ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I've finally changed my mind about Todd Haley (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=252827)

TEX 11-22-2011 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 8131921)
I do not think that Haley will get fired. I think Matt Cassel will be the starting QB next season. But I think we invest our 1st on a QB. I also think we make a couple of good acquisitions for the OLine. I also think a few weeks from now we will see some of our rookies gets some playing experience to use towards next season.

Next year will be year 4 - far too many holes still to fill. :shake:

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 8132870)
I think that if Haley had ONE competent quarterback on the team, most of us would have a different opinion of him.

Yeah, we'd be losing important games instead of meaningless ones.

TEX 11-22-2011 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8133293)
The line play is being WAY over-analyzed.

No way. 3 players need to be replaced on the OL and 2 on the DL. Nothing is being over - analyzed. Both lines need substantial improvement.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 05:09 PM

How many players show up to camp out of shape? How many good players have we re-signed on the cheap? I can only think of a handful of games where our team played without heart. There is a difference between being outmatched and beaten to submission and being outplayed.

I don't get why people obsess over game managers. If you want a guy to manage games then hire norv Turner. I'd rather a guy who coaches a good team. Haley does that. I want a 2 year extension and a concerted effort to get him a real qb. We spend endless threads btiching about the importance of a qb then we expect Haley to win with below average qbs. Doesn't make any sense.

CupidStunt 11-22-2011 05:29 PM

Welcome to Club Reality. The guy's a moron, as I and others have known for a while, and anyone who doesn't see it yet will realize their mistake sooner or later. Likely sooner. Definitely sooner.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 8133722)
No way. 3 players need to be replaced on the OL and 2 on the DL. Nothing is being over - analyzed. Both lines need substantial improvement.

Only two players need to be replaced because of performance - Lilja and Richardson.

Wiegmann needs to be replaced due to age.

I would argue that if we replace Richardson and Wiegmann we could get away with Lilja at LG. You don't need a flawless line to win a SB.

I'd also argue that if Powe pans out at NT we'd have a very solid DL, but depth is needed.

stevieray 11-22-2011 07:35 PM

...how anyone can expect continuity with a revolving door at OC is fooling themselves...

...even more amazing is after losing JC, EB and TM, the majority on this board wanted to SFL, yet still expects/expected the team to win games.

...this season was shot weeks ago.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 8134031)
.
...even more amazing is after losing JC, EB and TM, the majority on this board wanted to SFL, yet still expects/expected the team to win games.

They created that expectation by winning games.

stevieray 11-22-2011 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134035)
They created that expectation by winning games.

no, they didn't...that's just football...every year, teams win games they "should've" lost, and lose games they "should've" won.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 8134039)
no, they didn't...that's just football.

Sorry, as soon as we beat San Diego, I expected the team to beat bad teams at Arrowhead. I thought they were a decent team.

Turns out they were just a bunch of frauds. Like last year.

stevieray 11-22-2011 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134048)
I expected

:LOL:

it'll get you every time, dude.

Chiefnj2 11-22-2011 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8133734)
How many players show up to camp out of shape? How many good players have we re-signed on the cheap? I can only think of a handful of games where our team played without heart. There is a difference between being outmatched and beaten to submission and being outplayed.

I don't get why people obsess over game managers. If you want a guy to manage games then hire norv Turner. I'd rather a guy who coaches a good team. Haley does that. I want a 2 year extension and a concerted effort to get him a real qb. We spend endless threads btiching about the importance of a qb then we expect Haley to win with below average qbs. Doesn't make any sense.

The Chiefs have been blown out and scored 10 points or less in half their games this season. You think that's good coaching?

whoman69 11-22-2011 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8133639)
Hali and Bowe were not underachieving prior to Haley's arrival.

Short memory

Reerun_KC 11-22-2011 08:08 PM

I dont care who the coaches or players are anymore...

I just want to win a superbowl and could careless about who the HC is or the name on the back of the jersey...

Chiefnj2 11-22-2011 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8134133)
Short memory

Hali led the team in sacks his rookie year.
Bowe averaged about 80 receptions and 1000 yards his first two years.

Real underachievers there.

htismaqe 11-22-2011 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8133639)
Hali and Bowe were not underachieving prior to Haley's arrival.

But they've both improved dramatically since his arrival.

htismaqe 11-22-2011 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 8133722)
No way. 3 players need to be replaced on the OL and 2 on the DL. Nothing is being over - analyzed. Both lines need substantial improvement.

If Houston were performing to expectations and we had another solid LB instead of Jovan Belcher, people wouldn't be talking about the DL nearly as much. They're not stellar but they don't suck. Some of the no names (Gordon) don't look too bad either.

