ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I owe Kyle Orton an apology... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253905)

chiefzilla1501 12-18-2011 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenselessChiefsFan (Post 8216810)
It helps when the play is in on time. A coaches job is to take as much pressure off the players as possible. That includes getting the plays in and letting the QB make a presnap read.

That wasn't a problem last year. Matt still showed no ability to make pre snap adjustments, find a 2nd or 3rd target, or throw an accurate ball and he was one of the worst in the NFL at throwing a deep ball.

And this is cinsidering that defenses were throwing 8 in a box loading up against the run. That's a qbs wet dream.

threebag 12-18-2011 06:25 PM

One thing Cassel robs this team more with payroll.

SenselessChiefsFan 12-18-2011 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcan (Post 8216907)
This is true. I'm just doing my best to be objective. At no time during Cassel's tenure here so far did I ever see him do anything that made me think he was in control of his offense or team, or was a genuine leader or had any football presence. I like telling the story of Trent Green during his first game as a Chief back in 2001. We lost that game to the Raiders, but on our last offensive possession (you might remember Snoop Minnis laying out and catching that TD), there was a play where Trent rolled to his right on a 4th down and short. TRich was open and waving his hands at the marker, but there was a linebacker about to hit him in the back when the ball go there. Trent pointed to the linebacker as he ran and TRich turned and put that linebacker on his butt, allowing trent to scramble for the first. When I saw that play, I knew the Chiefs had somebody special. It takes a good QB to make that throw on the run, and GREAT fullback to catch that ball cleanly while being hit in the back... It takes a GREAT QB to NOT throw that ball, and a genuine leader to actually POINT to the guy he wanted blocked.

Of course, that year Trent became known as TrInt, and his numbers weren't that great. But there were CLEARLY intangibles that made me certain that if we stuck with this guy, we would have an amazing offense.

In his 3 years here, I have yet to see Cassel do anything on the field that has given me a similar feeling. So, even if Orton isn't any better, I don't have a problem with Cassel getting the boot. No problems at all.

I saw Cassel changing some things up last year and lining guys up correctly on the line.

I don't have a problem with Cassel being gone as well. I just think that Orton isn't any better, and in the long run will prove to be worse.

But, I have stated that the Chiefs should draft a QB this year. Of course, now that Haley is gone, the Chiefs will probably win out and lose the opportunity to get one of the top three.

I fully expect the Chiefs to trade down this year.

Brock 12-18-2011 06:31 PM

I saw Cassel taking too long to line guys up correctly and throwing a pussyfit when he had to call a timeout.

Baby Lee 12-18-2011 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8216882)
Name one thing cassel does better than orton? Because I can't think of a single thing. Both have no track record of clutch play. Orton throws a better deep ball. He throws a more accurate ball. He actually reads defenses pre snaps. He has a much better feel for the position like selling play fakes, having the recognition to run a quick count on a wr screen, etc...Tell me ONE THING.

Putting up moderately impressive TD/INT numbers against the easiest schedule in the league, using a customized game plan to minimize mistakes and make ultra-safe passes.

SenselessChiefsFan 12-18-2011 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8216911)
That wasn't a problem last year. Matt still showed no ability to make pre snap adjustments, find a 2nd or 3rd target, or throw an accurate ball and he was one of the worst in the NFL at throwing a deep ball.

And this is cinsidering that defenses were throwing 8 in a box loading up against the run. That's a qbs wet dream.

Don't know where Petro found it, but his downfield completion percentage over his career is better than Orton.

I guess I should just change my argument. Because it isn't really who is better, it is that Orton still isn't good enough.

But, if you asked me to pick a QB out of those two for the NFL, it has to be Cassel.

Why? Orton doesn't put in the work, and football isn't his first priority.

See, that is why McDaniels loves Cassel. That is why I would choose Cassel over Orton.

mcan 12-18-2011 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 8216983)
I saw Cassel taking too long to line guys up correctly and throwing a pussyfit when he had to call a timeout.

