ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   OT Rankings (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=337318)

kccrow 04-01-2021 05:08 AM

Question...

Is it that all of the tackle prospects have some rather significant flaws as left tackles or is it that they are being overanalyzed?

Is the crop, as a hole being overrated?

Christian Darrisaw - Notable issues in pass pro with hand placement/technique but seems to have the rest.

Samuel Cosmi - Clear lack of strength. Slow off the ball. Balance and hand placement issues. That said, shows elite-level athleticism. Is he moldable clay or not?

Rashawn Slater - Seems to have it all in spades, except arm length which is a troubling 33 inches.

Liam Eichenberg - Put down the best pass rushers he faced but 32-3/8" arms are more than concerning, doesn't have great lateral agility, and lacks the athleticism to get out in space.

Dillon Radunz - Seems to have most of what you look for but bad hand placement, lacks sand in his pants, and definitely a poor level of competition.

Alex Leatherwood - Bad hand placement, stops his feet on contact, balance issues, late off the snap, movement is clunky.

Spencer Brown - consensus RT only type with great length and athleticism but a long ways to go in just about all areas.

Jalen Mayfield - inexperienced, bad hand placement, balance issues, only played RT and allowed alot of pressure

Stone Forsythe - not a mover, terribly slow and heavy feet.

Walker Little - Stiff movement, bad against inside moves, some balance issues, not the quickest off the snap, hasn't played in nearly 2 seasons.

Teven Jenkins- Balance issues, lacks awareness, hand placement and overall technique needs refinement, not enough time at LT.

Brady Christensen - Doesn't move well in space, needs to add strength, struggles with speed, moderate competition


Most of the rest are being talked about as guards because of severe limitations in length or movement.


So where do the Chiefs go?

It seems like Slater will get snatched up by someone early because he's an elite guard prospect if they don't see him as a tackle, and he's better than anyone else in this class to take a chance on at LT sans Sewell.

Darrisaw and Jenkins are the only others I've seen consistently in round 1. Many seem to think Darrisaw is there in the 19-20 range and with Washington at 19 being his home, they may be inclined to take him. Is he worth a trade to 18? I don't know.

Jenkins is getting a lot of play at the 24-25 range. I see him as a RT, but I'm not in the consensus. Maybe I'm over-evaluating. He certainly seems to come with the most correctable issues. The Jets seem like a logical trade partner at 23 if that's the case, and should only cost a 3rd (possibly 3 and 4).

If KC had a legit starter for this season, I'd heavily favor Radunz.

Most analysts seem to project a lot of the rest to be there for KC at 31 or beyond.

So, are the issues outlined legitimate enough to make KC pass or are they being overblown by over-analysis? I have a hard time thinking they'd not be enticed by coaching up a guy like Cosmi but maybe he's just not good enough.

Coogs 04-01-2021 05:52 AM

I kind of like Radunz too. The right side should be okay. Remmers was okay on the RT spot last year. If Niang beats Remmers out, in theory we will be even better on the right side. Again, in theory, we should be much better on all three of the interior spots. We could roll with Radunz on the LT spot, and give him a little help with either a TE on his side, or a RB keeping an eye that direction if a play calls for Mahomes needing a little extra time while Radunz is getting more "sand in his pants" to handle the strength part of the job. Then, eventually, you would hope Radunz will be able to handle the LT spot on his own, as you would expect from any LT. But, if need be, give him some help early while he is learning, and trust the other 4 spots to do their job.

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15610999)
Question...

Is it that all of the tackle prospects have some rather significant flaws as left tackles or is it that they are being overanalyzed?

Yes and Yes.

And even more to the point, they're all being over analyzed by media types in a general way rather than a SPECIFIC way.

By that I mean that a player's specific skills may be perfect for one team and not another. It's difficult to know for sure what an individual GM and coaching staff will view as important and what they'll see as coachable issues. Orlando Brown Jr. may well be a perfect LT for a team like the Ravens, but isn't the best fit for a pass happy team like KC, for example. He'd be a good fit for like...The Titans, for example.

You can't coach out the measurables; the height, weight, reach, etc. Or probably not the 'quicks' or lack thereof. 40 time is probably irrelevant for OL but technique can be fixed.


So what do we kind of know about Andy Reid OT's? Are there strong tendencies in the measurables? I would expect you could assume you'd want to look at smart, hard workers.