A real QB would instantly make this line look better.

whosyou 11-22-2011 08:32 PM

Bill Cowher was at cabbalas buying a deer blind today

Reerun_KC 11-22-2011 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whosyou (Post 8134216)
Bill Cowher was at cabbalas buying a deer blind today

Lets hope he shoots himself in it...

Okie_Apparition 11-22-2011 08:39 PM

Cowher bought 99% of his QBs blind as well

ChiefsrGood 11-22-2011 08:54 PM

Answer this question:

Will the Kansas City Chiefs be good next year?

GloryDayz 11-22-2011 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 8133067)
I kinda see us like the 49ers last year in a sense. We've got good young talent, but we've got coaches who don't necessarily know what they want this team to be and how to coach them to be that team. The most damning thing to me about Haley is that we have no identity. Some of that is injuries, but I lay a lot of that on his promotion of Muir to OC. Again, to me this is like Mike Singletary and Jimmy Raye. You've got guys who are showing that they don't really know how to put guys in positions to succeed. I get that there are injuries, but there is no excuse to getting blown out this many times.

I think you get a proven, veteran coach in here who knows how to drive guys and get them ready to compete, and who can actually work with other coaches so that you can bring in a bright mind at OC, then you sprinkle in some more talent through the draft, sign a few savvy free agents, and get your injured stars back, and we can be right back in the thick of it. Lots of people coming into the year were comparing us to where the Packers were a few years ago, when they went from 13-3 to 6-10, then back to 11-5. I see the makings of a good nucleus here. The critical difference, of course, is the lack of the franchise QB. But again that's where I go back to SF, because Harbaugh is proving that if you know what you are doing and give your team an identity and put guys in a position to succeed, you can still win with a guy like Smith...

Nice dissertation... Rep!! Didn't read it, but the length is worth of a porn star... :thumb:

WhiteWhale 11-22-2011 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8134155)
Hali led the team in sacks his rookie year.
Bowe averaged about 80 receptions and 1000 yards his first two years.

Real underachievers there.

Bowe was a 50% catcher who we threw to more often than Tony Gonzalaz. He put up stats via volume... the same way Chris Chambers used to. It's like a CB that gets a lot of picks because QB's pick on him. Now he's a league leading WR that gets respect from elite corners.

Hali.. yeah... if you can't see the difference between then and now you're blind. Hali was an 8 sack guy prior to Haley and was coming off a 3 sack season. Now he's a 15 sack guy and one of the elite pass rushers in the NFL.

Of course, now you can tell me how DJ always played up to his potential and is no better now than he was before. Or maybe that it's all a coincidence and that Johnson was just due for his breakout season as a six year veteran.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8134121)
The Chiefs have been blown out and scored 10 points or less in half their games this season. You think that's good coaching?

How about addressing the points I make instead of completely changing direction. Like I've said, for all the arguments we make about the importance of a franchise QB, why are we so insistent that Haley win without one? It's pretty simple. The Chiefs get blown out a lot because when they fall 2-3 TDs behind, they have to rely on Cassel and have to ditch the running game.

You know what? Aaron Rodgers doesn't get blown out because when his defense falls behind, he picks up the pace. The Chiefs don't have someone like that. Other than Indianapolis, how many games can you remember where Matt Cassel picked up his defense?

FAX 11-22-2011 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134417)
How about addressing the points I make instead of completely changing direction. Like I've said, for all the arguments we make about the importance of a franchise QB, why are we so insistent that Haley win without one? It's pretty simple. The Chiefs get blown out a lot because when they fall 2-3 TDs behind, they have to rely on Cassel and have to ditch the running game.

You know what? Aaron Rodgers doesn't get blown out because when his defense falls behind, he picks up the pace. The Chiefs don't have someone like that. Other than Indianapolis, how many games can you remember where Matt Cassel picked up his defense?

It's this one, single, simple statement of fact that has me bumfuzzled.

And, the more I read about how Haley is the Devil, the more fuzzled my bum becomes. Assuming that these people want the Chiefs to succeed, they should realize that Haley (or whomever the coach might be) has to adjust our approach to the game in order to fit the scheme to Cassel's abilities ... and those abilities are very limited.

The result is a collage of risk-taking, aberrant play-calls, tired defenses, runs to nowhere, and dinky-dunks.

Not to mention the overall malaise that is bound to affect your locker room when the players know full well that we are A) Utterly unable to maintain a consistent offensive attack and B) Come from behind.