This is what I saw a LOT of. He WOULD get players to move to the left or the right if they were REALLY in the wrong spot, and usually have to call timeout and be pissed off (as he should be). But there were WAY too many procedural penalties called under Cassel for my tastes. This is an indictment on both he and his offensive coaches.

listopencil 12-18-2011 06:39 PM

He's the same guy he was in Denver. He's a decent QB. Gratz on the win.

hometeam 12-18-2011 06:40 PM

I have been preaching that orton is underrated since he was with the bears :/

SenselessChiefsFan 12-18-2011 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 8217026)
I have been preaching that orton is underrated since he was with the bears :/

Hey, I at least respect you. The ones that suddenly preached how good he was after he was acquired by the Chiefs got under my skin.

The same guys that were sure that Cassel was better last offseason.

Dexter Manley 12-18-2011 06:45 PM

One game, chill out...

MahiMike 12-18-2011 06:46 PM

Not me. I said he was as good as Carson Palmer and WAY cheaper. I'll go ahead and say we no longer need to think QB in the draft.

Chiefnj2 12-18-2011 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 8216986)
Putting up moderately impressive TD/INT numbers against the easiest schedule in the league, using a customized game plan to minimize mistakes and make ultra-safe passes.

As opposed to all those OC's who customize game plans to maximize mistakes and make risky passes.

SenselessChiefsFan 12-18-2011 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8217075)
As opposed to all those OC's who customize game plans to maximize mistakes and make risky passes.

Hey, don't talk about Haley like that.

chiefzilla1501 12-18-2011 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenselessChiefsFan (Post 8216992)
Don't know where Petro found it, but his downfield completion percentage over his career is better than Orton.

I guess I should just change my argument. Because it isn't really who is better, it is that Orton still isn't good enough.

But, if you asked me to pick a QB out of those two for the NFL, it has to be Cassel.

Why? Orton doesn't put in the work, and football isn't his first priority.

See, that is why McDaniels loves Cassel. That is why I would choose Cassel over Orton.

Over his career. Thats what happens when you have the best jump ball receiver of all time in Randy moss. Daunte Culpepper was nails when he had moss too.

Your comment on or ton's work ethic are ridiculous and unfounded. from what I've heard, he has a very good work ethic and his teammates like him. Mcdaniels loved cassel because he knew he could run his system. You have no idea who he would choose today. Remember, he chose cassel over orton in Denver because he had never worked with orton before.

Also, the fact that cassel puts in a ton of work and doesn't improve is a huge concern.

No, cassel does not make good pre snap adjustments. Too many plays where you see more blitzers than blockers. That's a qb issue.

Nobody here wants orton as a long term option. You are the only one who for whatever bizarre reason thinks cassel is any good. Again, the chiefs didn't have problems with play calling or communication last year. And cassel still struggled, despite his stats. Quite simply, he is a one read guy. You send in the play and he throws to his primary target or else check down. That works when you have moss. It does not work when you have even very good receivers like bowe.

chiefzilla1501 12-18-2011 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8217075)
As opposed to all those OC's who customize game plans to maximize mistakes and make risky passes.

The packers game plan around Aaron Rodgers. And they are not afraid to dial up higher risk pass plays.

The chiefs game plan to keep the ball out of cassels hands. Because when they put it squarely in his hands, he struggles.

Thats the huge distinction.

Baby Lee 12-18-2011 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8217075)
As opposed to all those OC's who customize game plans to maximize mistakes and make risky passes.

That's not the opposite of what I said. The opposite is taking chances for bigger gains and executing passes into challenging windows. Things proficient QBs can take advantage of

BoneKrusher 12-18-2011 07:00 PM

Orton did just what i thought he would do, show us all how Shitty Cassel and Haley both are.

and it feels nice beating a contender.

