I read the football threads far more than I post in them, but I've also learned that once a thread has hit about 50 or so posts it's more than likely become a pissing match and there's no good information being offered anymore. So I really don't care who's posting in them at that point.

Quite right

I'm not sure where Cochise's situation fits in with your comparison but I enjoyed it nonetheless.

I tend to post in football threads a lot more during the season. During the off-season when the same things are getting rehashed it's not as interesting.

During last season, when there was a generally agreed-upon uproar about the climate here being terrible, when the team was on a winning streak and the trolling just intensified to where it wasn't even fun to enjoy the streak with this community, I don't know how many times I would click on a football thread, see that it's the same turds ruining it again, and just hit the back button.

Fluffers would defend the offenders by saying they drive traffic. Well, they drive traffic to quote them, and to talk about them, and to make threads about them. They also drive traffic that would have discussed something valuable away to other threads or they drive traffic to not participate in the Lounge altogether. "He drives traffic" in all the wrong directions. This was most obvious in the game threads, I think. (Until the well-deserved thread bans started coming out)

I think the point is that if the place is more enjoyable and the threads are not ruined by attention whores, so good people are more likely to participate.

My only point is simply that one's contributions as a creator don't necessarily have anything to do with whether one's opinions about ways to improve are valid. Clay "created" a **** ton of "content" around here, so if that were the case he'd be running the joint.

This is purely my opinion, but I couldn't care less about "driving traffic." There's a certain level necessary to keep the lights on, of course, but beyond that I'd much rather have a lower level of high quality discussion than a ton of bullshit.

Do you think if someone is complaining about the "quality" of content on a public forum for several years and yet in a lengthy period never contributes that they should have their concerns acknowledged with glee?

No, and if this issue were Cochise alone complaining, everyone would tell him to kindly go **** himself.

But it's not.

It's ok, Sorter.

Really, it is.

I agree.

I just think it's funny.

A little bit.

Just a tangent to your post, but I think it's fair to say that a lot of sports forums have seen a shift from pithy, in depth sports discussions to a more terse and dismissive style.

Sure. But it's hard to take you seriously when all you do is go around insulting people for no reason. I mean look at this...

Are you 14? Why does any adult think acting like this is ok? On the internet or otherwise.

You're boring and you've never, ever understood this forum.

The forum's football content dried the **** up ever since megathreads started to come into fashion.

This is what happens when you two lovers of insular, protected positivity don't have a Clay to focus your hatred on; the snake eats itself.

Oh no, don't you even LOOK to me; my days of talking about that albatross of a franchise are dead and gone.

And keep in mind, this is a "Clay-based" thread, not a "Chiefs" thread. You're not even gonna' see me around that shit.

Two cents = given.

Dagnabit is SDH, isnt he? Gotta be.

OK. Whose mult is this?

Whoops, yeah. Baconeater the Wise is "99% sure it's Sweet Daddy".

I trust that guy with my life.

That post above sealed it for me.

Haha, the read option breakdown.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...4&postcount=99

Here is your chance to show us how that bar has been raised without Clay.

I don't even get why you're chiming in on this matter :shrug: :D

Its gotta be, had real questions of my own, but I'm thinking the Dude somehow called it in DC

Yes.

He hates Arizona and the Chiefs franchise, all the while defending Claynus.

What I'll never understand is why the guy continues to return to the forum under a new name after he's been banned what, 4 times? 5?

Yeah, he's got a bit of a soft spot for some Clay penis.

Maybe Clay gives a good mouth hug

Why did you return after starting an "I'm leaving forever" thread?

Are you new here?

99% of I'm leaving forever thread starters come back.

Some more than once.

:rolleyes:

I know, I know. I was just giving Dane shit from my new, slightly used .08 mm Nokia flip phone. Couldn't resist.

LMAO

Why would I waste a whole bunch of time documenting something that is obvious?

:clap:

Megathreads do suck.

If it is so obvious, then you shouldn't have any difficulty answering the question in the post you quoted. I do acknowledge that might be difficult for you, so I'm more than happy to wait for your enthralling analysis of the Redskins' offense during RG3's duration as a starter.

I'm a patient man.

I hate Phoenix and have nothing to say about the Chiefs franchise.

Arizona itself is a lovely state.

As to your question, the answer is that I spent too long fighting a losing battle, a battle I'm no longer fighting because I am no longer interested in the Chiefs as a franchise.

As was said to me 100 times over:

"Your choice to be a fan".

Well guess what?

I took the advice.

The Chiefs are a wonderful franchise( for you ); may the face of God smile upon them.

Some things you just have to experience yourself; give 'em a call!

I hate this thread more than I hate skim milk. And I ****ING HATE SKIM MILK.

May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your crotch and your arms be too short to scratch.


https://sp.yimg.com/xj/th?id=OIP.Mf8...=0&w=300&h=300

You're back!