Charles saved our asses last season, but without him, Haley has once again been charged with making chicken salad out of walrus feces and is criticized for the effort. It's too bad for a lot of reasons ... not the least of which is that Haley will likely be very successful in this league as a head coach someday ... but probably not here. And that's a shame.

FAX

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 09:58 PM

We've been blown out with Charles and without Charles.

14 blowouts in 42 games is not an accident.

Haley is garbage.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-22-2011 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8134174)
But they've both improved dramatically since his arrival.

Correlation has something to say about causation. Did Herm really coach up Jared Allen?

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134462)
Correlation has something to say about causation. Did Herm really coach up Jared Allen?

No, all credit for that goes to Krumrie and Gunther. :LOL:

Rasputin 11-22-2011 10:03 PM

I wanted to wait his 3rd year to form an honest opinion of him. Honestly he sucks.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-22-2011 10:03 PM

Haley is what he is, another one hit wonder offensive coordinator like Mike Mularkey, Greg Robinson, any many, many others. Honestly, he doesn't have a super impressive, or long, track record as an OC either. He's done nothing to indicate that he's anything other than replaceable. I don't even buy the "players play hard for him" line. If they did, more talented Chiefs teams, which this definitely is, wouldn't be getting curb stomped more than the Herm teams did.

FringeNC 11-22-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134456)
We've been blown out with Charles and without Charles.

14 blowouts in 42 games is not an accident.

Haley is garbage.

The three most important positions in a franchise are GM, head coach, and QB. Thus far, I'm far more convinced that Pioli and Cassel are garbage than I am about Haley.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-22-2011 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 8134475)
The three most important positions in a franchise are GM, head coach, and QB. Thus far, I'm far more convinced that Pioli and Cassel are garbage than I am about Haley.

Oh absolutely, but deer shit is still shit, even when compared against steaming hog shit.

petegz28 11-22-2011 10:15 PM

Haley failed miserably this year from the start of training camp. The team looks soft, scared, unprepared, unorganized and just generally sucks. That is not the sign of a good head coach in his 3rd year with a team.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134472)
Haley is what he is, another one hit wonder offensive coordinator like Mike Mularkey, Greg Robinson, any many, many others. Honestly, he doesn't have a super impressive, or long, track record as an OC either. He's done nothing to indicate that he's anything other than replaceable. I don't even buy the "players play hard for him" line. If they did, more talented Chiefs teams, which this definitely is, wouldn't be getting curb stomped more than the Herm teams did.

Again, though...
How many players can you say "that guy is not playing up to his potential" under Haley?

How many close games did we win last year because of NEGATIVE QB play? What if we had an AVERAGE QB play against Denver two weeks ago? What about this week against New England--a guy who could actually finish up drives? Better yet... why did we lose to Baltimore? Primarily because of negative QB play. Our QB is a virus. I saw Palko this week move tight ends and RBs into positions to pick up the blitz. I saw him call his own plays, whereas Cassel look confusedly to the sideline for direction. I saw Palko dictate the tempo of the game. And all year long, Haley/Muir's playcalls are getting receivers open. What the **** do you do when your QB doesn't hit those open guys? What do you do when your QB is so inept at throwing to the deep field that the entire defense is gunning for 20 yards and in?

I don't care how gifted a carpenter you are. You're not going to build a good house with a plastic hammer.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 8134515)
Haley failed miserably this year from the start of training camp. The team looks soft, scared, unprepared, unorganized and just generally sucks. That is not the sign of a good head coach in his 3rd year with a team.

Haley made a critical mistake the first 2 games of the season. It's not something he should be fired over.

It's obvious we weren't going to win with Cassel even if we were well prepared.

FringeNC 11-22-2011 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134487)
Oh absolutely, but deer shit is still shit, even when compared against steaming hog shit.

That we had a more wide-open game plan with a 28 year old journeyman QB making his first start than we have had with our Pioli-anointed starter for 3 years is just incredibly damning of the relationship between Pioli and Haley. Of course, Haley is right about Cassel. Who is going to work for Pioli after it comes out that Pioli won't let a head coach have any say about the QB? (Other than Gunther Cunningham.)

I'm not convinced Haley is a bad coach, but I don't think Pioli and Haley can work together, so it's a moot point.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 8134538)
That we had a more wide-open game plan with a 28 year old journeyman QB making his first start than we have had with our Pioli-anointed starter for 3 years is just incredibly damning of the relationship between Pioli and Haley. Of course, Haley is right about Cassel. Who is going to work for Pioli after it comes out that Pioli won't let a head coach have any say about the QB? (Other than Gunther Cunningham.)

I'm not convinced Haley is a bad coach, but I don't think Pioli and Haley can work together, so it's a moot point.

