ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs guard Geoff Schwartz will not return to KC (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282101)

RunKC 03-11-2014 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10479889)
So they're rebuilding.

Why the **** did they spend two 2nds on Alex Smith again?

Just bc these players are young doesn't mean they suck. Marcus Cooper won us games last year

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 10479912)
Guards can be replaced

In the first round of the draft.

mcaj22 03-11-2014 10:31 AM

SD game where the 5 olineman had to key on blocking one good player and then a bunch of scabs

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-11-2014 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10479905)
Just remember that when Alex Smith dies because of this offensive line.

It's March 11 the starting OLine when the season starts will be different.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10479927)
It's March 11 the starting OLine when the season starts will be different.

For his sake....I ****ing hope so.

TEX 03-11-2014 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 10479914)
We're basically going with the o-line that played the SD game. That's if they don't add anyone.

Kinda like the NFL combine where player X shines and they throw out his body of work in favor of outstanding combine numbers ...:hmmm:

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10479921)
Just bc these players are young doesn't mean they suck. Marcus Cooper won us games last year

Marcus Cooper also lost us games last year.

Young guys need to be developed. If you're developing them ON THE FIELD, you're potentially sacrificing wins now for wins in the future.

There are guys on this team that have an exceedingly short future. The purposefully signed guys last year (Alex Smith) that don't have a long window.

I understand the approach. Totally understand it.

But if you compare it to last year, where they did the EXACT opposite, it makes no sense. It appears to be very reactive and not very proactive.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10479819)
Gotta draft and develop, constantly. Guys like Catapano, Kush, Commings are gonna have to start being good players. You have to draft well and have the young cheap guys play like stars these days.

You forgot the other important part. Guys like DJ, Hali, Poe, Houston, Flowers, etc gotta stop sucking when the game really matters. When it came down to it, Smith stepped up, the defense went to sleep.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10479940)
You forgot the other important part. Guys like DJ, Hali, Poe, Houston, Flowers, etc gotta stop sucking when the game really matters.

ROFL

Dunerdr 03-11-2014 10:35 AM

Man the pannic around here right now is just funny. Two meh guards leave, a midget walks, and no news on two meh safety's and a two down ilb. Everyone loose their shit! Anyone who didn't see this coming is a ****tard. Dorsey does what Dorsey knows. Plain and simple. Do you really think our honchos really want to keep every pioli pick? **** no. I'm sure they'd like to keep either guard and DMC. But what are they really worth? Not what they're getting paid. Now we'll get some comp picks. Draft 10 ****ing guys that are what they want and fit what we're doing. Then profit.

RunKC 03-11-2014 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10479939)
Marcus Cooper also lost us games last year.

Young guys need to be developed. If you're developing them ON THE FIELD, you're potentially sacrificing wins now for wins in the future.

There are guys on this team that have an exceedingly short future. The purposefully signed guys last year (Alex Smith) that don't have a long window.

I understand the approach. Totally understand it.

But if you compare it to last year, where they did the EXACT opposite, it makes no sense. It appears to be very reactive and not very proactive.

We are developing young guys while using veterans as the focal point.

I'm glad we're not selling our souls like the Broncos. That team is ****ed when Manning retires. Their drafting has been terrible.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10479945)
We are developing young guys while using veterans as the focal point.

I'm glad we're not selling our souls like the Broncos. That team is ****ed when Elway retires. Their drafting has been terrible.

If you look at what they did last year and what it appears they are doing this year (and I'll be the first to admit it's WAY EARLY) you can't honestly say you have a clue what they're going to do.

There's no consistency.

RunKC 03-11-2014 10:41 AM

As much as you guys don't believe it, a youth movement is needed. Tamba and DJ are almost done, Flowers is always hurt and wants $$$ to play the ****ing slot.
Dorsey has no ****ing choice people.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10479957)
As much as you guys don't believe it, a youth movement is needed. Tamba and DJ are almost done, Flowers is always hurt and wants $$$ to play the ****ing slot.
Dorsey has no ****ing choice people.