Groves 12-18-2011 07:03 PM

Please don't make me have respect for Muir. That's all I ask.

threebag 12-18-2011 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8216381)
Hardly. People are acting like they saw good QB play out of a Chiefs team the first time in forever.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 8217063)
Not me. I said he was as good as Carson Palmer and WAY cheaper. I'll go ahead and say we no longer need to think QB in the draft.

This

chiefzilla1501 12-18-2011 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 8217063)
Not me. I said he was as good as Carson Palmer and WAY cheaper. I'll go ahead and say we no longer need to think QB in the draft.

We absolutely need to draft a QB. Orton has a ton to prove in terms of late-game heroics and while he's better than Cassel, he's not top-tier talent.

Even if Orton throws for 700 yards the next two games, the Chiefs have to draft a first or second round QB. Period.

Okie_Apparition 12-18-2011 07:56 PM

That pass to Baldwin to the 3 or so, was sweet. Except for the not holding on part

Messier 12-18-2011 08:23 PM

I've always thought Orton and Cassel were pretty much the same QB, but today I noticed I didn't get nervous every time Orton dropped back like I do with Cassel. I felt Orton was confidant in his ability to get the ball where he wanted. I know it seems obvious, but Cassel seems to have a, I hope the ball gets there, kind of mind set.

ChiefsCountry 12-18-2011 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenselessChiefsFan (Post 8216992)
That is why I would choose Cassel over Orton.

You might be the dumbest ****er on this board or top three. LMAO

Freekofnature 12-18-2011 08:26 PM

Give him good protection, he'll play like today and rack up yardages.

But trust me, he's not a guy you want starting long term.

beach tribe 12-18-2011 08:28 PM

Orton's skillset is ****ing mind blowingly more effective than Cassel's.
Those stupid WR screens that the DBs would be nailing us on with Cassel's wind up gun are actually effective with Orton's quick draw.
Orton reads the field, and actually finds the open man. Casel, ehh not so much.

boogblaster 12-18-2011 08:29 PM

today was a delight compaired to the last 2 1/2 seasons .. maybe not the QOTF but still a decent QB doing his job .. plus hats off to the D ......

Messier 12-18-2011 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8217585)
Orton's skillset is ****ing mind blowingly more effective than Cassel's.
Those stupid WR screens that the DBs would be nailing us on with Cassel's wind up gun are actually effective with Orton's quick draw.
Orton reads the field, and actually finds the open man. Casel, ehh not so much.

It was great to see when the play would break down, instead of freaking out Orton found the open man, quickly. Quickly is the key, because Cassel would eventually find the man in the flat, but so late in the play that the D could easily see what was happening and blow up the player in the flat for a one yard gain.

milkman 12-18-2011 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freekofnature (Post 8217571)
Give him good protection, he'll play like today and rack up yardages.

But trust me, he's not a guy you want starting long term.

We are well aware of Orton's limitations.

This may seem like a lovefest to you, but what it really is, is a celbration of the step up from absolute shit to mediocrity.

We now can only hope that Pioli has the sense to flush the shit, and actually find go out a bring us a QB we can win with long term and in the playoffs.

threebag 12-18-2011 09:11 PM

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...5pxjag4tKKgAzg

Ultra Peanut 12-18-2011 09:14 PM

That was a breath of fresh air.

Predarat 12-18-2011 09:44 PM

Sorry for dissen ya Orton, you kicked ass today.

htismaqe 12-19-2011 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freekofnature (Post 8217571)
Give him good protection, he'll play like today and rack up yardages.

But trust me, he's not a guy you want starting long term.

Who said anything about wanting him to start long term?

Read my original post - I STILL would prefer to see Stanzi start. I'm just glad that the book on Cassel is finally closed.

Hopefully Pioli can admit he made a mistake and move on.

Reerun_KC 12-19-2011 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8218783)
Who said anything about wanting him to start long term?

