ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Gas on the Fire: Shutdown Corner Gives Chiefs "F" in FA. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282806)

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10540827)
It was widely talked about that the 49ers were shopping Alex Smith.

He was a free agent in 2012. He could have been had for zero picks. Nobody wanted him. :hmmm:

Saccopoo 04-05-2014 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541711)
I would rather have signed Jarius Byrd at the price of a Mays, Walker, Devito, Fasano, Avery and then fill their spots with the rookies/UDFAs than band aid all those positions with average guys + one rookie at FS like they are currently doing.

Jesus dude...

You are going nuts about filling the current holes with draft picks and yet you want to scrap all the experience on the team for one ****ing free safety?

Really?

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10541763)
Jesus dude...

You are going nuts about filling the current holes with draft picks and yet you want to scrap all the experience on the team for one ****ing free safety?

Really?

There's a difference between 5 experienced shitty players and 1 experienced good player.

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541644)
So you were wrong last year, but not this time?

Some were so sure it was the wrong move last year, they won 11 games and made the playoffs. Yet now they're wrong again, before we've seen any actual games.

I dunno, did they not earn any trust?

Of course we could be wrong again.

However, we've already established that we can man up and admit a mistake.

I wanna know if all the balls-deep people on here are going to return the favor if they tank next season or if this is how football discussion on CP is going to be from now on.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541766)
Of course we could be wrong again.

However, we've already established that we can man up and admit a mistake.

I wanna know if all the balls-deep people on here are going to return the favor if they tank next season or if this is how football discussion on CP is going to be from now on.

Don't those people want them to tank? They are playing both sides

if the Chiefs win and still make the playoffs while in the "rebuild/transition" year then those people win with an easy "I told you so/suck it/eat crow"

if the Chiefs lose and have a horrible season those people can still use their excuses of "comp picks in '15/we're rebuilding/it's okay guys" flip.

They can't lose no matter what the Chiefs do

O.city 04-05-2014 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541766)
Of course we could be wrong again.

However, we've already established that we can man up and admit a mistake.

I wanna know if all the balls-deep people on here are going to return the favor if they tank next season or if this is how football discussion on CP is going to be from now on.

Just seems kin of pointless to deem said season a failure this soon is all.

And if you're talking about who I imagine you are, no they'll never admit they were wrong because that's admitting the chiefs were wrong

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10541691)
Sacc, I think the point you're missing is that very few, if any, people were wanting a drunken spending spree...

a) we didn't have the money, even if we redid a few guys deals.

b) most people these days are savvy enough to understand that that's not the way to remain relevant.

Most seem only to have wanted 2 players, and atleast in my mind, they didn't have to be marquee guys, just solid, youngish vets who could step right in, produce and give us so many more options in the draft.

2 legit starters, one for each side of the ball... I just don't see how that's asking too much.

Asking them to do anything other than exactly what they're doing is asking too much.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541753)
If by nothing you mean handing out a 5 year 34 million dollar deal to Zach Miller and a 5 year 40 million dollar deal to Sidney Rice as NOTHING in FA in 2011. Then yea sure, I guess that's "nothing" in FA.

If that's nothing I can't imagine what the Chiefs are currently doing.

Excuse me, 2012. They spent a bunch of money on Flynn, then basically got rid of him.

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541777)
Just seems kin of pointless to deem said season a failure this soon is all.

And if you're talking about who I imagine you are, no they'll never admit they were wrong because that's admitting the chiefs were wrong

I haven't deemed it a failure. I'm asking if we're going to have to endure another offseason of this garbage if it is. That's exactly what I want to know.

ForeverChiefs58 04-05-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10541763)
Jesus dude...

You are going nuts about filling the current holes with draft picks and yet you want to scrap all the experience on the team for one ****ing free safety?

Really?

lol would you seriously take Mays, Walker, Devito, Fasano, and Avery over Jarius Byrd?

You need to rewatch our playoff game against Indy 1,000 more times as punishment.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541781)
Excuse me, 2012. They spent a bunch of money on Flynn, then basically got rid of him.

