ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rams trade for #1 overall pick (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299347)

ThaVirus 04-14-2016 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 12178238)
Do people in LA really give a shit about someone from the Bay Area? If it were UCLA or USC, I could see the "local" storyline but I doubt people in LA care about a QB from Berkley.


I'm not sure about Cali, but here in Florida Jameis Winston gets a ton of love all over for being a "hometown" kid. Tallahassee and Tampa aren't all that close.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12178307)
Whomever they take (and I think it'll be Wentz) will spend the season handing off the ball to Gurley while throwing some play action passes now and then.

They'll be a team similar to the Chiefs and last year's Broncos: Conservative QB play with a strong running game and defense.

Keep in mind, the Rams had the #32 passing game and #29 overall offense and still went 7-9.

They needed to make this move.

And they lost some good defensive pieces.....

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12178311)
And they lost some good defensive pieces.....

They lost one: Janoris Jenkins.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12178321)
They lost one: Janoris Jenkins.

Janoris Jenkins
Rodney McLeod
Chris Long
Jame Larenitis

SAUTO 04-14-2016 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12178255)
I expect him to be gone before moving to Inglewood in 2019 but surely, it's too late into the league year to fire him now...?

Yeah I'm betting he gets one more year

BossChief 04-14-2016 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178232)
If I'm the Titans.....I take one of those 2nd round picks and use my #15 to trade up into the top 10 to get Ronnie Stanley.

Lewan isn't a bad left tackle.

IMO they should stay put and draft BPA because that will likely fill needs, anyway.

They don't even have a starting LCB and they can use upgrades at a couple DL spots. They can easily upgrade their LB corps.

They need to improve their receiving corps, too.

Rams Fan 04-14-2016 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12177948)
Their ol isn't good, they do ha e Gurley though, but their wrs a d TE's are ?

I dunno, don't know that I see it

OL isn't an issue.

Barnes is fine as center. Havenstein, as a rookie who played and started 12 games at RT, didn't give up a single sack. I think Robinson progressed near the end of the season. And LG Brown started as a rookie until he went on IR. At this point Saffold is a luxury.

Not to mention the # of 2nd year OLers who aren't starting, including three who did get some experience starting last season(Donnal, Williams, Wichmann) and the one who didn't (Battle). The OL should be considered a strength, not an issue.

As for WR, Britt is the only option who can start on a majority of other teams. I'd consider Austin that as well, but he gets touches through running the ball. Bailey shouldn't be counted to contribute to his recovery. Marquez can showed some promise. Everyone else is JAG, including Quick until he shows that last season was him needing time to recover from his shoulder injury.

As far as TE, well, the best receiving option was cut(Cook). Kendricks is an above average receiver and good blocker. And Harkey is utilized as a fullback. So virtually nothing at TE.

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12178330)
Janoris Jenkins
Rodney McLeod
Chris Long
Jame Larenitis

:facepalm:

pugsnotdrugs19 04-14-2016 11:38 AM

One thing that hasn't really been talked about, is the possibility of us trading up for a player (likely a CB, in front of Pittsburgh)

If they really like Alexander, or WJ3, and think PIT might snag said CB, I could see us going up a handful of spots. We'd be in a fine situation to do so as well, because with 4 comp picks next year we could afford to give up a 3rd next year and still get one back with the comp choice.

YayMike 04-14-2016 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12178374)
One thing that hasn't really been talked about, is the possibility of us trading up for a player (likely a CB, in front of Pittsburgh)

If they really like Alexander, or WJ3, and think PIT might snag said CB, I could see us going up a handful of spots. We'd be in a fine situation to do so as well, because with 4 comp picks next year we could afford to give up a 3rd next year and still get one back with the comp choice.

From everything I've seen and read, we should be able to get a quality player where we are, and without giving up anything. If we are truly going to lose the 3rd round pick to the "tampering" we can ill afford to trade any picks to move up. JMO

pugsnotdrugs19 04-14-2016 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YayMike (Post 12178385)
From everything I've seen and read, we should be able to get a quality player where we are, and without giving up anything. If we are truly going to lose the 3rd round pick to the "tampering" we can ill afford to trade any picks to move up. JMO

I get what you're saying, but there is always the possibility that Dorsey thinks Alexander or WJ3 can be the perfect compliment to Peters for the next several years, or who knows, maybe it's an entirely different position. But if that would be the case, now is the time to push the chips to the middle with some of our key contributors at critical ages. Of course, Dorsey ultimately sets out to compete every single year, so I wouldn't say it fits his M.O. to make the move. Possible though.