I think there's some truth to this.

I believe Pioli forced Weis and Crennel on Haley. I also believe keeping Gailey was more a favor to Hunt. I don't think Haley had a choice but to run the 2-gap 3-4. I think Haley was playing nice on the Weis hire, but no, I don't think it was a hire he necessarily wanted to make. And yes, given that Haley completely opened up the gameplan for Palko, a journeyman, it says a lot about how much he trusts Cassel.

Pioli is the problem. Let your head coach coach, and build the system around him. It took longer for Pioli to build Haley a defense because he had to get completely different personnel. And Cassel has clearly held the offense very far back.

Reerun_KC 11-22-2011 10:32 PM

Reading what you guys post is absolutely priceless...

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134537)
Haley made a critical mistake the first 2 games of the season. It's not something he should be fired over.

It's obvious we weren't going to win with Cassel even if we were well prepared.

You're right. He should be fired because he constantly gets blown out.

It's not changing anytime soon.

It's what he does best - embarrass the organization.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134581)
You're right. He should be fired because he constantly gets blown out.

It's not changing anytime soon.

It's what he does best - embarrass the organization.

We have a QB that can't come back from a lead of 14 points or higher. This is a running team because we can't trust our QB to take over games.

You're going to get blown out a lot when you have to develop a strategy around keeping the ball out of the hands of your QB.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134594)
We have a QB that can't come back from a lead of 14 points or higher. This is a running team because we can't trust our QB to take over games.

You're going to get blown out a lot when you have to develop a strategy around keeping the ball out of the hands of your QB.

Also when you can't stop anyone on defense. Let's try and absolve Haley for everything, though.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134632)
Also when you can't stop anyone on defense. Let's try and absolve Haley for everything, though.

This is a pass-happy league. We've talked about this a million times. We have 3 QBs that might beat Marino's record. Your defense is going to give up points.

The Packers have a very good defense. They give up a ton of points. Great offenses pick up a defense when they have an off day. And our Defense has a lot more good days than they have bad. Cassel should be able to pick up at least a few of those for his defense. Secondly, how many bad defensive performances were in the second half after they were left on the field the entire first half because of poor QB play?

A good QB improves the defense. For one, he picks them up when they struggle. He keeps them largely off the field. And he forces them to become one-dimensional. You know why GB gets a lot of sacks and forces turnovers? Because opposing offenses HAVE to pass in order to keep up.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134648)
And our Defense has a lot more good days than they have bad.

Not this year, and not in 09.

Don't act like Haley has built anything in KC. He hasn't. We have a loose collection of talent Haley has molded into a shit D and a shit O.

Brock 11-22-2011 11:01 PM

He's out of here. No way he gets an extension now.

It doesn't matter that a few players got better supposedly because Haley made them better (lol), that doesn't mean anything when the team looks as bad as this one does, loses like it does, by as many points as it does. No. Good bye, sir.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2011 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134658)
Not this year, and not in 09.

Don't act like Haley has built anything in KC. He hasn't. We have a loose collection of talent Haley has molded into a shit D and a shit O.

Who cares about '09? Pioli gave Haley ZERO to work with.

1) the Chiefs' defense in more games does enough to make the game winnable. They are more than adequate for a good offense and a hell of a lot better than what New Orleans or even New England have. 2) Again, it goes back to Pioli. You blame Haley for '09? What about Pioli for forcing a 3-4 on a 4-3 team? What about Pioli for being so stuck on his friends that he hired Romeo to run an outdated scheme? Haley never had a choice in this.

I don't think the defense is that bad. But the reason they aren't great is a hell of a lot more on Pioli than it is Haley. Again, who on defense is underperforming their talent level? Who? Nobody can answer that question because he's' made the most out of almost every player he's coached.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2011 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134686)

1) the Chiefs' defense in more games does enough to make the game winnable.

Buffalo? No.

Detroit? No.

Miami? No.

New England? No.

Four of our six losses the defense sucked horse cock.

They also tried to give the game away in Indianapolis. Fortunately the offense bailed them out.

This is not a good defense, and wasn't last year when it mattered in the playoffs.

ChiefsCountry 11-22-2011 11:18 PM

Haley will be back in 2012 IMO.

Epic Fail 007 11-23-2011 12:07 AM

http://kansascity.sbnation.com/kansa...-head-coach-of

RealSNR 11-23-2011 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134694)
Buffalo? No.

Detroit? No.

Miami? No.

New England? No.

Four of our six losses the defense sucked horse cock.

They also tried to give the game away in Indianapolis. Fortunately the offense bailed them out.

