ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Are you in favor of releasing Tyreek Hill? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322570)

Hammock Parties 04-25-2019 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 14231037)
He will be playing for another team if released and nobody will care in a year. It's horseshit.

The Chiefs are going to **** themselves hard and he will go play for Denver or Oakland or something awful.

**** KCTV5, **** Brooke Bryor, **** the Chiefs if they release him.

Why Not? 04-25-2019 09:41 PM

****. I guess so man. He’s either at worst a horrific piece of shit or at best a major dumbass who won’t get away from a crazy bitch who just tanked her shot at $100 mill. Either way, I don’t see how they can keep him. But figuring out a way to get something for him would be awesome.

kcpasco 04-25-2019 09:42 PM

Why won’t Pryor write some articles blasting the Browns for signing Hunt. It might win her some respect back with locals. But there is probably some unwritten rule about bashing another team as a beat reporter.

RetiredSeniorChief 04-25-2019 09:45 PM

So, release him so he can sign with the Browns? Patriots? Chargers? Raiders? Broncos?

Pitt Gorilla 04-25-2019 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231052)
Hill being such a rare talent really complicates the Chiefs morality....He's a superstar that isn't easily replaced...and will have 31 teams ready to take him off their hands.

Absolutely. Kareem Hunt got a contract and positive press with Cleveland. Hill is a significantly better player. If the league says he can play, he’ll play. Period.

BlackOp 04-25-2019 09:46 PM

If they release Hill...he will get counseling, split from his toxic relationship and be a changed man. Thats the PR spin his new team will sell...and Hill's superstar talent will make them forget all about it.

I hope Chunt is patient and lets the legal system play out...

arrwheader 04-25-2019 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14231068)
The Chiefs are going to **** themselves hard and he will go play for Denver or Oakland or something awful.



**** KCTV5, **** Brooke Bryor, **** the Chiefs if they release him.



Thats a glorious trio of ****s. Well done.

keg in kc 04-25-2019 09:49 PM

I don't know enough to make that call.

If they do think they've seen enough to release him I'm fine with that.

The timing of all this seems very odd. Again. Although better now than halfway through the season.

Eleazar 04-25-2019 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231133)
If they release Hill...he will get counseling, split from his toxic relationship and be a changed man. Thats the PR spin his new team will sell...and Hill's superstar talent will make them forget all about it.

I hope Chunt is patient and lets the legal system play out...

Do toxic relationships make you punch 3 year olds?

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-25-2019 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 14231016)
I am in the suspend indefinitely and make the league office rule first. Retain his rights so you dont get burned on the compensation if he ever gets back into the league.

This. Straight releases are for chumps and idiots.

kcpasco 04-25-2019 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 14231157)
Do toxic relationships make you punch 3 year olds?

It’s cool as long as you wait 6 months. All is forgiven.

Eleazar 04-25-2019 09:50 PM

I assume that a lot of the "No" votes are trolling but I don't understand how there could be ANY serious no votes.

RetiredSeniorChief 04-25-2019 09:51 PM

Why release him, when now you can sign him for significantly less money. Take any suspension, get counseling, sign for less $$, win Superbowl.

kcclone 04-25-2019 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14229611)
He doesn't deserve the ability to play another down in the NFL.

The best thing for his kid (and future twins) is for Hill to keep his income.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-25-2019 09:53 PM

It's total bullshit is what it is. Chiefs are screwed either way they go.

kcpasco 04-25-2019 09:53 PM

Or maybe a lot of the NO votes are because of the NFL’s hypocrisy. I wish someone at the Star would write about that.

Chief_For_Life58 04-25-2019 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 14229606)
And if you vote no - you'd better have a good damn reason for doing so.

No because we'll cut him and then some other team will get to sign him and get him for the next 6 years of his prime

cooper barrett 04-25-2019 09:54 PM

Keeping Hill is a NO WAY but holding him at bay and getting good money for him should be a no brainer. How to do that is how the front office demands the money they get.

Eleazar 04-25-2019 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief_For_Life58 (Post 14231190)
No because we'll cut him and then some other team will get to sign him and get him for the next 6 years of his prime

He won't play a down of football this year. Maybe not next year either.