Coogs 04-01-2021 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611076)
Yes and Yes.

And even more to the point, they're all being over analyzed by media types in a general way rather than a SPECIFIC way.

By that I mean that a player's specific skills may be perfect for one team and not another. It's difficult to know for sure what an individual GM and coaching staff will view as important and what they'll see as coachable issues. Orlando Brown Jr. may well be a perfect LT for a team like the Ravens, but isn't the best fit for a pass happy team like KC, for example. He'd be a good fit for like...The Titans, for example.

You can't coach out the measurables; the height, weight, reach, etc. Or probably not the 'quicks' or lack thereof. 40 time is probably irrelevant for OL but technique can be fixed.


So what do we kind of know about Andy Reid OT's? Are there strong tendencies in the measurables? I would expect you could assume you'd want to look at smart, hard workers.

Which sounds like Radunz.

The Franchise 04-01-2021 08:54 AM

It just shows me that screaming “OT at #31 or we suck” is stupid. There is no sure fire starter that we are getting at #31. Your best bet is sign a stopgap, find your best 3 OTs in the first two rounds and go get one of them. Whether that’s at #31, or trading back, or trading up in the 2nd or finding a guy at #63. No one is coming in day one and locking this position down. It’s just not happening.

And I love how everyone knocks a player like Niang or Little for not playing football in a year (yes I get they had injuries as well) but they won’t to blow two first round picks to get Sewell....who hasn’t played football in a year.

O.city 04-01-2021 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15611192)
It just shows me that screaming “OT at #31 or we suck” is stupid. There is no sure fire starter that we are getting at #31. Your best bet is sign a stopgap, find your best 3 OTs in the first two rounds and go get one of them. Whether that’s at #31, or trading back, or trading up in the 2nd or finding a guy at #63. No one is coming in day one and locking this position down. It’s just not happening.

And I love how everyone knocks a player like Niang or Little for not playing football in a year (yes I get they had injuries as well) but they won’t to blow two first round picks to get Sewell....who hasn’t played football in a year.

Sewell is 20 and could legitimately be an Orlando Pace type LT so I get the want.

Kind of similar to J Chase.

RunKC 04-01-2021 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611076)
So what do we kind of know about Andy Reid OT's? Are there strong tendencies in the measurables? I would expect you could assume you'd want to look at smart, hard workers.

Tall— >6’5”
Long arms— >34 inches
Smart
Athletic

There was an article on Andy’s affinity for long arms in linemen with a lot of telling data. I’ll see if I can find it

staylor26 04-01-2021 09:08 AM

Well you’re going to have a hard time finding a LT at 31 that meets all of those requirements...

It’s almost like we’d be better off signing a stop gap, going elsewhere at 31, and taking somebody like Little or Forsythe on day 2....

The Franchise 04-01-2021 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15611217)
Well you’re going to have a hard time finding a LT at 31 that meets all of those requirements...

It’s almost like we’d be better off signing a stop gap, going elsewhere at 31, and taking somebody like Little or Forsythe on day 2....

My two are Radunz or Little right now.

O.city 04-01-2021 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15611217)
Well you’re going to have a hard time finding a LT at 31 that meets all of those requirements...

It’s almost like we’d be better off signing a stop gap, going elsewhere at 31, and taking somebody like Little or Forsythe on day 2....

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15611225)
My two are Radunz or Little right now.

The more I look around, I might be more inclined to do that. But I also would just play him this year. With Thuney next to him, I think they could coach him up.

RunKC 04-01-2021 09:13 AM

Sidenote: I really hope the Chargers don’t get get this guy. He looks like a future stud

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Rashawn Slater v. Chase Young <a href="https://t.co/90NhjjPsLI">pic.twitter.com/90NhjjPsLI</a></p>&mdash; Bobby Skinner (@BobbySkinner_) <a href="https://twitter.com/BobbySkinner_/status/1377335343934889986?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RunKC 04-01-2021 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15611217)
Well you’re going to have a hard time finding a LT at 31 that meets all of those requirements...

It’s almost like we’d be better off signing a stop gap, going elsewhere at 31, and taking somebody like Little or Forsythe on day 2....

Or we trade up for a Teven Jenkins like Nate Taylor projected (assuming he’s in range). I think Nate has good info.

