ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Bosa rejects Chargers "best" offer (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=301717)

ToxSocks 08-24-2016 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 12384459)

Right.

I thought this was understood? That doesn't dispute anything i've said, nor does it state that he won't be getting his guaranteed money in the event of an injury.

jjchieffan 08-24-2016 04:11 PM

I seriously doubt that he gets cut and picked up by another team in his first contract anyway. When a team invests a top pick in a player, they are going to try everything to make the pick work out. When was the last time that a player drafted in the top 3, hell the top 15, was released in his first contract? Hell, Tyson Jackson was awful and stayed through his contract. Why? Because he was the 3rd overall pick. If he was a 5th round pick, he would've been gone by the end of season 2 at the latest. So Bosa and the Chargers are making a big deal out of something that will NEVER happen anyway.

ToxSocks 08-24-2016 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 12384480)
It is beyond comprehension to side with billionaire owners of the San Diego Chargers of all people. I guess that makes me an idiot or a union leader. A bad contract is a bad contract regardless if CP dudes want a spoiled rich athlete to suck it up and accept whatever terms they think up that benefit them and not the player.

What kind of Mr. Potter old cronies do we have on this site?

What's beyond comprehension is your lack of comprehension. The Chargers aren't offering a bad contract. They're offering a standard contract (actually their latest offer is MORE than a standard contract) and Bosa is demanding more.

That's not taking sides. That's stating what's actually occurring.

At no point is Bosa not going to get his money. He's going to get paid. He's crying about WHEN he's going to receive it all.

NFL teams sign players with deferred signing bonuses all the time. It allows them to recoup a little interest money. Bosa, essentially wants that interest money for himself.

Again, they're essentially fighting over interest. Which is stupid. From both sides.

Mr. Laz 08-24-2016 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12384519)
I seriously doubt that he gets cut and picked up by another team in his first contract anyway. When a team invests a top pick in a player, they are going to try everything to make the pick work out. When was the last time that a player drafted in the top 3, hell the top 15, was released in his first contract? Hell, Tyson Jackson was awful and stayed through his contract. Why? Because he was the 3rd overall pick. If he was a 5th round pick, he would've been gone by the end of season 2 at the latest. So Bosa and the Chargers are making a big deal out of something that will NEVER happen anyway.

He won't get cut, he might sit out the entire season though.


He then goes into next year's draft. (i think that the rule now)

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 04:18 PM

Chargers exec John Spanos: Bosa's stance 'absolutely asinine'
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...lutely-asinine

jjchieffan 08-24-2016 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12384537)
He won't get cut, he might sit out the entire season though.


He then goes into next year's draft. (i think that the rule now)

You misunderstood me. I meant, were he to sign his contract, he's not getting cut. He could be dogshit awful and the team would keep him around until his contract is up because he was the 3rd overall pic. Therefore, the offset language us a moot issue.

jspchief 08-24-2016 04:30 PM

Can't believe people are siding with the Chargers on this. I'm just glad the Chiefs FO isn't such an embarrassment.

Mr. Laz 08-24-2016 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12384550)
You misunderstood me. I meant, were he to sign his contract, he's not getting cut. He could be dogshit awful and the team would keep him around until his contract is up because he was the 3rd overall pic. Therefore, the offset language us a moot issue.

yep, i misunderstood


:thumb:

jjchieffan 08-24-2016 04:38 PM

Can't believe people are siding with Visa on this. I'm just glad that the Chiefs draft picks aren't such an embarrassment.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-24-2016 04:40 PM

Dude is going to sit out next year too when he gets peanuts offered as a second rounder...BUT BUT BUT I GOT PICKED TURD OVERALL!!!

mcaj22 08-24-2016 04:41 PM

where does this rank in draft blunders/holdouts all time so far?

1. Bo Jackson

2. Elway?

3. Eli

4. Bosa (and climbing)

KCUnited 08-24-2016 04:41 PM

Chargers have Discovered new ways of embarrassing themselves.

jjchieffan 08-24-2016 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12384597)
where does this rank in draft blunders/holdouts all time so far?

1. Bo Jackson

2. Elway?

3. Eli

4. Bosa (and climbing)

Funny that 2 of the 4 were the Chargers. Add in Ryan Leaf and that's a whole lotta drafting fail at the top of the draft.

jspchief 08-24-2016 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12384590)
Can't believe people are siding with Visa on this. I'm just glad that the Chiefs draft picks aren't such an embarrassment.