Bump 04-25-2019 09:56 PM

Only if he's banned from the NFL. He's a shit human being, but we knew that going in and if we cut him then some other team just gets to pick him up cheap while they laugh at us for just handing him over to them. There's no honor in this league. I'm ok with him being perma banned from the NFL tho.

cooper barrett 04-25-2019 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcclone (Post 14231169)
The best thing for his kid (and future twins) is for Hill to keep his income.

He can pump gas with Don Pepe at Costco for all I care. He certainly will not be coaching in our schools.... will he?/

Hammock Parties 04-25-2019 09:56 PM

Remember that the Chiefs didn't release Hunt for ****ing up.

They released him for lying to them.

Don't **** this up, Chiefs.

kcpasco 04-25-2019 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14231215)
Remember that the Chiefs didn't release Hunt for ****ing up.

They released him for lying to them.

Don't **** this up, Chiefs.

I think you are about to witness some serious bs that should make you question anything you are told.

MaHomies 04-25-2019 10:00 PM

If we release him, we are 2 years away from the title. I say wait for the NFL.

Mecca 04-25-2019 10:01 PM

If Kareem Hunt runs wild in the Browns run to the playoffs..no one will talk about his suspension it will just be how awesome he is and how great a move they made to steal him.

Seriously no one cares about domestic violence in the NFL until they basically are forced to and then it's forgotten about just as fast.

crazycoffey 04-25-2019 10:03 PM

I said no, with the current info available to me (likely a small percentage of all the variables). Waiting to see how the nfl, the chiefs organization and the final findings of criminal or civil process before I’d change my vote. Even then, is it best to cut him or trade him?


Obligatory addition to this post, of course I do not support domestic violence and if all the powers that be find this incident or past incidents, indicate he should be dropped, I’d support it.

Pitt Gorilla 04-25-2019 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14231240)
If Kareem Hunt runs wild in the Browns run to the playoffs..no one will talk about his suspension it will just be how awesome he is and how great a move they made to steal him.

Seriously no one cares about domestic violence in the NFL until they basically are forced to and then it's forgotten about just as fast.

of course, this is exactly what I said would happen when Hunt was released.

Unless the NFL suspends him permanently, hill will be signed as soon as he’s available. Nobody will care about hill’s issue at that point.

kcclone 04-25-2019 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14231283)
of course, this is exactly what I said would happen when Hunt was released.

Unless the NFL suspends him permanently, hill will be signed as soon as he’s available. Nobody will care about hill’s issue at that point.



Releasing Hunt got us absolutely nothing. The Browns, Pats and rest of the NFL were LOL’ing though

Mr_Tomahawk 04-25-2019 10:18 PM

https://www.instagram.com/p/BeVyvncg...d=qvs7da3pmvkj

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-25-2019 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14231283)
of course, this is exactly what I said would happen when Hunt was released.

Unless the NFL suspends him permanently, hill will be signed as soon as he’s available. Nobody will care about hill’s issue at that point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcclone (Post 14231302)
Releasing Hunt got us absolutely nothing. The Browns, Pats and rest of the NFL were LOL’ing though

And do you think the lesson will be learned this time around? Is it possible that we could get SOMETHING halfway worth a **** out of this mess?

Trent Green GOAT 04-25-2019 10:33 PM

I believe in second chances, he blew his.

Couch-Potato 04-25-2019 10:48 PM

I have to honestly say no. He's going to play ball in the nfl no matter what, if he's going to have to seek rehabilitation then he might as well do it with KC. That said, if Clark Hunt wants to let him go then so be it, I trust in the Chief.

My suggestion to him would be to separate from his girl, take time away from the kid, seek counseling, take anger management and parenting classes.

ChiefsLV 04-25-2019 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14231240)
If Kareem Hunt runs wild in the Browns run to the playoffs..no one will talk about his suspension it will just be how awesome he is and how great a move they made to steal him.

Seriously no one cares about domestic violence in the NFL until they basically are forced to and then it's forgotten about just as fast.

This. Total bullshit that we have to give him up to take the high ground but after he serves his suspension, some other team would benefit and the narrative would change back to being about his game changing talent and how this other team took a chance and it worked out. **** that

kcpasco 04-25-2019 11:07 PM

Still NO. Roger will have to make a decision at some point.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-25-2019 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 14231309)

Holder and kicker ROFL

PunkinDrublic 04-25-2019 11:13 PM

Another reason to hate our old defensive coordinator. We had one of the most historically dynamic offenses last year and you couldn’t even put together a halfway decent defense. **** you!!!

