![]() |
Quote:
I can see the Chiefs adding a WLB and vet CB like Dennard after they extend Jonsey. #RunItBack |
Quote:
As for Speaks, I think he could be a long shot to make this roster. Veach just made moves to win the Super Bowl, something that hasn’t happened in 50 years, so his likely not gonna get flack if he moves on from Speaks. Keep in mind that Speaks first impression with this new staff was coming in overweight and out of shape. I could totally see Danna being Speaks replacement as he played an awful lot of DT in college. Harris isn’t bad, but he’s not a good pass rusher. If Danna is better than him then so be it. That’s the beauty of camp |
I don’t get the love for Harris (who is a fine player but nothing special) when compared to Charlton, Danna, or Speaks.
Charlton has pretty intriguing upside because of his size and overall athleticism at that size. That’s someone that, like Ogbah, could really shine as a strong side DE who can benefit from the attention Clark and Chris Jones demand, and he’s big enough to rotate inside on passing downs. This coaching staff loves big, versatile ends they can use inside or outside. That’s why I believe Speaks makes the roster and is effective at least as a rotational player. People are being WAY too influenced by Speaks’ being misused as a rookie. |
Quote:
|
Is Burrito Rodriguez still available?
|
Quote:
I’ve never seen such an overblown offseason story in my life. Speaks has always had the body of an interior DL. Also, sounds like you’re insinuating that his injury was due to him being out of shape, which is ****ing reeruned. |
Speaks better lay off the twinkies.
|
To the Watchtower
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He tore ligaments in his knee. That type of season-ender happens all the time. It’s a dumb reason to be down on a player unless it has happened repeatedly. The overweight thing is silly, too. 1) players show up carrying extra weight frequently and it is worked off during training camp 2) we don’t know what the Chiefs asked him to do in that offseason. 3) Speaks has never been a guy who looks like a Greek statue Writing off a guy who was a top 100 prospect after one season (in which he did flash while playing terribly out of position) is just weird. Especially when he’s being written off so they can hang on to a guy who is pretty JAG-y. |
3rd and long and the Chiefs line up Clark (1.58 sec 10 yard split, 7.08 sec 3 cone), Saunders (1.73 split, 7.57 cone), Jones (1.69 split, 7.44 cone), and Charlton (1.63 split, 7.17 cone) to rush the passer. That's some serious get off and lateral agility bringing the heat.
|
Quote:
Taco might very well be a better player than the young guys currently, but if Spags doesn't see an actual use and a fit in the DL rotation, he'll tell Reid to go with Danna and Harris. Also, this is a sidenote, but provided Speaks isn't a total piece of shit, I don't think he's any more at risk of being cut as a result of this signing. Veach talked about playing him all over the place when we drafted him, and his brief stint at 3-4 OLB in which he got restricted to one position by Bob Sutton shouldn't hold him to being a DE only. I really think they're going to try to use Speaks as an inside/outside guy, and with the roster size expansion, they now have an available slot to use him as their gadget DL. People might call Speaks a DE since he'll probably play the majority of his time there, but if that's how you categorize him when predicting the Week 1 roster, don't be surprised to see us keeping 6 DEs (Clark, Okafor, Tanoh, Danna, Taco/Harris, Speaks) EDIT: Or you can just read what duncan had posted like 5 posts earlier instead of reading my drivel |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Danna’s passrush tape I’ve seen is just not great. Harris’ isn’t either, but he’s young, coachable, and the right size. His upside is real. Danna is undersized — and he seems to be maxed out. There’s just absolutely no chance he flexes in to DT for the NASCAR package. (Honestly I’m not even sure if he makes the field, but I’m bearish on him.) I hope he shows out in camp and proves me wrong. |
Quote:
Harris played pretty much right away after we acquired him and was our 2nd best run defending DE immediately. Dude is tough at the point of attack. Needs to develop a passrush, but he has started upside if he does. |
Quote:
For this team to become a dynasty, however, it’s going to need cheap young dudes to emerge. I just feel like the Danna pick backbenches a guy who’s been doing that. |
I'd agree insofar as I'm not expecting Danna to play inside. They had him beefed up 20 pounds over what's probably his optimal weight at Michigan, and all it really did was slow him down. He needs to be closer to 260 than 280, as he purportedly was at the Shrine Game, when the Chiefs may have really focused in on him.
