ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs suspended Tyreek Hill (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322576)

Sassy Squatch 04-25-2019 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 14231595)
Pointed this out earlier. If this had all come to light a few months later the Chiefs would be screwed. As it is it sucks to lose an incredible WR, but he was a fifth round rookie on his first contract.

Yeah. I'm sure we could've gotten most of the money back eventually but better to just not have to deal with it.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-25-2019 11:15 PM

Chiefs apparently love Metcalf. I can see them trading up to grab him

PutQuinnIn 04-25-2019 11:15 PM

Wait for the Fax to come in.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-25-2019 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 14231598)
This sort of rationalization is a common and totally understandable coping mechanism.

I'm telling you, there's no justification for hitting a kid. There is nothing to be learned from it.

The cognitive dissonance of believing your parents love you while knowing they mistreated you is ****ing hard to deal with.

The thing is, they probably did love you. But that doesn't mean they didn't mistreat you. Being able to acknowledge that fact is when the real personal growth begins. But it's a tough ****ing process.

I really hope Tyreek's kid gets set up with a great therapist who knows how to handle early childhood trauma. He's going to need it.

Sad thing is the kid will be in a foster home for the next 15 years.

frozenchief 04-25-2019 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231586)
Remember when Kelce has maturity issues now you don’t hear a peep because he has grown up on the field. Hill needs to follow whatever Kelce did to get it turned around.

In fairness, Kelce’s maturity issues involved making a jerk-off motion at a ref. Hill’s involve physical abuse of a toddler. Maybe it’s me but those seem really far apart.

Shiver Me Timbers 04-25-2019 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231596)
Dorsey doesn’t give a shit. If we released Hill, He would be a Brown tomorrow morning

Just like King Carl Peterson, Dorsey has a 5 year plan. It started in KC and ends in Cleveland.

chuxtrux 04-25-2019 11:18 PM

If Tyreek Hill was a model citizen he wouldn't be a Chief ... he would have been a top 10 pick in the 2016 draft. I am surprised the Chiefs got 3 good years out of him before something blew up. Time to move on. It was going to happen at some point.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-25-2019 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers (Post 14231610)
Just like King Carl Peterson, Dorsey has a 5 year plan. It started in KC and ends in Cleveland.

Dorsey is playing chess while Clark Hunt is playing checkers

Shiver Me Timbers 04-25-2019 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuxtrux (Post 14231611)
If Tyreek Hill was a model citizen he wouldn't be a Chief ... he would have been a top 10 pick in the 2016 draft. I am surprised the Chiefs got 3 good years out of him before something blew up. Time to move on. It was going to happen at some point.

Chux gotta good point evenif he lives in Elvis's basement

Hammock Parties 04-25-2019 11:20 PM

You know who the bigger winner in this is?


wazu 04-25-2019 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 14231598)
This sort of rationalization is a common and totally understandable coping mechanism.

I'm telling you, there's no justification for hitting a kid. There is nothing to be learned from it.

The cognitive dissonance of believing your parents love you while knowing they mistreated you is ****ing hard to deal with.

The thing is, they probably did love you. But that doesn't mean they didn't mistreat you. Being able to acknowledge that fact is when the real personal growth begins. But it's a tough ****ing process.

I really hope Tyreek's kid gets set up with a great therapist who knows how to handle early childhood trauma. He's going to need it.

Just curious - when you say "hitting a kid" do you include any form of spanking?

ROYC75 04-25-2019 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14231571)
Still trying to figure out what a 3 year old could do that would warrant being whipped by a belt.

Nothing!

Tyreek probably has Schizophrenia, anger issues, plus some improper parenting when Tyreek was a child.

Best22 04-25-2019 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14231571)
Still trying to figure out what a 3 year old could do that would warrant being whipped by a belt.

Maybe the 3 year old punched Crystal in the stomach?

mr. tegu 04-25-2019 11:21 PM

Chiefs suspended Tyreek Hill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14231571)
Still trying to figure out what a 3 year old could do that would warrant being whipped by a belt.


He would probably ask you what it would take to use a belt, and when you said nothing would make you, he would be as appalled that you wouldn’t use a belt that many people are that he does use a belt.

Using a belt for discipline isn’t like some evolutionary instinct we have to suppress. He learned it growing up, probably thinks it helped him given his career success, and sees no issue with using it on his kid but instead truly thinks it is a positive method of discipline. The problem is the person he had a kid with likely wasn’t a positive enforcement on encouraging him to change or may even agree with those tactics. Getting him to change his views on it would be very difficult as he would just point to the successful results of his own upbringing. Of course that doesn’t mean the attempts shouldn’t be made.