Gotta start getting used to life without Tyreek.

tx4chiefs 04-25-2019 11:23 PM

Innocent until proven guilty... He hasn't been convicted of anything.

BlackOp 04-25-2019 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14231240)

Seriously no one cares about domestic violence in the NFL until they basically are forced to and then it's forgotten about just as fast.

Just like the reporters that seem SO offended...it's all horseshit. They move on as soon as a new scoop comes and they can get clicks.

It's a completely fake moral outcry...that the parrots and sheep latch onto..until there is another one.

It's bizarre to watch how easily people are swayed...

Where are all those SJW that demanded Hunt be shit canned? After the dust settled, they realized their emotions had been manipulated...and really dont give a shit anymore.

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2019 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231133)
If they release Hill...he will get counseling, split from his toxic relationship and be a changed man. Thats the PR spin his new team will sell...and Hill's superstar talent will make them forget all about it.

I hope Chunt is patient and lets the legal system play out...

He doesn't get that luxury anymore. Can anyone really trust that excuse anymore? I think we're downplaying how bad this looks outside of kc. This is kareem hunt times a million.

Hammock Parties 04-25-2019 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231655)
Just like the reporters that seem SO offended...it's all horseshit. They move on as soon as a new scoop comes and they can get clicks.

It's a completely fake moral outcry...that the parrots and sheep latch onto..until there is another one.

It's bizarre watch how easily people are swayed...

virtue signaling

a digital high horse for losers to ride every time someone famous puts a toe out of line

BlackOp 04-25-2019 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tx4chiefs (Post 14231634)
Innocent until proven guilty... He hasn't been convicted of anything.

Dont going saying that...it contradicts the blood lust.

chiefzilla1501 04-25-2019 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsLV (Post 14231548)
This. Total bullshit that we have to give him up to take the high ground but after he serves his suspension, some other team would benefit and the narrative would change back to being about his game changing talent and how this other team took a chance and it worked out. **** that

No team is picking tyreek up for a very very long time. And unlike hunt, we knew this could happen. Let's stop comparing the two. At this point, the optics of any team picking up tyreek will be Greg hardy level bad. It doesn't matter if he's innocent or not at this point. Let's be realistic.

TinyEvel 04-25-2019 11:47 PM

I voted no on this before I heard the news about the audio tape

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-25-2019 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231655)
Just like the reporters that seem SO offended...it's all horseshit. They move on as soon as a new scoop comes and they can get clicks.

It's a completely fake moral outcry...that the parrots and sheep latch onto..until there is another one.

It's bizarre to watch how easily people are swayed...

Where are all those SJW that demanded Hunt be shit canned? After the dust settled, they realized their emotions had been manipulated...and really dont give a shit anymore.

Dude I'm telling you as sure as I sit at this computer typing a post, 98% of the posters on this forum who went Full-Midol Needed today WILL at some point lament the Chiefs, THE CHIEFS, for letting go of Tyreek Hill during this upcoming football season.

They will not say, "I'm pissed at Tyreek for ****ing this up".

They will not say, "I'm pissed at the press for swaying public opinion"

They will not say, "I'm pissed at John Dorsey for drafting Hill"

And they will most assuredly NOT say, "I'm pissed at Tyreek and Cristal for being shitty parents".

What they WILL say, is "Goddamn the ****ing Chiefs for jumping the gun and releasing this player".

You watch. You wait. You'll see.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-25-2019 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 14231678)
No team is picking tyreek up for a very very long time. And unlike hunt, we knew this could happen. Let's stop comparing the two. At this point, the optics of any team picking up tyreek will be Greg hardy level bad. It doesn't matter if he's innocent or not at this point. Let's be realistic.

With all due respect, I REALLY think you're undervaluing what truly drives this league. But, we'll see I'm sure.

chiefzilla1501 04-26-2019 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14231699)
With all due respect, I REALLY think you're undervaluing what truly drives this league. But, we'll see I'm sure.

While that's usually true. I think the league sees a very very big difference between kareem hunt and Larry Johnson, and cases like Vick, hardy, and hill. Even the fans do too. Jerry jones was harassed nonstop for signing hardy.

