ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The Chiefs are simply built to beat the Patriots’ in playoffs, says Fox Sports writer (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303835)

Pasta Little Brioni 11-19-2016 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfmanJoe (Post 12562775)
2014 Alex Smith and Jamaal Charles aren't walking through that door.

Instead we have a broken down version of that QB and a RB who runs a 4.5 instead of a 4.3.

Plus, what fantasy land are you living in where this team gets the #1 seed. ROFL

This team isn't beating anyone in the playoffs that isn't starting Brian Hoyer.

Your football knowledge is pathetic

ThaVirus 11-19-2016 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 12561634)
Chris Conley needs to start being implemented in the offense. I firmly believe that guy is a play maker not being used. It's a dangerous team if the offense magically clicks.


Strange that he's become nothing more than a possession receiver with his measurables

Pasta Little Brioni 11-19-2016 10:45 AM

Keep in mind this is the same Clay that beat off to Huard and LJ 2.7

NWTF 11-19-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfmanJoe (Post 12562775)
2014 Alex Smith and Jamaal Charles aren't walking through that door.

Instead we have a broken down version of that QB and a RB who runs a 4.5 instead of a 4.3.

Plus, what fantasy land are you living in where this team gets the #1 seed. ROFL

This team isn't beating anyone in the playoffs that isn't starting Brian Hoyer.

Right now Id pick them over Houston, AFC north winner, Denver, Oakland, basically all probable playoff teams other than NE.

dannybcaitlyn 11-19-2016 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12562793)
Strange that he's become nothing more than a possession receiver with his measurables

I won't pass judgment til a see him with a above avg quarterback. Has any #2 receiver been productive with smith at the helm?

ThaVirus 11-19-2016 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn (Post 12562817)
I won't pass judgment til a see him with a above avg quarterback. Has any #2 receiver been productive with smith at the helm?


Most #1s aren't even productive with Smith.

RunKC 11-19-2016 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 12562655)
Denver beat NE by first jamming receivers, disrupting timing. That allowed them to get pressure. The Chiefs playing man coverage 8 yards off will get shredded by Brady and Peters and company aren't great pressing.

The Chiefs are going to have to play a different type of defense than what they've been winning with. And it's going to have to be defense that beats NE. Or we can hope to face a different opponent in the post season

I agree with Sutton playing zone when they didn't have a running game and it worked well for the most part. We put them in bad situations and the pass rush didn't come through and that's what killed us.

3rd and 10
3rd and 13
3rd and 7
3rd and 7

They converted all of those mostly bc we had little pressure on Brady and he had all the time in the world.

If Houston is back to himself that will change drastically in our favor.

DaneMcCloud 11-19-2016 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12562793)
Strange that he's become nothing more than a possession receiver with his measurables

It's not surprising, at all, considering he's not explosive off the line. He's also got tight hips, something DJ's Left Nut had pointed out when he was drafted.

I don't think he'll ever have the physicality of an Anquan Boldin but if his ceiling is a 700-800 yard possession receiver, that's great value for a 3rd rounder.

ThaVirus 11-19-2016 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12562825)
It's not surprising, at all, considering he's not explosive off the line. He's also got tight hips, something DJ's Left Nut had pointed out when he was drafted.

I don't think he'll ever have the physicality of an Anquan Boldin but if his ceiling is a 700-800 yard possession receiver, that's great value for a 3rd rounder.


He's still got great speed and height with insane explosion off the ground. He should be a vertical and red-zone threat.

RunKC 11-19-2016 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12562835)
He's still got great speed and height with insane explosion off the ground. He should be a vertical and red-zone threat.

He is. Our QB missed him last week

NJChiefsFan 11-19-2016 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12562825)
It's not surprising, at all, considering he's not explosive off the line. He's also got tight hips, something DJ's Left Nut had pointed out when he was drafted.

I don't think he'll ever have the physicality of an Anquan Boldin but if his ceiling is a 700-800 yard possession receiver, that's great value for a 3rd rounder.

I also think he has decent after the catch skills.

notorious 11-19-2016 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12562850)
He is. Our QB missed him last week

God Damnit.