This is not a good defense, and wasn't last year when it mattered in the playoffs.

They're good in the first halves of games! /Patriot fans

007 11-23-2011 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric007 (Post 8134767)

not gonna happen

bevischief 11-23-2011 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric007 (Post 8134767)

The server would melt if that happened...

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8134694)
Buffalo? No.

Detroit? No.

Miami? No.

New England? No.

Four of our six losses the defense sucked horse cock.

They also tried to give the game away in Indianapolis. Fortunately the offense bailed them out.

This is not a good defense, and wasn't last year when it mattered in the playoffs.

The Detroit and Buffalo game, we have no idea how well they would have played if they were actually prepared. That was easily a preparation issue. Everyone looked gassed. The New England game, the defense played well enough in the first half to keep the team in the game. You're not going to keep Tom Brady silent for two halves. We don't have an elite defense, but as I said, in most games, they do enough to give the offense a fighting chance to win. It was definitely our offense that lost the game against New England. And in Baltimore, you're using the score to justify your point. Our defense played solid that game. You forget that we were winning in the first half. We lost that game because our passing game (despite Baltimore throwing 8 guys in the box) couldn't move the ball whatsoever, and because McCluster and Cassel committed two key turnovers early in the 2nd half that gave Baltimore prime field position.

And again, you're assuming the defense is on Haley. I blame Pioli for hiring Crennel and jamming a 3-4 onto him.

FAX 11-23-2011 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134904)
The Detroit and Buffalo game, we have no idea how well they would have played if they were actually prepared. That was easily a preparation issue. Everyone looked gassed. The New England game, the defense played well enough in the first half to keep the team in the game. You're not going to keep Tom Brady silent for two halves. We don't have an elite defense, but as I said, in most games, they do enough to give the offense a fighting chance to win. It was definitely our offense that lost the game against New England. And in Baltimore, you're using the score to justify your point. Our defense played solid that game. You forget that we were winning in the first half. We lost that game because our passing game (despite Baltimore throwing 8 guys in the box) couldn't move the ball whatsoever, and because McCluster and Cassel committed two key turnovers early in the 2nd half that gave Baltimore prime field position.

And again, you're assuming the defense is on Haley. I blame Pioli for hiring Crennel and jamming a 3-4 onto him.

This whole thing has passed the absurdity threshold. Some people are merely looking for any reason to bolster their point of view. Everybody knows that, when a defense spends as much time on the field as ours does, you're going to have problems. When you add in the field position issue, the enemy has every reason to put 40 on your ass.

Grampa Dick used to complain that the offense scored too fast, which put pressure on the defense. Nowadays, it's because the offense is a 3-and-out machine.

On account of our record and the blowout losses, people are going to hate Haley regardless of the facts or the truth or the actualityness of the situation. I, on the other hand, prefer to reserve my unreasonable and irrational hate for Cassel and his family.

FAX

htismaqe 11-23-2011 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134462)
Correlation has something to say about causation. Did Herm really coach up Jared Allen?

I didn't say they got better BECAUSE of Haley.

But they did get better while he was here, did they not?

Chiefnj2 11-23-2011 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134535)
Better yet... why did we lose to Baltimore? Primarily because of negative QB play..

KC lost to Baltimore because nobody on D could cover Todd Heap. Dex's fumble. Charles' fumble. Not getting the ball to Bowe in the first half and a ridiculous 4th down call by an OC who had mailed it in 3 weeks prior. And then, once Baltimore got the lead Cassel folded under pressure in the 2nd half.

Reerun_KC 11-23-2011 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8134931)
KC lost to Baltimore because nobody on D could cover Todd Heap. Dex's fumble. Charles' fumble. Not getting the ball to Bowe in the first half and a ridiculous 4th down call by an OC who had mailed it in 3 weeks prior. And then, once Baltimore got the lead Cassel folded under pressure in the 2nd half.

That pretty much sums it up....

kysirsoze 11-23-2011 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134462)
Correlation has something to say about causation. Did Herm really coach up Jared Allen?

OK, so he gets credit for the bad but not the good. How does that make sense? Haley made high profile moves regarding Bowe and Johnson and they both responded by playing at the next level. Credit where it's due, man.

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 08:19 AM

s
Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8134913)
This whole thing has passed the absurdity threshold. Some people are merely looking for any reason to bolster their point of view. Everybody knows that, when a defense spends as much time on the field as ours does, you're going to have problems. When you add in the field position issue, the enemy has every reason to put 40 on your ass.

Grampa Dick used to complain that the offense scored too fast, which put pressure on the defense. Nowadays, it's because the offense is a 3-and-out machine.