-King- 04-26-2019 12:14 AM

My first post was a troll post


But honestly, I don't care either way. I think the NFL will come down hard on him either way and force the chiefs to cut him but if they don't, I'll understand if they don't cut him and I'll understand if they do.

I have no relationship with tyreek so my feelings about him being a piece of shit don't really mean anything. I don't care about football players outside the field and I don't really feel embarrassment some of you guys feel about this situation. That's just weird to me. I wouldn't feel bad winning with him on the team like you guys say you would. The past few years when he scored a touchdown, I was too busy cheering that my team did something good to be mad or sad that a woman beater had scored a TD.

I'll also cheer when Frank Clark gets a sack. And I bet most of you will too. I just can't put myself in a position where I'm like "I'll cheer for you if you just beat a woman, but if she's pregnant and then you beat your child later, that's too far!". Seems to me, it would be an all or nothing proposition.

chuxtrux 04-26-2019 12:15 AM

Chiefs: Okay Tyreek, even through you have a history where you beat up a pregnant lady and punched her in her belly, you are a good enough football player that we will give you 100 million dollars. We aren't saying that you have to be a saint, or even a somewhat good person. We are just asking that you won't punch a toddler and break his arm. Can you do that?

Hill: No

BlackOp 04-26-2019 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuxtrux (Post 14231766)
Chiefs: Okay Tyreek, even through you have a history where you beat up a pregnant lady and punched her in her belly, you are a good enough football player that we will give you 100 million dollars. We aren't saying that you have to be a saint, or even a somewhat good person. We are just asking that you won't punch a toddler and break his arm. Can you do that?

Hill: No

That's valid except we dont know if Hill was actually the one who broke his arm...his girl seems pretty ****ing crazy...so you cant completely rule that out. She's the level of crazy that she could do that...and use it a bargaining chip.

cooper barrett 04-26-2019 12:21 AM

Chuxtrux Who were the guys on 23rd hat did van and truck customs?


In memory or Roger Hurst....


Quote:

Originally Posted by chuxtrux (Post 14231766)
Chiefs: Okay Tyreek, even through you have a history where you beat up a pregnant lady and punched her in her belly, you are a good enough football player that we will give you 100 million dollars. We aren't saying that you have to be a saint, or even a somewhat good person. We are just asking that you won't punch a toddler and break his arm. Can you do that?

Hill: No


-King- 04-26-2019 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231772)
That's valid except we dont know if Hill was actually the one who broke his arm...his girl seems pretty ****ing crazy...so you cant completely rule that out. She's the level of crazy that she could do that...and use it a bargaining chip.

He beat her up when she was pregnant. As crazy as she might be....he's 50 steps crazier.

I get wanting him to still be on the team but you people still defending him and still trying to accuse others of shit is sad.

But then again, you're just a troll. I'm surprised you aren't saying his girlfriend works for the NFL and this is a part of their rigging. Clown.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-26-2019 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231772)
That's valid except we dont know if Hill was actually the one who broke his arm...his girl seems pretty ****ing crazy...so you cant completely rule that out. She's the level of crazy that she could do that...and use it a bargaining chip.

Mmm...she's certainly not very bright as evidenced by the turning over of the recording to her "friend", but at this point all we know is that she uses the belt.

BlackOp 04-26-2019 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14231792)
Mmm...she's certainly not very bright as evidenced by the turning over of the recording to her "friend", but at this point all we know is that she uses the belt.

Well...remember the first place this information was dropped, after the police rejected it, was to TMZ. Who does that if the welfare of the child is really a concern? A tabloid?

Fast forward to his so-called girlfriend setting him up on the phone then giving it to KCTV5.

See a pattern here..this isn't a normal flow of behavior, there is some premeditated shit going on.. I think this girl is psycho...who gives this recording out the day after you just get cleared with no charges?

None of this makes rational sense...

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-26-2019 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231803)
Well...remember the first place this information was dropped, after the police rejected it, was to TMZ. Who does that if the welfare of the child is really a concern?

Fast forward to his so-called girlfriend setting him up on the phone then giving it to KCTV5.

See a pattern here..this isn't a normal flow of behavior, there is some premeditated shit going on.. I think this girl is psycho...who gives this recording out the day after you just get cleared with no charges?

None of this makes rational sense...