|
Quote:
WHY. I am not a Speaks fan, but that is ABSURD misuse. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Coming in heavier makes sense if the plan was to play him inside and out, but I’m unsure whether that was Daly and Spags’ intent. Speaks is shaping up to be the worst draft pick of the Veach era. DOD a close second. |
Quote:
Knee injuries happen to all sorts of athletes and NFL players, regardless of weight or body fat percentage. There’s no reason to link Speaks’ injury to his weight. Considering they dropped Kpassagnon inside and talked about Speaks ability to rush inside or outside and versatility when they drafted him, it’s a safe bet they were planning to use him inside at least some times. This year will tell the story on Speaks. Anything we say now is projection. |
Giving up on Speaks right now is as silly as giving up on Kpass was last season.
One wasted season at OLB, and one season lost to injury. We have no idea what there is there. |
Quote:
FAX |
Quote:
And then Hyde had a costly fumble that helped us beat Houston |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But he damn sure better show up (metaphorically) hungry. |
Quote:
|
The more you mull this one over, the better it looks and feels
A recent first round talent for peanuts, coming to a first class organization where one of his best friends is an undisputed leader... he’s gonna succeed here, get Gay up to speed and our front seven is ****ing dangerous right now |
Charlton is a solid signing and drafting Gay was an excellent move... I hate to say it...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ain't no more **** around. The culture has changed. |
Quote:
I don’t think anything negative of Speaks based on year one. He looked over weight and slow at training camp. There seems to be this belief you either think he will be good or a bust. Some of us are just cautious because no part of Speaks game as shown he will be anything more than a average to below average rotational guy. That is based off of what I’ve seen from the guy. I’ve said before and say it again, I’m not saying cut the guy and I hope I’m wrong because if he could just be then Okafor then that could save us like 5-6mil and not make DE a priority next draft. I’ve heard Petro freaking out about the 2021 roster but in reality it’s not in bad shape if a couple guys can be ready to start. So far this staff seems to be developing pretty well and spags does an incredible job of working with what he is given. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Veach has said they make moves thinking a couple years out. In 2018, they'd decided that Mahomes was ready. You really want to change BOTH sides of a play-off caliber football team? Put the pressure on a first year starter to have to score every drive? Nah. They knew they were moving on from Sutton. But it was time to hand the keys of the offense to Mahomes. They opted to hope the defense could hold the line one more year. It worked out to where it couldn't have gone much worse, but I understand the thought process, and I did at the time, and if you wanna go back and look, I was saying so all throughout. And I was good with gutting the damned thing in Mahomes year 2 and starting over. Those cats drafted in '18 were drafted for scheme flexibility. I don't know if they had Spags earmarked (but it's entirely possible they did) or whether they knew for sure they were going 4-3 but either way, they knew Sutton was gone. He was a lame duck. They just didn't want to up-end the entire team in one offseason. It's just common sense. |
Quote:
He is too heavy to be an effective LB, and too slow to be an effective DE, and not big enough to be an effective DT. Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well stated Duncan! |
Quote:
Aaron Donald is 6'1", 280. Just sayin'. |
Quote:
Having a DE who is stout enough to stand up against the run on early downs and slide inside to create interior pressure on passing downs works just fine in this system. |
I think it's pretty obvious they view him as DT, they walked on Xavier Williams who played quite a few snaps and didn't bring in another DT.
|
Quote:
It also helps us to identify and utilize talent that is specific to Spags system but maybe not a great fit for other systems. Kind of like Moneyball, but for football. We can really use guys that do a few things fairly well better than guys that do ONE thing very well. The fact that pre-snap an opposing offense doesn't know what we're going to do because we have so many versatile players helps hide any deficiencies. Other than the outside corners, you don't know who's doing what on any given snap. Creating confusion is like shaving a quarter of a second off everyone's 40 time. And now that we have a LB capable of covering backs, we'll be even better. |
Quote:
On top of that Charlton can give you what Harris does with a lot more pass rush upside. |
Quote:
When he was in the game, he was almost always neutralized by a single blocker. He doesn't have any pass rush moves to speak of, and I don't remember him ever being successful with a bull rush. I don't remember him ever running down a play from behind along the LOS. I can't remember any play from the all-22 where he stood out. Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
You haven’t even seen him play DE/DT yet. How the **** can you determine that? The guy has 1 year at this level playing out of position. I swear most of you guys have no ****ing patience whatsoever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't quite get the Speaks hate. He hardly played on season under a shitty DC and then was hurt the all of last season. I have a feeling if we had signed him off the waiver wire... there would be a great contingent here banging the drum that he was a high draft pick with potential who had bad luck and just needed a fresh start. Anyway, I don't give a shit one way or another...but he really evokes a lot emotion on here.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He hasn't been used as a strong side DE in an even front. He hasn't been used as an interior pass rusher in an even front. Those are the things his college tape and general skillset suggest are best uses of him. We literally haven't seen either. He flashed more and looked more competent than Tanoh Kpassagnon two seasons ago, and Kpass was an effective player in Spagnuolo's system, being used just like they would probably use Speaks. We haven't seen him used properly yet, so it's too early to say either he's going to obviously succeed or definitely fail. Patience, people. |
LMAO Dude did look slow as ****, but so would any DT/DE tweener playing OLB in a 3-4. ****ing Sutton, man.