Flowers and Hali are both gone next year.

mcaj22 03-11-2014 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10479957)
As much as you guys don't believe it, a youth movement is needed. Tamba and DJ are almost done, Flowers is always hurt and wants $$$ to play the ****ing slot.
Dorsey has no ****ing choice people.

that makes sense and all but if they extend 30 year old Alex Smith to a big contract then it contradicts it entirely

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10479957)
As much as you guys don't believe it, a youth movement is needed. Tamba and DJ are almost done, Flowers is always hurt and wants $$$ to play the ****ing slot.
Dorsey has no ****ing choice people.

Who here doesn't believe it?

You're missing the point.

If the team is now recognizing this team needs to be rebuilt, especially from the inside out, why give a big contract to Bowe? Why give up two 2nds for Alex Smith, who is essentially now a transitional QB rather than your franchise?

The biggest folly of the Herm years was that they tried to patch it together in year 1 and THEN stripped it down to rebuild.

If Dorsey and Reid thought this team needed to be rebuilt, they should have started LAST YEAR.

saphojunkie 03-11-2014 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10479966)
that makes sense and all but if they extend 30 year old Alex Smith to a big contract then it contradicts it entirely

QB has a very different shelf life than cornerback.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10479966)
that makes sense and all but if they extend 30 year old Alex Smith to a big contract then it contradicts it entirely

Exactly.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10479969)
QB has a very different shelf life than cornerback.

So you're expecting to get another how many years out of Smith?

Certainly, QBs last longer than some other positions. But 38-year old QBs performing at a high level isn't the norm...

RunKC 03-11-2014 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10479955)
If you look at what they did last year and what it appears they are doing this year (and I'll be the first to admit it's WAY EARLY) you can't honestly say you have a clue what they're going to do.

There's no consistency.

I know exactly what they are doing. Relying on veterans to do all the work. Von is a dumbass who is not what he was, Chris Harris ****ed his knee up, they are losing Decker.

They're going all out with veterans without bringing in quality young players to take over and it's going to bite them in the ass soon

mcaj22 03-11-2014 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10479969)
QB has a very different shelf life than cornerback.

you cant have a youth movement/rebuild with a 30 year old QB that gets say an 80 million extension


thats just silly

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10479973)
I know exactly what they are doing. Relying on veterans to do all the work. Von is a dumbass who is not what he was, Chris Harris ****ed his knee up, they are losing Decker.

They're going all out with veterans without bringing in quality young players to take over and it's going to bite them in the ass soon

I'm not talking about the Broncos.

kcchiefsus 03-11-2014 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10479957)
As much as you guys don't believe it, a youth movement is needed. Tamba and DJ are almost done, Flowers is always hurt and wants $$$ to play the ****ing slot.
Dorsey has no ****ing choice people.

If that's the case then why trade two ****ing 2nd's when those would have been really useful for a youth movement?

It's almost a guarantee I'm sure that Alex Smith will be signed to an extension. So with this youth movement Alex Smith will probably be 33 or 34 by the time the rest of the roster is built up and competitive.

There is no god damned consistency with what Dorsey is doing. If you're going for a youth movement, then go all out and do a youth movement. But don't splurge in FA and trade picks for an average QB when you could be building the team up.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 10:50 AM

I can see what Dorsey is doing/has done....but it doesn't ****ing mean that I have to be happy about it. And it doesn't guarantee that it's going to ****ing work.

mcaj22 03-11-2014 10:50 AM

Alex Smith was in a youth movement for like 7 years in SF and got to enjoy the built roster for basically one and a half seasons. Hes not doing that bullshit again

-King- 03-11-2014 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10479905)
Just remember that when Alex Smith dies because of this offensive line.

I'll be shocked if Schwartz is any better than average next semester.
Posted via Mobile Device

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10479988)
Alex Smith was in a youth movement for like 7 in SF and got to enjoy the built roster for basically one and a half seasons. Hes not doing that bullshit again

I feel sorry for Alex Smith if they turn over the entire line.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10479990)
I'll be shocked if Schwartz is any better than average next semester.
Posted via Mobile Device

I'll be shocked if he isn't.

TEX 03-11-2014 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10479990)
I'll be shocked if Schwartz is any better than average next semester.
Posted via Mobile Device

ROFL Why would you say that? Do you just post stuff without knowing anything on the subject? Never mind...

