ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft ***West Virginia Pro Day*** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271117)

DaKCMan AP 03-14-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9497073)
You asked what the Chargers won with their trade. That's what they won.

Eh. LT was a better player, yes. However, until Vick was out of football for 3 years LT had 4 Pro Bowls & Vick had 3. The teams had the same number of wins & playoff appearances. Vick was going to be 27 years old, entering the beginning of the prime for quarterbacks, coming off of two straight Pro Bowls. At the time he was a top-10 QB. I'll take a top-10 QB over a top-3 RB.

Molitoth 03-14-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9497092)
And the conventional wisdom is that Elway didn't win a superbowl until he had a running back. What's your point and how is it relevant to the issue of whether or not a pick or a trade for a single player should be judged on the basis of team performance?

Post after post what I gather from you is that QB is not the most important position on the field.

What I'm trying to say is that you can have the best player to ever live at certain positions, and it won't matter if your QB sucks the shit.

More often than not, an Elite QB goes to/wins the superbowl.
Every once in a great while, a mediocre one can do it when surrounded by a great team.

I'd think it's easier to find that 1 guy, than finding the "right 53".

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 10:26 AM

http://i.imgur.com/a21bAYO.gif

BigCatDaddy 03-14-2013 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9497111)

Ok, I LOL'd.

patteeu 03-14-2013 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9497099)
Whoops. Elway took 3 average teams to the dance while being handcuffed by his HC.


Next argument.

... and lost them right? Should I be using Heath Shuler, Carson Palmer, Tim Couch, David Carr, Ryan Leaf, or any of a bajillion other highly-touted saviors instead?

duncan_idaho 03-14-2013 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9497092)
And the conventional wisdom is that Elway didn't win a superbowl until he had a running back. What's your point and how is it relevant to the issue of whether or not a pick or a trade for a single player should be judged on the basis of team performance?

Then the conventional wisdom is dumb.

Elway didn't win a Super Bowl until he had a better team around him, including a RB, and an offensive system that took full advantage of his immense natural abilities.

kcxiv 03-14-2013 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9497106)
Post after post what I gather from you is that QB is not the most important position on the field.

What I'm trying to say is that you can have the best player to ever live at certain positions, and it won't matter if your QB sucks the shit.

More often than not, an Elite QB goes to/wins the superbowl.
Every once in a great while, a mediocre one can do it when surrounded by a great team.

I'd think it's easier to find that 1 guy, than finding the "right 53".

Yup yet the chiefs try it the hardest possible way and have failed time and time again. Then the organization keeps trying to do it that way.

It's mind boggling that it keeps happening. The chiefs are the only franchise in the nfl keeps trying it this way. Shouldn't that tell the fans hey this is wrong.

DaKCMan AP 03-14-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9497106)
Post after post what I gather from you is that QB is not the most important position on the field.

What I'm trying to say is that you can have the best player to ever live at certain positions, and it won't matter if your QB sucks the shit.

More often than not, an Elite QB goes to/wins the superbowl.
Every once in a great while, a mediocre one can do it when surrounded by a great team.

I'd think it's easier to find that 1 guy, than finding the "right 53".

pat's stuck in the 80's-90's. He's repeatedly undervalued the QB position all over this board. I'd say he should just stick to the DC forum but he's just as lost over there. Sad story.

MahiMike 03-14-2013 10:30 AM

Why do you guys continue to torment yourselves?

BigCatDaddy 03-14-2013 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9497133)
Why do you guys continue to torment yourselves?

It's the Chiefs way.

ptlyon 03-14-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9497125)
Then the conventional wisdom is dumb.

Elway didn't win a Super Bowl until he had a better team around him, including a RB, and an offensive system that took full advantage of his immense natural abilities.

I'm not sure what eating corn on the cob thru a picket fence has anything to do with this, but ok.

kcxiv 03-14-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9497119)
... and lost them right? Should I be using Heath Shuler, Carson Palmer, Tim Couch, David Carr, Ryan Leaf, or any of a bajillion other highly-touted saviors instead?

But they tried they gave it a shot. The chiefs don't try. They just submit to striving for mediocre.

DaKCMan AP 03-14-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9497133)
Why do you guys continue to torment yourselves?

Masochists.

In58men 03-14-2013 10:32 AM

Geno Smith had a very good pro day. 60-64 passes, 2 passes were drops.