Idk why but I see Jenkins as a Steeler. I don’t think they pass on him

staylor26 04-01-2021 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15611243)
Or we trade up for a Teven Jenkins like Nate Taylor projected (assuming he’s in range). I think Nate has good info.

Idk why but I see Jenkins as a Steeler. I don’t think they pass on him

His arms are under 35”...

htismaqe 04-01-2021 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15610999)
(cut for brevity)

So, are the issues outlined legitimate enough to make KC pass or are they being overblown by over-analysis? I have a hard time thinking they'd not be enticed by coaching up a guy like Cosmi but maybe he's just not good enough.

See, this is where I've kind of always been on this and why I've been so vocal about it...

I don't think they're legitimate enough to pass up a LT altogether but in my mind, there's just NO WAY I trade up in this draft for a LT. The only one really worth it is Sewell and that would cost us more than we gave up for Mahomes. I just can't say that's a good idea.

htismaqe 04-01-2021 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15611199)
Tall— >6’5”
Long arms— >34 inches
Smart
Athletic

There was an article on Andy’s affinity for long arms in linemen with a lot of telling data. I’ll see if I can find it

Theres a ton of guys this year with short arms.

Seems like that's a non-starter for the Chiefs.

staylor26 04-01-2021 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15611268)
Theres a ton of guys this year with short arms.

Seems like that's a non-starter for the Chiefs.

But it does seem like they really like Jenkins, so who knows?

The Franchise 04-01-2021 09:49 AM

Has Jenkins had his pro day yet?

The Franchise 04-01-2021 09:50 AM

Just saw that it’s today.

staylor26 04-01-2021 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15611295)
Just saw that it’s today.

Yea it’s today, but sounds like his arm length is expected to be around 33”.

The Franchise 04-01-2021 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15611299)
Yea it’s today, but sounds like his arm length is expected to be around 33”.

Good. Now can he play LT? Hasn’t he played RT his entire career?

staylor26 04-01-2021 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15611303)
Good. Now can he play LT? Hasn’t he played RT his entire career?

No, he’s played LT as well and G.

I personally think he can play LT. I think with him and Niang both being capabalr you can sort that out in camp.

RunKC 04-01-2021 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15611268)
Theres a ton of guys this year with short arms.

Seems like that's a non-starter for the Chiefs.

Maybe. Then again these guys went against everything we thought they believed in last year when they drafted a RB and LB in the first 2 rds

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 10:48 AM

I really think it's going to be in the 2nd that we take an OT.

Little, Radunz, Christiansen, Forsythe, Brown are all possibilities.

htismaqe 04-01-2021 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15611231)
Sidenote: I really hope the Chargers don’t get get this guy. He looks like a future stud

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Rashawn Slater v. Chase Young <a href="https://t.co/90NhjjPsLI">pic.twitter.com/90NhjjPsLI</a></p>&mdash; Bobby Skinner (@BobbySkinner_) <a href="https://twitter.com/BobbySkinner_/status/1377335343934889986?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

You should have seen Rashawn Slater vs. AJ Epinesa. I saw it more than once.

Slater struggles with long, lanky DE's. That's why people think his best position in the NFL will be on the inside.

htismaqe 04-01-2021 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15611311)
No, he’s played LT as well and G.

I personally think he can play LT. I think with him and Niang both being capabalr you can sort that out in camp.

Correct.

He's played about 80% of his career at RT from what I gather. Another 15% or so at LT and the rest on the inside.

htismaqe 04-01-2021 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611404)
I really think it's going to be in the 2nd that we take an OT.

Little, Radunz, Christiansen, Forsythe, Brown are all possibilities.

I think Forsythe is the sleeper right now. You look at what he offers in terms of size and athleticism, combined with his pass blocking, and I think it might be a shocker.

kccrow 04-01-2021 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15611420)
I think Forsythe is the sleeper right now. You look at what he offers in terms of size and athleticism, combined with his pass blocking, and I think it might be a shocker.

Andy pulls his tackles out in space alot though, and Forsythe isn't going to be able to do it. I don't see it.

kccrow 04-01-2021 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15611268)
Theres a ton of guys this year with short arms.

Seems like that's a non-starter for the Chiefs.