|
Quote:
I don’t know about that. It can be argued that Gilbert Brown was the Packer fan favorite on those 90s Green Bay teams, not Brett Favre |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Usually that gets you a short time in the league if you are lazy, especially a player like Speaks. You can’t pull that shit unless you’re elite. Coming to camp in shape and ready to go is pretty much the basics for the NFL. |
Quote:
When I watched Speaks, he just looked slow and plodding, with no explosion. I would love for him to develop into a very good player, I just think no one knows really what to do with him. Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unless you are John Kruk or John Daily. :evil: |
1 Attachment(s)
Speaks took it easy in the offseason again- but said he will cut the weight when he gets to camp.
|
I guess it's not fair to hate on Speaks personally, but I despise the pick because it was a dumb pick from day 1. The comparison I will constantly give for Speaks is Turk McBride, another DE/DT tweener from the SEC picked in the 2nd round. McBride had 9.5 total sacks over a 7 year career. You don't take players like Speaks in the 2nd round who offer very little upside, you take them in the 3rd or 4th. I didn't like the pick of Kpass the year before either, as he was incredibly raw and took 3 years to finally contribute, but at least he had the physical attributes to see some hint of a future if he developed. Speaks doesn't have the size or strength to ever be more than a rotational pass rusher at DT, and he doesn't have the speed or athleticism to get after the QB from DE. Again, no problem with that type of player if he's taken in the 4th. But a 2nd round pick should be able to contribute sooner than later. Willie Gay or Juan Thornhill are the types you take in the 2nd. 2018 wasn't a stellar draft class overall, but there are multiple quality players at several positions that were taken not too long after Speaks.
|
Quote:
Who won that fight? Oh yeah, Dad Bod. Unbeknownst to most people, there are three completely different body types. Guys with Endomorph bodies will never appear ripped but that doesn't mean that they're not strong and athletic. |
Quote:
Also keep in mind Veach got Ward, Neimann and Rankin on rookie deals who were from that draft class. I’d consider Nnandi and Ward to be hits while Speaks and Rankin are TBD. Neimann is probably a decent get. Not really good or bad. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Speaks had 7 sacks in the SEC his last year as an interior pass rusher. His pass rush upside alone makes him a better prospect than Turk McBride who had 3.5 sacks total in his entire college career. The only reason you’re making that comparison is because they play the same position, they’re from the SEC, and they were drafted by the Chiefs in the 2nd round. Speaks was a significantly better prospect. Give me a ****ing break. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do it all of the time due to where I put my finger to scroll LMAO |
825,000 1 year deal. No guaranteed money. Definitely not considered a lock to make the roster solely based on this contract.
|
Quote:
It is his attitude and work ethic that has been called into question in his short tenure in the league. Sounds like this contract is loud and clear in that this could be one of his last chances to smarten up. |
This could turn out to be a damn good signing ,if it does doubt we will be able to keep him long term
|
I know it’s highlights but he looks good in them
|
Quote:
:hmmm: Meh, who am I kidding? I’ve never had a highlight. :( |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Story far from finished. 👹 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Unloaded?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Unloaded</a> <a href="https://t.co/9vgdY0GAKI">pic.twitter.com/9vgdY0GAKI</a></p>— Taco Charlton (@TheSupremeTaco) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheSupremeTaco/status/1284867415889895424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Speaks better get his ass in gear |
@wildcard
Our dline looks so lit right now |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We are going to see what happens when you pair Mahomes up with a top 10 defense this year.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.