In58men 03-14-2013 10:33 AM

@tweetydimes: "@ByJimCorbett: Geno Smith finished sharp throwing showcase 60 of 64 with two drops both by Stedman Bailey great zip, accuracy on move

patteeu 03-14-2013 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9497106)
Post after post what I gather from you is that QB is not the most important position on the field.

What I'm trying to say is that you can have the best player to ever live at certain positions, and it won't matter if your QB sucks the shit.

More often than not, an Elite QB goes to/wins the superbowl.
Every once in a great while, a mediocre one can do it when surrounded by a great team.

I'd think it's easier to find that 1 guy, than finding the "right 53".

You're not getting me then. QB is by far the most important position on the field. But a bad QB isn't better than a good player at another position. And drafting isn't a game of pure chance like roulette where the only way to win is to take a chance and it doesn't really matter which spin you bet on.

I'm in favor of making it *the* top priority to find an elite QB. I don't agree that the only way to pursue that goal is to use the first pick of *this* draft on a QB. I'm not saying that is a bad approach, I'm just saying that it's not a no-brainer good approach like many around here believe. That belief comes primarily from what I'll call a "roulette mindset" (based on an assumption of pure chance) no matter how many youtube videos these people watch to help them rationalize their position.

patteeu 03-14-2013 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9497125)
Then the conventional wisdom is dumb.

Elway didn't win a Super Bowl until he had a better team around him, including a RB, and an offensive system that took full advantage of his immense natural abilities.

So the elite QB can't do it alone and you essentially agree with the point I was making (that judging a player exclusively on the basis of team performance is foolish) even if you think you were undermining it.

saphojunkie 03-14-2013 10:39 AM

If the Chiefs drafted Geno Smith, I would buy season tickets, and I live 1600 miles away.

As it stands, Buffalo will be trading up. They absolutely need to make a huge splash at the QB position or they're fanbase is going to bail. Sounds really familiar, but at least THEIR owner is aware of it.

patteeu 03-14-2013 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 9497132)
pat's stuck in the 80's-90's. He's repeatedly undervalued the QB position all over this board. I'd say he should just stick to the DC forum but he's just as lost over there. Sad story.

I've never undervalued the QB position.

Mr. Laz 03-14-2013 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9497133)
Why do you guys continue to torment yourselves?

yep, spent too much for Alex Smith to turn around and draft Geno Smith.



sorry :huh:

penbrook 03-14-2013 10:40 AM

28/32 teams were at Genos pro day including Chiefs, Jaguars, Raiders, and Bills. No Cardinals.

patteeu 03-14-2013 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fruit Ninja (Post 9497138)
But they tried they gave it a shot. The chiefs don't try. They just submit to striving for mediocre.

Trying (in one particular way) might be enough for you, but it's not enough for me.

saphojunkie 03-14-2013 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9497172)
28/32 teams were at Genos pro day including Chiefs, Jaguars, Raiders, and Bills. No Cardinals.

The Arizona Cassinals.

ILChief 03-14-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9497079)
"we" didn't win anything.

You know who did? The Cowboys.

You know how they did it?

Taking a QB first overall and still spent a second rounder to take another qb in the supplemental draft.

And trading Herschell Walker for ten thousand picks

notorious 03-14-2013 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 9497182)
And trading Herschell Walker for ten thousand picks

And they were able to keep their talent due to no salary cap.

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 10:45 AM

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=905...medium=twitter

Geno interview at pro day

notorious 03-14-2013 10:46 AM

How much salary would Geno get if he was drafted #1?

Bowser 03-14-2013 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9497166)
If the Chiefs drafted Geno Smith, I would buy season tickets, and I live 1600 miles away.

As it stands, Buffalo will be trading up. They absolutely need to make a huge splash at the QB position or they're fanbase is going to bail. Sounds really familiar, but at least THEIR owner is aware of it.

I live 16 miles away, and I'm waiting to see if we draft Geno before I get tickets or not.

penbrook 03-14-2013 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9497190)
How much salary would Geno get if he was drafted #1?

About 5 mil a year.

ptlyon 03-14-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9497190)
How much salary would Geno get if he was drafted #1?

Just guessing, but less than A. Smith.

AdumbGuy 03-14-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9497062)
Just draft him. God forbid that we're stacked at the quarterback position.

Agree. The disturbing part was the press conference where Alex Smith was named the unquestionable starter. Don't care what he did for the 9ers, he hasn't done anything yet for the Chiefs. If he is in fact the best qb on our roster, he's the starter. Just reeks of Casselism from the FO, but I hope I'm wrong.