I did not recall or remember that. Are you sure TMZ was in possession of this? And was it given over to them by Cristal's "friend"? If so, it would seem to me that they did not find it incriminating enough to run with it. I don't know if they would pay for it either under those conditions.
As far as the welfare concern, I would think that it was given over with the hopes of having the same success as the Hunt affair. But maybe they just don't do audio alone and wanted some video to back it up a bit? I certainly would. Outside of KC and the rabid furor, that audio makes most people say "huh"? It's just not a vivid picture unless you're using a predisposed mind to color in the details IMO.

BoxWine_Stouffers_TubeSock 04-26-2019 02:29 AM

Buncha ****in pussies and reeruns on this forum. The man hasn't even been charged with anything and most of you are calling for him to get the boot. **** every single one of you brainwashed virtue signaling snowflakes. You disgust me and you ain't no Chief fan. **** YOU

TwistedChief 04-26-2019 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14231803)
Well...remember the first place this information was dropped, after the police rejected it, was to TMZ. Who does that if the welfare of the child is really a concern? A tabloid?

TMZ? What planet are you on? Stop making up shit to get Sweet Daddy all excited. It's beneath even you and he's fragile at the moment.

kcpasco 04-26-2019 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahomes_Is_God (Post 14231835)
Buncha ****in pussies and reeruns on this forum. The man hasn't even been charged with anything and most of you are calling for him to get the boot. **** every single one of you brainwashed virtue signaling snowflakes. You disgust me and you ain't no Chief fan. **** YOU

I’m only trying to salvage the situation. I bet most of these hypocrites would still watch a Browns or Redskins game if it was on. Virtue Signaling while being complicit.

kcpasco 04-26-2019 02:40 AM

Browns vs. Patriots with Kareem starting, who do you root for? OMG I love this shit.

chiefzilla1501 04-26-2019 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 14231838)
I’m only trying to salvage the situation. I bet most of these hypocrites would still watch a Browns or Redskins game if it was on. Virtue Signaling while being complicit.

Right because there's a player on either of those teams that previously hit a pregnant girlfriend. Good grief. If you can't see the difference between what kareem hunt did and whatever lame redskins example you're throwing out there, and what made tyreek hill controversial in the first place then you're on a planet of your own. Beyond your beloved buzzwords... Tyreek will undoubtedly be suspended. He'll be an enormous distraction. And I'm not giving a long term contract to a guy on his third chance who's pretty much one tiny mistake away from being suspended indefinitely.

Chiefs4TheWin 04-26-2019 03:37 AM

Well I mean he kinda has to go. Can't get rid of Kareem Hunt for what he did and not off a dude for busting his childs arm. All of those "There's always next year" people.. is there really?

chiefzilla1501 04-26-2019 03:37 AM

It's going to be a really really long summer for anyone not resigned to the inevitable. We don't even know the full story and given that what we haven't heard yet is because it warrants further investigation, each new revelation is not going to be good. God bless if you're still holding out hope I suppose.

kcpasco 04-26-2019 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 14231851)
Right because there's a player on either of those teams that previously hit a pregnant girlfriend. Good grief. If you can't see the difference between what kareem hunt did and whatever lame redskins example you're throwing out there, and what made tyreek hill controversial in the first place then you're on a planet of your own. Beyond your beloved buzzwords... Tyreek will undoubtedly be suspended. He'll be an enormous distraction. And I'm not giving a long term contract to a guy on his third chance who's pretty much one tiny mistake away from being suspended indefinitely.

Ok so you have a definition on what is ok and what is not. I’m kinda OCD and prefer specific rules.This is why I want an NFL specific ruling. But I’d probably have better luck dating a supermodel.

Rasputin 04-26-2019 03:42 AM

I just assume sit him on the bench for rest of his contract so no other team can play him against us.

Rasputin 04-26-2019 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 14231861)
I just assume sit him on the bench for rest of his contract so no other team can play him against us.

Also he can rot in hell.

rabblerouser 04-26-2019 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 14231851)
Right because there's a player on either of those teams that previously hit a pregnant girlfriend. Good grief. If you can't see the difference between what kareem hunt did and whatever lame redskins example you're throwing out there, and what made tyreek hill controversial in the first place then you're on a planet of your own. Beyond your beloved buzzwords... Tyreek will undoubtedly be suspended. He'll be an enormous distraction. And I'm not giving a long term contract to a guy on his third chance who's pretty much one tiny mistake away from being suspended indefinitely.