Rams Fan 04-14-2016 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12178369)
:facepalm:

2 of those players(Jenkins,McLeod) are definitely losses. I do think at least one of Gaines and Joyner will be successful in replacing them, though.

At this point Long isn't. And I don't think Laurinaitis is a loss, but you could argue that him, Tree, and Ayers at LB with Barron at S is better than better than Barron, Tree, and Ayers at LB.

Additionally, losing Fairley is a kind of a big deal. He served nicely as a 3rd DT.

Toby Waller 04-14-2016 11:47 AM

Lol of course it happened.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 12178396)
2 of those players(Jenkins,McLeod) are definitely losses. I do think of Gaines and Joyner will be successful in replacing them, though.

At this point Long isn't. And I don't think Laurinaitis is a loss, but you could argue that him, Tree, and Ayers at LB with Barron at S is better than better than Barron, Tree, and Ayers at LB.

Additionally, losing Fairley is a kind of a big deal. He served nicely as a 3rd DT.

Well, I still consider Cut's losses.... But BARRON has shown NOTHING...

Rams Fan 04-14-2016 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12178404)
Well, I still consider Cut's losses.... But BARRON has shown NOTHING...

Regarding Barron, that is simply not true. He has been nothing short of stellar since he's been with the Rams. Unless you mean if his body can hold up playing LB due to being undersized. That is a fair question.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 12178407)
Regarding Barron, that is simply not true. He has been nothing short of stellar since he's been with the Rams. Unless you mean if his body can hold up playing LB due to being undersized. That is a fair question.

EVEN if he is playing the Weak side, he is 6'2 and only 213 pounds... Height isn't as big of factor as weight. He is going to get destroyed vs Run game. He might have the speed, but a WR can still block him easy.

The Franchise 04-14-2016 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12178419)
EVEN if he is playing the Weak side, he is 6'2 and only 213 pounds... Height isn't as big of factor as weight. He is going to get destroyed vs Run game. He might have the speed, but a WR can still block him easy.

Deone Bucannon does it and he's only 216 lbs.

O.city 04-14-2016 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12178290)
It's a big boy league.

Sure, we'd all love to get HoFers in the 5th round but that doesn't really happen. Everything in this league comes at some sacrifice and the Rams have chosen to make theirs to give themselves their best shot at securing the thing that has held them back since Warner left.

"Making things harder" isn't really an argument I buy - this league is hard to win in, period. This doesn't make it harder at all if Wentz/Goff turns out the be the force multiplier at QB that the Rams think he'll be.

And if he isn't, they just blow it up and start over, which is probably easier than trying to slowly drag yourself out of the middle of the pack.

For ine, I think the calculus for the force multiplier that is a qb has changed. I'll take my stron roster and a good qb over your great qb and average roster 9 times out of 10.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178432)
Deone Bucannon does it and he's only 216 lbs.

230weight min neither of those guys will be on the level of Lavonte David, Sean Lee, ect... And considering the Rams have Alec Olgletree at Weakside, are you going to move him to Middle I'll assume?

ChiefsCountry 04-14-2016 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178451)
For ine, I think the calculus for the force multiplier that is a qb has changed. I'll take my stron roster and a good qb over your great qb and average roster 9 times out of 10.

I'll take Andrew Luck and the Colts roster over Alex Smith and the Chiefs roster anyday of the week.

O.city 04-14-2016 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12178455)
I'll take Andrew Luck and the Colts roster over Alex Smith and the Chiefs roster anyday of the week.

As of today? No thanks

staylor26 04-14-2016 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178464)
As of today? No thanks

Yea. **** that. We actually have a shot to win it all.

O.city 04-14-2016 12:17 PM

Luck is a better qb than smith. But unless he lowers his affinity for turning it over, he isn't winning anything of note.

Especially once they pay him 200 mil

Mile High Mania 04-14-2016 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12178455)
I'll take Andrew Luck and the Colts roster over Alex Smith and the Chiefs roster anyday of the week.

One franchise is 30-18 and the other is 31-17 in the last 3 reg seasons.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178464)
As of today? No thanks

2nd, CAN WE GET A THIRD SO MOTION OF ****ING THAT CAN PASS!

staylor26 04-14-2016 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 12178475)
One franchise is 30-18 and the other is 31-17 in the last 3 reg seasons.

And one has a roster that would still be good enough to win games without the QB.