I'd rather they drafted a qb somewhere, even if it's not the preferred geno, and then give the best guy the job.

notorious 03-14-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9497196)
About 5 mil a year.

Wow.


That is a cheap investment. This can still happen.

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 10:49 AM

Dana talking about how hot Geno is;

http://blogs.nfl.com/2013/03/14/geno...medium=twitter

Imon Yourside 03-14-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 9497132)
pat's stuck in the 80's-90's. He's repeatedly undervalued the QB position all over this board. I'd say he should just stick to the DC forum but he's just as lost over there. Sad story.

I blame Dick Cheney.

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9497201)
Wow.


That is a cheap investment. This can still happen.

Lol.

Mr. Laz 03-14-2013 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9497190)
How much salary would Geno get if he was drafted #1?

I realize nobody gives a shit ... but drafting a QB #1 after trading for Alex Smith would be like dropping an atomic bomb. Alex Smith would be totally undermined considering he just lost his job to a draft guy in San Fran. Alex Smith didn't feel support from his organization before.

I just don't see how it could possibly happen.

ptlyon 03-14-2013 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdumbGuy (Post 9497200)
Agree. The disturbing part was the press conference where Alex Smith was named the unquestionable starter. Don't care what he did for the 9ers, he hasn't done anything yet for the Chiefs. If he is in fact the best qb on our roster, he's the starter. Just reeks of Casselism from the FO, but I hope I'm wrong.

I'd rather they drafted a qb somewhere, even if it's not the preferred geno, and then give the best guy the job.

Whats even more disturbing, is that he won't be the starter come week 17

Bowser 03-14-2013 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdumbGuy (Post 9497200)
Agree. The disturbing part was the press conference where Alex Smith was named the unquestionable starter. Don't care what he did for the 9ers, he hasn't done anything yet for the Chiefs. If he is in fact the best qb on our roster, he's the starter. Just reeks of Casselism from the FO, but I hope I'm wrong.

I'd rather they drafted a qb somewhere, even if it's not the preferred geno, and then give the best guy the job.

Hey, that's fine. I have zero problem with Geno coming in and sitting behind Alex, as unlikely as it sounds to have a top draft pick sit the bench.

There are stories out there where Kaepernick talks about Alex being a great teammate after he was benched. Kap called him an extra coach on the field.

And just **** right off with whatever you're about to type in response, B14ckmon.

notorious 03-14-2013 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. SyphiLaz (Post 9497207)
I realize nobody gives a shit ... but drafting a QB #1 after trading for Alex Smith would be like dropping an atomic bomb. Alex Smith would be totally undermined considering he just lost his job to a draft guy in San Fran. Alex Smith didn't feel support from his organization before.

I just don't see how it could possibly happen.

Let me dream, if only for another month.


I still want to get more picks and draft another project QB.

Mr. Laz 03-14-2013 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9497210)
Let me dream, if only for another month.


I still want to get more picks and draft another project QB.

sorry, my bad.


carry on

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2013 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9497201)
Wow.


That is a cheap investment. This can still happen.

Not with the chiefs cap room not gonna pay someone 5m to ride the bench.

Sorter 03-14-2013 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9497196)
About 5 mil a year.

So, if we had him, Alex, and Chase all on the roster it be roughly a 16.5 cap hit?

notorious 03-14-2013 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. SyphiLaz (Post 9497212)
sorry, my bad.


carry on

Nah, I am not a Hardcore Geno fan. Thank goodness.

Bowser 03-14-2013 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 9497208)
Whats even more disturbing, is that he won't be the starter come week 17

A true possibility, given him being prone to injury.

Surely Reid and Dorsey know that the more quarterbacks you have, the better, right? And that this is a QB driven league?

Smith > Cassel
Geno > Quinn
Chase > Stanzi

****ing do it.

BigCatDaddy 03-14-2013 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. SyphiLaz (Post 9497207)
I realize nobody gives a shit ... but drafting a QB #1 after trading for Alex Smith would be like dropping an atomic bomb. Alex Smith would be totally undermined considering he just lost his job to a draft guy in San Fran. Alex Smith didn't feel support from his organization before.

I just don't see how it could possibly happen.

Unless he knew he was a place holder. Regardless he'll get at least 1 full season at the starter with no pressure since they brought in Daniel to be the backuup.

Bowser 03-14-2013 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9497217)
So, if we had him, Alex, and Chase all on the roster it be roughly a 16.5 cap hit?

Remind me - how much was Cassel going to cost us this year, had Pioli been here and kept him?