On account of our record and the blowout losses, people are going to hate Haley regardless of the facts or the truth or the actualityness of the situation. I, on the other hand, prefer to reserve my unreasonable and irrational hate for Cassel and his family.

FAX

Its absurd
The same people who say we can't win without a franchise qb let alone a qb who nnegatively contributes...
The same people who say Clark hunt is shortchanging this team of talent by being cheap...
The same people who blast pioli for screwing up the qb, nt, pass rusher and for being a bad gm....
These are the same people who grill Haley for losing despite being shortchanged of talent especially at qb and nt. When things go wrong the first instinct is to blame everybody.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-23-2011 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8134920)
I didn't say they got better BECAUSE of Haley.

But they did get better while he was here, did they not?

Fo shooooo.

Haley's definitely not Rich Kotite. He's also not Bill Walsh. To me, he's just a guy. Yeah, he got a bit of a raw deal with the Cassel thing, but that's balanced out by the fact that I'm not sure he was really ready or competent enough to be a HC.

If he gets canned, it won't bother me. If he stays, it won't bother

I will say this: if we do draft a QB in the first (I'm still pessimistic), I'd much rather have Haley than some retread defensive coach (John Fox, Jeff Fisher, Bill Cowher, etc.) who loathes the thought of developing a young QB and just wants someone to manage the game.

htismaqe 11-23-2011 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134949)
Fo shooooo.

Haley's definitely not Rich Kotite. He's also not Bill Walsh. To me, he's just a guy. Yeah, he got a bit of a raw deal with the Cassel thing, but that's balanced out by the fact that I'm not sure he was really ready or competent enough to be a HC.

If he gets canned, it won't bother me. If he stays, it won't bother

I will say this: if we do draft a QB in the first (I'm still pessimistic), I'd much rather have Haley than some retread defensive coach (John Fox, Jeff Fisher, Bill Cowher, etc.) who loathes the thought of developing a young QB and just wants someone to manage the game.

Yup yup.

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8134931)
KC lost to Baltimore because nobody on D could cover Todd Heap. Dex's fumble. Charles' fumble. Not getting the ball to Bowe in the first half and a ridiculous 4th down call by an OC who had mailed it in 3 weeks prior. And then, once Baltimore got the lead Cassel folded under pressure in the 2nd half.

An average qb keeps us in that game. Period. We were competitive in every phase of the game except our d bag quarterback. Our defense did more than enough to win. Our offense crippled them.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-23-2011 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 8134937)
OK, so he gets credit for the bad but not the good. How does that make sense? Haley made high profile moves regarding Bowe and Johnson and they both responded by playing at the next level. Credit where it's due, man.

???

I'm not saying he only gets credit for the losses or bad outcomes but not the good, I'm saying that to assume that those players improved solely because of Haley is a logical misstep.

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134949)
Fo shooooo.

Haley's definitely not Rich Kotite. He's also not Bill Walsh. To me, he's just a guy. Yeah, he got a bit of a raw deal with the Cassel thing, but that's balanced out by the fact that I'm not sure he was really ready or competent enough to be a HC.

If he gets canned, it won't bother me. If he stays, it won't bother

I will say this: if we do draft a QB in the first (I'm still pessimistic), I'd much rather have Haley than some retread defensive coach (John Fox, Jeff Fisher, Bill Cowher, etc.) who loathes the thought of developing a young QB and just wants someone to manage the game.

Shortchanged on cassel, by a cheap owner, by a gm who forced his system onto the clay instead of letting the coach run his system. Haley is the definition of being handcuffed. But in the process, players have gotten much better under his watch, they respect him deeply, and they stay disciplined enough to work hard and stay in shape for training camp.

I don't know his ceiling. Maybe its low. But he's shown tremendous upside and he deserves a shot at doing things his way instead of the gm jamming the patriot way down his throat.

Chiefnj2 11-23-2011 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134957)
An average qb keeps us in that game. Period. We were competitive in every phase of the game except our d bag quarterback. Our defense did more than enough to win. Our offense crippled them.

How many yards did Charles have in the 2nd half? Baltimore's first possession of the game led to points and about 5 minutes of the clock being chewed up. I agree the offense was bad - but it was bad all around. Drives ended with bad playcalling, and fumbles by players other than Cassel. Did Cassel melt under pressure toward the end - sure, he always does. But to ignore the playcalling, lack of productivity by Charles in the 2nd half, and turnovers by other players is just ignorant. But I know, with any other QB the team is a playoff contender.*

* Except Tyler Palko.