If this were a Chiefs 3rd pick, fans would be forming a lynch mob against the front office.

A team that desperately needs talent is losing out on that talent because they are being more stingy than nearly every other team that's been in the situation. They are more concerned about bottom line than fielding a competitive product for their fans. I'm sure Chargers fans will tune in on Sundays to cheer the bank account in their Spanos jerseys.

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 12384625)
If this were a Chiefs 3rd pick, fans would be forming a lynch mob against the front office.

A team that desperately needs talent is losing out on that talent because they are being more stingy than nearly every other team that's been in the situation. They are more concerned about bottom line than fielding a competitive product for their fans. I'm sure Chargers fans will tune in on Sundays to cheer the bank account in their Spanos jerseys.

Would you form a lynch mob for the Chiefs to sign Tyson Jackson or Eric Fisher?
It was a similar shitty draft. Bosa's entitled to be misled by his agent.

HemiEd 08-24-2016 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12383981)
ROFL gazook just leapt into the ocean

He was pretty cocky the other day, this might clip his wings a little.

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 12384644)
He was pretty cocky the other day, this might clip his wings a little.

Nope.:)

DaneMcCloud 08-24-2016 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384635)
Would you form a lynch mob for the Chiefs to sign Tyson Jackson or Eric Fisher?
It was a similar shitty draft. Bosa's entitled to be misled by his agent.

It's waaaaaaaaaaay too early to make that kind of an assessment.

If I was a Chargers fan, I'd have been much happier with the selection of Stanley, Ramsey, Floyd, Buckner and hell, even Nkemdiche or Elliott.

Bosa's father was a bust and his son is following in his footsteps.

jspchief 08-24-2016 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384635)
Would you form a lynch mob for the Chiefs to sign Tyson Jackson or Eric Fisher?
It was a similar shitty draft. Bosa's entitled to be misled by his agent.

Yes. If my team was one of the worst in the league and they were handicapping improvement because of money they already committed to spending? **** yes. If Bosa wasn't worth 3rd overall money, don't draft him. If no one was worth it, trade the pick. What he's worth was already determined when they selected him.

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12384654)
It's waaaaaaaaaaay too early to make that kind of an assessment.

If I was a Chargers fan, I'd have been much happier with the selection of Stanley, Ramsey, Floyd, Buckner and hell, even Nkemdiche or Elliott.

Bosa's father was a bust and his son is following in his footsteps.

We agree. The fact that you can name 6 other players that could've been picked at 3 shows how weak this draft was.

Understandably, no one wanted to trade up to 3.

Bosa's Mommy, Daddy and Agent aren't helping him at this point.

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 12384665)
Yes. If my team was one of the worst in the league and they were handicapping improvement because of money they already committed to spending? **** yes. If Bosa wasn't worth 3rd overall money, don't draft him. If no one was worth it, trade the pick. What he's worth was already determined when they selected him.

No one wanted the 3rd pick in this draft. Meh, **** Bosa 'till he gets his head out of his ass.

ToxSocks 08-24-2016 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384546)
Chargers exec John Spanos: Bosa's stance 'absolutely asinine'
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...lutely-asinine

"He would have gotten more cash in this calendar year than anyone except Carson Wentz."

Tell me again how the Chargers are offering Joey a bad, bad contract?

DJ's left nut 08-24-2016 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384635)
Would you form a lynch mob for the Chiefs to sign Tyson Jackson or Eric Fisher?
It was a similar shitty draft. Bosa's entitled to be misled by his agent.

You can keep telling yourself that, but I see some legitimate studs coming out of this draft.

Time will tell, but I think the Chargers are going to look at 6-8 people drafted after him and think to themselves "man, what the **** were we doing?"

And frankly, Bosa had a chance to be a better version of Wistrom had he gone to a 4-3 team. He was going to be a damn good player in his own right.

jjchieffan 08-24-2016 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384635)
Would you form a lynch mob for the Chiefs to sign Tyson Jackson or Eric Fisher?
It was a similar shitty draft. Bosa's entitled to be misled by his agent.

2 teams trading up to take quarterbacks in this draft and you want to compare it to the draft that gave us Eric Fisher??? Please!! There was nobody willing to trade up with KC because there was NOBODY worth the first overall pick. This draft doesn't come close to that. So after weeks of knowing who the first 2 picks were, and therefore able to pretty much have their pick debated and decided on way ahead of time, this inept organization picks an overrated player who doesn't fit their scheme and you want to whine about a shitty draft?? They could have and should have picked ANYONE else that went in the top ten.

