Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16610507)

LMAO
And there you go. Case closed.

For a complete reerun with no reading comprehension maybe.

And your take on Andy is stupid, just so you know. Name a HOF coach that was available in 2012 that was better, or would've been as successful. I'll wait.

Please quote where I asked for Reid to be replaced.

Again, poor coaching decisions can be criticized without resorting to full knee jerk FIRE HIM NAOW.

It's okay little buddy. You can criticize questionable calls, bad playcalls, and call full reidtard things full reidtard things and just want those things to be limited, without firing the man. Really.

It's not slobber on Andy's cock, or fire him.

Also, Andy is now the winningest coach in KC history, iirc.

And?

4 straight title game hosts, and one Superbowl win is an understandable "wasted opportunities" situation.

You act as if teams repeatedly host the title game with regularity. They don't. This team was in position 4 years running to establish itself as a dynasty.

Hasn't happened .

But count your wins. I know it worked for us to do that in the Marty Era, because wins>championships amirite?



Just one season with fewer than 10 wins. His second one in KC? So, 8 seasons with more than 10 wins, and well ont he way to another.

7 Divisional titles?

A 57% playoff win% as the HC for KC. 72% in the regular season.

Easy, easy! You'll need Kleenex soon.

4 consecutive AFCCG appearances. Won 2, and lost two through no fault of his own. Unless it's now Andy's fault that Dee Ford lined up offsides.

Oh. So we're just gonna forget about the legendary Andy Reid getting his ass shut out in the first half of that game? Ohhhh. Ok. Gotcha. Games are easier to win if you try to win from the opening kickoff, but hey, regular season wins and division titles.


Or that CJ got called for a bogus RTP call. I know, you think it's Andy's fault that the offense shit the bed in the 2nd half of the AFCCG last season, in spite of every NFL analyst coming to the same exact conclusion, which was that Pat shit the bed.

Sure did call a lot of passes into a 3 man front dropping 8. Coaches are supposed to put their guys in the best position to win. He threw Patrick to the wolves with the Bengals dropping 8 in coverage. Not to mention stepping on his own dick at the end if the half and passing up a sure 14 point lead going into half, he rolled the dice and came away with nothing Brandon Staley style.

But sure, hang it on Patrick, because it suits your narrative that Andy's just this legend who is blameless in his huge losses.

Or that Spags shit the bed in that game because reasons that have nothing to do with reality.

I bagged on spags for the worst 7 game stretch in NFL history defensively. Well earned, well deserved.



And I literally don't have time to go back and search out all your posts shitting on players.

Because they don't ****ing exist. Outside of bagging on Jones for running his mouth in Indy, and doing NOTHING for the rest of the game winning drive, Clyde for being a bag of smashed assholes, or guys hated in general by cp like Mathieu, Sorensen, Nieman, etc.

So yeah, continue to run your mouth about how I shit on half the players without backing it up with anything you ****ing dipshit.


And I shouldn't really have to, after taking apart your arguments against Andy Reid.

You should be able to just spout bullshit claims about things I supposedly said without having to back it up? Yeah okay dipshit. Jesus **** you're unfathomably ****ing reeruned.

How's this for Andy Ried's coaching ability?

After completely tearing down the WR room and filling it with 5 players that have never spent any time in Andy's offense, two of whom came in as rookies, the Chiefs are the no. 1 scoring offense in the league and 2nd in passing yards/gm.

Again. For like the 4th time.

Yeah this all falls in line with Andy being that great coach that gets you a shot at the big game, that most franchises would kill for. I guess you missed that part or your handler skimmed over it and didn't read it to you.

Hopefully translates into another ring. We will see.

On defense the team lost the services of both Hitchens and Mathieu, the defensive play-callers for the last three years, and replaced them with Bolton and Justin Ried, a S that had never played in Spags' defense before, plus three rookies in the starting line up?

IMAGINE BASING AN ARGUMENT ON THE IDEA THAT THE LOSS OF HITCHENS AND MATHIEU WAS ANYTHING BUT ADDITION BY SUBTRACTION. IMAGINE IT.

You've lost your ****ing fingertip grip on reality and descended into an abyss of irreversible ****ing lunacy if you expect ANYONE to believe that those two players leaving was any sort of negative AT ALL.

And somehow Spags defense is top-4 in sacks, ditto QB hurries/hits/pressures or something like that. Top-10 vs. the run, I believe. Yeah, he sux as well, right?

Wait, you mean to tell me that if you add talent to a unit, the unit will perform better?

What a revelation.

Yes, without Sorensen and Nieman trotting out there, with the corpse of Anthony Hitchens and the shell of Tyrann Mathieu, thing are going very well.