Excuse you aka you were ****ing wrong.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541774)
Don't those people want them to tank? They are playing both sides

if the Chiefs win and still make the playoffs while in the "rebuild/transition" year then those people win with an easy "I told you so/suck it/eat crow"

if the Chiefs lose and have a horrible season those people can still use their excuses of "comp picks in '15/we're rebuilding/it's okay guys" flip.

They can't lose no matter what the Chiefs do

No, I consider this and last season a success based on how our draft picks and scrap guys play.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541789)
No, I consider this and last season a success based on how our draft picks and scrap guys play.

LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

what?!

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10541756)
Personally, I'm glad that Sanders went with the Donkeys. I think he's mediocre and provides us with the ability to fill that hole with a better talent such as Odell Beckham, Brandin Cooks or Marquis Lee.

It's gonna be glorious when they draft a guard and you applaud it as a great move...

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541793)
It's gonna be glorious when they draft a guard and you applaud it as a great move...

see that's my point. He can't lose

if they draft a WR Sac looks like a genius because that's what he wants

if they draft an OL, then Sac still looks like a genius because he loves lineman.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541791)
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

what?!

I am saying if we have a good draft this year and some of last year's picks start contributing, then we are on a good track.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541797)
I am saying if we have a good draft this year and some of last year's picks start contributing, then we are on a good track.

and if that doesn't happen? Since we haven't really had any draft picks contribute since 2008 that arent named Berry, Poe or Houston.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541799)
and if that doesn't happen? Since we haven't really had any draft picks contribute since 2008 that arent named Berry, Poe or Houston.

Then we have the wrong GM. I've long said that I think this 2014 approach is a proven winning approach but only if you draft well.

O.city 04-05-2014 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541799)
and if that doesn't happen? Since we haven't really had any draft picks contribute since 2008 that arent named Berry, Poe or Houston.

And that means what?

If pioli and the former don't matter that is

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541803)
And that means what?

If pioli and the former don't matter that is

did Pioli draft in 2013? Because I remember the 2013 season having jack shit for draft picks that did anything.

TEX 04-05-2014 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541797)
I am saying if we have a good draft this year and some of last year's picks start contributing, then we are on a good track.

IF, If,if,if,if,if,if,if.....

This Free Agency period has been a disaster for the Chiefs. They've taken a huge step backwards. They didnt have to.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:43 PM

You're asking the Chiefs to nail a day 1, year 1 impact contributor in the draft and they couldnt even do that with the #1 pick last year. But they are going to do that at 23? Without the rookie going through some sort of growing pains/learning curve?

Pasta Little Brioni 04-05-2014 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10541811)
IF, If,if,if,if,if,if,if.....

This Free Agency period has been a disaster for the Chiefs. They've taken a huge step backwards. They didnt have to.

Welcome to the NFL FA is usually fools gold

Pasta Little Brioni 04-05-2014 04:45 PM

JFC u bitch a lot

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10541811)
IF, If,if,if,if,if,if,if.....

Depending on way too much via the crap shoot called the draft. This Free Agency period has been a disaster for the Chiefs. They've taken a huge step backwards.

I would rather depend on a winning strategy than lay up on a safe strategy that gives us a three year window on a team that still has long shot odds.

And we haven't taken a big step backwards. A few good picks and scrap moves and we could easily be as good if not better than last year.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541817)
You're asking the Chiefs to nail a day 1, year 1 impact contributor in the draft and they couldnt even do that with the #1 pick last year. But they are going to do that at 23? Without the rookie going through some sort of growing pains/learning curve?

Because I am not in a panic to win a Super Bowl this year. Nor do I have unrealistic expectations that two free agents gives us even close to great odds.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541826)
Because I am not in a panic to win a Super Bowl this year. Nor do I have unrealistic expectations that two free agents gives us even close to great odds.

So you cheer for the Chiefs to what? Not win the Super Bowl?