Yep. Radunz only came in at like 33-1/8 or something like that too. Weird year.

kccrow 04-01-2021 11:24 AM

The only tackles I've seen so far that kind of fit the athleticism and arm length requirements Reid typically looks for are:

Darrisaw - 34-1/2"
Leatherwood - 34-3/8"
Brown - 34"

Slater, Cosmi, Jenkins, Radunz, Mayfield, Christensen, Hudson, and Carmen all came in at 33-1/4" or less. Hell, Jenkins, Mayfield, Christensen, and Carman came in under 33"


If the Chiefs are taking a tackle in 1, I'd put money on moving up for Darrisaw and hoping they fix his issues.

Otherwise...????

htismaqe 04-01-2021 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15611455)
The only tackles I've seen so far that kind of fit the athleticism and arm length requirements Reid typically looks for are:

Darrisaw - 34-1/2"
Leatherwood - 34-3/8"
Brown - 34"

Slater, Cosmi, Jenkins, Radunz, Mayfield, Christensen, Hudson, and Carmen all came in at 33-1/4" or less. Hell, Jenkins, Mayfield, Christensen, and Carman came in under 33"


If the Chiefs are taking a tackle in 1, I'd put money on moving up for Darrisaw and hoping they fix his issues.

Otherwise...????

Well, if they really are going to move up for Darrisaw, we just have to hope the board breaks the right way.

If the Cowboys pass or Sewell slips, then the Chargers can take Slater and we don't have to trade up to 12.

I really like Darrisaw's upside. He needs to develop for sure but he has pro bowl potential for sure.

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15611455)
The only tackles I've seen so far that kind of fit the athleticism and arm length requirements Reid typically looks for are:

Darrisaw - 34-1/2"
Leatherwood - 34-3/8"
Brown - 34"

Slater, Cosmi, Jenkins, Radunz, Mayfield, Christensen, Hudson, and Carmen all came in at 33-1/4" or less. Hell, Jenkins, Mayfield, Christensen, and Carman came in under 33"


If the Chiefs are taking a tackle in 1, I'd put money on moving up for Darrisaw and hoping they fix his issues.

Otherwise...????

what's up with all these T.Rex mother****ers?!

I'm 6'3" and I'm 34".

RunKC 04-01-2021 11:41 AM

Brady Christensen and Jackson Carman arm length is less than 33. Goddamn

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 11:43 AM

what did Little measure in at?

The Franchise 04-01-2021 11:50 AM

Know who has over 33” arms? Lucas ****ing Niang.

UChieffyBugger 04-01-2021 11:53 AM

Stone Forsythe arms are over 34 according to his pro day results.

RunKC 04-01-2021 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611493)
what did Little measure in at?

I can’t find a number but his scouting reports rave about his length (giggity) and some tweets I’ve seen indicate he’s one of the guys who pass the length threshold average of 34

The Franchise 04-01-2021 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15611521)
I can’t find a number but his scouting reports rave about his length (giggity) and some tweets I’ve seen indicate he’s one of the guys who pass the length threshold average of 34

A trade back out of the first or a trade up in the second for Little then.

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 12:00 PM

Here's why I think Little may well be the guy we take, and most likely at #63.

1)It's literally a repeat of the Niang pick. First round value talent, drops due to an injury.

2)He fits the physical measurables; all the traits Reid looks for. His pass blocking is his strength too.

3)Dummies don't go to Stanford. This is a smart kid. He's going to have the mental wherewithal to handle whatever they want him to teach him.

Otter 04-01-2021 12:05 PM

Calling it now: trading up for Teven Jenkins.

htismaqe 04-01-2021 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611531)
Here's why I think Little may well be the guy we take, and most likely at #63.

1)It's literally a repeat of the Niang pick. First round value talent, drops due to an injury.

2)He fits the physical measurables; all the traits Reid looks for. His pass blocking is his strength too.

3)Dummies don't go to Stanford. This is a smart kid. He's going to have the mental wherewithal to handle whatever they want him to teach him.

I agree.

htismaqe 04-01-2021 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 15611545)
Calling it now: trading up for Teven Jenkins.

Prototypical RT that doesn't have the measurable Andy likes.

I don't think it happens.