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-11-2014 10:52 AM

If the SOC wants to lay claim to running off Pioli. Then getting Alex Smith has to be laid at their feet as well. Hunt needed to win soon or risk losing the fan base.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10479988)
Alex Smith was in a youth movement for 8 years in SF and got to enjoy the built roster for basically one and a half seasons. Hes not doing that bullshit again

Difference is, he has a good coaching staff to start with this time and, if he plays without reservations like he did against the Colts and for much of the second half of the season, he has shown the ability to elevate the play of those around him as well. All he needs is a good defense and for the overpaid defensive stars to play to the level of their damn pay checks when it matters.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10479990)
I'll be shocked if Schwartz is any better than average next semester.
Posted via Mobile Device

Why does it matter?

The point is that the line is losing considerable continuity. That's never a good thing. Never.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480002)
Why does it matter?

The point is that the line is losing considerable continuity. That's never a good thing. Never.

Especially going into a year when we have a tough ass schedule.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10480000)
Difference is, he has a good coaching staff to start with this time and, if he plays without reservations like he did against the Colts and for much of the second half of the season, he has shown the ability to elevate the play of those around him as well.

If the offensive line can't protect him, we know what happens.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10480000)
for the overpaid defensive stars to play to the level of their damn pay checks when it matters.

Pure BlackBob ridiculousness. Just plain dumb.

mcaj22 03-11-2014 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10480000)
Difference is, he has a good coaching staff to start with this time and, if he plays without reservations like he did against the Colts and for much of the second half of the season, he has shown the ability to elevate the play of those around him as well. All he needs is a good defense and for the overpaid defensive stars to play to the level of their damn pay checks when it matters.

Alex Smiths play with the current roster is not an argument for Alex Smith with a youth movement

because get this, the current roster has win now players in their prime. Imagine that.

Dunerdr 03-11-2014 10:55 AM

So because there's no rumors of fa talks we assume this is a complete rebuild from now on?

-King- 03-11-2014 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480002)
Why does it matter?

The point is that the line is losing considerable continuity. That's never a good thing. Never.

Losing 7 games of continuity? Really? If we can't get a guard to play as good as or better than Schwartz, we have a bigger problem. He's started 26 games in 6 years for a reason.
Posted via Mobile Device

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 10480012)
So because there's no rumors of fa talks we assume this is a complete rebuild from now on?

What else can we do? We can only discuss what we know and then speculate.

Should we just not talk about it?

Rainbows and unicorns! Chiefs rule!

saphojunkie 03-11-2014 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10479972)
So you're expecting to get another how many years out of Smith?

Certainly, QBs last longer than some other positions. But 38-year old QBs performing at a high level isn't the norm...

I would expect 5-6 years of Smith playing at this level, barring injury. And that's about as long of a contract as he should get.

Realistically, I think you're looking at a 6 year deal worth around 70 million, and we will not see that through.

I would like to him signed through 2019 and draft his replacement in the first round sooner rather than later.

I really do think that having a stable, capable quarterback was vital to other players' development as well. I have no idea how the hell you evaluate OL or WR or TE or RB when you have Brady Quinn and Tyler Palko slugging it out.

We needed someone that the team could look at and say "I'm not just taking a pounding for nothing. We can actually win a game." Alex Smith was a very stabilizing presence for a team that had really been in crisis for a few years. Hopefully, that continues, but Dorsey realizes that he will have to re-up his investment at QB in the form of an early round draft pick.

I mean, if Reid can replicate finding Foles in the second round, sitting him for a year to learn, and then having a guy ready to take over... I'm happy as shit.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10480013)
Losing 7 games of continuity? Really? If we can't get a guard to play as good as or better than Schwartz, we have a bigger problem. He's started 26 games in 6 years for a reason.
Posted via Mobile Device

It's not just about Schwartz.

The line finally started to gel towards the end of the season.

Now we're looking at two new tackles, a new guard, potentially a new center.

You can't have that much turnover and expect to succeed, at least not right away.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 10:58 AM

Paying top 5 money to a slot corner that can't even adequately cover #1 WRs and had all of 7 PDefs last season.:clap: Only the Chiefs.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10480016)
but Dorsey realizes that he will have to re-up his investment at QB in the form of an early round draft pick.

You hope he does.

mcaj22 03-11-2014 10:59 AM

yea Reids not finding another Foles

saphojunkie 03-11-2014 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480022)
You hope he does.