DaneMcCloud 08-24-2016 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384668)
We agree. The fact that you can name 6 other players that could've been picked at 3 shows how weak this draft was.

Understandably, no one wanted to trade up to 3.

Bosa's Mommy, Daddy and Agent aren't helping him at this point.

Whoa, hold on there, cowboy.

The fact that no one traded up to take a player is not an indication that the draft was "weak". Again, that's way too early to be determined.

I'm not going to re-hash the first round of the 2016 draft but after the Chargers picked Bosa, the next several picks fell exactly to teams with specific needs that were filled.

Elliott to the Cowboys, Ramsey to the Jags, Stanley to the Ravens, Buckner to SF (Chip Kelly/Oregon connection), Leonard Floyd to the Bears and so on.

DJ's left nut 08-24-2016 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384668)
We agree. The fact that you can name 6 other players that could've been picked at 3 shows how weak this draft was.

Understandably, no one wanted to trade up to 3.

Bosa's Mommy, Daddy and Agent aren't helping him at this point.

How many drafts have a no-brainer at 3?

Very very rarely. If there's a consensus, it rarely extends beyond the first couple of picks. There are usually 3-5 similarly tiered players in that range and then it's just a question of fit.

Bosa was pretty much the worst fit imaginable for SD. But that doesn't mean there weren't damn good players available to them there.

jjchieffan 08-24-2016 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384668)
We agree. The fact that you can name 6 other players that could've been picked at 3 shows how weak this draft was.

Understandably, no one wanted to trade up to 3.

Bosa's Mommy, Daddy and Agent aren't helping him at this point.

That doesn't show how weak the draft was. It is just a list of players that were better choices than Boss for the Chargers.

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12384683)
You can keep telling yourself that, but I see some legitimate studs coming out of this draft.

Time will tell, but I think the Chargers are going to look at 6-8 people drafted after him and think to themselves "man, what the **** were we doing?"

And frankly, Bosa had a chance to be a better version of Wistrom had he gone to a 4-3 team. He was going to be a damn good player in his own right.

Please name some of the other 'legitimate studs' that would have been worthy of the 3rd overall pick. There are arguments against all of them.
It was a weak draft class plain and simple.

DaneMcCloud 08-24-2016 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384696)
Please name some of the other 'legitimate studs' that would have been worthy of the 3rd overall pick. There are arguments against all of them.
It was a weak draft class plain and simple.

:facepalm:

The Franchise 08-24-2016 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384696)
Please name some of the other 'legitimate studs' that would have been worthy of the 3rd overall pick. There are arguments against all of them.
It was a weak draft class plain and simple.

Jalen Ramsey
Ezekiel Elliot
Ronnie Stanley
DeForest Buckner
Laremy Tunsil
Robert Nkemdiche

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12384692)
That doesn't show how weak the draft was. It is just a list of players that were better choices than Boss for the Chargers.

Alright here we go... the rest of the top 10 of the 2016 draft:
Ezekiel Elliott - SD drafted Melvin Gordon in 2015
Jalen Ramsey - Not a particular need. Ramsey had 1 INT at FSU. Seconary is OK.
Ronnie Stanley - Would have been a back-up to King Dunlap and was the 2nd ranked OT
DeForest Buckner - Bosa or Buckner seemed like the choice and Bosa won
Jack Conklin - 3rd ranked OT
Leonard Floyd - OLB was not a strong need and who is this guy?
Eli Apple - See Ramsey.

There were no good choices for the Chargers and no way to trade out of 3. The proof is right here. It was a weak draft class.

Chief Roundup 08-24-2016 05:40 PM

Someone is forgetting the history that San Diego has with signing their first round picks.
San Diego is the real problem here not Bosa.

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12384721)
Laremy Tunsil
Robert Nkemdiche

Too risky to be drafted at 3.

Easy 6 08-24-2016 05:50 PM

Not even talking smack, but when Rivers hangs' em up... :reaper:

That club has no direction, no identity, no ruling philosophy, they wont even have their own stadium soon

DaneMcCloud 08-24-2016 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12384740)
Not even talking smack, but when Rivers hangs' em up... :reaper:

That club has no direction, no identity, no ruling philosophy, they wont even have their own stadium soon

If they don't get a stadium deal done, the NFL and the city will probably spend $800 million to renovate the Murph.