Read my original post - I STILL would prefer to see Stanzi start. I'm just glad that the book on Cassel is finally closed.

Hopefully Pioli can admit he made a mistake and move on.

I have a feeling that so many are putting the cart before the horse here...

Gonna be alot of pissed off people come opening day next year.

ShowtimeSBMVP 12-19-2011 09:16 AM

<a href="http://tinypic.com?ref=1129wfl" target="_blank"><img src="http://i39.tinypic.com/1129wfl.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>

BoneKrusher 12-19-2011 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8218783)
I'm just glad that the book on Cassel is finally closed.

Hopefully Pioli can admit he made a mistake and move on.

that's where it has to start.

OzarksChiefsFan 12-19-2011 11:50 AM

Is it at least possible that Orton is like Gannon? Gannon got better with age. I thought Orton got a

raw deal after leading the Bears to the playoffs and then they went with Grossman. Orton is a much

better QB today than the was then. I don't think the play calling was a lot different but I think the

QB went downfield and didn't give up on plays. I also think some of the O line problems were

reduced by Orton burning the Packers when they blitzed and threatened them with the deep ball

the entire game thus not letting them put 10 in the box and jam receivers. If he continues to play

well how do you not sign him?

Baby Lee 12-19-2011 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzarksChiefsFan (Post 8219225)
If he continues to play well how do you not sign him?

Was he drafted, by us and only us, 1st round top 10?

BigMeatballDave 12-19-2011 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8218786)
I have a feeling that so many are putting the cart before the horse here...

Gonna be alot of pissed off people come opening day next year.

Didn't you say Orton was garbage?

:)

Fansy the Famous Bard 12-19-2011 03:13 PM

The one play that stood out to me more than any one was when BJ Raji busts through the middle and is in Orton's face. I am thinking for sure this is going to be a sack or INT... he stands there and keeps progressing through receivers then fires the ball for a completion.

My wife looked at me and said "Cassel couldn't have done that, he'd of looked like a toddler running in place about to pee himself"

Reerun_KC 12-19-2011 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8219695)
Didn't you say Orton was garbage?

:)

Yes I did. I was proven wrong yesterday...

guess we are going to see how he does against the raiders and the broncos..

but still want a franchise QB for the future to start next year.
I am not going to change my approach on wanting a 1st rd qb under center. I want a superbowl victory.. Not feel good stories...

WhiteWhale 12-19-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenselessChiefsFan (Post 8216992)
Don't know where Petro found it, but his downfield completion percentage over his career is better than Orton.

I guess I should just change my argument. Because it isn't really who is better, it is that Orton still isn't good enough.

But, if you asked me to pick a QB out of those two for the NFL, it has to be Cassel.

Why? Orton doesn't put in the work, and football isn't his first priority.

See, that is why McDaniels loves Cassel. That is why I would choose Cassel over Orton.

I'm not some Orton fan, but this is pure speculative nonsense.

chiefzilla1501 12-19-2011 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenselessChiefsFan (Post 8216002)
Yes. Just pointing out games that Cassel had against similar defenses.

we've pointed out multiple times that Orton did things fundamentally that Cassel hasn't done in 3 years. Cassel had good half-games against those 3 teams. In his entire 3 year career, he has less than a handful of games where he was very good for more than 3 quarters. That's really bad. Orton's been here one game and he already did that once. Yes, I thought Cassel played a decent game against Minnesota and Indy for a half. Against San Diego, he wasn't great. He got a bunch of yards on a few gimmick plays and disappeared for almost the entire second half.

Again, it's the little things. Cassel gets antsy when the primary read isn't there. orton kept his cool. Cassel is lazy at selling the play fake. Orton did it beautifully. Cassel is inaccurate--he doesn't always get the ball there and almost never leads his receivers. Orton isn't perfect, but significantly better.