Smith missed some easy TD's last week. He needs to pull his head out of his ass.



If he figures out what is wrong, this team is going to be complete.

RunKC 11-19-2016 11:42 AM

Still blows my mind that Andy won't run more crossing routes with Conley. That's a tall ****ing guy with long arms, especially against midget CB's that Tampa will be sporting.

Andy needs to give all of the designed plays Harris gets and give them to Conley from now on. He's far more athletic and his hands are reliable.

Discuss Thrower 11-19-2016 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn (Post 12562817)
I won't pass judgment til a see him with a above avg quarterback. Has any #2 receiver been productive with smith at the helm?

#2 receiver based on position?

2011 - Kyle Williams: 20 catches, 241 yards 3 TDs (#1 Crabtree: 72 rec 874 yds 4 TDs)
2013 - McCluster: 53 catches, 511 yards 2 TDs (#1 Bowe: 57 rec 673 yds 5 TDs)
2014 - D' Thomas: 23 catches, 156 yards 0 TDs (Bowe replicated the year before stat wise with 0 TDs)
2015 - A Wilson: 35 catches, 451 yards 2 TDs.

threebag 11-19-2016 11:48 AM

This offense has had a ton of dropped passes it seems.

ThaVirus 11-19-2016 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12562850)
He is. Our QB misses him every week


FYP

DaneMcCloud 11-19-2016 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12562884)
FYP

That's silly. He has 50 less yards this season than Maclin.

The blame for Conley's low number of receptions (27) is due to Andy Reid's game plan.

Funny how Andy can game plan in shitty Albert Wilson when Maclin's out or Tyreek Hill (which isn't a complaint - just a comparison) yet Conley see 3 passes a game.

DaneMcCloud 11-19-2016 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12562858)
I also think he has decent after the catch skills.

For sure. He's made a huge leap from his rookie season. Many times, he looks like Maclin out there.

It's mind bottling why he's not more involved.

ThaVirus 11-19-2016 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12562890)
That's silly. He has 50 less yards this season than Maclin.

The blame for Conley's low number of receptions (27) is due to Andy Reid's game plan.

Funny how Andy can game plan in shitty Albert Wilson when Maclin's out or Tyreek Hill (which isn't a complaint - just a comparison) yet Conley see 3 passes a game.


Yeah, during Maclin's worst season as a pro while dealing with injury and the loss of a friend.

Mother****erJones 11-19-2016 12:26 PM

Conley should be used in the slot more

splatbass 11-19-2016 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 12562659)
We are not equipped this season to make the playoffs

We are 7-2 and in first place in the toughest division in football at week 11. WTF are you talking about?

Mother****erJones 11-19-2016 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfmanJoe (Post 12562775)
2014 Alex Smith and Jamaal Charles aren't walking through that door.

Instead we have a broken down version of that QB and a RB who runs a 4.5 instead of a 4.3.

Plus, what fantasy land are you living in where this team gets the #1 seed. ROFL

This team isn't beating anyone in the playoffs that isn't starting Brian Hoyer.

Hey Clay

RunKC 11-19-2016 07:16 PM

Ian Rapoport

#Patriots* pass-rusher Jabaal Sheard did not make the trip to SF to play the #49ers because of a performance-based decision.

That defense is a dumpster fire this year. Looks like Hoodie's moves are not working out for him for once after all.

Mother****erJones 11-19-2016 07:19 PM

God I hope that Patriots team implodes. Bart Scott was very animated this week on Inside the NFL while talking about Belichick and his way of doing things. Said if you're not part of that core 5 then you're always expendable. He said players will notice that and tend to not want to lay it all out there for him.

NJChiefsFan 11-19-2016 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12563477)
God I hope that Patriots team implodes. Bart Scott was very animated this week on Inside the NFL while talking about Belichick and his way of doing things. Said if you're not part of that core 5 then you're always expendable. He said players will notice that and tend to not want to lay it all out there for him.

I watched that segment. Didn't agree with him. History has proven that it works for Bill. Not only do players lay it on the line for him, they tend to do everything asked of them. Maybe if he stays past the Brady years and things get a little worse he might lose his players, but he isn't going to in this situation.