O.city 04-14-2016 12:19 PM

If Grigson wasn't a dumb asshole, they'd have atleast 1 superbowl appearance

ThaVirus 04-14-2016 12:19 PM

Andrew Luck is buns

Toby Waller 04-14-2016 12:24 PM

Team moving to major media center,gets number one pick.
It has nothing to do with all your present analyzing.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smellypitts (Post 12178486)
Team moving to major media center,gets number one pick.
It has nothing to do with all your present analyzing.

?

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178480)
If Grigson wasn't a dumb asshole, they'd have atleast 1 superbowl appearance

Worst GM in the league

RunKC 04-14-2016 12:27 PM

The Colts defense is terrible, their OL is terrible and they lost players like Jerrell Freeman.
They're one of the worst pass rushing teams in the league and are relying on 35 year old Mathis.

They are literally a good QB and WR surrounded by absolute garbage.

O.city 04-14-2016 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12178492)
Worst GM in the league

He wasted 5 years of cheap qb play. Unbelievable he still has a job

DJ's left nut 04-14-2016 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12178455)
I'll take Andrew Luck and the Colts roster over Alex Smith and the Chiefs roster anyday of the week.

Yes, but you're wrong.

The Colts will win nothing with that roster - ever. But you have a hard on for Alex Smith so you'll just howl at the moon any chance you get.

Grigson is the worst GM in sports and the worst I can remember since Elgin Baylor. He's absolutely run that team into the ground and they're only going to get worse as Luck gets more and more expensive.

DJ's left nut 04-14-2016 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 12178475)
One franchise is 30-18 and the other is 31-17 in the last 3 reg seasons.

And the former did that while getting their Pro Bowl quarterback for about the cost of a high-end backup.

They won't be getting that anymore.

It's Chiefscountry.

Ming the Merciless 04-14-2016 12:50 PM

wow

LA is really gonna start over

O.city 04-14-2016 12:52 PM

This isn't really the thread for it, but if

the chiefs get a good lg, with the addition of Schwartz and the expected maturity of the offense, Charles comes back healthy....

Alex smith may put up a really interesting year

KChiefs1 04-14-2016 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12178286)
If the Chiefs were a perpetual 7-9 team without a Franchise QB, who here wouldn't give up Dee Ford, Philip Gaines and De'Anthony Thomas (2014 picks) along with Marcus Peters, Mitch Morse and Chris Conley (2015) for a Franchise QB?

I'd do it in a heartbeat.



Is that "franchise" QB named Ryan Leaf or RG III?

pugsnotdrugs19 04-14-2016 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178509)
This isn't really the thread for it, but if

the chiefs get a good lg, with the addition of Schwartz and the expected maturity of the offense, Charles comes back healthy....

Alex smith may put up a really interesting year

MVP!!!

Lol, okay I'm kidding. But you're right, I think he might too. Could see a 25 TD, 7 INT type year while nearing 4000 passing yards.

Tribal Warfare 04-14-2016 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178509)
This isn't really the thread for it, but if

the chiefs get a good lg, with the addition of Schwartz and the expected maturity of the offense, Charles comes back healthy....

Alex smith may put up a really interesting year

You had to go there

Ming the Merciless 04-14-2016 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178509)

Alex smith may put up a really interesting year

Oh it will be interesting for sure....no doubt.

I mean we should win the west....and we should see ALex get more playoff chances...

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12178506)
wow

LA is really gonna start over

Not really. They have this year's #1, two 4's, a 5, two 6's and a 7.

Next year, they'll have a 2, 3 (compensation for Jenkins), 4, 5, 6, 7.

They could package a 4 and a 6 to jump into the 3rd round this year or any combination of those picks.

According to Don Banks, the Broncos are interested in Case Keenum as a starter and while the Rams gave him a 1st round tender, they'll likely let him go to Denver for less.

So it's possible they add more draft choices, especially since Denver is loaded up with comp picks.

The Franchise 04-14-2016 01:01 PM

Denver with Case Keenum. ROFL

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178524)
Denver with Case Keenum. ROFL

I know but he played under Kubiak, who loves him.

I hope they give up a 3 and a 5 for him.

Keenum, Sanchez and Siemian.

LMAO

Mile High Mania 04-14-2016 01:05 PM

Denver should just wait and see if Cook falls to them or later in R1 where they make a minimal trade to move up.

ChiefsCountry 04-14-2016 01:06 PM

Let's see here - Colts since 2013 have 3 playoff wins. Chiefs have 1.