RunKC 04-01-2021 12:15 PM

1. Terrance Marshall WR LSU
2. Walker Little OT Stanford
3. Daelin Hayes DE Notre Dame

Who says no to this?

kccrow 04-01-2021 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611493)
what did Little measure in at?

Have yet to see a report with it. I've been looking. That said, Little had some pretty serious pass blocking issues that you'd have hoped to see him work out over time but injury and covid...

The Franchise 04-01-2021 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15611573)
1. Terrance Marshall WR LSU
2. Walker Little OT Stanford
3. Daelin Hayes DE Notre Dame

Who says no to this?

Welp....I just came.

staylor26 04-01-2021 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15611573)
1. Terrance Marshall WR LSU
2. Walker Little OT Stanford
3. Daelin Hayes DE Notre Dame

Who says no to this?

I like Hayes, but I think there will be better pass rushers available at 94.

Give me Odeyingbo or Turner and I’d be thrilled.

kccrow 04-01-2021 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611531)
Here's why I think Little may well be the guy we take, and most likely at #63.

1)It's literally a repeat of the Niang pick. First round value talent, drops due to an injury.

2)He fits the physical measurables; all the traits Reid looks for. His pass blocking is his strength too.

3)Dummies don't go to Stanford. This is a smart kid. He's going to have the mental wherewithal to handle whatever they want him to teach him.

I really disagree on pass blocking being his strength and I can say confidently I'm very much not alone there. Agility issues, specifically opening and aligning his hips, and letting guys into his chest were huge problems. I think he has the ability to learn and get better there, but there's a difference between that and it being a strength.

The Franchise 04-01-2021 12:27 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My latest OL rankings for the 2021 draft dropped this morning over on B/R<br><br>Here’s my latest top tackle list, minus Stone Forsythe who I graded right as this article was getting edited. <br><br>Forsythe = 8.0/OT6<a href="https://t.co/koPu9duLEG">https://t.co/koPu9duLEG</a> <a href="https://t.co/e7cgkSrDHS">pic.twitter.com/e7cgkSrDHS</a></p>&mdash; Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1377627392299110414?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RunKC 04-01-2021 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611531)
Here's why I think Little may well be the guy we take, and most likely at #63.

1)It's literally a repeat of the Niang pick. First round value talent, drops due to an injury.

2)He fits the physical measurables; all the traits Reid looks for. His pass blocking is his strength too.

3)Dummies don't go to Stanford. This is a smart kid. He's going to have the mental wherewithal to handle whatever they want him to teach him.

Would be more like the Willie Gay pick IMO. Measurables there and upside is big, but don’t play all that much ball in college.

kccrow 04-01-2021 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15611573)
1. Terrance Marshall WR LSU
2. Walker Little OT Stanford
3. Daelin Hayes DE Notre Dame

Who says no to this?

I'd be fine with it.

I'm leaning more towards:

1. Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech (trade up to 18)
2. Dyami Brown, WR, North Carolina
3. Adetokunbo Ogundeji, DE, Notre Dame

Either case of 1/2, I'd rather Ogundeji over Hayes.

htismaqe 04-01-2021 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15611610)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My latest OL rankings for the 2021 draft dropped this morning over on B/R<br><br>Here’s my latest top tackle list, minus Stone Forsythe who I graded right as this article was getting edited. <br><br>Forsythe = 8.0/OT6<a href="https://t.co/koPu9duLEG">https://t.co/koPu9duLEG</a> <a href="https://t.co/e7cgkSrDHS">pic.twitter.com/e7cgkSrDHS</a></p>&mdash; Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1377627392299110414?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That puts Forsythe squarely in the conversation at #31.

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15611606)
I really disagree on pass blocking being his strength and I can say confidently I'm very much not alone there. Agility issues, specifically opening and aligning his hips, and letting guys into his chest were huge problems. I think he has the ability to learn and get better there, but there's a difference between that and it being a strength.

that's not what any scouting reports I've read say.

The Franchise 04-01-2021 12:36 PM

McShay has Sewell falling to the Chargers at 12 in his latest mock.

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 12:37 PM

It's just going to come down to who Veach and the coaching staff like.

I think there are several guys that fit the measurables and athletic ability they prefer. It's entirely possible that they WON'T like guys that are 'consensus' picks.

I think a project like a Little or a Forsythe may well be the pick, paired with a veteran on a short deal.