Mother****erJones 11-19-2016 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12563482)
I watched that segment. Didn't agree with him. History has proven that it works for Bill. Not only do players lay it on the line for him, they tend to do everything asked of them. Maybe if he stays past the Brady years and things get a little worse he might lose his players, but he isn't going to in this situation.

Agreed that it's worked well for him. But lets see how it works when Brady is gone.

Pointer19 11-19-2016 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12561507)
We meet the pats in the playoffs it will just be a repeat of last year maybe worse some how our offense has regressed from total ass to abysmal

Our defense is tearing it up. If we can nail down the offense part, I'd start to think we've got a good shot.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pointer19 (Post 12563503)
Our defense is tearing it up. If we can nail down the offense part, I'd start to think we've got a good shot.

People keep saying this yes the defense is doing well

What have you seen from the offense at all that makes you think there is even a slight chance of nailing it down hmmm ?

Pointer19 11-19-2016 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563505)
People keep saying this yes the defense is doing well

What have you seen from the offense at all that makes you think there is even a slight chance of nailing it down hmmm ?

You're putting words in my mouth. I never said there has been any proof. It doesn't mean it can't happen.

RunKC 11-19-2016 07:53 PM

Pats offense is better with Bennett but their defense is straight up trash this year.

We can absolutely beat them if we're healthy

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pointer19 (Post 12563509)
You're putting words in my mouth. I never said there has been any proof. It doesn't mean it can't happen.

I never said you did I said people keep saying this if the offense can get it down we have a real shot.

Where does this belief come from most of last year and almost all of this year has been a dumpster fire.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12563511)
Pats offense is better with Bennett but their defense is straight up trash this year.

We can absolutely beat them if we're healthy

There 15th overall if our offense isn't total trash at 27th overall how can there defense be trash at 15th ?

splatbass 11-19-2016 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563523)
I never said you did I said people keep saying this if the offense can get it down we have a real shot.

Where does this belief come from most of last year and almost all of this year has been a dumpster fire.

1. Alex Smith usually plays better in the playoffs.

2. We won a playoff game last year, and I think most people think the offense is better this year when healthy.

3. We lost by 7 in NE last year to a great team in their home in January, a very tough place and time to play. That is nothing to be ashamed of. A few plays turn out differently and we win that one and go to the AFCCG against a team we had beaten already.

4. We've seen this offense play better than the last couple of weeks, when we had a number of key injuries, including at QB. Foles sucked badly two weeks ago.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563531)
1. Alex Smith usually plays better in the playoffs.

2. We won a playoff game last year, and I think most people think the offense is better this year when healthy.

3. We lost by 7 in NE last year to a great team in their home in January, a very tough place and time to play. That is nothing to be ashamed of. A few plays turn out differently and we win that one and go to the AFCCG against a team we had beaten already.

4. We've seen this offense play better than the last couple of weeks, when we had a number of key injuries, including at QB. Foles sucked badly two weeks ago.

1.not last year
2.Jamal is not coming back so one half of SD and the oakland game was nothing mind blowing the offense is clearly worse this year healthy or not
3.Alex had one TD and played adequate defense was not terrible just needed more from our offense they had been sucking all year and it was bound to cost us a game in the playoffs last year.
4.the offense did the best it did all season under Foles during the indy game Oakland and SD was nothing to write home about.

splatbass 11-19-2016 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563540)
4.the offense did the best it did all season under Foles during the indy game

HAHAHAHA. ROFL

You should be a comic.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563542)
HAHAHAHA. ROFL

You should be a comic.


We had 422 total yards on offense

N. Foles
16-22, 223 YDS, 2 TD

Oakland chiefs

406 yards

A. Smith
19-22, 224 YDS no touch downs

Cant argue math Indy was this offenses best game.

splatbass 11-19-2016 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563551)
We had 422 total yards on offense

N. Foles
16-22, 223 YDS, 2 TD

Oakland chiefs

406 yards

A. Smith
19-22, 224 YDS no touch downs

Cant argue math Indy was this offenses best game.