Yeah, I was trying to say that. "Hopefully... Dorsey realizes..."

The Franchise 03-11-2014 11:00 AM

They'd better ****ing sign Houston before the beginning of next year. Otherwise say goodbye because they'll let themselves get outbid.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10480023)
yea Reids not finding another Foles

Reid isn't finding anybody. Dorsey is running the draft.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480033)
They'd better ****ing sign Houston before the beginning of next year. Otherwise say goodbye because they'll let themselves get outbid.

They would probably release Hali and tag Houston if it came down to it.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10480045)
They would probably release Hali and tag Houston if it came down to it.

Well if that's the case, I'm glad they locked up Frank Zombo.

DaWolf 03-11-2014 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480033)
They'd better ****ing sign Houston before the beginning of next year. Otherwise say goodbye because they'll let themselves get outbid.

I'm guessing that's why they are letting most of these guys walk. They have faith in some of their younger guys, and they need to get Houston and Poe and Berry extended, and probably rework Charles' deal since he's pretty underpaid (and will likely want to get it reworked)...

RunKC 03-11-2014 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480033)
They'd better ****ing sign Houston before the beginning of next year. Otherwise say goodbye because they'll let themselves get outbid.

Ever think that this is why they aren't overpaying for a journeymen guard?

-King- 03-11-2014 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480033)
They'd better ****ing sign Houston before the beginning of next year. Otherwise say goodbye because they'll let themselves get outbid.

Why would they get outbid?
Posted via Mobile Device

saphojunkie 03-11-2014 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480040)
Reid isn't finding anybody. Dorsey is running the draft.

That doesn't mean Reid won't be evaluating quarterbacks.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10480070)
Why would they get outbid?
Posted via Mobile Device

Seriously? There are always going to be teams that are flush with cap room and willing to pay more for a player to fill a huge hole on their roster.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 10480054)
I'm guessing that's why they are letting most of these guys walk. They have faith in some of their younger guys, and they need to get Houston and Poe and Berry extended, and probably rework Charles' deal since he's pretty underpaid (and will likely want to get it reworked)...

Charles isn't underpaid. He's a RB, his wheels could fall off at any time.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10480071)
That doesn't mean Reid won't be evaluating quarterbacks.

I was being sarcastic.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480078)
Charles isn't underpaid. He's a RB, his wheels could fall off at any time.

As good as Charles is, RBs are a dime a dozen. Great ones can be found anywhere in the draft. Would much rather pay a good WR or build a great OL vs paying a ton of money to a RB in this league.

mcaj22 03-11-2014 11:18 AM

Charles gets paid peanuts for being the only guy on offense that can move the ball consistently

RunKC 03-11-2014 11:18 AM

This thread is hilarious. People want to overpay for a journeyman guard and then pay for Houston.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480100)
This thread is hilarious. People want to overpay for a journeyman guard and then pay for Houston.

Wrong.

RunKC 03-11-2014 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480105)
Wrong.

You keep Schwartz then you're overpaying

-King- 03-11-2014 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480077)
Seriously? There are always going to be teams that are flush with cap room and willing to pay more for a player to fill a huge hole on their roster.

So that statement could literally go for any player in the league.
Posted via Mobile Device

The Franchise 03-11-2014 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480107)
You keep Schwartz then you're overpaying

Contracts increase over the years. It's what happens.

Levitre got $8 million last year. Vasquez got $7.5. I bet Schwartz doesn't touch either of those.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480107)
You keep Schwartz then you're overpaying

If every free agent that signs a contract is "overpaid", the definition of overpaid is no longer valid.

saphojunkie 03-11-2014 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480080)
I was being sarcastic.

Meter broken.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10480123)
Meter broken.

Yeah, I've said all along that this idea that Dorsey is in complete control of personnel is bunk. The head coach is gonna have some say.

Sorry I took it out on you. It's hard to resist those "back at ya" moments.

RunKC 03-11-2014 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480119)
Contracts increase over the years. It's what happens.

Levitre got $8 million last year. Vasquez got $7.5. I bet Schwartz doesn't touch either of those.