I doubt they take a guy and expect him to start right away.

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 12:39 PM

and honestly, maybe they take Jenkins or Brown in the second or third, put him at RT in camp to fight it out with Remmers and move Niang to LT. Maybe they think that projects well for them.

staylor26 04-01-2021 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15611621)
That puts Forsythe squarely in the conversation at #31.

Nope. Kccrow told me he’s a day 3 pick!

:)

I don’t think he’s a 1st rounder at the end of the day, but he’s probably going somewhere on day 2.

staylor26 04-01-2021 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15611610)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My latest OL rankings for the 2021 draft dropped this morning over on B/R<br><br>Here’s my latest top tackle list, minus Stone Forsythe who I graded right as this article was getting edited. <br><br>Forsythe = 8.0/OT6<a href="https://t.co/koPu9duLEG">https://t.co/koPu9duLEG</a> <a href="https://t.co/e7cgkSrDHS">pic.twitter.com/e7cgkSrDHS</a></p>&mdash; Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1377627392299110414?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I keep trying to tell everybody that Cosmi falling to 31 is a legitimate possibility...

kccrow 04-01-2021 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15611632)
that's not what any scouting reports I've read say.

Here's some knocks for you. Don't get me wrong, I think he's a hell of a developmental guy but I'd be remiss if I didn't think he also has some serious flaws to work out before he is counted upon at the pro level. That said, I don't think he has major, uncorrectable shortcomings. Maybe an NFL coach thinks he can knock enough of the bad out of him in one training camp?

Quote:

he tends to overcompensate for his lack of lateral quickness by getting his upper body involved, which often leaves him off-balance and susceptible to inside counters.
Quote:

However, in some games, he showed weakness — both inside and out — against speed rushers.
Quote:

His Pass Blocking footwork is an absolute mess. Everything you can think to do wrong, he does at one point or another. Whether it's giving up a sack because his feet collide during his kick slide Or maybe Losing his balance because he turns his hips early.
Quote:

Cons: Little’s biggest warning sign is his lack of bend along the edge and the issues that he causes against more athletic pass rushers. This issue shows especially against pass rushers who use an inside move, which Little does very little to stop, essentially giving pass rushers a free lane to the quarterback, allowing six sacks in the four games of film I watched. Along with these issues Little doesn’t engage in blocks with enough power and strength to deter blockers or take defensive backs out of plays. Little’s flaws show in both the pass and run game, meaning teams should be wary of using a high selection on him.
Quote:

Little was a very complex study based on the hype surrounding him, in comparison to his play on the field...

Consistency is going to be the common theme here, but first, let's start with his feet. Little's footwork improved as the season went on, but I don't believe he will ever have the feet to be a natural fit on the blind side. That's not to say Little can't play there, but the more athletic pass rushers in the Pac-12 gave him some issues, and I just don't see him being able to consistently shut down the quicker edge rushers at the next level without help. As I've mentioned, Little took major steps forward in the second half of the year, but he can still get more consistent in a number of areas. For starters, he is not always on balance. Sometimes his footwork was too clunky, while other times his pad level was too high, but the result was him playing with poor balance, and that's a recipe for disaster. His balance also occasionally affected his ability to time his punch. Little is usually good about timing his punch accordingly in order to get the most out of his long arms, but when you don't have a good base, it makes this a much more difficult task.
Quote:

Little, in my opinion, saw some struggles in pass protection during his solid 2018 season, allowing double-digit pressures including six combined sacks and hits. He was also penalized five times, so I was really looking forward to him taking his skills to another level in 2019
Quote:

While Walker Little has good lateral agility and always seems to be in the right position he lacks the consistent balance and core strength to lock down defenders on a regular basis. Late in their game against Notre Dame really highlighted this as Little was abused by power moves that often left him knocked off balance and the defender being able to get quarterback hits which lead to two interceptions and another near pick. Whether it is having his feet too close to each other during his lateral slides or just lacking the anchor he’s too easily displaced by defenders.

kccrow 04-01-2021 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15611662)
Nope. Kccrow told me he’s a day 3 pick!

:)

I don’t think he’s a 1st rounder at the end of the day, but he’s probably going somewhere on day 2.