We won both games. Yardage DOES NOT MATTER. WINS matter. At the end of the season they don't send teams to the playoffs based on the number of yards their QB threw for.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/p...6/seasontype/2

Top 5 in passing yards this season:

Drew Brees - not making playoffs

Matt Ryan - will likely make playoffs

Phyllis Rivers - not making playoffs

Kirk Cousins - could make playoffs, but probably not

Andrew Luck - not making playoffs

QBs likely to make playoffs:

Brady - #29

A. Smith - #27

Carr - #7

Seimian - #23

Flacco - #14

Osweiler - #26

Prescott - #18

Wilson - #11

Clearly passing stats don't correlate to making the playoffs.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563566)
We won both games. Yardage DOES NOT MATTER. WINS matter. At the end of the season they don't send teams to the playoffs based on the number of yards their QB threw for.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/p...6/seasontype/2

Top 5 in passing yards this season:

Drew Brees - not making playoffs

Matt Ryan - will likely make playoffs

Phyllis Rivers - not making playoffs

Kirk Cousins - could make playoffs, but probably not

Andrew Luck - not making playoffs

QBs likely to make playoffs:

Brady - #29

A. Smith - #27

Carr - #7

Seimian - #23

Flacco - #14

Osweiler - #26

Prescott - #18

Wilson - #11

Clearly passing stats don't correlate to making the playoffs.

I said in terms of offensive production is the indy game not our best game ?

splatbass 11-19-2016 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563571)
I said in terms of offensive production is the indy game not our best game ?

And I said who gives a shit? QB numbers mean very little as far as being a playoff team, and I PROVED IT. The best teams in the league have QBs with mediocre numbers.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563579)
And I said who gives a shit? QB numbers mean very little as far as being a playoff team, and I PROVED IT. The best teams in the league have QBs with mediocre numbers.

our numbers aren't even mediocre right now there abysmal.

threebag 11-19-2016 09:21 PM

You should go seek medical attention. You have to be pushing four hours.

splatbass 11-19-2016 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563589)
our numbers aren't even mediocre right now there abysmal.

A. Smith is two spots ahead of Brady. Did you even read my post?

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12563596)
You should go seek medical attention. You have to be pushing four hours.

I'm not even arguing at this point I'm actually astonished that people can look so blindly on stats and just say we win or Alex plays better in playoffs That's not a realistic view.

http://i65.tinypic.com/5nk4tj.jpg

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563600)
A. Smith is two spots ahead of Brady. Did you even read my post?

Brady has been suspended for the better part of the season.

NJChiefsFan 11-19-2016 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563579)
And I said who gives a shit? QB numbers mean very little as far as being a playoff team, and I PROVED IT. The best teams in the league have QBs with mediocre numbers.

It's not about stats. However it is about making plays. QB's will in all likelihood have to step up and be a big part of a win to get through the playoffs. Even in the years where QBs who aren't elite won it happened. Flacco played the best football of his life when the Ravens won and they needed him to. They also needed luck. Same thing with the Giants. Eli made some incredible throws in those SB's to beat NE twice. He also had that luck.

If KC expects to get past NE, and possibly beat a SEA, they will need Smith to really step up in those games. No matter how SEA is playing now, I expect them and NE to be incredibly tough to beat in the playoffs. You aren't beating them by just playing not to lose, which is absolutely how I thought we played against NE last year. I hated how that game played out and the game plan the coaches had.

Also, while your post on QB yards bears out your point well, listing Brady as 27th and implying that as part of your support is a little disingenuous. I would have thrown an asterisk on that one.

Reerun_KC 11-19-2016 10:44 PM

This offense is built to win playoff games /splatbass

splatbass 11-19-2016 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12563657)
This offense is built to win playoff games /splatbass

Not what I said at all.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12563657)
This offense is built to win playoff games /splatbass

I'm actually starting to lose my mind there is no defending this offense and saying well playoffs or Fantasy stats WTF!!!!!

http://i67.tinypic.com/2s9cg14.gif

It's a shit offense and it was shit last year its shit this year

and it's a hell of a'lot more shit then Den was last year or this year

FACT.

splatbass 11-19-2016 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12563653)
It's not about stats. However it is about making plays. QB's will in all likelihood have to step up and be a big part of a win to get through the playoffs. Even in the years where QBs who aren't elite won it happened. Flacco played the best football of his life when the Ravens won and they needed him to. They also needed luck. Same thing with the Giants. Eli made some incredible throws in those SB's to beat NE twice. He also had that luck.