BigRedChief 04-25-2019 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14231439)
This can't happen again.

IT CAN'T.

It's not ****ing fair.

Hunt had known anger issues before the draft. Thats why he dropped. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,


Hill had known issues with anger. Serious violence. The Chiefs knew and did the rest of the NFL. Thats why he dropped to to us in the 5th. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,

Clark had issues with violence before the draft. The Chiefs trade for him. give him a ton of money. Will history repeat itself.

Shiver Me Timbers 04-25-2019 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231612)
Dorsey is playing chess while Clark Hunt is playing checkers

Don't tell Clark. He went to private shcool

wazu 04-25-2019 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 14231627)
Hunt had known anger issues before the draft. Thats why he dropped. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,


Hill had known issues with anger. Serious violence. The Chiefs knew and did the rest of the NFL. Thats why he dropped to to us in the 5th. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,

Clark had issues with violence before the draft. The Chiefs trade for him. give him a ton of money. Will history repeat itself.

Did their homework this time. Feel very comfortable that's all in his past.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-25-2019 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Best22 (Post 14231625)
Maybe the 3 year old punched Crystal in the stomach?

Tyreek would give him a good star for that!

Sassy Squatch 04-25-2019 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 14231626)
He would probably ask you what it would take to use a belt, and when you said nothing would make you, he would be as appalled that you wouldn’t use a belt that many people are that he does use a belt.

Using a belt for discipline isn’t like some evolutionary instinct we have to suppress. He learned it growing up, probably thinks it helped him given his career success, and sees no issue with using it on his kid but instead truly thinks it is a positive method of discipline. The problem is the person he had a kid with likely wasn’t a positive enforcement on encouraging him to change or may even agree with those tactics. Getting him to change his views on it would be very difficult as he would just point to the successful results of his own upbringing. Of course that doesn’t mean the attempts shouldn’t have been made.

You're missing the point. The kid was 3 ****ing years old. What could a 3 year old possibly do to warrant that?

ROYC75 04-25-2019 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231604)
Sad thing is the kid will be in a foster home for the next 15 years.

How old are you ? No, Really!

You got a habit of just throwing shit out there hoping it will stick.

Or it's the fact you feel you have to say something, to add to the cause when you have no proof of it!

BlackOp 04-25-2019 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231612)
Dorsey is playing chess while Clark Hunt is playing checkers

No doubt about that...have to think this is some karmic payback for ****ing him over. Hunt...Hill...Berry blowing out his Achilles.

Good thing Mahomes is immune to petty shit...the gods like him better than everyone else.

scho63 04-25-2019 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231586)
Remember when Kelce has maturity issues now you don’t hear a peep because he has grown up on the field. Hill needs to follow whatever Kelce did to get it turned around.

These two issues aren't even in the same universe. :rolleyes:

RealSNR 04-25-2019 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231550)
Nah actually it taught me discipline and to never make the same mistake again. It’s a life lesson. However I never got punched in the chest let alone when I was 3

You seem to believe in that mode of discipline strongly because it worked for you when you were a kid, right?

Let's say you have a kid, and you're among the best at what you do in your field. A new benefit package is instituted at your work to show their appreciation for you. "In four years if you keep up your same level of productivity while also doing absolutely nothing to make us think you're a giant piece of shit in your domestic life, we will pay you 10s of millions of dollars in guaranteed money to continue working for us, thereby setting you and your family up financially for the rest of your life."

All you have to do is make sure nobody gets the slightest notion in their head, whether true or false, that you might be even sorta abusive. That's it.

Would you still discipline your child with a belt?

I'm not proposing this hypothetical to debate the morality of using the belt or any other implement to discipline your kid. I'm saying if that offer came to you, do you really think using a belt on your kid is the way to go? Do you think you would continue to use that mode of discipline as a parent and not think anything of the possibility that your work might view that as behavior unworthy of their mega millions in cash reward?

That's what I'm getting at. Tyreek was THIS close to getting those millions, and he did that to his ****ing kid anyway.

New World Order 04-25-2019 11:25 PM

I'm going from waking up every morning and checking to see if we executed a blockbuster trade to waking up every morning to see if Tyreek has been released.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2019 11:26 PM

Okay, so you don't want to cut Hill so that another team gets a shot at him. Where do you draw the line?

If one of these dudes beat the shit out of your wife or child, would you still hope the Chiefs held onto him if he could take the top off of a defense?

Sassy Squatch 04-25-2019 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 14231643)
I'm going from waking up every morning and checking to see if we had executed a blockbuster trade to waking up every morning to see if Tyreek has been released.

He's not playing anytime soon regardless of of he's on the team or not, so don't worry about it.

carcosa 04-25-2019 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 14231621)
Just curious - when you say "hitting a kid" do you include any form of spanking?