Right, the difference between Kareem Hunt and Tyreek Hill is :

Kareem has multiple infractions with different, random people.

Tyreek has had 2 incidents with the same, toxic person...a person who baits him and pushes his buttons. Both incidents have happened while she was pregnant.

Sounds like Tyreek needs to stay away from that one specific person forever.

rabblerouser 04-26-2019 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 14231792)
Mmm...she's certainly not very bright as evidenced by the turning over of the recording to her "friend", but at this point all we know is that she uses the belt.

And that she's a liar.

Mecca 04-26-2019 04:34 AM

She isn't very bright, in that tape she basically says Hill was abusive to the kid in front of her and that she is aware of things..

Does she know by CPS standards that makes her guilty as well?

-King- 04-26-2019 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 14231861)
I just assume sit him on the bench for rest of his contract so no other team can play him against us.

Why would you assume that?

-King- 04-26-2019 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14231874)
She isn't very bright, in that tape she basically says Hill was abusive to the kid in front of her and that she is aware of things..

Does she know by CPS standards that makes her guilty as well?

She could easily say she feared for her life and the kids life if she contacted authorities and given his history and what he says in the end, that would be believable.

rabblerouser 04-26-2019 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14231874)
She isn't very bright, in that tape she basically says Hill was abusive to the kid in front of her and that she is aware of things..

Does she know by CPS standards that makes her guilty as well?

Um, if that's the case, then not only is she guilty of child endangerment, but she perjured herself in family court and is guilty of obstruction.

Some "friend" to release that recording to the media.

rabblerouser 04-26-2019 05:42 AM

The only reason we should release Hill is if he gets the Haglund's and his spirit isn't willing.

rabblerouser 04-26-2019 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14231879)
She could easily say she feared for her life and the kids life if she contacted authorities and given his history and what he says in the end, that would be believable.

Except for the fact that she's left him and come back numerous times, including early March when she went back to him after moving back to Oklahoma...and the way she baits him on the recording.

The "feared for her life/kid's life" angle would get torn apart by any decent attorney.

I ain't saying the crazy bitch is a gold digger, but...

GloryDayz 04-26-2019 05:55 AM

**** Tyreek Hill (!!!!), but won't vote until the NFL details the conditions of his future in the NFL. I'll be dammed if I'll put up with this moron re-****ing us later because the NFL decides to give him a third chance.

Did I mention **** Tyreek Hill!

tyreekthefreak 04-26-2019 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14231879)
She could easily say she feared for her life and the kids life if she contacted authorities and given his history and what he says in the end, that would be believable.

She doesn't sound like she's afraif of anything on the recording! Keep Reek! Keep Reek! Keep reek!

jaa1025 04-26-2019 06:02 AM

I voted no because the NFL has a punishment system in place and I say let that run its course and handle the situation if and when he comes back.

I'd rather the Chiefs retain his rights and try to trade him in a year or two when he comes back than lose him to a contender for nothing.

rabblerouser 04-26-2019 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyreekthefreak (Post 14231901)
She doesn't sound like she's afraif of anything on the recording! Keep Reek! Keep Reek! Keep reek!

This.

BUT...seeing as both incidents involved her, I'd stipulate that he needs to get a restraining order against her and abide by the terms, i.e. no contact forever.

jaa1025 04-26-2019 06:05 AM

Derrick Thomas would have been chased out of town as would several Chiefs greats with today's media and social media.

GloryDayz 04-26-2019 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaa1025 (Post 14231903)
I voted no because the NFL has a punishment system in place and I say let that run its course and handle the situation if and when he comes back.

I'd rather the Chiefs retain his rights and try to trade him in a year or two when he comes back than lose him to a contender for nothing.

Agree.. We've seen this movie... The last thing we need is an angry Tyreek Hill coming back into Arrowhead just to **** us, at least not without lots of compensation.

rabblerouser 04-26-2019 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaa1025 (Post 14231906)
Derrick Thomas would have been chased out of town as would several Chiefs greats with today's media and social media.

Yup, DT and Dale Carter are the first two to come to mind...

KChiefs1 04-26-2019 06:26 AM

Cleveland is drooling at the thought.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.