Foul was not flagrant

should have been an OPI though

LMAO

This is just too funny

Hoculi always shitty and we almost always get the shaft when he calls our games.

Worst is when Hoculi refs a Chiefs/Bronco game ... terrible ... no lube ... dry all the way

It's always just if this happened, or change 2 plays and this. **** your what ifs. Smith had a chance to win the game after the Defense bent but didn't break and he failed. End of story.

They "abused" us for 19 points.

People need to quit blaming the defense when they are relied on every game to win it for us. They are bound to give up plays at some point.

The offense has won us how many game this year? 1?

Seven point swing from that pick in the end zone. You must have forgotten points off turnovers in that insane knowledge you claim to have forgotten.

You always want to flush everyone that's been here forever.

Here's a board just for you, your brother wouldprobably enjoy some company.

http://royalsplanet.com/forum/royals...splanet-lounge

Holy shit you are dumb. Are you really implying that every offensive drive must result in points in order to win a game? Did Montana/brady/young/manning score on every single drive and when they didn't did their team lose?

If you can't comprehend that moving the football in the positive direction is still production in the overall strategy of football, then you are a lost cause. There is a reason why Colquitt is one of the highest paid punters you asshat.

I like days like this because it really shows the contrast in intelligence to be found on CP. Only the deplorables come in full force on days like this.

The defenseive bias on this game is insane the offense is ranked 28th you morons den is 16th there is almost nothing redeemable about this offense and it's not just injuries that's causing them to suck

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

You are calling a possession that ends in a punt a positive...

I hurt your feelings? Yes?

I can't get over the line "Alex Smith set up colquitt to land the ball at the 4 yard line"...

That's not a positive you ****ing idiot. Absolutely not a positive

:D

No, you are hurting your family's feelings. They are wondering how they are related to you at this point.

CP deplorables ->" field position is not a thing. Colquitt makes big money because he is cute. I like turtles."

Kind of Bob Dole's point.

Ok, guys, not sure where to put this observation about Alex Smith, but I figure a thread that's about the defense is as good of a place as any!

Anyway, not sure if you guys heard Smith's post-game interview? As much as I'd agree that he's a mediocre (or worse) QB, I'll give the guy one thing. He's one sharp dude. His answers to questions were very well thought out, and his observations about the game were insightful. One item that I remember was his comment about the significance of us going 3 and out twice after our first drive. He felt that those were opportunities missed that could've changed the nature of the game early on.

Of course, he owned up to the endzone interception as he said he lost sight of the safety. Heck, I don't think he even said anything about it being tipped.

I guess my point here is that Alex is a sharp guy who probably has a better feel for the game that I give him credit for. I'm also wondering if some of his reluctance to "take chances" is possibly Reid-driven as Andy also seems risk averse. So maybe, just maybe, just a tad of Alex's overly careful demeanor is encouraged by Reid?

In sum, I was impressed by Smith's interview and responses. Just wish he'd adopt a more aggressive game. Damn, he really is an enigma.

If you're on the same side as Sauto, Oak, and Rabble in an argument you should re-evaluate your life.

Yes, MeatRock. I'm looking at you. It's not too late to get that degree .

Ditto.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxQA2znHiDo

San Fran gave us a guy who went 20-5-1 under Harbaugh... but the idiots on this forum want us to gamble on the next Geno Smith.

Don't look at me, i don't want to lose brain cells from your moronic stare.

and the defense had a chance to win the game if they could ever stop the bucs

they didn't

Andy had a chance to win the game if he wasn't an idiot

he didn't

How your troll ass is allowed to keep posting here but clay is banned is beyond Comprehension

Scoring more points is the most important thing.

Sorry I hurt your feelings dude. It's just a game.

Oh but they did. Multiple times in the red zone. Held them to what 4 FG's? That's ****ing decent on a bad day. Tell me what the offense did again after those stops?

We are ranked 28th total offense 2 years in a row we are pushing for worse offense in the league the Alex smith experiment should be over by this point

This question will go unanswered by bob dole bass and tiger it's mind blowing

Offense scored enough points to win if Andy Reid and the defense hadn't given up a field goal right before half when they shouldn't have.

Or maybe you don't give up 24 first downs, 19 of which were on passes.

Common sense, use it.

already answered it, you cock munch

Good point. This is a team we beat 4/5 times. NFL isn't college football, every team has a fair chance to win every sunday and we fed TB so many opportunities.

I guarantee there was no drive that started out and the coaches and players thought "man I sure hope we can set up colquitt for a chance to pin them deep"

If that's not the intent it was not a successful drive, therefore not a positive for Alex Smith

Or the Defense did just enough that we could have won if the offense doesn't turn the ball over in the end zone, then ran back to the 50. Seven point swing off a turnover into triple coverage.

Not with any reasonable answer other then the offense sucks and it's not good enough I've not seen one of them say it

true or false, if tampa doesn't score 3 pts because of Andy Reids timeout stupidity and the Defense not making a stop it changes the 19-17 loss.

True.

True or false, IF Alex Smith holds that ball that gets int'd in double coverage and we kick a fg it changes the 19-17 loss.

Even if we won Tampa's defense sucks and it would have been another game of the defense carrying this shit offense we are ranked 28th on offense and there has zero signs of that improving true or false ?

Seattle Seahawks average offensive yards/game: 342 Rank = 20
Kansas City Chiefs average offensive yards/game: 333 Rank = 26
NFL league average: 352


Offensive production does not equal wins. This takes a decent level of intelligence to understand. So I would advise you call your Mom over to explain if this is too complicated for you

Seahawks have a way better defense then we do.