LA doesn't want the Chargers or Raiders.

DaneMcCloud 08-24-2016 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384733)
Too risky to be drafted at 3.

Good lord

Gadzooks 08-24-2016 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12384757)
Good lord

Hey, NFL FO's don't like stoners with high picks (pardon the pun). Warren Sapp, Randy Moss, etc...
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...aremy-0429.jpg

Easy 6 08-24-2016 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12384755)
If they don't get a stadium deal done, the NFL and the city will probably spend $800 million to renovate the Murph.

LA doesn't want the Chargers or Raiders.

I see a lot of talk on the web about them playing in LA, but yeah that sounds like a huge cluster**** that would never work

Where else would they even go, St Louis maybe?

TigeRRUppeRRcut 08-24-2016 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384696)
Please name some of the other 'legitimate studs' that would have been worthy of the 3rd overall pick. There are arguments against all of them.
It was a weak draft class plain and simple.

Chris Jones.

:)

DaneMcCloud 08-24-2016 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384772)
Hey, NFL FO's don't like stoners with high picks (pardon the pun). Warren Sapp, Randy Moss, etc...

Yet, Hall of Famers.

Hell, it's *legal*'out here. Who cares?

Chiefshrink 08-24-2016 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12384005)
Or Ronnie Stanley. Or DeForest Buckner.

Literally anybody else they were rumored to be interested in, but instead they took Bosa to play him at 3-4 DE. LMAO

Was there any kind of indication that Bosa and his agent were going to conduct themselves this way? Was Bosa a diva in college? Or is this his agent or both??

DaneMcCloud 08-24-2016 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12384784)
I see a lot of talk on the web about them playing in LA, but yeah that sounds like a huge cluster**** that would never work

Where else would they even go, St Louis maybe?

If the referendum doesn't pass (and I doubt that it does), I think the NFL will up their ante to $500 million from $300, while giving the Spanos family a zero interest loan for the remainder of the Murph renovations.

The owners will lose more money with a move than they will with a renovation and the NFL *really* wants to be in San Diego.

Blackouts in Los Angeles will cost 4x as much as in Los Angeles than San Diego.

Kiimo 08-24-2016 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12384784)
I see a lot of talk on the web about them playing in LA, but yeah that sounds like a huge cluster**** that would never work

Where else would they even go, St Louis maybe?


If they went to LA (where nobody wants them, incidentally) they'd not only be fighting for fans in a notoriously ambivalent-towards-football town who among the few fans mostly root for they Raiders and Rams, they'd also be Stan Kroenke's bitch. I mean seriously. He'd be their landlord. I'm sure he'd be totally impartial and not use every opportunity he could find to sabotage their football team.

They have to stay in San Diego unless they get really bold and go to San Antonio or (haha) Oakland after the Raiders go to Vegas.


also this

Quote:

Official Statement from Joey Bosa's representatives:
It is unfortunate the San Diego Chargers have decided to manipulate facts and negotiate in the media. The team surely is not strengthening its relationship with Joey Bosa by taking this stance and making their position public.

We have decided that we will not engage in public negotiations or discuss numbers and/or terms in this negotiation.

We will say, that it is ironic that the team now takes issue with the timing of Joey’s arrival, since the Chargers unilaterally decided to remain silent for the first 14 days of training camp instead of replying in a timely fashion to the proposal we made on the eve of training camp on July 28th.

At this point, all we can do is continue to fight for a fair contract on behalf of our client, as we do for all of our clients. The Chargers can focus on trying to sway public opinion, but our focus will remain on our client and securing a contract for him that is fair and consistent with his draft position.

ToxSocks 08-24-2016 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12384729)
Someone is forgetting the history that San Diego has with signing their first round picks.
San Diego is the real problem here not Bosa.

Anything prior to the new CBA does not count. Completely different circumstances.

Kiimo 08-24-2016 06:44 PM

The funny thing is that the Spanos family has supported anti-tax, no hand-out politics. You know, Koch Brothers stuff.

And here they are. Begging voters for a hand-out.


That being said, I hope they get it for personal (Gaslamp pregame) reasons. Even if this measure doesn't pass it's really just to test the waters of the voting public.