Neither are probably long-term options. But don't act like Orton's success comes from the magical genius that is Bill Muir.

chiefzilla1501 12-19-2011 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 8220080)
I'm not some Orton fan, but this is pure speculative nonsense.

That is the first I ever heard that. I think he saw some pictures of him drinking and boozing and assumed that. Everything i've heard is that he has a solid work ethic and is liked by his teammates. I don't think he has a Tom Brady like work ethic (in cassel's defense, he's a relentlessly hard worker. Probably works harder than Orton). But that doesn't mean it's close to an issue.

Beef Supreme 12-19-2011 04:39 PM

"Cassel works really hard" is hardly a glowing endorsement. The kids at the special olympics work really hard too.

Reerun_KC 12-19-2011 04:40 PM

You know when our franchise has hit rock bottom when you are debating Orton vs Cassel and totally blind to the fact that neither can win you a superbowl.

we should be discussing our first round shiney new frachise of Hope QB...

But NO, we are talking about orton vs cassel....

Can we get any lower?

chiefzilla1501 12-19-2011 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8220151)
You know when our franchise has hit rock bottom when you are debating Orton vs Cassel and totally blind to the fact that neither can win you a superbowl.

we should be discussing our first round shiney new frachise of Hope QB...

But NO, we are talking about orton vs cassel....

Can we get any lower?

But you can't just jump to the opposite extreme. It's not "start a first round QB or bust." It's... "just draft a good QB we can develop for the future."

Few are saying Orton is the next hope. But I think most of us would be very comfortable with him being a starter for 1-2 years while we develop somebody on the bench. I think people are acting like a young QB learns nothing on the bench. I'll again point to my golf example. You don't learn how to be a good golfer until you play a few rounds on a real course. But if you become really good on the range, then when you step on the course, it's all about tweaking and making small adjustments.

Reerun_KC 12-19-2011 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 8220164)
But you can't just jump to the opposite extreme. It's not "start a first round QB or bust." It's... "just draft a good QB we can develop for the future."

Few are saying Orton is the next hope. But I think most of us would be very comfortable with him being a starter for 1-2 years while we develop somebody on the bench. I think people are acting like a young QB learns nothing on the bench. I'll again point to my golf example. You don't learn how to be a good golfer until you play a few rounds on a real course. But if you become really good on the range, then when you step on the course, it's all about tweaking and making small adjustments.

You are about as extreme as the come and are all over the place...

**** showing the ropes feel good stories... I dont want orton for 1-2 years. I want a franchise qb playing football...

griZZly64 12-19-2011 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8220151)
You know when our franchise has hit rock bottom when you are debating Orton vs Cassel and totally blind to the fact that neither can win you a superbowl.

we should be discussing our first round shiney new frachise of Hope QB...

But NO, we are talking about orton vs cassel....

Can we get any lower?


Well you're a fan of our team, so no.. we cannot get any lower.

chiefzilla1501 12-19-2011 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8220175)
You are about as extreme as the come and are all over the place...

**** showing the ropes feel good stories... I dont want orton for 1-2 years. I want a franchise qb playing football...

It's not about showing the ropes. It's about having QBs coaches to teach mechanics. Training them in the film room. Playing on the scout team. Adjusting to the speed of the game.

Unless you have an abomination of a QB situation, there is no reason to force rushing getting a young QB on the field.

Messier 12-19-2011 05:46 PM

I wanted to post this but didn't want to start a thread. Kevin Kietzman is on the air just making stuff up to fit his argument. He's a Cassel backer and in trying to make Orton look like the wrong QB to go with, is saying he has Orton and Cassels career stat in front of him. He said they've started the same number of games,( Wrong! Orton has started 66, Cassel has started 54.) KK went on to say Cassel leads in almost every important category. The key word must be almost, because he's right, except for Orton has almost 3000 more passing yards and 3 more TD passes.

I know this isn't that big a deal, but Kietzman knows people can look this stuff up. Or does he?