FAX 11-23-2011 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134945)
s

Its absurd
The same people who say we can't win without a franchise qb let alone a qb who nnegatively contributes...
The same people who say Clark hunt is shortchanging this team of talent by being cheap...
The same people who blast pioli for screwing up the qb, nt, pass rusher and for being a bad gm....
These are the same people who grill Haley for losing despite being shortchanged of talent especially at qb and nt. When things go wrong the first instinct is to blame everybody.

It's human nature, Mr. chiefzilla1501.

It's like those people who blame the iceberg for the Titanic. Or, those people who blame the New Orleans flood on backed up sewers. Or, those people who blame Torgo for tying up The Master's wife to that pole.

FAX

kysirsoze 11-23-2011 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134960)
???

I'm not saying he only gets credit for the losses or bad outcomes but not the good, I'm saying that to assume that those players improved solely because of Haley is a logical misstep.

Well assuming anyone ever improves as a player due to one factor is a logical misstep. I'm saying any reasonable person will look at what took place during those camps and give him a large share of the credit, especially when you hear those players talk about him. It's more than simple correlation.

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134960)
???

I'm not saying he only gets credit for the losses or bad outcomes but not the good, I'm saying that to assume that those players improved solely because of Haley is a logical misstep.

Fat players show up on time and in shape to camp. Putting bowe and dj in the doghouse had clear impact. Managing hali and Albert on their weight has elevated their games. Bowe is taking his game seriously enough to attend fitz's camp. He did a very good of managing bowe and Baldwin's offseason distractions. And players are resigning for cheap, indicating they love playing for him. The most important quality of a head coach is to manage the team especially their attitude. He has done that in spades and I appreciate his creativeness to do it.

FAX 11-23-2011 08:46 AM

I would just like to see what Haley could do with a good quarterback ... not even a great one ... just a good, decent quarterback who can go through his progressions, throw a good, accurate pass in the 10 to 40 yard range, and demonstrate decent pocket presence.

I honestly believe that, given his knowledge of the passing game, he could do some very interesting things with a guy like that.

I'll probably never get the chance to see it, though.

FAX

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8134971)
How many yards did Charles have in the 2nd half? Baltimore's first possession of the game led to points and about 5 minutes of the clock being chewed up. I agree the offense was bad - but it was bad all around. Drives ended with bad playcalling, and fumbles by players other than Cassel. Did Cassel melt under pressure toward the end - sure, he always does. But to ignore the playcalling, lack of productivity by Charles in the 2nd half, and turnovers by other players is just ignorant. But I know, with any other QB the team is a playoff contender.*

* Except Tyler Palko.

You're looking at the stats. Not what actually happened on the field.

Second half
Drive 1: we get to the 34 yard line. Charles doesn't convert on a 4th and 1. Mostly effective drive. By the way, main reason we didn't get a first down on that drive was because Charles dropped an easy dump-off pass on first down.
Baltimore fg - 13-7

Drive 2:
Matt Dipshit Cassel -- intentional grounding on first down. 2nd and 20 -- sacked for -5 yards. 3rd and 25 -- McCluster fumbles. Uh... yeah, you think the QB and not the coaching is to blame here?
Baltimore fg (gifted to them) - 16-7

Drive 3:
Matt Dipshit Cassel -- intercepted on the second play of the drive. SECOND PLAY.
Baltimore td (gifted to them) - 23-7

But yeah, let's blame the defense and coaching for this loss. That's an easy excuse. The Chiefs were in this game and then two boneheaded drives by the QB led to a 10 point swing that put the game out of reach.

FAX 11-23-2011 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8135026)
You're looking at the stats. Not what actually happened on the field.

Second half
Drive 1: we get to the 34 yard line. Charles doesn't convert on a 4th and 1. Mostly effective drive. By the way, main reason we didn't get a first down on that drive was because Charles dropped an easy dump-off pass on first down.
Baltimore fg - 13-7

Drive 2:
Matt Dipshit Cassel -- intentional grounding on first down. 2nd and 20 -- sacked for -5 yards. 3rd and 25 -- McCluster fumbles. Uh... yeah, you think the QB and not the coaching is to blame here?
Baltimore fg (gifted to them) - 16-7

Drive 3:
Matt Dipshit Cassel -- intercepted on the second play of the drive. SECOND PLAY.
Baltimore td (gifted to them) - 23-7

But yeah, let's blame the defense and coaching for this loss. That's an easy excuse. The Chiefs were in this game and then two boneheaded drives by the QB led to a 10 point swing that put the game out of reach.

Ouch.

Anybody else's testicles hurt all of a sudden?