Chief Roundup 04-05-2014 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10541821)
JFC u bitch a lot

it is not bitching you just can't handle someone with a different opinion/cp

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541826)
Because I am not in a panic to win a Super Bowl this year.

Who is?

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10541831)
it is not bitching you just can't handle someone with a different opinion/cp

ROFL

You're such a ****ing pussy.

Chief Roundup 04-05-2014 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541833)
ROFL

You're such a ****ing pussy.

you are so ****ing ridiculous.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:51 PM

That's the difference between me and most on here. I think the Chiefs window with this current roster is now while most here think the Chiefs window is 2038 or something. And thus I'm seen as a bitcher all because I want to cheer for a team that wins now.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541832)
Who is?

Read mcaj post

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10541843)
you are so ****ing ridiculous.

Yeah, of course.

Anybody that doesn't 100% agree with what the Chiefs are doing is ridiculous.

No dissenting opinions allowed.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541828)
So you cheer for the Chiefs to what? Not win the Super Bowl?

What? I am saying a 10 win season is a huge failure if we we were aggressive in free agency.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:54 PM

I mean how dare I think a team with the 2nd best RB in the league and a 30 year old QB that has actually been to the playoffs/on a Super Bowl team not have a WIN now window with 8 pro bowlers and a bunch of guys making 10+ million on their contracts.

I should just conform and hope the Chiefs use this year as a transition year to rebuild for the year 2022 instead.

O.city 04-05-2014 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541852)
I mean how dare I think a team with the 2nd best RB in the league and a 30 year old QB that has actually been to the playoffs/on a Super Bowl team not have a WIN now window with 8 pro bowlers and a bunch of guys making 10+ million on their contracts.

I should just conform and hope the Chiefs use this year as a transition year to rebuild for the year 2022 instead.

How much else do they need?

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541855)
How much else do they need?

I don't know, that's my question. Why build through the draft if you are a couple steps away?

You're going to end up looking back on a guy like Jamaal Charles career, the best RB in Chiefs history and say

"Man what a great player, it's a shame the Chiefs pissed away his entire career on a bunch of transition years to rebuild for 8 ****ing years towards the year 2018"

htismaqe 04-05-2014 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541855)
How much else do they need?

Jarius Byrd would have won that playoff game last year. After that, who knows? It's a whole hell of lot better than what we've seen for the past 20 years.

O.city 04-05-2014 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541858)
I don't know, that's my question. Why build through the draft if you are a couple steps away?

Why can't you get said pieces thru the draft?

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541852)
I mean how dare I think a team with the 2nd best RB in the league and a 30 year old QB that has actually been to the playoffs/on a Super Bowl team not have a WIN now window with 8 pro bowlers and a bunch of guys making 10+ million on their contracts.

I should just conform and hope the Chiefs use this year as a transition year to rebuild for the year 2022 instead.

I don't remember you being this high on our roster last year. Strange.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541865)
I don't remember you being this high on our roster last year. Strange.

I just admitted that, like two pages back. If you knew how to read you would have already seen that.

This team's job, to me as a fan, was to to sell me on that Alex Smith trade going forward post the Matt Cassel era. Andy Reid's offense and Alex Smith as a QB, and a real NFL starting caliber player, did just that.

They marketed it that to me as a fan, and I want to cheer for it. How dare I not want them to win. I'm a terrible fan. Guess I should just cheer for them being just like Seattle in the year 2075, when we build toward that window instead.

O.city 04-05-2014 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541862)
Jarius Byrd would have won that playoff game last year. After that, who knows? It's a whole hell of lot better than what we've seen for the past 20 years.

I think had any of the injured guys not gotten injured we probably win that game.

Hell, knife Davis staying upright probably wins that game

OnTheWarpath15 04-05-2014 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541855)
How much else do they need?

It could be argued all they really needed was a FS.

Then they decided to let walk/release two starting offensive linemen, a starting defensive lineman and a slot WR.

They created holes we didn't have in January, and expect to fill them with guys who couldn't beat out the apparently unimportant players we let walk.

mcaj22 04-05-2014 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541863)
Why can't you get said pieces thru the draft?