I mean, yeah. Somebody the child innately trusts to protect them is physically hurting them. It's a lower degree of trauma, but it's still trauma. So, in my opinion, it's unacceptable.

I understand that tradition and the frustration of parenting make spanking acceptable to a lot of people, and I don't judge those people for being raised to believe it's ok. But based on what I've learned about how trauma affects people, I will never, ever spank my own kids. Ever.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-25-2019 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14231642)
You seem to believe in that mode of discipline strongly because it worked for you when you were a kid, right?

Let's say you have a kid, and you're among the best at what you do in your field. A new benefit package is instituted at your work to show their appreciation for you. "In four years if you keep up your same level of productivity while also doing absolutely nothing to make us think you're a giant piece of shit in your domestic life, we will pay you 10s of millions of dollars in guaranteed money to continue working for us, thereby setting you and your family up financially for the rest of your life."

All you have to do is make sure nobody gets the slightest notion in their head, whether true or false, that you might be even sorta abusive. That's it.

Would you still discipline your child with a belt?

I'm not proposing this hypothetical to debate the morality of using the belt or any other implement to discipline your kid. I'm saying if that offer came to you, do you really think using a belt on your kid is the way to go? Do you think you would continue to use that mode of discipline as a parent and not think anything of the possibility that your work might view that as behavior unworthy of their mega millions in cash reward?

That's what I'm getting at. Tyreek was THIS close to getting those millions, and he did that to his ****ing kid anyway.

Tbh yes. Nowadays this nation is getting soft. Everyone gets offended by anything and expects handouts. A little discipline in someone’s life would change them and ultimately change this country.

FAX 04-25-2019 11:28 PM

Great Jesus ...

Corporal punishment with a damn belt? What kind of belt? I'm pretty sure that some belts are designed to hurt more than others. Some belts will simply leave welts while others are embedded with metal that cuts right through to the bone. And I'm sure some guys consider the buckle the business end.

Why not beat the kid with a snowshoe? Or strangle him with a pair of pants?

WTF are we talking about here?

FAX

007 04-25-2019 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14231445)
Tyreek is done. If he for some reason doesn’t get released, he will absolutely get railroaded by the NFL.

They made the commissioners exempt list for these situations.

Yeah, because it worked out so well with Hunt right? NFL screwed the Chiefs on that one.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2019 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231648)
Tbh yes. Nowadays this nation is getting soft. Everyone gets offended by anything and expects handouts. A little discipline in someone’s life would change them and ultimately change this country.

Can you point me to the data that demonstrates that hitting your kid with a belt results in greater success for the child?

kcpasco 04-25-2019 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14231644)
Okay, so you don't want to cut Hill so that another team gets a shot at him. Where do you draw the line?

If one of these dudes beat the shit out of your wife or child, would you still hope the Chiefs held onto him if he could take the top off of a defense?

Hill is getting suspended by the Chiefs because the NFL refuses to make a proper policy. Why do you have problem with this?

Clark got bent over last time and his asshole probably still hurts.

mr. tegu 04-25-2019 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14231635)
You're missing the point. The kid was 3 ****ing years old. What could a 3 year old possibly do to warrant that?


I believe you are missing the point. Mainly that while a belt is appalling to you, it probably isn’t to him (in fact it might a great tool to him) and therefore questions like what the kid could do to deserve it are not relevant in his perspective. It might be like someone who is appalled by spanking asking a parent who regular spanks occasionally for discipline what they could possibly do to deserve it.

Frazod 04-25-2019 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 14231544)
It's dispiriting to see so many people say "my parents kicked my ass and I'm fine." You might think you are, but I guarantee that you're repressing a LOT of shit that needs to be unpacked.

Trauma is really ****ing complicated.

You know, maybe we're not. Maybe we just learned from it, gained strength from it, without the need of headshrinkers, prescribed personality-altering drugs, therapy dogs or ****ing safe spaces.

I remember once I was goofing off in the grocery store. A woman I didn't know smacked the shit out of me, then grabbed me by my ear and took me to my mom and told her what I did and what she did. Mom's reaction - she was mortified - not because a stranger had hit her child, but because her child had created a situation that warranted a stranger hitting her child. So she smacked the shit out of me again, thanked the woman and apologized for my behavior. Then, after we got home, I got my ass kicked a third time. Now, this was well over 40 years ago, and I don't even remember what I did in the first place to rate those three beatings, but I'm damned sure I never did it again.