This Bosa situation really doesn't help their cause. They should just give Bosa deferment or let him lose the language. Just give him one, and we're done. Your 3rd overall pick is in camp, fans are happy, fans who vote.

kc79 08-24-2016 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 12384460)
This is why I don't care.
The 5 or 6 other options for the 3rd pick wouldn't have been much better either.

Chris Jones would've been better lol

JoeyChuckles 08-24-2016 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12384597)
where does this rank in draft blunders/holdouts all time so far?

1. Bo Jackson

2. Elway?

3. Eli

4. Bosa (and climbing)

And none of them amounted to anything, so bad news for Bosa.

Bwana 08-24-2016 07:38 PM

Sweet draft pick!

Wildcat2005 08-24-2016 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12384447)
Link?

Because we already debunked your "3rd overalls get this" argument. I'd love to see some validity to this claim.

From what i understand, Elliot agreed to the same terms that the Chargers are offering Bosa.

And again, the Jags picking in the top 5 for the past 3 years skews that data. As well as the Rams this year...so when you say "Most" what does that even mean?

Not sure if you know what "debunked" means, nothing I said was wrong.
I think the slotting system started in 2012, which would include the Browns along with the Dolphins and Jags that agreed to what Bosa is asking

http://www.boltsfromtheblue.com/2016...rding-to-hoyle

Fact: Since the slotting system went into effect in 2012 (five drafts), every third overall pick has signed a contract in which either the offset was removed or their signing bonus was paid in full by the end of their rookie season, as Bosa is requesting.

Fact: 16 of the 20 top five picks from 2012-2015 either received their bonus by the end of their rookie season or had the offset language removed from their deal.

Fact: Three of the top five picks, and five of the top seven picks to have signed this year, either have no offset language or will receive their bonus before the end of the 2016 season.

Psyko Tek 08-24-2016 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12383986)
Apparently they offered to pay $10 million of his $17 million signing bonus up front and he refused.

this kind of judgement gets you a job slinging burgers
unless he actually went to class and got a degree...

HAHAHAHAHAH

staylor26 08-24-2016 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12384796)
Chris Jones.

:)

Lol Dorsey got a better 3-4 DE a round later.

CupidStunt 08-24-2016 09:31 PM

Why is there so much debate on who's to blame? If we know the facts, it should be quite obvious who's at fault. If we don't, how TF can we judge whose fault it is?

Chief Pagan 08-24-2016 10:55 PM

So I thought the point of the rookie pay scale was to end holdouts.

Why didnt the league create a standardized contract?

MMXcalibur 08-24-2016 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyChuckles (Post 12384932)
And none of them amounted to anything, so bad news for Bosa.

Eli Manning didn't amount to anything?

Dylan 08-25-2016 02:20 AM

Difference is that Eli was the consensus top #1 overall pick in the draft. He was a franchise quarterback prospect that could lead a team for the next 15-years. Add in Philip Rivers, who the Giants traded to the Chargers for Eli.

Archie Manning knew what he was doing – Eli has two Super Bowl rings.

From the San Diego Tribune:
Quote:

The team offered to No. 3 overall pick Joey Bosa and his representation Tuesday evening the highest cash payout in the initial calendar year for a first-round draft pick in team history, a source said Wednesday.

It was declined.

San Diego’s best offer featured an 85 percent cash payout in 2016, sources said, or $14,464,630.

In a span from July 28 to Tuesday, they moved from a 57 percent cash payout this calendar year to an 85 percent payout, sources said. In that span, Ayrault moved his position, albeit to a scale of lesser degree. He went from a 100 percent cash payout this calendar year to a number higher than 85 percent, one that allows for a seven-figure cash deferment to 2017, sources said.

With Ayrault’s refusal, the Chargers pulled their best offer, releasing a statement Wednesday.

“As a result, we will restructure our offer since Joey will be unable to contribute for the full 16 game season without the adequate time on the practice field, in the classroom, and in preseason games.”
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/...ontract-offer/


Bad decision that could cost a player millions of dollars.

BF88 08-25-2016 02:40 AM

The Chargers and Bosa are basically quarreling over $2.5M out of his $17M signing bonus.