So why didn't they get any of those pieces in their first draft then?

O.city 04-05-2014 05:02 PM

That's the thing, how much does a said core need around it? Guess that's the big question

htismaqe 04-05-2014 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10541875)
It could be argued all they really needed was a FS.

Then they decided to let walk/release two starting offensive linemen, a starting defensive lineman and a slot WR.

They created holes we didn't have in January, and expect to fill them with guys who couldn't beat out the apparently unimportant players we let walk.

This is the biggie...

htismaqe 04-05-2014 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541878)
That's the thing, how much does a said core need around it? Guess that's the big question

I think it's pretty obvious what kind of a supporting cast Alex Smith needs...

TEX 04-05-2014 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10541822)
I would rather depend on a winning strategy than lay up on a safe strategy that gives us a three year window on a team that still has long shot odds.

And we haven't taken a big step backwards. A few good picks and scrap moves and we could easily be as good if not better than last year.

ROFL Absolute BS! You'll convince yourself the sky is purple...
You're expecting the Chiefs to hit on every draft pick and no way in hell that's gonna happen. We're also short a # 2 which makes it even harder...

O.city 04-05-2014 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10541875)
It could be argued all they really needed was a FS.

Then they decided to let walk/release two starting offensive linemen, a starting defensive lineman and a slot WR.

They created holes we didn't have in January, and expect to fill them with guys who couldn't beat out the apparently unimportant players we let walk.

Come on.

Of all the guys that walked, Maybe 1 created a hole at eh that can't be filled internally (apparently they feel it can).

Schwartz couldn't beat out asamoah, but ended up being better.

Maybe guys weren't ready last year, but are now.

It jus seems there's a lot of "sucks we lost this player, creates a hole" when said players were constantly chastised while they were here

O.city 04-05-2014 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541877)
So why didn't they get any of those pieces in their first draft then?

Maybe they did? Apparently they feel they did atleast

mcaj22 04-05-2014 05:06 PM

Alex Smith needs a defense. That's it. He can put on an NFL offense style drive and score points in any ****ing game. He needs a defense to help slow down/stop a shootout and he's fine. I'm not even asking for a shutdown defense anymore, just a defense that isn't going to give up the quick 1 minute touchdown strike. Any defense that can make a ****ing stop and he's fine. He can throw to any slapdick, the dude proved that his entire career.

O.city 04-05-2014 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541880)
I think it's pretty obvious what kind of a supporting cast Alex Smith needs...

In harbaughs system, I agree.

In Andy Reid's, I'm not sure he needs that much.

R8RFAN 04-05-2014 05:08 PM

You will have a better draft slot next year.. Don't Worry

Easy 6 04-05-2014 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10541895)
Alex Smith needs a defense. That's it. He can put on an NFL offense style drive and score points in any ****ing game. He needs a defense to help slow down/stop a shootout and he's fine. I'm not even asking for a shutdown defense anymore, just a defense that isn't going to give up the quick 1 minute touchdown strike. Any defense that can make a ****ing stop and he's fine. He can throw to any slapdick, the dude proved that his entire career.

:clap:

htismaqe 04-05-2014 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10541897)
In harbaughs system, I agree.

In Andy Reid's, I'm not sure he needs that much.

I wasn't talking about the offense.

See mcaj22's post.

Easy 6 04-05-2014 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rd&48ers (Post 10541903)
You will have a better draft slot next year.. Don't Worry

Mr. Spiccoli you're on dangerous ground here...

Just because I make fun of my family doesn't mean YOU can.

Easy 6 04-05-2014 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10541811)
IF, If,if,if,if,if,if,if.....

Yep, theres waaay too many of those for my liking this year...

mcaj22 04-05-2014 05:15 PM

why couldn't they just sign one of these safeties and then pack it up for FA. why did they have to sign all these scrub bottom feeders and then put all the eggs in one basket on a special teamer and a 5th round pick with a bum shoulder to play safety in 2014 as it stands right now.

I can hope they use their 1st or 3rd round pick on a safety but that's a longshot.