I guess you'd want the woman in the grocery store to get 20 years hard labor, right? :shake:

FAX 04-25-2019 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 14231627)
Hunt had known anger issues before the draft. Thats why he dropped. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,


Hill had known issues with anger. Serious violence. The Chiefs knew and did the rest of the NFL. Thats why he dropped to to us in the 5th. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,

Clark had issues with violence before the draft. The Chiefs trade for him. give him a ton of money. Will history repeat itself.

Peters is another example of a Dorsey guy with "character" issues. His history was not known to be as violent, of course.

Unless you count the bus attack on the coach.

They couldn't fix him, either.

FAX

RealSNR 04-25-2019 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 14231627)
Hunt had known anger issues before the draft. Thats why he dropped. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,


Hill had known issues with anger. Serious violence. The Chiefs knew and did the rest of the NFL. Thats why he dropped to to us in the 5th. The Chiefs thought they could fix him. They were wrong,

Clark had issues with violence before the draft. The Chiefs trade for him. give him a ton of money. Will history repeat itself.

The first time I ever heard of the "known" anger issues with Hunt, it was after the February report where he got into that altercation in Ohio. And even then, I can't quite remember what these issues were, because they were pretty much, "Oh, he has a short fuse and gets angry." The dude didn't have a past of beating his girlfriends or anything (at least not reported).

The whole, "Kareem Hunt came back to bite them" thing is bullshit. In the case of Hunt, yes, the Chiefs knew what they were getting into and they ****ing did it anyway. Hunt was far more of a blindside to them (and probably whoever else in this league that would have ended up drafting him). He was graded in the 3rd round by a lot of teams. Things that dropped him were things like the lack of breakaway speed, the heavy workload in college, the highlights only against small conference schools and talent, etc. Sure, "He has anger issues" probably was known by teams when they evaluated his personality and fit in a locker room, but let's not claim that he dropped to the 3rd round because of that. That's just inaccurate.

carcosa 04-25-2019 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231648)
Tbh yes. Nowadays this nation is getting soft. Everyone gets offended by anything and expects handouts. A little discipline in someone’s life would change them and ultimately change this country.

I'd argue that decade upon decade of parents hitting their kids for fear of being "soft" is a big part of what ****ed this nation up in the first place.

It's possible to be firm and assertive and discipline your kids without coming close to traumatizing them. It's just a lot harder than kicking their ass and being done with it.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2019 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 14231652)
Hill is getting suspended by the Chiefs because the NFL refuses to make a proper policy. Why do you have problem with this?

I think the NFL should not be in the business of employing violent criminals. If other teams want to, that's their prerogative, but I see no reason why the Chiefs, or their fans, would want to reward violent criminals because they're good at football.

If the Chiefs win the AFCCG, does it make you a better parent? Does it make you better at your job? It's a fun thing to discuss and complain, and get excited about, but it's still just a form of entertainment. That's all it is. If you pass the buck because the NFL won't make a policy you are condoning the behavior.

And if the Chiefs have to lose a few football games because they aren't going to give millions of dollars to people who are societal menaces, I'm okay with that. Maybe you're not.

RealSNR 04-25-2019 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231648)
Tbh yes. Nowadays this nation is getting soft. Everyone gets offended by anything and expects handouts. A little discipline in someone’s life would change them and ultimately change this country.

The nation is getting soft.

And you don't get your mega millions.

Thanks for playing. You just lost the game of life. The work still would have owed you that money if you made it the four years and then started disciplining your kid that way again.

Hammock Parties 04-25-2019 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14231656)
You know, maybe we're not. Maybe we just learned from it, gained strength from it, without the need of headshrinkers, prescribed personality-altering drugs, therapy dogs or ****ing safe spaces.

I remember once I was goofing off in the grocery store. A woman I didn't know smacked the shit out of me, then grabbed me by my ear and took me to my mom and told her what I did and what she did. Mom's reaction - she was mortified - not because a stranger had hit her child, but because her child had created a situation that warranted a stranger hitting her child. So she smacked the shit out of me again, thanked the woman and apologized for my behavior. Then, after we got home, I got my ass kicked a third time. Now, this was well over 40 years ago, and I don't even remember what I did in the first place to rate those three beatings, but I'm damned sure I never did it again.

I guess you'd want the woman in the grocery store to get 20 years hard labor, right? :shake:

I once got damn near a concussion because my dad was clowning around in the backyard with me and our doberman and the doberman rammed me into a wall headfirst.

My dad should have gone to prison for sure, the dog should have been put down.

Sassy Squatch 04-25-2019 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 14231653)
I believe you are missing the point. Mainly that while a belt is appalling to you, it probably isn’t to him (in fact it might a great tool to him) and therefore questions like what the kid could do to deserve it are not relevant in his perspective. It might be like someone who is appalled by spanking asking a parent who regular spanks occasionally for discipline what they could possibly do to deserve it.