But joining a site where you aren't a fan of any of the teams? You're gonna just rip DC apart aren't you?

Several of us figured out who Dagnabit is.

There once was a twerp named Clay.
Of whom a few dudes on here wanted to stay.
He argued away his soul
With that pissy guy Bob Dole
Now he's posting on Reddit all day.

LMAO

CP is an institution unto itself. I'm content to let others fight the losing Chiefs battle, and simply observe.

I still like football, but I'm no where near as hard-core about it or as drunk as I used to be from 1994-2012. Without alcohol to kill the pain of Andy Reid, Alex Smith, and The Hunt Doctrine, all you're left with is a very dismal reality and future.

No thanks. And no need to beat people over the head repeatedly about it, either. Some things just are what they are, and if that's your thing, groove on.

God Bless Dorsey for trying, though. Maybe he'll outlive the other three?

After I left you some pos-rep spelling it out in all but Crayon, I'm sure you finally solved the mystery.

Kudos, good sir. :)

Stand by, I'm baking a big batch of cookies as we speak.

Limericks are my thing though..

Speaking of limericks, FAX was an overrated poster.

There, I said it.

You're literally the only person that acts like you do. Even Milkman is sick of your shit. It's like you're mentally unstable sometimes.

I might do it if I cared one iota about your opinion on the subject, but I don't.

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/l-lJZiqZaGA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

You'll be sorry when you're on your deathbed in 25 years, and the Chiefs win a championship, that you didn't waste all this time like the rest of us.

This is a bit of an odd attack by sorter on cochise. Has something been festering between the two, or is this out of nowhere?

:deevee:

**** off

That's nice.


It's common way for ignorant folks like yourself to save face but it's still nice. I truly appreciate your candor in admitting to being a spineless person that can spend hundreds of hours arguing with people in the D.C. but can't muster up even the slightest shred of evidence to support your claims here.

Ohhhhhhh, it's a DC thing. Figures.

Not in limerick form. Fail.

FAX 1
SNR 0

I just don't understand why such a beautiful mind such as Cochise would spend so much effort arguing and trying to convince others of his position in the D.C. but turn tail when presented the very same opportunity here?

Essentially, Cochise just seems silly when it comes to football; a person who likely bitches about "playcalling" during and after each and every Chiefs game because that's the easiest way to assign blame and appear intelligent on this board.

Given that sorter goes above and beyond typical message board analysis by breaking down the game on a very technical level, I think he's using his calling out of Cochise to show his frustration about the whole "level of football discussion" topic.

At least that's what I'd be thinking if I had his understanding of the game-if you can't bring something to the table about actual analysis of the sport then you don't really have any room to complain about the lack of discussion.

No, I don't remember ever speaking to him/her before.

We all know that everything's the offensive coordinator's fault. He ran when he should have passed, and he passed when he should have run. But I, (insert name here), would have called the opposite on that play, and it would have worked, without a doubt!


LMAO

Spineless? No. I just don't see any reason to engage in a long and time consuming discussion about the merits of a garbage QB who's finishing out his career in Cleveland as the biggest bust of all time.

LMAO

You may be right. I highly doubt it, but you may be right.

ROFL.

But hey guys, the board has clearly improved. We've certainly solved the mystery of who is behind all of the Chiefs losses.

If it's such an obvious answer, then it shouldn't be lengthy or time consuming.

Especially for someone as smart as you are.

One of my favorites is one I see a few times a year over on Patriots forums.

1. 3rd and short
2. Patriots get to line
3. Brady reads defense
4. Brady makes call
5. Brady throws incomplete pass, 15+ yards down the field
6. Patriots fans lose minds, start lighting the torches for McDaniels
7. Post-game conference has Brady saying "Josh called a run/short pass, but the defense did _______, so I audibled to a longer pass. We just didn't execute."

That one gets me laughing every time.

LMAO

I think, not positive, but I think that BigCatDaddy was implying that you don't know shit about football. Just a guess...

Sweet Daddy?

LMAO Right?

ROFL

Well, this thread delivered. Thanks for pointing me to it, Clay. :D

I blame Skip and the you aint shit unless you've got several 100 post threads.....


Ah good times...... good times.........

It is him.

I think he admitted it somewhere.

Some people just can't leave this place.

It's been well over 37 days. What happened?

Lots of soap always is Fax
His head, front and backs
RealSNR
Collects piss in jars
And vinegars his ass

Hey, don't besmirch the deductive skills of Lex Luthor. Your pos-rep message consisted of "Hush, little Luthy". That doesn't exactly spell out that Dagnabit is Sweet Daddy Williams.

The way you post made it obvious whose mult you are. I was just the first to say it. I'm sure a lot of people were also aware.

Why can't we all just get along?

We're gonna' get along great, because I'm done trolling the Chiefs, because I'm done caring about the Chiefs, because the Chiefs are no longer a part of my life.

Congratulations!