Easy 6 04-05-2014 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541862)
Jarius Byrd would have won that playoff game last year. After that, who knows? It's a whole hell of lot better than what we've seen for the past 20 years.

That guy would've been a HUGE get this year, hell we could've just gotten him and no one else in free agency this year and it would've been a hit IMO.

A receiver would've been great, but this current group went into the 30's 40's and 50's in the last 5 games, so I could've lived with just one real impact guy like Byrd at our most atrocious position.

ed* didn't see that first sentence from mcaj before posting this, couldn't agree more, just ONE big signing at that position would've made a world of difference.

BigMeatballDave 04-05-2014 06:05 PM

The fact that Lewis and Robinson are gone is an improvement in the D.

But, yeah Byrd would have been nice.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-05-2014 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rd&48ers (Post 10541903)
You will have a better draft slot next year.. Don't Worry

Your retirement home pickups still have u in the basement. ..don't worry

Chief Roundup 04-05-2014 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10541847)
Yeah, of course.

Anybody that doesn't 100% agree with what the Chiefs are doing is ridiculous.

No dissenting opinions allowed.

That is not it and you know it. You are so ridiculous. Mr. a 4th round pick is not a middle round pick to you it is late, yet it is the middle round.
If you think I agree 100% with what they have done you are very mistaken.

Titty Meat 04-05-2014 06:23 PM

Has Marcellus botched about this thread yet?

htismaqe 04-05-2014 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10542031)
That is not it and you know it. You are so ridiculous. Mr. a 4th round pick is not a middle round pick to you it is late, yet it is the middle round.
If you think I agree 100% with what they have done you are very mistaken.

ROFL

Is that really all you have to stand on? That I consider a 4th round pick "late"?

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10541875)
It could be argued all they really needed was a FS.

Then they decided to let walk/release two starting offensive linemen, a starting defensive lineman and a slot WR.

They created holes we didn't have in January, and expect to fill them with guys who couldn't beat out the apparently unimportant players we let walk.

To do what? Win a playoff game? Against a fringe playoff team in the Colts?

You do realize this is a team that even at Alex smith's best lost most of our games in the second half of the year, right? It's amazing to me how many of the typical critics are now acting like the chiefs are awesome to fit the dialogue that we are doing things wrong.

chiefs1111 04-05-2014 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10540666)
Don't worry, we'll have some late round comp picks to build with.

In 2015.

Its a process?

DeezNutz 04-05-2014 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10542174)
To do what? Win a playoff game? Against a fringe playoff team in the Colts?

You do realize this is a team that even at Alex smith's best lost most of our games in the second half of the year, right? It's amazing to me how many of the typical critics are now acting like the chiefs are awesome to fit the dialogue that we are doing things wrong.

The point is that the "typical critics" are correctly observing that the "dialogue" coming from the Chiefs, based on what they did last off-season and what they're doing this off-season, is all ****ed up; it's illogical because it's contradictory.

Nothing more and nothing less, so let's not get this twisted.

Chief Roundup 04-05-2014 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10542067)
ROFL

Is that really all you have to stand on? That I consider a 4th round pick "late"?

No that is just one example of how your opinion works.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10542228)
The point is that the "typical critics" are correctly observing that the "dialogue" coming from the Chiefs, based on what they did last off-season and what they're doing this off-season, is all ****ed up; it's illogical because it's contradictory.

Nothing more and nothing less, so let's not get this twisted.

Nothing more, nothing less? Give me a break. I get if people are skeptical of a draft strategy because they don't trust us to draft well. But there are people who actually think we are one or two pieces way from being serious contenders. And it's not homers saying that.

Hammock Parties 04-05-2014 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10542268)
But there are people who actually think we are one or two pieces way from being serious contenders.

We WERE before we let Albert walk.

The Chiefs have completely undermined the win now strategy they put into motion last offseason.

I mean what the **** was that shit? One last gasp to win a Super Bowl before we blow it up? Dunta Robinson! Sean Smith! Anthony Fasano! Alex Smith! TO THE LOMBARDI!