Sorry, but I really don't give a shit about Hills "perspective" on this issue considering an appropriate response in his mind to his 8 week pregnant girlfriend pissing him off is to punch and choke her.

carcosa 04-25-2019 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14231656)
You know, maybe we're not. Maybe we just learned from it, gained strength from it, without the need of headshrinkers, prescribed personality-altering drugs, therapy dogs or ****ing safe spaces.

I remember once I was goofing off in the grocery store. A woman I didn't know smacked the shit out of me, then grabbed me by my ear and took me to my mom and told her what I did and what she did. Mom's reaction - she was mortified - not because a stranger had hit her child, but because her child had created a situation that warranted a stranger hitting her child. So she smacked the shit out of me again, thanked the woman and apologized for my behavior. Then, after we got home, I got my ass kicked a third time. Now, this was well over 40 years ago, and I don't even remember what I did in the first place to rate those three beatings, but I'm damned sure I never did it again.

I guess you'd want the woman in the grocery store to get 20 years hard labor, right? :shake:

No, but it was clearly ****ed up for her to do that to you.

Rationalize it however you want, but there's absolutely no way that experience had a positive effect on you.

It sucks how this society teaches us that we deserve to be treated like shit from such an early age.

Frazod 04-25-2019 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14231664)
I once got damn near a concussion because my dad was clowning around in the backyard with me and our doberman and the doberman rammed me into a wall headfirst.

My dad should have gone to prison for sure, the dog should have been put down.

And don't forget the years of extended therapy! :whackit:

mr. tegu 04-25-2019 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14231665)
Sorry, bit I really don't give a shit about Hills "perspective" on this issue considering an appropriate response in his mind to his 8 week pregnant girlfriend pissing him off is to punch and choke her.


Maybe you don’t care about it but it is relevant when asking about what could make, in his mind, that punishment be deserved.

Frazod 04-25-2019 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 14231668)
No, but it was clearly ****ed up for her to do that to you.

Rationalize it however you want, but there's absolutely no way that experience had a positive effect on you.

It sucks how this society teaches us that we deserve to be treated like shit from such an early age.

Are you a woman? Christ, I hope so.

kcpasco 04-25-2019 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14231662)
I think the NFL should not be in the business of employing violent criminals. If other teams want to, that's their prerogative, but I see no reason why the Chiefs, or their fans, would want to reward violent criminals because they're good at football.

If the Chiefs win the AFCCG, does it make you a better parent? Does it make you better at your job? It's a fun thing to discuss and complain, and get excited about, but it's still just a form of entertainment. That's all it is. If you pass the buck because the NFL won't make a policy you are condoning the behavior.

And if the Chiefs have to lose a few football games because they aren't going to give millions of dollars to people who are societal menaces, I'm okay with that. Maybe you're not.

The Chiefs are keeping a child abusing sociopath from playing for another NFL team. They should praised as heroes for all abused children. If they released him he would just be picked up by Dorsey or another shithead because Roger obviously hates children.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2019 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14231656)
You know, maybe we're not. Maybe we just learned from it, gained strength from it, without the need of headshrinkers, prescribed personality-altering drugs, therapy dogs or ****ing safe spaces.

I remember once I was goofing off in the grocery store. A woman I didn't know smacked the shit out of me, then grabbed me by my ear and took me to my mom and told her what I did and what she did. Mom's reaction - she was mortified - not because a stranger had hit her child, but because her child had created a situation that warranted a stranger hitting her child. So she smacked the shit out of me again, thanked the woman and apologized for my behavior. Then, after we got home, I got my ass kicked a third time. Now, this was well over 40 years ago, and I don't even remember what I did in the first place to rate those three beatings, but I'm damned sure I never did it again.

I guess you'd want the woman in the grocery store to get 20 years hard labor, right? :shake:

If we accept the premise that parents being more willing to use discipline on their kids led to better behaved kids and that that parents aren't willing to do that as often now, the logical conclusion would be that there are fewer behaved kids, right? And it's usually those hellions that end up becoming derelicts, which I will not argue.

Howver, that becomes a little bit harder to reconcile when you look at rates of violent crime in the US over time.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ted_States.png

RealSNR 04-25-2019 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14231649)
Great Jesus ...

Corporal punishment with a damn belt? What kind of belt? I'm pretty sure that some belts are designed to hurt more than others. Some belts will simply leave welts while others are embedded with metal that cuts right through to the bone. And I'm sure some guys consider the buckle the business end.

Why not beat the kid with a snowshoe? Or strangle him with a pair of pants?

WTF are we talking about here?