We don't have that much money. So who are you cutting from the team to be able to afford this journeyman guard?

saphojunkie 03-11-2014 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480131)
Yeah, I've said all along that this idea that Dorsey is in complete control of personnel is bunk. The head coach is gonna have some say.

Sorry I took it out on you. It's hard to resist those "back at ya" moments.

I'm with you. I think Reid stepped back from the draft, getting scouting reports from regional guys and all that. But the idea that he doesn't have some say in who the team drafts in the first round I just don't buy.

It's like, people don't realize that movies aren't just made by the guy in charge of production. The lady in charge of marketing has a hell of a say about what gets made.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480144)
We don't have that much money. So who are you cutting from the team to be able to afford this journeyman guard?

If we don't have that kind of money, the only logical conclusion then is that we're going to not replace him. We're going to go into the season with what we have (and potentially someone from the draft).

Considering the moves they made last offseason, how in God's holy name does that make one bit of sense?

The Franchise 03-11-2014 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480144)
We don't have that much money. So who are you cutting from the team to be able to afford this journeyman guard?

Who are you starting in his place without having a drop off?

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480156)
Who are you starting in his place without having a drop off?

The Chiefs farm system is loaded. Just like the Royals.

Cham-peen-ship!

Titty Meat 03-11-2014 11:36 AM

So the realists who saw this team lose to every playoff team they played last year and recognize they need to get better talent to compete are dramatic dumbasses but the guys who think Sanders Cummings and a bunch of other late round draft picks will get us over the hump are right. Hilarious.

This board has never seen a late round pick it didn't like and the funny thing is most of them dont work out.

While the niners traded a 6th for Boldin our GM drafted Trevor Wilson LMAO

RunKC 03-11-2014 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480156)
Who are you starting in his place without having a drop off?

Not sure yet. I think this is why they drafted Kush honestly.

Are you not confident in Dorsey to find that player after he literally did that with Schwartz, Abdullah, Demps on ST's, McGrath, A. Jordan and Cooper?

saphojunkie 03-11-2014 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480156)
Who are you starting in his place without having a drop off?

Some other free agent guard we pick up for $1m/1 year. Just like Schwartz.

Damn, suckas be actin like Schwartz wuz all pro bowlz n shit


ChiliConCarnage 03-11-2014 11:40 AM

meh. We had a bunch of cap money last year and spent it.
If Asamoah really got anything like 4.5 million then Schwartz was never really an option.

It was a good buy low signing by Dorsey. He'll have to keep doing that and/or finding young talent through the draft. In hindsight, it would've been amazing if Dorsey had given him a 3 year deal last season.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 11:41 AM

I'm supposed to be confident when really the only starters that he got out of that group was Jordan and Cooper? Schwartz started because Asamoah got injured and then proved that he should have been starting the entire time....and now he's gone. Abdullah and Demps were so awesome that Lewis was never benched the entire season. McGrath started because of injures.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480171)
Not sure yet. I think this is why they drafted Kush honestly.

Are you not confident in Dorsey to find that player after he literally did that with Schwartz, Abdullah, Demps on ST's, McGrath, A. Jordan and Cooper?

Abdullah? Demps? McGrath?

You're talking about role players. ST guys and backups.

I absolutely trust Dorsey to find those kinds of guys.

He's yet to prove he can find someone to protect Alex Smith as a full-time starter though...

RunKC 03-11-2014 11:46 AM

@TerezPaylor: With McCluster, Albert, Schwartz and Asamoah headed out, #Chiefs will look for free-agent bargains this week: http://t.co/eiDU46geJV

We're going to find out soon who these guys have in mind to sign and step in. Let's wait until they actually sign these players first before we crucify the GM that literally did a great job of finding talent to step in last year.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 11:46 AM

I haven't crucified him once.

RunKC 03-11-2014 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480178)
Abdullah? Demps? McGrath?

You're talking about role players. ST guys and backups.

I absolutely trust Dorsey to find those kinds of guys.

He's yet to prove he can find someone to protect Alex Smith as a full-time starter though...

Schwartz was pretty good last year as a starter. Let's see who he gets this time before we judge.

Halfcan 03-11-2014 11:48 AM

O line was the weakest link on the team besides Kendrick Lewis. Why resign these guys to huge contracts when they never really got it together last year and played as a unit?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.