Colts have 30-18 record (even with Luck missing half of last season) 2 division titles
Chiefs have 31-17 record. 0 division titles.

Pretty black and white. One team has the superior QB, the other the superior roster. I'll take my chances with the superior QB over the superior roster. I'm sure most around the NFL would feel the same way.

Eleazar 04-14-2016 01:07 PM

You've got to be hating life if you are a 49er fan or a your name is Colin Krapernick

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12178530)
Let's see here - Colts since 2013 have 3 playoff wins. Chiefs have 1.

Colts have 30-18 record (even with Luck missing half of last season) 2 division titles
Chiefs have 31-17 record. 0 division titles.

Pretty black and white. One team has the superior QB, the other the superior roster. I'll take my chances with the superior QB over the superior roster. I'm sure most around the NFL would feel the same way.

Division titles?

:spock:

Come on, Dude, the AFC South has been pure unadulterated dogshit for years. Jacksonville and Tennessee have been outright horrific and the Texans have been inconsistent at best while going 2-14 during that time frame.

mcaj22 04-14-2016 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178509)
This isn't really the thread for it, but if

the chiefs get a good lg, with the addition of Schwartz and the expected maturity of the offense, Charles comes back healthy....

Alex smith may put up a really interesting year

so by that you mean the same year hes had the last 5 years

Toby Waller 04-14-2016 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smellypitts (Post 12178486)
Team moving to major media center,gets number one pick.
It has nothing to do with all your present analyzing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12178488)
?

its simple. the nfl made it happen.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smellypitts (Post 12178552)
its simple. the nfl made it happen.

Damnit ROGER!!!!!

http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/9-01-2015/lNviKU.gif

O.city 04-14-2016 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12178547)
so by that you mean the same year hes had the last 5 years

No, o think substantially better.

Toby Waller 04-14-2016 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12178559)

YOU DAMN DIRTY RAMS !!:cuss:

jd1020 04-14-2016 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12178547)
so by that you mean the same year hes had the last 5 years

I'm taking the over on 4,000 yards and 30 TDs. He's been hearing people call him a top 10 QB the last couple years and you have see it in his play that he is starting to believe. Alex is ready.

lcarus 04-14-2016 01:30 PM

All of this for what? Goff? Good lord, man. This is such a terrible draft for QBs. I don't see why desperate teams are forcing these average QBs up the draft board. There's desperation and then there's this shit...

RunKC 04-14-2016 01:31 PM

I hope Lynch doesn't make it to the late teens. I think horse face is readying for a trade up.

jd1020 04-14-2016 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 12178572)
All of this for what? Goff? Good lord, man. This is such a terrible draft for QBs. I don't see why desperate teams are forcing these average QBs up the draft board. There's desperation and then there's this shit...

Take a chance. Not every good NFL QB was pegged to be good coming out of college.

staylor26 04-14-2016 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12178575)
I hope Lynch doesn't make it to the late teens. I think horse face is readying for a trade up.

Let him.

By the time Lynch is ready (if he ever is) that D won't be the same.

Discuss Thrower 04-14-2016 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12178576)
Take a chance. Not every good NFL QB was pegged to be good coming out of college.

Too risky.

RunKC 04-14-2016 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12178535)
Division titles?

:spock:

Come on, Dude, the AFC South has been pure unadulterated dogshit for years. Jacksonville and Tennessee have been outright horrific and the Texans have been inconsistent at best while going 2-14 during that time frame.

The Chiefs would have won that division every year and most likely would have won another playoff game with home playoff games every year.

The Franchise 04-14-2016 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12178575)
I hope Lynch doesn't make it to the late teens. I think horse face is readying for a trade up.

Here's the issue. I don't see Lynch as being that QB that can come in year 1 and manage the game. Dude needs to sit for 1-2 seasons and get adjusted. Denver doesn't have a QB in front of him that can start and keep them relevant. And if they do draft Lynch.....and then end up tanking this season....what are they going to do with a high pick? Draft another QB? No.

jd1020 04-14-2016 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12178584)
Too risky.

Very true. If this fails it might leave a scar that wont heal for 30+ years.

ClevelandBronco 04-14-2016 01:38 PM

Have the usual conspiracy lunatics already taken their shits in here?

vailpass 04-14-2016 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 12178594)
Have the usual conspiracy lunatics already taken their shits in here?