FAX

My dad used masturbate into a sock and make me wear it over my head around the house for an entire day. And I turned out fine!

Warrick 04-25-2019 11:42 PM

ROFL

Sassy Squatch 04-25-2019 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14231679)
My dad used masturbate into a sock and make me wear it over my head around the house for an entire day. And I turned out fine!

No you did not

jerryaldini 04-25-2019 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14231499)
The belt thing is fine. I got beat with a belt. Pretty sure a lot of people did growing up

Yeah, but not until we were older. I think I was about 8 when I got my first. It worked. My friends all got the belt. Hell the school principal could beat you on the ass with a plank multiple times, and did. But kid that young, and punching, definitely not.

I really hope Tyreek can get the work he needs and later reconcile with the boy and they can go on to a loving relationship at some point. Tragic.

kcpasco 04-25-2019 11:44 PM

Clark Hunt could come out looking like a hero on this. If he is the one to force Roger to care about the children.

carcosa 04-25-2019 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14231674)
Are you a woman? Christ, I hope so.

That's right. As men, we're taught that we're supposed to be okay with being abused, that we're pussies if we don't just take it and repress it. Yep. Pretty textbook stuff here.

This is the sort of mentality that churns out the Tyreek Hills and Adrian Petersons of the world. We internalize the terrible shit that happens to us and inevitably go on to inflict it on others. The cycle continues indefinitely.

This stuff is so depressing. (Oops, not supposed to get depressed, either. Sorry.)

FAX 04-25-2019 11:45 PM

Maybe the Chiefs just aren't particularly good at "fixing" people.

Then again, maybe that's not their job. Maybe their job is to put a team on the field that wins football games. Maybe a significant number of players emerge from bad families and bad neighborhoods. And maybe the college experience is insufficient to provide a foundation that allows players to alter their behavioral patterns. Maybe when you give a guy like that an assload of fame and fortune, they simply can't handle it.

It that's true, maybe an NFL team is simply not equipped to provide the necessary psychological services to change a person's life. And if so, why would we expect any other outcome in these cases? Why should we expect anything at all? Other than wins, that is.

Football teams are not intervention services designed to improve society. It would be nice if they were, but is that a reasonable burden to place on organizations that have no such expertise and are actually devoted to and encourage controlled violence?

FAX

mr. tegu 04-25-2019 11:46 PM

Chiefs suspended Tyreek Hill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14231677)
If we accept the premise that parents being more willing to use discipline on their kids led to better behaved kids and that that parents aren't willing to do that as often now, the logical conclusion would be that there are fewer behaved kids, right? And it's usually those hellions that end up becoming derelicts, which I will not argue.

Howver, that becomes a little bit harder to reconcile when you look at rates of violent crime in the US over time.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ted_States.png


Violent crime would be 18 year olds and over right? (Don’t know really). If so that graph shows the biggest decline is mid 90s and sort of levels off in early 2000s with continual gradual decreases. But for the biggest change you are looking at kids born late 70s and early 80s as the youngest options with most born earlier. Just based on my perception the less frequency of physical discipline is actually more of a last 20-25 years thing but is good to see a continual steady decline. I guess what caused the increase might be a discussion as well though.

carcosa 04-25-2019 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14231677)
If we accept the premise that parents being more willing to use discipline on their kids led to better behaved kids and that that parents aren't willing to do that as often now, the logical conclusion would be that there are fewer behaved kids, right? And it's usually those hellions that end up becoming derelicts, which I will not argue.

Howver, that becomes a little bit harder to reconcile when you look at rates of violent crime in the US over time.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ted_States.png

Yeah, well. The idea that we all deserve to be treated like shit is stronger than anything supported by data, unfortunately.

Frazod 04-25-2019 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14231677)
If we accept the premise that parents being more willing to use discipline on their kids led to better behaved kids and that that parents aren't willing to do that as often now, the logical conclusion would be that there are fewer behaved kids, right? And it's usually those hellions that end up becoming derelicts, which I will not argue.

Howver, that becomes a little bit harder to reconcile when you look at rates of violent crime in the US over time.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ted_States.png

Your chart sort of disproves your argument. Do you think kids back in 1960 were getting timeouts and participation trophies? Seems like shit started to spike as soon as all the kids who were ruined by the late 60s started crapping out undisciplined brats.

And also, do you think that the fact that we're under almost constant surveillance now might have something to do with any drop in crime?

kcpasco 04-25-2019 11:48 PM

Maybe a shitty upbringing combined with a violent sport is the problem. Maybe a percentage of the player base can’t flip the light switch off when the game is over. But no one will want to talk about that.

Any phychologist want to chime in?

BlackOp 04-25-2019 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14231688)
Maybe the Chiefs just aren't particularly good at "fixing" people.