Is there some millionaire in SD who can let Bosa borrow $2.5M and then get the money back from the Chargers in 2017 when the Chargers want to give him that $2.5M?

mdchiefsfan 08-25-2016 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12384519)
I seriously doubt that he gets cut and picked up by another team in his first contract anyway. When a team invests a top pick in a player, they are going to try everything to make the pick work out. When was the last time that a player drafted in the top 3, hell the top 15, was released in his first contract? Hell, Tyson Jackson was awful and stayed through his contract. Why? Because he was the 3rd overall pick. If he was a 5th round pick, he would've been gone by the end of season 2 at the latest. So Bosa and the Chargers are making a big deal out of something that will NEVER happen anyway.

There was also significantly more money invested in Jackson at the time.

I have no horse in this race; both are being stupid:

-Player X: "I just care about football."

-Team X: "We just want to bring a Championship to Town X."

They're all full of shit.

RippedmyFlesh 08-25-2016 05:25 AM

The bolts stuck with the 3rd pick in a 2qb class. Been there.

BlackHelicopters 08-25-2016 05:47 AM

I think Bosa is holding out, hoping for a trade. SD is quite far away from competing for SB's.

CoMoChief 08-25-2016 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BF88 (Post 12385215)
The Chargers and Bosa are basically quarreling over $2.5M out of his $17M signing bonus.

Is there some millionaire in SD who can let Bosa borrow $2.5M and then get the money back from the Chargers in 2017 when the Chargers want to give him that $2.5M?

I'm sure there is. Doesn't Denver participate in those kind of contract/cap shenanigans?

BleedingRed 08-25-2016 07:47 AM

I think BOSA's plan really is to hold out and reenter draft with the intent of playing for the Dallas Cowboys. Pure speculation

Mr. Laz 08-25-2016 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12385287)
I think BOSA's plan really is to hold out and reenter draft with the intent of playing for the Dallas Cowboys. Pure speculation

He will lose millions.

This year Laremy Tunsil dropped from No. 5 to No. 13 and it cost him at least $8 million.

hometeam 08-25-2016 08:40 AM

Joey Busta is a ****ing dumbass and so is his rookie agent.

Fat Elvis 08-25-2016 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 12385214)
Difference is that Eli was the consensus top #1 overall pick in the draft. He was a franchise quarterback prospect that could lead a team for the next 15-years. Add in Philip Rivers, who the Giants traded to the Chargers for Eli.

Archie Manning knew what he was doing – Eli has two Super Bowl rings.

From the San Diego Tribune:


http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/...ontract-offer/


Bad decision that could cost a player millions of dollars.

Bosa comes from an NFL family who happens to be pretty wealthy. He doesn't need the money. He knows he is going to get paid either by the Chargers this year or someone else next year.

Wildcat2005 08-25-2016 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Pagan (Post 12385185)
So I thought the point of the rookie pay scale was to end holdouts.

Why didnt the league create a standardized contract?

They did, the Chargers are not willing to pay it

What is going to be interesting is if the Chargers suck again this year and are picking in the top 5 of the 2017 NFL draft.

They have already said publicly "team precedent" doesn't allow them to offer market value contracts that top 5 picks typically get

Pogue 08-25-2016 09:23 AM

Chargers are ****ing stupid and possibly wasted a 3rd overall pick. Dumbasses.

tooge 08-25-2016 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dls6501 (Post 12384222)
Are you insinuating that you didnt bust your ass to even be in the position you are in now? Because basically you are saying that all the work Bosa has done PRIOR to being drafted is nothing. Which, in your example, means that working your ass of in school, college, getting internships, etc. mean "you havent done piss."

I didn't get paid shit when I came out of school.

CaliforniaChief 08-25-2016 09:36 AM

The Chargers wasted a 3rd round pick and are taking a terrible public beating for the way they do business, forcing them to TWEET out their offer.

Bosa comes off as a self-righteous, entitled douche who will ultimately lose millions of dollars and soil his reputation moving forward.

Who wins this one? Nobody.

ToxSocks 08-25-2016 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 12385413)

Who wins this one? Nobody.

Fans of the other 3 teams in the division?

BleedingRed 08-25-2016 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 12385413)
The Chargers wasted a 3rd round pick and are taking a terrible public beating for the way they do business, forcing them to TWEET out their offer.

Bosa comes off as a self-righteous, entitled douche who will ultimately lose millions of dollars and soil his reputation moving forward.

Who wins this one? Nobody.

People keep saying this like its a GIVEN........ Who is to say BOSA is not drafted in top 10 next year?

CaliforniaChief 08-25-2016 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12385419)
Fans of the other 3 teams in the division?