He should be about a round 4 guy. His feet are shit and his run blocking is near non-existent. Doesn't mean he shouldn't be on the radar or shouldn't be picked. Guys become starters in that range, even at LT. In fact, odds show if you aren't picking a LT by 23, do it in round 3 or 4.

Chris Meck 04-01-2021 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15611699)
Here's some knocks for you. Don't get me wrong, I think he's a hell of a developmental guy but I'd be remiss if I didn't think he also has some serious flaws to work out before he is counted upon at the pro level. That said, I don't think he has major, uncorrectable shortcomings. Maybe an NFL coach thinks he can knock enough of the bad out of him in one training camp?

fair enough.

I think those criticisms all say 'raw' to me, which I would expect. I'd also expect a Stanford kid to learn fast.

Coogs 04-01-2021 01:17 PM

Radunz graduated in December with a degree in engineering and management. I've seen several comparisons to the Packers Bryan Bulaga.

The Franchise 04-02-2021 08:52 AM

Matt Miller’s latest mock.

31. Kansas City Chiefs
The Pick: OT Teven Jenkins, Oklahoma State

A right tackle for the most part in college, Teven Jenkins told me last month that he’s comfortable playing on the left side. That’s music to the ears of the Kansas City Chiefs, who couldn’t reel in a free agent left tackle.

Jenkins is a powerful run blocker and mean finisher when he gets his hands on a defender. He also has the size and length to be effective cutting off the backside on all those beautiful Patrick Mahomes rollout passes.

Brett Veach could always surprise us with a wide receiver pick here, but Jenkins feels like a match of need and value they can’t ignore.

louie aguiar 04-02-2021 09:57 AM

I don't think Jenkins will make it to 31 but who knows. I think there may be some surprises on draft day. This may be one of the toughest draft classes to evaluate because of the opt-outs and limited play etc.

htismaqe 04-02-2021 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louie aguiar (Post 15612830)
I don't think Jenkins will make it to 31 but who knows. I think there may be some surprises on draft day. This may be one of the toughest draft classes to evaluate because of the opt-outs and limited play etc.

I have a hard time seeing Jenkins at 31. He seems to be be emerging as the clear #4 tackle.

staylor26 04-02-2021 11:44 AM

The guy I think surprisingly (for some) falls to 31 is Cosmi.

htismaqe 04-02-2021 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15612970)
The guy I think surprisingly (for some) falls to 31 is Cosmi.

Yeah, I can see it now. It's going to be interesting.

Otter 04-02-2021 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15612764)
Matt Miller’s latest mock.

31. Kansas City Chiefs
The Pick: OT Teven Jenkins, Oklahoma State

A right tackle for the most part in college, Teven Jenkins told me last month that he’s comfortable playing on the left side. That’s music to the ears of the Kansas City Chiefs, who couldn’t reel in a free agent left tackle.

Jenkins is a powerful run blocker and mean finisher when he gets his hands on a defender. He also has the size and length to be effective cutting off the backside on all those beautiful Patrick Mahomes rollout passes.

Brett Veach could always surprise us with a wide receiver pick here, but Jenkins feels like a match of need and value they can’t ignore.

I called it first!

UChieffyBugger 04-02-2021 04:10 PM

Jenkins is good but what else is he gonna say? "No I don't like playing LT"?? He just wants to be drafted as high as possible at this point so of course he's gonna say that. The question remains can our rookie LT come in three games into the season if needed? We cannot aford to have a kid who needs a year or two to adapt to playing there so Veach has to think very carefully about this.

chiefforlife 04-02-2021 04:30 PM

I would be happy with Jenkins or Cosmi.

This draft is so loaded with O lineman we are very fortunate. Guys like those two rarely make it to 31.

The Franchise 04-02-2021 11:15 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Considering how often UF went empty and how little help they gave Forsythe in high leverage situations when they didn&#39;t, I&#39;d put his pass pro tape/traits/skill very, very high in this class based on who I&#39;ve watched so far. So impressive.</p>&mdash; Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1376259226188808192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

staylor26 04-02-2021 11:21 PM

The Chiefs are going to shock everybody and take Forsythe at 31 aren’t they?

The Franchise 04-02-2021 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15613797)
The Chiefs are going to shock everybody and take Forsythe at 31 aren’t they?

Or find a way to get him in the 2nd round with a WR in the first.

staylor26 04-02-2021 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15613798)
Or find a way to get him in the 2nd round with a WR in the first.