Hammock Parties 12-19-2011 06:10 PM

Why do people even bother looking at Orton's Chicago numbers...they aren't relevant at all.

rocknrolla 12-19-2011 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenselessChiefsFan (Post 8216079)
I wish Haley was still here, so that we could actually judge Orton in the same situation.

I have said ALL along, for a long time, that Cassel is average, Haley makes him and the entire offense less than average.

Either way, Crennel got more out of this team than Haley did all season.

I wanted Haley gone. I am fine with Cassel leaving. I just don't think that Orton is any better.

If Haley was still here Palko would have been playing. You are high as a mother fucker, if you think Cassel is better than Orton! Senseless is very fitting for you.

Reerun_KC 12-19-2011 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by griZZly64 (Post 8220176)
Well you're a fan of our team, so no.. we cannot get any lower.

That was so hurtful.

KCBOSS1 12-19-2011 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8220496)
Why do people even bother looking at Orton's Chicago numbers...they aren't relevant at all.


The poor guy had absolutely nothing to work with in Chicago, plus it's the least pass friendly conditioned stadium in the NFL

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-19-2011 07:30 PM

I'm convinced that 95% of Chiefs fans are, at heart, True Fans.

DeezNutz 12-19-2011 07:36 PM

Did Kyle:

I apologize for criticizing you for sitting out with a tweaked finger. You were right and should have taken more time to heal.

Now that you've played, thus showing that even a middle-of-the-road NFL starter is far more polished than Matt "Pioli is a ****ing idiot" Cassel, we're stuck with you. Now we'll go through the same types of arguments with True Fans (he needs O-line help, drops, schedule!!, play-calling) that we had with another lackluster started, Kr..Bo...Gr...Cassel.

But at least we got rid of Carl. I think.

Reerun_KC 12-19-2011 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8220713)
I'm convinced that 95% of Chiefs fans are, at heart, True Fans.

Agree 100% great post.

Tombstone RJ 12-19-2011 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8215784)
and quite a few people here should be doling them out as well... :)

Leonard Pope? Big catches. Barry Richardson? Nice job.

Same cast of characters, same playcalling (McCluster up the middle, anyone?)...

Yet Orton has 300 yards passing in a game where we led the entire way.

Yeah, I wanted to see Stanzi play and I still do.

But thank you Kyle Orton for making it ABUNDANTLY clear how much of a waste Matt Cassel is...

:)

keep drinking the Koolaid brosef. All Orton will do for the chefs is insure you won't be drafting real QB talent in the 2012 draft.

You could have had RG3, but instead you get KNB. :clap:

Tombstone RJ 12-19-2011 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8220737)
Did Kyle:

I apologize for criticizing you for sitting out with a tweaked finger. You were right and should have taken more time to heal.

Now that you've played, thus showing that even a middle-of-the-road NFL starter is far more polished than Matt "Pioli is a ****ing idiot" Cassel, we're stuck with you. Now we'll go through the same types of arguments with True Fans (he needs O-line help, drops, schedule!!, play-calling) that we had with another lackluster started, Kr..Bo...Gr...Cassel.

But at least we got rid of Carl. I think.

this

Oh Snap 12-19-2011 10:19 PM

I knew Orton would light it up. He did pretty well in Denver considering they had a crappy running game, and a defense that was absolutely terrible last year, and for the early part of this year.

He also has much better recievers to work with here vs what he had with denver. He was zipping the ball all over the place yesterday. And did anyone notice how he placed the ball to his recievers? Right in the numbers, or right where the reciever could catch it. That one long pass to Baldiwn (which he dropped) was placed perfectly for him to catch it.

Seeing Orton light it up never surprised me. I knew he was capable of it. It might be too early to say hes the QB for this team, but if he can perform at a high level like he did last sunday, he will go a long ways in proving that he is our man.