Yes, there is that. :D

ToxSocks 08-25-2016 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12385421)
People keep saying this like its a GIVEN........ Who is to say BOSA is not drafted in top 10 next year?

Doesn't matter. He won't be top 5. No way in hell. Lets say he goes 6-10, he would lose millions.

Take Jack Conklin for example: #8 Overall and his contract is worth almost 16mill TOTAL. Currently, Bosa is set to make more than that in just his signing bonus alone. The drop off is substantial.

NWTF 08-25-2016 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 12385236)
I think Bosa is holding out, hoping for a trade. SD is quite far away from competing for SB's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12385287)
I think BOSA's plan really is to hold out and reenter draft with the intent of playing for the Dallas Cowboys. Pure speculation

I dont think he or his family were thrilled being picked by the Chargers from the beginning. The Chargers are being cheapskates trying to keep both the deferred signing bonus and offset language in the contract. Which does appear to be on the douchey side of rookie contract deals, but not unheard of.

16 of the 20 top five picks from 2012-2015 either received their bonus by the end of their rookie season or had the offset language removed from their deal.

Bosa has said one or the other but not both which would be inline with most high pick rookie contracts. I dont get why you dont get rid of one to get him signed, but it is the Chargers.

The Chargers refuse. So you got a rookie who already has a sense of entitlement, who comes from a family thats well off (able and willing to hold out),and a team that is known as being cheapskates, and are here as well. The Chargers gambled here ala Eli Manning, picking an entitled diva knowing full well they were going to give him one of the more team friendly deals compared to most teams. The Chargers are morons picking this guy, and expecting him to take a worse deal than most of his peers in the same draft slot. Its pettiness on both sides at this point but this is Bosa's out if he really doesnt want to be there and the Chargers are just dumb no matter how you look at it.

BleedingRed 08-25-2016 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12385454)
Doesn't matter. He won't be top 5. No way in hell. Lets say he goes 6-10, he would lose millions.

Well maybe a few million is worth being on the team of his choice.

BlackOp 08-25-2016 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BF88 (Post 12385215)
The Chargers and Bosa are basically quarreling over $2.5M out of his $17M signing bonus.

There has to be some "behind-the-scenes" NFLPA/agent pressure not to accept any deviation from the normal contractual structure. It could open up the potential for future situations like this to be a recurring problem...which the new CBA was intended to prevent.

The Chargers are the ones that are trying to "juke" the system...and the owners ego is preventing him from the realization that he's not going to get his way. Publishing the contractual situation was intended to paint Bosa as being unreasonable...petty, under-handed move.

BleedingRed 08-25-2016 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NWTF (Post 12385457)

16 of the 20 top five picks from 2012-2015 either received their bonus by the end of their rookie season or had the offset language removed from their deal.

Bosa has said one or the other but not both which would be inline with most high pick rookie contracts. I dont get why you dont get rid of one to get him signed, but it is the Chargers.

This is the real problem, ****ing chargers

El Jefe 08-25-2016 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 12385341)
Joey Busta is a ****ing dumbass and so is his rookie agent.

I definitely don't agree with that. His family is pretty well off, so I'm sure he doesn't feel any pressure to take something he doesn't feel is right. That being said, I think the Chargers and the Bosa's are pretty ridiculous. If its guaranteed money, who cares if it comes 8 months later. I cannot believe he is willing to sit out a year, but then again, I don't come from a family with money. I would never pass money like that.

CoMoChief 08-25-2016 10:17 AM

I think at this point Bosa doesn't even want to be a Charger and since he doesn't care about the money that's being offered at this point.

Didn't know Bosa's great grandfather was Chicago mob boss Tony Accardo (Big Tuna), used to also work as a hitman under Al Capone in his early yrs. That's ****ing cool, and note to self, don't ever mess with that family or try to **** them over LMAO.

Wonder what kind of vetting the Chargers did on that. Those ****ers are still around too and are (and have been) in bed w/ the Daley's for decades. In a big city like that I'm sure they still carry some kind of pull.

SAUTO 08-25-2016 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12384192)
Yet to hear you specifically tell us why this a bad deal?

Not getting his whole signing bonus up front costs him money.

what do you think the extra 7 million is worth over a years time?

The Franchise 08-25-2016 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 12385461)
Well maybe a few million is worth being on the team of his choice.

How is he going to get the team of his choice being in the draft again?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.