Obviously I’d prefer this, but the former wouldn’t surprise me either.

The Franchise 04-02-2021 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15613806)
Obviously I’d prefer this, but the former wouldn’t surprise me either.

Nope. I’m fine either way. I’m just dreaming of Marshall in the first and Stone in the second.

UChieffyBugger 04-03-2021 02:58 AM

Everything will depend on the run on linemen and when it happens. If all the teams who are tackle needy get their guys in the first then the Chiefs will be able to be patient. But if three or more teams don't bite in the first and we find ourselves being able to pick from Stone, Cosmi, Jenkins, Radunz, Little etc then I think it could be risky waiting tbh. IF Marshall or Batemen are there for us though you probably have to take em because the tackle class has way more options.

Dull Tools 04-03-2021 04:16 AM

I have seen a few mocks now where the first OT has fallen to around 11-13.

I think it could be worth trading up to 12 where the Eagles are now if Sewell falls that far.

It gets us a great OT for the next 10 years and stops the Chargers having him.

I do think we need to at least get above the Steelers/Bills who are going to take one to make sure we get the tackle we want unless they are comfortable taking someone like Little in the second round.

Tribal Warfare 04-03-2021 06:26 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who are analysts selecting for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> at pick No. 31? <a href="https://t.co/sGoGTf3h0g">https://t.co/sGoGTf3h0g</a></p>&mdash; Chiefs Wire (@TheChiefsWire) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheChiefsWire/status/1378320655746228224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 3, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Quote:

A big issue that seems to be popping up during the pro day circuit seems to be the arm length of the tackles in this class. The Chiefs like long arms in their starting tackles, so it’ll be interesting to see how they value some of these guys like Cosmi, Eichenberg, and Radunz who fall under the 33.5-inch threshold that Kansas City seems to follow. Jenkins met that threshold and the team has shown pre-draft interest in him, but he’s the type of player who has picked up steam over the last several weeks. If they want him they might have to trade up to get him.

Coogs 04-03-2021 07:37 AM

From GBN:

Quote:

Mixed bag of sorts at Sewell pro day … Its been kind of a mixed bag for Oregon OT Penei Sewell at the Ducks’ pro day today. Accoring to reports from the Senior Bowl’s Jim Nagy, Sewell came in a tad shorter than expected at just under 6-5, 331 – he had been listed at 6-6 in the team’s program. However, that’s no big deal. What could be a bigger deal, though is the fact that he actually has relatively short arms at just over 33 inches, compared with the gold standard of over 35. Sewell, though, does have huge mitts at almsot 10-5 inches. Sewell also impressed with 30 reps in the bench press, but neither of jumps – 28 inches in the vertical and 9-1 in the long jump were particularly impressive for an elite OT. The first 4 OTs taken in the opening round of the 2020 draft, for example, had an average vertical of around 33 inches. At the same time, Sewell’s 40-time is being reported as somewhere in the 5.1 range. Again not bad for a big OL, but in comparison, Northwestern’s Rashawn Slater, the other top 10 type OL prospect in this year’s draft class, ran the 40 in under 4.9. Same story in the agility drills in which Sewell had times of 4.68 seconds in the short shuttle and 7.70 in the 3-cone both of which would have been among the leaders at the 2020 combine. Again, though, Sewell’s 3-cone time was significantly slower than Slater’s 7.48 clocking in the same discipline. We’ll see how NFL types interpret to these numbers, but they certainly weren’t the blow your socks off type figures a lot of analysts were expecting.

April 2, 2021 - 2:35 pm

Chargem 04-03-2021 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 15613883)
From GBN:

My god, Sewell dropping and Slater/Darrisaw going first is the only thing that would tempt me to trade up...

The Franchise 04-03-2021 12:45 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Oklahoma State OT Teven Jenkins on what teams are getting if they draft him.<br><br>&quot;Tough, physical, nasty mother****er. A dude who does not shy away from hits. A dude&#39;s who is going to bust his ass.&quot;</p>&mdash; Alex Kozora (@Alex_Kozora) <a href="https://twitter.com/Alex_Kozora/status/1377680920203902980?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Chris Meck 04-03-2021 02:23 PM

I trust Veach, Reid, and Heck to make a solid choice.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.