Sorter 03-14-2013 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9497224)
Remind me - how much was Cassel going to cost us this year, had ***** been here and kept him?

I think 7M?

Bowser 03-14-2013 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. SyphiLaz (Post 9497207)
I realize nobody gives a shit ... but drafting a QB #1 after trading for Alex Smith would be like dropping an atomic bomb. Alex Smith would be totally undermined considering he just lost his job to a draft guy in San Fran. Alex Smith didn't feel support from his organization before.

I just don't see how it could possibly happen.

I get the point you're making, but Alex Smith or any other QB shouldn't need to be coddled. Show a little mental fortitude and go out and take the ****ing job, instead of being all pissy they took a QB with the first pick.

We all have very fresh memories of what happened with the Chiefs the last time the front office chose to baby their starting QB.

Bowser 03-14-2013 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9497232)
I think 7M?

You're right. I was getting Cassel's and Jackson's cap numbers flipped in my head.

notorious 03-14-2013 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9497236)
I get the point you're making, but Alex Smith or any other QB shouldn't need to be coddled. Show a little mental fortitude and go out and take the ****ing job, instead of being all pissy they took a QB with the first pick.

We all have very fresh memories of what happened with the Chiefs the last time the front office chose to baby their starting QB.

I agree. Show me a coddled QB and I will show you a loser.

saphojunkie 03-14-2013 11:03 AM

The veteran trade.
The local hero.
The first overall pick.

EVERYONE WOULD BE HAPPY. PERIOD.


Drafting Geno would immediately rejuvenate every single fan of this franchise. Every person who cares about the Chiefs would have at least one guy they were rooting for to win the job and succeed.

It's quite simply the boldest, strongest, most energizing move you could make for a franchise that has floundered for twenty years. It's the only thing that makes any ****ing sense. Take one offseason, and like Andy Reid said, address the QB position through "trade, free agency, and the draft."

You would have done all three, reclaimed your fan base, injected pure hope and confidence into your team's future, and bought your front office and coaching staff years of development with the players.

It's the only thing to do.

Which is why it won't happen.

Oh, and anyone saying that you don't draft the number one QB and sit him as some kind of arbitrary rule of football can **** right off. You get your QB no matter what, and I don't care if you do it by drafting a left tackle and having HIM play QB. However you get that franchise guy, however you develop him, is the right way.

lcarus 03-14-2013 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9497203)
Dana talking about how hot Geno is;

http://blogs.nfl.com/2013/03/14/geno...medium=twitter

You don't have to tell me honey. Have you seen his ass do work in those tights? :p

ptlyon 03-14-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9497219)
A true possibility, given him being prone to injury.

Surely Reid and Dorsey know that the more quarterbacks you have, the better, right? And that this is a QB driven league?

I hope so. And don't call me Shirley.

ptlyon 03-14-2013 11:10 AM

Honestly, especially after the Daniels pickup, I didn't think Geno was a possibility.

The more I keep thinking about it, it would be stupid if it weren't true.

Sorter 03-14-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9497239)
You're right. I was getting Cassel's and Jackson's cap numbers flipped in my head.

Seeing 17+ as his cap # is etched permanently into my brain, even if he won't receive it this year.

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 11:14 AM

WVSports.com ‏@WVSportsDotCom

RT @marc_b: Still waiting on Geno for his post Pro Day presser. Word is he's still talking with the #Jaguars #WVUProDay

saphojunkie 03-14-2013 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9497304)
WVSports.com ‏@WVSportsDotCom

RT @marc_b: Still waiting on Geno for his post Pro Day presser. Word is he's still talking with the #Jaguars #WVUProDay

Sweet. Keep talking to the Jags, bro. Let everybody know that the only way to get Geno is to trade up to #1.

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9497309)
Sweet. Keep talking to the Jags, bro. Let everybody know that the only way to get Geno is to trade up to #1.

Will do.

Old Dog 03-14-2013 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. SyphiLaz (Post 9497207)
I realize nobody gives a shit ... but drafting a QB #1 after trading for Alex Smith would be like dropping an atomic bomb.

I'm with you bro. It worked to end WWII with Japan, it may as well end our Super Bowl drought too.

saphojunkie 03-14-2013 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 9497320)
I'm with you bro. It worked to end WWII with Japan, it may as well end our Super Bowl drought too.

I want to see a Mel Kiper and Todd McShay atomic shadow.

The Franchise 03-14-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9497318)
Will do.