Where are the pats and raiders in offensive production?

Nice cherry pick bob.

:shake:

True or false: if Andy Reid doesn't call a TO on 2nd and 11 with the clock running, TB doesn't kick a FG at the end of the first half.

So why do you keep bringing up Winston's yards today?

God.

Because that offensive production won the game, totally making his point. Duh!

Or maybe the defense doesn't give up 24 first downs to the other team? :shrug:

Last 4 Superbowl winners...
Denver Broncos ranked 16th in offensive yards/game
New England Pats ranked 11th in offensive yards/game
Seattle Seahawks ranked 17th in offensive yards/game
Baltimore Ravens ranked 16th in offensive yards/game

Chiefs had 2 TD's and the ball inside the 10 2X. We should have scored 4 TD's.

IDGAF about 3rd downs given up by the defense. They gave up 19 points. FFS the NFL average points given up is like 22 PPG.

True or False: Winston sets up his punter to pin us deep in our own end instead of scoring pts, Chiefs win.

Where were they at in points scored?

That's the REAL issue here, we can't get it in the end zone.

But deflect all you want.

He always brushes off Alex's lack of yards as meaningless "fantasy football" stats.

Suddenly, it's the most important stat of the day.

But we were over the average in third down conversions on offense.

Checkmate.

Points off turnovers. Hard to win with that along with a bunch of 3 and outs. No chance to keep the Buc's offense off the field and rest the Defense. The offense did nothing to control the game.

You understand field position is part of the game of football and an offense that moves the ball 40 yards down the field puts their team in favorable position regardless if points are scored?

Or do we have special teams there to make sure the owners don't keep all the money to themselves?

Not sure if you are an idiot or just a clay level troll ....or both

You want the offense to put up points but how much can you expect if the other team controls time of possession 35 to 25 as a result of their ability to create first downs?

Uh, that's not entirely true. The defense did little to get themselves off the field.

Ok, say we do that every drive do we win or lose?

Well I think his post explained how he expected more points scored.

We knew Mike Evans would own whatever corner we had covering outside of Peters. It happened. Defense did themselves no favors, but holding them to FG's was an accomplishment.

You realize you trade picks and extend QBs to pick up critical 3rd downs and not set up the punter right, or did the lack of oxygen to your brain from your uncle's cock lodged down your throat stunt your development?

Isn't that what i just said?

That was my point, are you agreeing with me?

Make no mistake, nobody thinks the defense played great today. They did not play well. They still held the opposing team to 19 points. The offense didn't step up and do their part. The defense has won so many games for this team, how about the offense do their ****ing part for once.

True, definitely

My point is that there was more than one reason we lost the game.

Of course Alex Smith's terrible pass for an interception was one of those reasons.

Here's where the defense hurt us today....

Field position...
3rd down conversions...
Stops on critical downs...

They couldn't hold them at the half...
They couldn't keep them out of the endzone after the INT...
They couldn't get a stop at the end of the game when we needed it on 3rd down..

Save one drive, the Bucs didn't have great starting field position the entire game. In fact, one of their drives started on their own 4 yard line and they just waltzed right down the field. The only times they didn't score was when Winston dropped the ball and when they got called for a holding penalty.

Other than that, the Bucs had their way with our defense today. On the ground, in the air, 3rd and long, didn't matter.

The offense left 11 points on the field, no questions about it. But the defense was not good at all today. I think the score is not indicative of how bad they played. Maybe that's a good thing, I don't know.

This is really all that needs to be said out offense is ranked 28th there is no defending it anymore.

That doesn't matter. Score TD's when you have the ball inside the 5

Is this the only logical thought you could create? To even think that we have to score on every drive is the only way to win is laughable. Thanks for showing us your 5th grade intelligence bud by not understanding football strategy.

The offense and special teams did the defense a favor pinning the Bucs inside the 4 after they had just moved the ball 40 yards... but the defense went on to **** up the field position game by allowing the Bucs to move the ball 60 yards.

I agree the defense isn't blameless but when you hold a team to 19 points at home you should win

We had 0 pressure today. None. Nada. Zip. Nothing up the middle. Sutton was either scared to call a blitz or we didn't execute them. I rarely saw any kid of LB blitzes or S blitzes.

We had several tackles for losses or short gains that we missed. All of their WR's were open all game. We can say we held them to 19 points but we can also be lucky we didn't give up 30+.

Defense was on the field way to much and most of it was their own fault in this case.

That's frustrating there. I lay a lot of that on Reid and Kelce. Yeah, Smith threw the INT but that rarely happens. Bad play calls and dropped balls have been a plague throughout the season.

The number one priority for an offense is to score points. Period. If you are on the 5 yard line 1st and goal. You better score a ****ing TD.

Oh **** you. You'll blame Kelce but not Smith?

Not every drive, an nfl team should score when they get inside the ten years line on a much better than 50% clip though.

I don't think we need to score on every drive you helmet wearing shitlord. I'm laugh at you for praising a QB for setting up the ****ing punter. You are praising the 2nd highest paid player on the team for doing the bare ****ing minimum.

That's not what I said, now is it?

At least a fg

I don't know why Reid decides to trick teams when we are inside the 10? Smash the ball ahead, or bootleg, etc. But the crafty TE sweep or sideways 5 yards behind the LOS have killed us.

Uh yeah. You'll lay the blame on Reid and Kelce but Smith gets a pass because he hardly throws INTs.

When you are in the redzone you need to come away with a fg or a td anything else is a failure.