we'll explained answer.
When you take nearly 20 years of data and allow it to be searchable and accessible to reuse, it chews up CPU for sure. This site also has an enormous amount of graphics, gifs and videos that add to the crush. Could an archive DB be setup to house a lot of older stuff that is still accessable but not always indexed and updated? I recall a large medical company like Merck or someone similar had an issue like this. |
Quote:
The version that I was suggesting would literally mean cloning the entire thing into a new installation like archive.chiefsplanet.com. There would be no interaction between the two, so if you wanted to "bump a post" from 2005, you'd just have to start a thread and link to it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sorry guys, it’s all of us Texas Tech fans who are now Chiefs fans. I rarely post, but I load the site probably 40-50 times a day (usually as a guest because, well, you guys know, doing activities that require me to clear browsing history and cookies on the regular so that the wife doesn’t see, and I forget to sign back in...).
I know it’s not much, but if there is a fundraiser, I’m in for a few bucks. I plan to be here for the next 50 or so years until I kick the bucket (at which point I’m sure we will all be able to upload our consciousnesses into a virtual ChiefsPlanet anywase - **** can these servers support that?). |
Just Nuke DC and ban political talk in the lounge, if they want to start a spin-off circle jerk on something like Discord, sweet. 2+ million posts of ****ing garbage.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
- nuke 2 million posts in DC - nuke accounts with 0 posts that haven’t logged in in say, 2 years - nuke all threads (and posts) with 10 or fewer posts (is that a thing?) |
Quote:
|
in life shit is always c hanging, change is not a bad thing. People will get used of it. I been to plenty of forums that tried to hold on to the old software and finally said **** it, and upgraded, people got used of it, and its a non issue.
|
Its time for AC to snap his fingers and delete half of the bulk of the site. :)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The downside of that is probably no way to import accounts and post history outside of that there is no feature that I couldn't do without that I depend on. People would get used to it. |
Quote:
Migrating to another software such as Xenforo would be pretty much the same as they have conversion scripts. Just more time consuming. |
I'm not an IT guy, but it would seem to me that an equipment upgrade might be one of the easier fixes. I'm not sure how long that takes, but you'd have to shut the board down for a bit. Could we live without our beloved board for 6-8 hours?
One thing I have noticed is we have stuff showing up on the 1st page that are of little or no interest to most of us. Why do we need a Broncos thread? The last time I looked, there were over 35K posts. If you want to see donkey news, go to one of their sites. The same with the St. Louis Cards thread. I don't know how much effort it would take to do some pruning, but do we really need to bump a 2 year old thread, let alone one farther back? Personally, I don't know, or care to know, what software we have. I'll adjust to whatever changes are needed on my part. Again, if we can't bump a 2 year old thread or give a thumbs up/down, I can live with that. |
I dont know what the answer is but if we have to go back to the collection plate again HMU
|
Quote:
|
hey but seriously.
DC takes up 16.5% of the total post count history here, on a football board, and it's a cesspool. That would clean things up reaaaaal easily for the short term. |
Seriously look into discourse: https://www.discourse.org/
It has sooooo many features that are an upgrade from vbulletin - the best being new posts auto-load w/o having to refresh the page. We could try out just for gameday threads or something. It's definitely a next evolution in forum software. AC - I'm a web developer. You could always hire me. I'll give you a good price to set it up. |
Quote:
|
Jesus, it's been nine years.
****, I've wasted my entire life! |
Quote:
There is nothing it does that a modern build of VB or Xenforo can’t do. |
Has anyone suggested deleting DC? I would suggest that, if it hasn’t been suggested.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm sure there would ad revenue lost by deleting a forum that nets a lot of views. In terms of performance improvement, what would that do? And how much of a time investment would it take from you/AC/etc...? |
Quote:
On a more relevant note, this site has been dragging for me for quite a while now but today it's running great. :shrug: |
Quote:
BRC change is inevitable that is just life. As Daface said you can keep a read-only archive if you are feeling nostalgic Quote:
If that is the case then moving to Xenforo sounds like a good plan. you could do a new server migration to VBulletin it looks like as well. |
Quote:
|
CP was not ready for a franchise QB.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here's an idea on how to begin pruning old threads:
1. Lounge Thread: Any 5-10 years old gets deleted EXCEPT the Top 50 or Hall of Classics Any greater than 10 gets deleted except Top !0 2. DC Threads: greater than 5 years old gets deleted EXCEPT Top 10 3. Pictures Threads: ONLY Top 20 get saved 4. Media Threads: ONLY Top 20 get saved 5. ROMPER ROOM: 10 THREAD LIMIT AND LEAST POPULAR ALWAYS DROPS OFF FOR GOOD Moving forward, the only way to save a thread for future is if 100 posters approve Option, instead of deleting have all these threads moved to a seperate server Also, All inactive posters greater than 3 years get deleted NO MORE MULTS moving forward |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I haven't been on a lot today but it seems to be running quite a bit better. That said, it's the middle of the week during preseason.
If the server has extra bays sliding a couple SSDs in and copying the data files over would be pretty easy and not a huge amount of money. |
Quote:
I'd say we leave the lounge as is, but delete all threads with less than 10 posts. It'd get rid of a healthy chunk. Maybe 2 million of the 12 million posts? more? less? DC isn't even football related... it's a cesspool of evil. Ship it out to elsewhere and let football and entertainment lounges reign. There's 2 million in there. As for pissing people off, I'd be eager to see the results of a poll. Now we are talking about a forum with 1/3rd of the space cleared out. Easy to do, somewhat improved efficiency, by only removing the lowest value posts. We are about to have the greatest Chiefs season in franchise history, and possibly the beginning of a dynasty. Best to get out in front of it and take out the trash now. |
I say revamp it however is easiest and most cost efficient for AC. If people are that butt hurt over losing a post count, should that happen, then they probably need to take their internet-reliant man card and turn it in for a real one anyway. I like what others have said about taking DC and media out. This is a sports site. If they are that adamant on talking about those certain subjects, there are plenty of other dedicated sites they can frequent. All of this worked whenever there were a handful of people, but that has changed, and the site needs to change with it. Just have to decide whether this is a social catch-all site or a sports site. Maybe make one sub-forum for anything non-Chiefs related, a general sports sub-forum, and maybe a general KC Metro sub-forum for those planning to visit the area. That's all just my opinion, though, which, of course, isn't worth the time it took me to type it. LMAO
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
The most important issues of our time are discussed in there Yes it’s often pointless and ugly as sin, but there are also bright spots that I believe enhance our understanding of the world around us |
Quote:
I'm sure there's plenty of spots on the web to discuss AOC's birth certificate / Epstein ties or Trump's pee tape. |
Quote:
What would the cost be to upgrade. I'm in for helping out with some cash... |
Quote:
If endless scroll works for twitter and FB there's no reason it can't work for forum threads. I really don't think people would be clamoring for pages if all forum threads were one page endless scroll. You're just used to pages. |
Quote:
But it sounds like 3-4K isn’t gonna be a panacea this time, our old setup is maxed out... and taking away a big chunk of ad revenue as you mentioned earlier just might make things worse JMO |
Quote:
What I’m curious to know, though, is it a traffic issue? A storage issue? Both? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.