FAX

Hammock Parties 11-23-2011 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134968)
I don't know his ceiling. Maybe its low. But he's shown tremendous upside and he deserves a shot at doing things his way instead of the gm jamming the patriot way down his throat.

He hasn't, really.

He continues to show he's a sideline hothead who can't co exist with a quality OC.

That alone is reason enough to can his ass.

His upside is becoming a good offensive coordinator.

Hammock Parties 11-23-2011 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8134949)
Fo shooooo.

Haley's definitely not Rich Kotite. He's also not Bill Walsh. To me, he's just a guy. Yeah, he got a bit of a raw deal with the Cassel thing, but that's balanced out by the fact that I'm not sure he was really ready or competent enough to be a HC.

If he gets canned, it won't bother me. If he stays, it won't bother

I will say this: if we do draft a QB in the first (I'm still pessimistic), I'd much rather have Haley than some retread defensive coach (John Fox, Jeff Fisher, Bill Cowher, etc.) who loathes the thought of developing a young QB and just wants someone to manage the game.

I sort of agree with this. It wouldn't be horrible.

But even with a franchise QB I still get the heebie jeebies that Haley would do something dumb in a close game in the playoffs.

Hammock Parties 11-23-2011 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8134904)
And again, you're assuming the defense is on Haley. I blame Pioli for hiring Crennel and jamming a 3-4 onto him.

He's the ****ing head coach.

We're running the worst McDonalds in town and you want to blame the fry cook and the register biscuits instead of the manager.

RealSNR 11-23-2011 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8135026)
You're looking at the stats. Not what actually happened on the field.

Second half
Drive 1: we get to the 34 yard line. Charles doesn't convert on a 4th and 1. Mostly effective drive. By the way, main reason we didn't get a first down on that drive was because Charles dropped an easy dump-off pass on first down.
Baltimore fg - 13-7

Drive 2:
Matt Dipshit Cassel -- intentional grounding on first down. 2nd and 20 -- sacked for -5 yards. 3rd and 25 -- McCluster fumbles. Uh... yeah, you think the QB and not the coaching is to blame here?
Baltimore fg (gifted to them) - 16-7

Drive 3:
Matt Dipshit Cassel -- intercepted on the second play of the drive. SECOND PLAY.
Baltimore td (gifted to them) - 23-7

But yeah, let's blame the defense and coaching for this loss. That's an easy excuse. The Chiefs were in this game and then two boneheaded drives by the QB led to a 10 point swing that put the game out of reach.

This is kind of how we lose a lot of games. We stay competitive and fierce for awhile, then something happens and we just go into a shell and get raped for a couple of quarters.

Red Beans 11-23-2011 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8135146)
He hasn't, really.

He continues to show he's a sideline hothead who can't co exist with a quality OC.

That alone is reason enough to can his ass.

His upside is becoming a good offensive coordinator.

Weiss left on his own volition. What other quality OC has there been, or rumored to have been?

FringeNC 11-23-2011 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8135151)
I sort of agree with this. It wouldn't be horrible.

But even with a franchise QB I still get the heebie jeebies that Haley would do something dumb in a close game in the playoffs.

Actually Haley's problem isn't losing close games. It's getting blown out. A case could be made that blowout loses reflect talent deficiencies.

Hammock Parties 11-23-2011 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Beans (Post 8135162)
Weiss left on his own volition. What other quality OC has there been, or rumored to have been?

Chan Gailey.

We would be far better off with that guy coaching this team. At any position.

Plus, we didn't even try to hire an OC this past offseason. Haley didn't even practice due diligence. Muir is a farce of a hire.

Hammock Parties 11-23-2011 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 8135178)
A case could be made that blowout loses reflect talent deficiencies.

Bullshit. The #1 symptom of blowout losses is not being adequately prepared. This is the modern NFL. Shitty teams are competing with good teams every week because of parity.

You people don't want to blame Haley for ANYTHING.

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8135146)
He hasn't, really.

He continues to show he's a sideline hothead who can't co exist with a quality OC.

That alone is reason enough to can his ass.

His upside is becoming a good offensive coordinator.

Gailey didn't run his system. Weis never understood that his role was to ne a coordinator not the head coach. I personally don't believe Haley had much choice with either. And I personally believe Muir was hired because pioli didn't want Haley calling plays.

Pioli has to quit being a control freak and let his coaches coach. Isn't it clear Haley wants to call plays? Then freaking let him.

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2011 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 8135154)
He's the ****ing head coach.

We're running the worst McDonalds in town and you want to blame the fry cook and the register biscuits instead of the manager.

You can't blame the manager if the owner is hiring crackheads and stokers to cook your food. I blame pioli for 90% of this mess.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.