If KC expects to get past NE, and possibly beat a SEA, they will need Smith to really step up in those games. No matter how SEA is playing now, I expect them and NE to be incredibly tough to beat in the playoffs. You aren't beating them by just playing not to lose, which is absolutely how I thought we played against NE last year. I hated how that game played out and the game plan the coaches had.

Also, while your post on QB yards bears out your point well, listing Brady as 27th and implying that as part of your support is a little disingenuous. I would have thrown an asterisk on that one.

We've seen Alex Smith play better in the playoffs than the regular season. It is not out of the question.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563667)
Not what I said at all.

You used Tom brady suspended year stats to justify our offense JUST WHAT?!!?!??!

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563670)
We've seen Alex Smith play better in the playoffs than the regular season. It is not out of the question.

last year playoff alex smith would not be the year to justify it

Alex and the entire offense meh in Texas

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...visional-round

splatbass 11-19-2016 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12563653)

Also, while your post on QB yards bears out your point well, listing Brady as 27th and implying that as part of your support is a little disingenuous. I would have thrown an asterisk on that one.

I had a momentary brain fart, but my point still stands.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563688)
I had a momentary brain fart, but my point still stands.

it really doesn't.

we have played some of the worse defenses in the league and have looked atrocious

oakland 25
New Orleans 29
Indianapolis 28
Carolina 24
San deigo 27

The bottom will fall out our offense will look just has bad as it did against jacksonville when we play a real d again.

splatbass 11-19-2016 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563704)
it really doesn't.

we have played some of the worse defenses in the league and have looked atrocious

oakland 25
New Orleans 29
Indianapolis 28
Carolina 24
San deigo 27

The bottom will fall out our offense will look just has bad as it did against jacksonville when we play a real d again.

I'm pretty sure this means the offense will look good, since your football takes are always wrong.

oaklandhater 11-19-2016 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563707)
I'm pretty sure this means the offense will look good, since your football takes are always wrong.

Was right about New England last year and was right on KeiVarae Russell


and it's not take it's math football is math.....

BlackOp 11-20-2016 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563716)
Was right about New England last year and was right on KeiVarae Russell


and it's not take it's math football is math.....

Oh gee..playing in NE without half of your stars...you're brilliant.

Please tell us all how the Patriots are going to compensate for the loss of Collins/Jones?

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12563808)
Oh gee..playing in NE without half of your stars...you're brilliant.

Please tell us all how the Patriots are going to compensate for the loss of Collins/Jones?

excuses are like what ???

our offense was showing signs of trouble long before we went to new england.

BlackOp 11-20-2016 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12563811)
excuses are like what ???

our offense was showing signs of trouble long before we went to new england.

No...you act like the NFL is static. Like Sutton didn't learn anything from Belichicks game-plan last winter. Like KC could withstand losing 3-4 of its best players against NE in NE. Like the Patriots wont be affected by losing 2 of its 3 best defenders.

KC was fine until a shit-ton of injuries just happened..and guess what..they still won. Take a look at the mighty Steelers and how that team handled injuries to their best players...yep, they've lost like 4 in a row.

How long have you been watching football again?...its a game of attrition.

splatbass 11-20-2016 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12563819)
No...you act like the NFL is static. Like Sutton didn't learn anything from Belichicks game-plan last winter. Like KC could withstand losing 3-4 of its best players against NE in NE. Like the Patriots wont be affected by losing 2 of its 3 best defenders.

KC was fine until a shit-ton of injuries just happened..and guess what..they still won. Take a look at the mighty Steelers and how that team handled injuries to their best players...yep, they've lost like 4 in a row.

How long have you been watching football again?...its a game of attrition.

And Dorsey has given us good depth, enough to win even if the wins aren't pretty. That is really all you can ask of a team, to keep winning despite losing key players to injury.