Or they are located in the mid-west where people have nothing else to do but fixate on shit like this..

Frazod 04-25-2019 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 14231687)
That's right. As men, we're taught that we're supposed to be okay with being abused, that we're pussies if we don't just take it and repress it. Yep. Pretty textbook stuff here.

This is the sort of mentality that churns out the Tyreek Hills and Adrian Petersons of the world. We internalize the terrible shit that happens to us and inevitably go on to inflict it on others. The cycle continues indefinitely.

This stuff is so depressing. (Oops, not supposed to get depressed, either. Sorry.)

That's okay. When you're sobbing about me to your therapist tomorrow, remember, that Frazod with a "z".

FAX 04-25-2019 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 14231687)
That's right. As men, we're taught that we're supposed to be okay with being abused, that we're pussies if we don't just take it and repress it. Yep. Pretty textbook stuff here.

This is the sort of mentality that churns out the Tyreek Hills and Adrian Petersons of the world. We internalize the terrible shit that happens to us and inevitably go on to inflict it on others. The cycle continues indefinitely.

This stuff is so depressing. (Oops, not supposed to get depressed, either. Sorry.)

Dude ... you're making me tear up a little over here ...

I'm beginning to question my raison d'etre. I mean, seriously.

FAX

CrazyPhuD 04-25-2019 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14231679)
My dad used masturbate into a sock and make me wear it over my head around the house for an entire day. And I turned out fine!

I bet that was the last time you were playing outside and didn't come when your dad called right?

BossChief 04-25-2019 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14231644)
Okay, so you don't want to cut Hill so that another team gets a shot at him. Where do you draw the line?

If one of these dudes beat the shit out of your wife or child, would you still hope the Chiefs held onto him if he could take the top off of a defense?

Everything in the NFL has a value attributed to it. Draft picks, cap space, roster spots, coaching positions, etc. everything.

I don’t want Tyreek Hill to be able to play football for the Chiefs ever again. I think he should probably have to go to prison for a full year and prove to society that he understands what he did and that there will be more severe consequences if this were to ever happen again. Rehabilitation needs to happen immediately. It’s horrific to think that he hit this child while he was still in the womb and likely broke his arm at age 3. Terrible.

But

I do believe that out of 31 other nfl teams, one of them is willing to be stupid enough to roll the dice with Hill. He is a damaged commodity that is sure to have diminished value, but there is likely still some value there.

If he’s ever going to play again, KC should own that value and be able to extract it.

If he’s going to play again, some dumb team should have to pay a pick for the chance.

carcosa 04-25-2019 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14231698)
That's okay. When you're sobbing about me to your therapist tomorrow, remember, that Frazod with a "z".

All I'll say is I understand why you think this way.

FAX 04-25-2019 11:52 PM

Charts. Now we have charts.

FAX

Sassy Squatch 04-25-2019 11:52 PM

Why is the guy who runs around constantly screaming different variations of "****" and "SHIT" and the occasional "yip" all of a sudden Dr Phil lite? It's ****ing bizzare.

ROYC75 04-25-2019 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14231679)
My dad used masturbate into a sock and make me wear it over my head around the house for an entire day. And I turned out fine!

ROFL

ROFL

ROFL

ROFL

ROFL


That was a 5 star clap for you!

FAX 04-25-2019 11:53 PM

I think we need a chart to properly analyze that.

FAX

ROYC75 04-25-2019 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14231679)
My dad used masturbate into a sock and make me wear it over my head around the house for an entire day. And I turned out fine!

I had to clean my screen off damn it!!!

ROFL

CrazyPhuD 04-25-2019 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14231705)
Charts. Now we have charts.

FAX

We just need stick figure animation of the incident now.

BlackOp 04-25-2019 11:55 PM

Make no mistake..Hill is a bonafide superstar who was about to be the highest paid WR in the world.

Chiefs are going to handle this differently than Hunt....generational talent buys you that. It will show you exactly where the line of faux morality ends and true talent begins.

You dont just haphazardly kick Hill to curb..

TribalElder 04-25-2019 11:56 PM

If it was recorded in Dubai it might be considered illegal recording

Either way though if he would have lived in Missouri instead of OP Kansas this likely never sees the light of day.

Best bet would have been to ditch that girl and not hurt the child

mr. tegu 04-25-2019 11:57 PM

Chiefs suspended Tyreek Hill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 14231668)
No, but it was clearly ****ed up for her to do that to you.



Rationalize it however you want, but there's absolutely no way that experience had a positive effect on you.



It sucks how this society teaches us that we deserve to be treated like shit from such an early age.