Joeckel will look pretty awesome in a Jags jersey.

Imon Yourside 03-14-2013 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9497339)
Joeckel will look pretty awesome in a Jags jersey.

Yup I think the Jags take Joeckel.

BigCatDaddy 03-14-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9497340)
Yup I think the Jags take Joeckel.

I've been seeing Fisher mocked to them a little as well. I wouldn't be suprised to see Lane Johnson jump up there and grab that spot though.

The Franchise 03-14-2013 11:24 AM

It's all going to work out for you B14ckmon.

Joeckel moves to RT for the 1st year and then takes over after Eugene Monroe is gone next year.

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9497348)
I've been seeing Fisher mocked to them a little as well. I wouldn't be suprised to see Lane Johnson jump up there and grab that spot though.

No chance the Jaguars take a OT. They never get our pick right because they never pay attention to us or do homework.

Cephalic Trauma 03-14-2013 11:29 AM

You have to be some kind of loser to be a Jaguar fan (LMAO) trolling a Chiefs board about Geno.

Rock bottom: You've hit it.

Cephalic Trauma 03-14-2013 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9497352)
No chance the Jaguars take a OT. They never get our pick right because they never pay attention to us or do homework.

Have you ever given them a reason to?

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2013 11:31 AM

Evan Silva ‏@evansilva

ESPN's Todd McShay on Geno Smith: "The #Jaguars are meeting with him as we speak. They have a lot of interest. #Raiders rumored as well."

ptlyon 03-14-2013 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cephalic Trauma (Post 9497372)
Have you ever given them a reason to?

They ain't smart enough to fly banners

Old Dog 03-14-2013 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cephalic Trauma (Post 9497368)
You have to be some kind of loser to be a Jaguar fan (LMAO) trolling a Chiefs board about Geno.

Rock bottom: You've hit it.

I assume Blackmon (or whatever its name is) is still trying to gove full blown aids to the board. "Univeral Ignore" is AWESOME

The Franchise 03-14-2013 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9497375)
Evan Silva ‏@evansilva

ESPN's Todd McShay on Geno Smith: "The #Jaguars are meeting with him as we speak. They have a lot of interest. #Raiders rumored as well."

That's going to be just ****ing great.

We blew our ****ing load on Alex Smith and Chase Daniel while a team like the Jags or Raiders get Geno Smith. The Chiefs better start talking the Bills into how much they want our ****ing pick.

AndChiefs 03-14-2013 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9497309)
Sweet. Keep talking to the Jags, bro. Let everybody know that the only way to get Geno is to trade up to #1.

Not #1 material. Would be a reach there. Fine to pick him #2 though.

B14ckmon 03-14-2013 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cephalic Trauma (Post 9497372)
Have you ever given them a reason to?

Like the two AFC Championship games? When we knocked Elway out of the playoffs? When we destroyed Marino and the dolphins in his last game in the NFL? When we beat the Steelers in the Wild Card Game and then came close to beating the Patriots?

And I am trolling by posting stuff about Geno...in a Geno Pro Day thread? Get the **** out of here lol

The Franchise 03-14-2013 11:33 AM

PAY ATTENTION TO US!!!!! WE CAME CLOSE!!!!

ptlyon 03-14-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9497380)
That's going to be just ****ing great.

We blew our ****ing load on Alex Smith and Chase Daniel while a team like the Jags or Raiders get Geno Smith. The Chiefs better start talking the Bills into how much they want our ****ing pick.

Take it easy Francis...

The Franchise 03-14-2013 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 9497395)
Take it easy Francis...

Yeah....it's going to be awesome watching Alex Smith get close to 200 yards a game and take 3-4 sacks.

ptlyon 03-14-2013 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9497410)
Yeah....it's going to be awesome watching Alex Smith get close to 200 yards a game and take 3-4 sacks in the 6 games hes a Chief.

FYP

lcarus 03-14-2013 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cephalic Trauma (Post 9497368)
You have to be some kind of loser to be a Jaguar fan (LMAO) trolling a Chiefs board about Geno.

Rock bottom: You've hit it.

Is it just me or has there been a lot of Jags fans trolling here (in good fun) lately. More than Denver fans...

Dayze 03-14-2013 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndChiefs (Post 9497385)
Not #1 material. Would be a reach there. Fine to pick him #2 though.

LMAO
I'm assuming sarcasm.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2013 11:55 AM

Todd McShay ‏@McShay13

Geno Smith put on a show. Tavon Austin stole the show!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.