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12563819)
No...you act like the NFL is static. Like Sutton didn't learn anything from Belichicks game-plan last winter. Like KC could withstand losing 3-4 of its best players against NE in NE. Like the Patriots wont be affected by losing 2 of its 3 best defenders.

KC was fine until a shit-ton of injuries just happened..and guess what..they still won. Take a look at the mighty Steelers and how that team handled injuries to their best players...yep, they've lost like 4 in a row.

How long have you been watching football again?...its a game of attrition.

KC was not fine our offense 28th overall when everything was said and done the writing was on the wall that the offense was gonna cost us a game when it mattered and it did.

NJChiefsFan 11-20-2016 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563670)
We've seen Alex Smith play better in the playoffs than the regular season. It is not out of the question.

I agree. I also think it's reasonable for some to be concerned that it isn't trending in that direction. Hopefully we see signs of it today.

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12563688)
I had a momentary brain fart, but my point still stands.

Got ya.

Mother****erJones 11-20-2016 08:27 AM

Some QBs are just better postseason QBs. Flacco, Eli, and Alex Smith are three I think of that people clown on but can get it done. Alex hasn't won a super bowl but he got the 49ers close and has been really good with KC. Alex Smith isn't the reason we've lost those games. Frankly, his NE game last season showed he'll make the necessary plays. Now, this is what I'm hanging my hat on since Alex is struggling right now. My hope is that today he rebounds with his best game of the year and gets his confidence back.

JD10367 11-20-2016 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12563477)
God I hope that Patriots team implodes. Bart Scott was very animated this week on Inside the NFL while talking about Belichick and his way of doing things. Said if you're not part of that core 5 then you're always expendable. He said players will notice that and tend to not want to lay it all out there for him.

Since the beginning of 2001: 189-60 in the regular season. Yup, any day now, Bart Scott. "This team hates their coach."

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 03:16 PM

Thread title looks like a joke now.

notorious 11-20-2016 03:17 PM

Too bad the Chiefs aren't built to beat the Bucs.

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12566708)
Too bad the Chiefs aren't built to beat the Bucs.

Chiefs are built to hang with any team in the nfl which is why this team will suck in the playoffs

Titty Meat 11-20-2016 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12562769)
The Chiefs can absolutely beat the Pats.


They skull-****ed them 2 years ago, and were a dropped INT away from tying/winning in New England last year.


Jesus you guys, pull your head out of your ass.

Lol

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 03:25 PM

Some people look like total jackasses on here now its beautiful.....

notorious 11-20-2016 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12566773)
Lol

What is so funny about that post?


It's all true if this team pulls it's head out of it's ass.

Titty Meat 11-20-2016 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12566789)
What is so funny about that post?


It's all true if this team pulls it's head out of it's ass.

It's not true at all. This team can't score 17 points on the Pats.

Eleazar 11-20-2016 03:28 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pJOm2mRHDE0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smasher (Post 12566799)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pJOm2mRHDE0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12561530)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pJOm2mRHDE0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Thunder stealing mother******

notorious 11-20-2016 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12566789)
What is so funny about that post?


It's all true if this team pulls it's head out of it's ass.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12566796)
It's not true at all. This team can't score 17 points on the Pats.

Read

Titty Meat 11-20-2016 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12566814)
Read

I read your post and pulling it's head out of its ass suggests they aren't playing to their potential which is false. We're 10 games in now this offense has been bad for most of it.

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12566828)
I read your post and pulling it's head out of its ass suggests they aren't playing to their potential which is false. We're 10 games in now this offense has been bad for most of it.

oakland and indy are the only passes and Alex barely played in one

notorious 11-20-2016 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12566828)
I read your post and pulling it's head out of its ass suggests they aren't playing to their potential which is false. We're 10 games in now this offense has been bad for most of it.

They are playing to their potential now?



Holy shit.

Prison Bitch 11-20-2016 03:41 PM

Lol @ this thread

oaklandhater 11-20-2016 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 12566901)
Lol @ this thread

Yeah its comedy gold :)

New World Order 11-20-2016 03:46 PM

Is Pete Grathoff, Tigerbob?

scho63 11-20-2016 04:00 PM

We couldn't beat the Browns the way we played today


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.