If someone believes certain events had positive effects on them, denying them those beliefs because they don’t fit your view of how they should feel is not really how it works. Now if you observe them beating kids or others excessively and they express rage unhealthily that’s different but without that you really can’t say it had no positive effects.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2019 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 14231689)
Violent crime would be 18 year olds and over right? (Don’t know really). If so that graph doesn’t say much as the decline is mid 90s and sort of levels off in early 2000s so you are looking at kids born late 70s and early 80s as the youngest options with most born earlier. Just based on my perception the less frequency of physical discipline is actually more of a last 20-25 years thing and this graph doesn’t really point to a noticeable decline in the last 15-20 years but is good to see continual steady improvement.

Again, if we accept that the kids in the past were paddled more often, why are the rates of criminal behavior so high, and why did they drop off if the null hypothesis is that parents have become more lax over time?

Violent crime rates began dropping shortly after 1990. That's 29 years ago. Corporal punishment was unheard of in my elementary and secondary experience which started in '88 and ran through 2000, and while the rates of people who agree that spanking is acceptable has declined, it's a very gradual decline over the last 25 years. Rates of corporal punishment have also declined over the last generation, and the practice is largely unheard of now outside of the South.

As a parent that has used spanking as a redirect, I'm not against it, but there is no compelling evidence that things like paddling or using a belt lead to better outcomes. If there were, one would expect a relative change in the rate of various offenses, but the data is not there.

Every older generation thinks younger generations are soft pussies, and every older generation overrates their toughess. I'm old enough to remember when the 50-somethings on this board were all labeled as morose, navel-gazing slackers by their parents. It was a bullshit characterization, too.

Part of a parent's job is to discipline their child and instill a set of morals and values in them, but I don't think the child should never fear the parent.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-25-2019 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 14231717)
If it was recorded in Dubai it might be considered illegal recording

Either way though if he would have lived in Missouri instead of OP Kansas this likely never sees the light of day.

Best bet would have been to ditch that girl and not hurt the child

Both KS and MO are one-party consent states.

007 04-26-2019 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14231706)
Why is the guy who runs around constantly screaming different variations of "****" and "SHIT" and the occasional "yip" all of a sudden Dr Phil lite? It's ****ing bizzare.

Absolutely correct

mr. tegu 04-26-2019 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14231720)
Again, if we accept that the kids in the past were paddled more often, why are the rates of criminal behavior so high, and why did they drop off if the null hypothesis is that parents have become more lax over time?



Violent crime rates began dropping shortly after 1990. That's 29 years ago. Corporal punishment was unheard of in my elementary and secondary experience which started in '88 and ran through 2000, and while the rates of people who agree that spanking is acceptable has declined, it's a very gradual decline over the last 25 years. Rates of corporal punishment have also declined over the last generation, and the practice is largely unheard of now outside of the South.



As a parent that has used spanking as a redirect, I'm not against it, but there is no compelling evidence that things like paddling or using a belt lead to better outcomes. If there were, one would expect a relative change in the rate of various offenses, but the data is not there.



Every older generation thinks younger generations are soft pussies, and every older generation overrates their toughess. I'm old enough to remember when the 50-somethings on this board were all labeled as morose, navel-gazing slackers by their parents. It was a bullshit characterization, too.



Part of a parent's job is to discipline their child and instill a set of morals and values in them, but I don't think the child should never fear the parent.


I didn’t connect that you were discussing punishment beyond simple spanking. So that form of corporal punishment definitely has been in decline longer than spanking.

After thinking about it for a minute I think some major global war events definitely contributed to those rapidly rising numbers prior to the 1990s decline.

carcosa 04-26-2019 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14231706)
Why is the guy who runs around constantly screaming different variations of "****" and "SHIT" and the occasional "yip" all of a sudden Dr Phil lite? It's ****ing bizzare.

Yip

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2019 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14231695)
Your chart sort of disproves your argument. Do you think kids back in 1960 were getting timeouts and participation trophies? Seems like shit started to spike as soon as all the kids who were ruined by the late 60s started crapping out undisciplined brats.

And also, do you think that the fact that we're under almost constant surveillance now might have something to do with any drop in crime?

So the kids in the late 60's were undisciplined, but the kids in the mid 70's-80's were more disciplined, yet the crime rate went up that entire time? Did the kids suddenly become more disciplined in the late 80's to early 90's?

And the helicopter parent argument has been around this entire century, yet there's no spike in apparent delinquency?

FAX 04-26-2019 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14231679)
My dad used masturbate into a sock and make me wear it over my head around the house for an entire day. And I turned out fine!

That's what I'm talking about ...

The kind of guy who could raise an entire infantry platoon of outstanding citizens and do it barefoot.

FAX


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.