Saccopoo 04-05-2014 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Douche Baggins (Post 10542281)
We WERE before we let Albert walk.

The Chiefs have completely undermined the win now strategy they put into motion last offseason.

I mean what the **** was that shit? One last gasp to win a Super Bowl before we blow it up? Dunta Robinson! Sean Smith! Anthony Fasano! Alex Smith! TO THE LOMBARDI!

Albert was the key?

Really?

The drive killer?

Hammock Parties 04-05-2014 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10542305)
Albert was the key?

Really?

The drive killer?

**** you.

DeezNutz 04-05-2014 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10542268)
Nothing more, nothing less? Give me a break. I get if people are skeptical of a draft strategy because they don't trust us to draft well. But there are people who actually think we are one or two pieces way from being serious contenders. And it's not homers saying that.

I've read that better safety play would have allowed us to beat INDY in the playoffs, and that this would have been a lot better than anything else the franchise has done in the past 20 years.

Is any of this wrong?

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10542319)
I've read that better safety play would have allowed us to beat INDY in the playoffs, and that this would have been a lot better than anything else the franchise has done in the past 20 years.

Is any of this wrong?

I'm pretty sure that most of this group has repeatedly said we should never settle for anything less than a Super Bowl. And I completely agree. And yes, it sure seems like the tone of the thread was that a free safety is all we would need this year, not just last year.

chiefzilla1501 04-05-2014 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Douche Baggins (Post 10542281)
We WERE before we let Albert walk.

The Chiefs have completely undermined the win now strategy they put into motion last offseason.

I mean what the **** was that shit? One last gasp to win a Super Bowl before we blow it up? Dunta Robinson! Sean Smith! Anthony Fasano! Alex Smith! TO THE LOMBARDI!

Our or two more players wouldn't keep us from being big time underdogs against Denver or new England.

DeezNutz 04-05-2014 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10542328)
I'm pretty sure that most of this group has repeatedly said we should never settle for anything less than a Super Bowl. And I completely agree. And yes, it sure seems like the tone of the thread was that a free safety is all we would need this year, not just last year.

Well, we don't need only a FS, that much is clear.

OTWP said it best when he noted that we let a lot of marginal players walk. Cool. The problem is that the Chiefs, seemingly, are expecting players who could not unseat said marginal talent last year to carry the water in 2014.

That's unsettling, assuming that logic is allowed in the room.

On the offensive side, with respect to free agency, you better damn well believe that I think the entire complexion of the offense changes if the organization signs D. Jackson.

Huge, huge, huge ****ing mistake not to have made that a reality. People who say otherwise are wrong. Simple as that.

Eleazar 04-05-2014 08:17 PM

I know I'm stating the obvious, but I'm going to wait until after the draft to raise the alarm. Sure, they let some marginal starters go and we only have their understudies to replace them. I'd like to see what the roster looks like on the first day of camp.

You aren't going to get better at every single position every offseason. Sometimes you take a step back and there isn't an obvious free agent replacement or you aren't able to get the one you want. You go young or invite another player to prove himself.

I think that Reid and Dorsey realize that while last year was nice, the record was better than it really should have been and this team isn't remodeled yet. They aren't trying to add the last pieces to a super bowl team just yet. They are going to spend another offseason trying to deepen the roster and develop. I think they are correct in their judgement that this team isn't a player or two away so they are probably making sober choices and this year will be another development year.

There's going to be a lot of teeth-gnashing and wailing "fire everybody" on ChiefsPlanet when they don't win more games than they did last year, I bet. But the W column this year is probably a better barometer of where we are at than the W column last year was.

Hammock Parties 04-05-2014 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10542347)
Our or two more players wouldn't keep us from being big time underdogs against Denver or new England.

We competed with Denver at Arrowhead.

There's no reason to think one or two more impact players wouldn't have made a difference against them, especially with Manning getting a year older.

Hammock Parties 04-05-2014 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 10542352)
I'm going to wait

Sincerely,

True Fans


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.