Lets not forget that he hasnt really played any meaningul snaps for the past several weeks going into this game. He looked quite impressive considering everything. He has some rust to shake off, but he looked better than Cassel ever has in his 3 years here.

milkman 12-19-2011 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8220713)
I'm convinced that 95% of Chiefs fans are, at heart, True Fans.

The definition of InKansasCity:

Keep signing mediocre QBs and hope for different results.

Tombstone RJ 12-19-2011 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oh Snap (Post 8221429)
I knew Orton would light it up. He did pretty well in Denver considering they had a crappy running game, and a defense that was absolutely terrible last year, and for the early part of this year.

He also has much better recievers to work with here vs what he had with denver. He was zipping the ball all over the place yesterday. And did anyone notice how he placed the ball to his recievers? Right in the numbers, or right where the reciever could catch it. That one long pass to Baldiwn (which he dropped) was placed perfectly for him to catch it.

Seeing Orton light it up never surprised me. I knew he was capable of it. It might be too early to say hes the QB for this team, but if he can perform at a high level like he did last sunday, he will go a long ways in proving that he is our man.

Lets not forget that he hasnt really played any meaningul snaps for the past several weeks going into this game. He looked quite impressive considering everything. He has some rust to shake off, but he looked better than Cassel ever has in his 3 years here.

LMAO

Reerun_KC 12-19-2011 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8221499)
The definition of InKansasCity:

Keep signing mediocre QBs and hope for different results.

Well.done sir!

Titty Meat 12-19-2011 10:34 PM

The guy played a great game yesterday. It is what it is.

Tombstone RJ 12-19-2011 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8221523)
The guy played a great game yesterday. It is what it is.

or--and stay with me on this b/c it's rocket science--GB had a bad day. Hey listen, do a search of all my posts on Orton here on the planet and see what I've said about the guy.

The win over GB was nice but essentially meaningless. Orton can be good sometimes but he's never great and he stinks in big games. Yesterday's game was completely meaningless and he did ok.

I'll be very suprised if kc beats oakland.

Titty Meat 12-19-2011 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 8221557)
or--and stay with me on this b/c it's rocket science--GB had a bad day. Hey listen, do a search of all my posts on Orton here on the planet and see what I've said about the guy.

The win over GB was nice but essentially meaningless. Orton can be good sometimes but he's never great and he stinks in big games. Yesterday's game was completely meaningless and he did ok.

I'll be very suprised if kc beats oakland.

Green Bay had a bad day yup explain why Orton was successful against Green Bay the first time too dumbass? Orton is what he is - Sometimes he can be a damn good QB but he also has Cassel like games. Not the long term answer at QB but would be a great option while we groom a young guy.

Tombstone RJ 12-19-2011 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8221586)
Green Bay had a bad day yup explain why Orton was successful against Green Bay the first time too dumbass? Orton is what he is - Sometimes he can be a damn good QB but he also has Cassel like games. Not the long term answer at QB but would be a great option while we groom a young guy.

what young guy--Stanzi? Orton becomes a FA after this year. Do you think Pioli is gonna sign him to a big fat contract? If so, do you think Pioli is going to also draft a QB in the first round?

Freekofnature 12-19-2011 10:55 PM

almost 300 yards and no tds.

Such a typical orton performance.

BigMeatballDave 12-19-2011 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freekofnature (Post 8221664)
almost 300 yards and no tds.

Such a typical orton performance.

Most of the plays in the red zone were running plays.

BigMeatballDave 12-19-2011 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 8221557)
or--and stay with me on this b/c it's rocket science--GB had a bad day. Hey listen, do a search of all my posts on Orton here on the planet and see what I've said about the guy.

The win over GB was nice but essentially meaningless. Orton can be good sometimes but he's never great and he stinks in big games. Yesterday's game was completely meaningless and he did ok.

I'll be very suprised if kc beats oakland.

*sniff*

Yep.

Smells like sour grapes ... :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.