And again, none of the things i wrote above are my opinion.

Those are stone cold hard facts, buddy.

I'm actually amazed you can spell fact.

Read 'em and weep.:p

Oh that was simply amazing. Except for the part where I haven't criticized Spags this year outside of some inexplicable playcalls leaving rookies in single coverage on stud superstar receivers and repeatedly watching them either get roasted or flagged. Or having Josh Allen squirming and flustered at his own 2, and then letting him off the hook on 3rd down.

Again, you can criticize bad plays, bad decisions, without jumping to firing.

You really struggle with this concept.

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 16610720)

I haven't seen anything yet and I'm just a tad shocked they haven't announced anything - it's like we are more focused on breaking household appliances....

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 16610792)

I am sticking with my original take on this.

JuJu's injury is Andre Cisco's fault. Totally unnecessary hit. Not buying any other theory.

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 16610664)

My question is was Cisco fined on either of those hits to the head? It seems like Wednesday they announce fines or maybe end of week.

Originally Posted by the steam (Post 16610715)

I'm fine with the hit. Sucks it happened to a Chief but as a football fan I want to see big hits on WRs and QBs and that has become extremely rare in 2022. Allowing this makes the game way better to watch.

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16610593)

LMAO

Chris Simms has the Chiefs winning the SB and has declared Mahomes the NFL MVP front runner.

But sure, he's a hater i guess.

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16611007)

He tries to be objective as possible. He's not some hot take jockey like Cowherd or an opinion spammer like Thkyiiuuuuuuup.

Occasionally that leads to him saying things like, "I think Josh Allen is currently the best QB in the NFL," which he has said multiple times this very season and as recently as last week.

I won't say he's a hater, but he probably does have CTE.

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 16611048)

But how is that not a hot take? Doesn't help that it is demonstrably false.

Originally Posted by blake5676 (Post 16609526)

10/10 times if a player on the Chiefs landed a shot like that this whole board argue to their deathbeds it was a clean solid tackle and we'd be blaming the receiver for lowering his helmet before getting hit.

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16610983)

It doesn’t make the game better to watch. What makes the game better to watch is the best players on the field. And teams winning Super Bowl because they were the best not because they were lucky enough to get through the grind without injury. The nfl goes overboard in enforcing that. But there is a good reason these rules exist. Bountygate is a good example of why this exists. If you can’t beat them, knock ‘‘em out is a tonya Harding strategy I can’t stand behind.

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16610983)

It doesn’t make the game better to watch. What makes the game better to watch is the best players on the field. And teams winning Super Bowl because they were the best not because they were lucky enough to get through the grind without injury. The nfl goes overboard in enforcing that. But there is a good reason these rules exist. Bountygate is a good example of why this exists. If you can’t beat them, knock ‘‘em out is a tonya Harding strategy I can’t stand behind.

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16610493)

I’m not a fan of that either. A receiver up in the air is as defenseless as it gets and the DB is making a very intentional decision to truck a receiver instead of playing the ball or at least an attempt at tackling. People may call the rules soft. No, the reason these rules are in place is because no fan wants to see backups play. It’s one thing to do it in the moment. This is a pattern for Cisco and it’s not one that should be encouraged.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16611369)

Exactly.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16611403)

Man, hard hits are a part of football. Now there are players like Burfict who take it to an insane level. But **** that, if you can lay a hard hit, lay it. As long as you're not purposefully out there trying to injure people, hard hits are a part of the game. Unfortunately, sometimes injuries happen. Thats the risk of football. I want Thornhill doing that every chance he gets and as long as there's no helmet to helmet contact, there should never be a flag.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16611409)

It was helmet-to-helmet. I have no problem with hard hits. I do have a problem with guys just launching themselves and hurting star players.

I want to watch real football, not a bunch of backups.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16611403)

Man, hard hits are a part of football. Now there are players like Burfict who take it to an insane level. But **** that, if you can lay a hard hit, lay it. As long as you're not purposefully out there trying to injure people, hard hits are a part of the game. Unfortunately, sometimes injuries happen. Thats the risk of football. I want Thornhill doing that every chance he gets and as long as there's no helmet to helmet contact, there should never be a flag.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16611666)

Come on man, you keep talking about the juju hit. We're talking about the MVS hit which led to me posting the Thornhill hit which led to Chiefzilla saying he didn't like that hit either which led to my comment.

Keep up man :)

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16611409)

It was helmet-to-helmet. I have no problem with hard hits. I do have a problem with guys just launching themselves and hurting star players.



I want to watch real football, not a bunch of backups.