See #210

The Franchise 04-14-2016 01:46 PM

So there have been leaks that the Rams traded up for Wentz.....and leaks that they traded up for Goff. NOW there is a rumor that if the Rams take Goff.....that the Browns may trade out with the Eagles and the Eagles would draft Wentz.

O.city 04-14-2016 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178605)
So there have been leaks that the Rams traded up for Wentz.....and leaks that they traded up for Goff. NOW there is a rumor that if the Rams take Goff.....that the Browns may trade out with the Eagles and the Eagles would draft Wentz.

I saw someone say they didn't know which one they want, but traded up and now will decide.

listopencil 04-14-2016 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 12178475)
One franchise is 30-18 and the other is 31-17 in the last 3 reg seasons.

Ouch.

BleedingRed 04-14-2016 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178605)
So there have been leaks that the Rams traded up for Wentz.....and leaks that they traded up for Goff. NOW there is a rumor that if the Rams take Goff.....that the Browns may trade out with the Eagles and the Eagles would draft Wentz.

Dude, I'm always a CHIEFS fan first... But that would be a god send for the Dallas Cowboys.

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178605)
So there have been leaks that the Rams traded up for Wentz.....and leaks that they traded up for Goff. NOW there is a rumor that if the Rams take Goff.....that the Browns may trade out with the Eagles and the Eagles would draft Wentz.

The Eagles don't have a 2nd rounder, which is now property of the Titans.

What in the world are they willing to give up? 3 #1's?

FlaChief58 04-14-2016 01:52 PM

I hope the rams at least got a reach around and some cab money after the ****ing the just took

O.city 04-14-2016 01:52 PM

Also saw some talk that 5 qbs could go round 1. Crazy

RunKC 04-14-2016 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178589)
Here's the issue. I don't see Lynch as being that QB that can come in year 1 and manage the game. Dude needs to sit for 1-2 seasons and get adjusted. Denver doesn't have a QB in front of him that can start and keep them relevant. And if they do draft Lynch.....and then end up tanking this season....what are they going to do with a high pick? Draft another QB? No.

or draft Lynch, tank this year, get a ton of picks in a trade next year and have a very good QB plus lots of picks to build the team.

No Bueno

Chief Roundup 04-14-2016 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178605)
So there have been leaks that the Rams traded up for Wentz.....and leaks that they traded up for Goff. NOW there is a rumor that if the Rams take Goff.....that the Browns may trade out with the Eagles and the Eagles would draft Wentz.

The Eagles won't be drafting a QB let alone giving up the farm to get one with what they have already invested into that position. Chase Daniel 3rd string wouldn't dress for how many millions. Not happening.

The Franchise 04-14-2016 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12178643)
The Eagles won't be drafting a QB let alone giving up the farm to get one with what they have already invested into that position. Chase Daniel 3rd string wouldn't dress for how many millions. Not happening.

Yeah....because you know more than people who have sources.

Chief Roundup 04-14-2016 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12178624)
or draft Lynch, tank this year, get a ton of picks in a trade next year and have a very good QB plus lots of picks to build the team.

No Bueno

They can tank without drafting Lynch. Why draft Lynch to be at the top of the draft where there would likely be better prospects at the QB position.

O.city 04-14-2016 02:10 PM

So the Rams traded all those picks to get to number 1 and don't even know which qb they're taking.

I'm sure it'll work out

jd1020 04-14-2016 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12178651)
So the Rams traded all those picks to get to number 1 and don't even know which qb they're taking.

I'm sure it'll work out

I'm sure they know exactly which one they are taking.

Chief Roundup 04-14-2016 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12178647)
Yeah....because you know more than people who have sources.

Those sources wouldn't have any vested interest in hyping a story that wouldn't happen to create buzz now would they?
Common sense says it would be DUMB on the Eagles part to make such a move.

staylor26 04-14-2016 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12178653)
I'm sure they know exactly which one they are taking.

Yea I'm not buying that report. You don't make that trade unless you are set on one.

DaneMcCloud 04-14-2016 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12178643)
The Eagles won't be drafting a QB let alone giving up the farm to get one with what they have already invested into that position. Chase Daniel 3rd string wouldn't dress for how many millions. Not happening.

Wrong.

Bradford's only on the hook for one season and with his injury history, he won't likely play all 16 games.

Daniel signed a 3 year, $21 million dollar deal, which is now considered "Elite Backup" money.

If the Eagles can somehow move up to Cleveland's spot and take Goff or Wentz, the presence of Bradford and Daniel means that they won't have to rush their new QB into a starting role.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.